Loading…

A comparison of 1% ropivacaine with a mixture of 0.75% bupivacaine and 2% lignocaine for peribulbar anaesthesia

In a single centre, randomised, double‐blind study, 54 patients underwent intraocular surgery under peribulbar anaesthesia with either ropivacaine 1% or a mixture of bupivacaine 0.75% and lignocaine 2%, both with hyaluronidase 7.5 iu.ml−1. There were no significant differences in volume of anaesthet...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Anaesthesia 1999-12, Vol.54 (12), p.1178-1182
Main Authors:	McLure, H. A., Rubin, A. P., Westcott, M., Henderson, H.
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Subjects:	Aged Aged, 80 and over Amides Anaesthetics, local Anesthesia Anesthesia depending on type of surgery Anesthesia, Local - methods Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Anesthetics, Combined Anesthetics, Local Biological and medical sciences Bupivacaine Double-Blind Method Female Humans Lidocaine Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures Orthopedic surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Otorhinolaryngologic surgery. Stomatology. Ophtalmology. Investigation and treatment technics peribulbar block Postoperative Complications Ropivacaine ropivacaine. Anaesthesia, local
Citations:	Items that cite this one
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

cited_by	cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4459-655750bb32e592c8d9c24c7dc4de4c37f1210ec081928f907aa2d9c4c8898f663
cites
container_end_page	1182
container_issue	12
container_start_page	1178
container_title	Anaesthesia
container_volume	54
creator	McLure, H. A. Rubin, A. P. Westcott, M. Henderson, H.
description	In a single centre, randomised, double‐blind study, 54 patients underwent intraocular surgery under peribulbar anaesthesia with either ropivacaine 1% or a mixture of bupivacaine 0.75% and lignocaine 2%, both with hyaluronidase 7.5 iu.ml−1. There were no significant differences in volume of anaesthetic required, time to onset of block, peri‐operative pain scores or frequency of adverse events between the ropivacaine group and the lignocaine and bupivacaine group.
doi_str_mv	10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.01069.x
format	article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69352046</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69352046</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4459-655750bb32e592c8d9c24c7dc4de4c37f1210ec081928f907aa2d9c4c8898f663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0MFP3SAcwHGyzMyn7l9YOPh2a_1BgcJlyYtxamLmRc-EUjp5aUsHr_P539uuL-pxJwh84Jd8EcIEcgJMXGxzUgieUWAsJ0qpHAgIle8_odXbxWe0AoAiowzUMTpJaQtAqCTyCzomwBVjRKxQ2GAbusFEn0KPQ4PJGscw-L_GGt87_Ox3T9jgzu93Y3QzgLzka1yN78b0NaZr3PrffVhOmhDx4KKvxrYycQLGpd2TS96coaPGtMl9Payn6PHn1cPlTXZ3f317ubnLLGNcZYLzkkNVFdRxRa2slaXMlrVltWO2KBtCCTgLkigqGwWlMXQyzEqpZCNEcYq-L_8OMfwZp-m688m6tjW9C2PSQhV8qjRDuUAbQ0rRNXqIvjPxRRPQc2y91XNTPTfVc2z9L7beT0-_HWaMVefqDw-XuhM4PwCTrGmbaHrr07ujQETJJvZjYc--dS__PV9vfm2u5m3xCikKmS8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69352046</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of 1% ropivacaine with a mixture of 0.75% bupivacaine and 2% lignocaine for peribulbar anaesthesia</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>McLure, H. A. ; Rubin, A. P. ; Westcott, M. ; Henderson, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>McLure, H. A. ; Rubin, A. P. ; Westcott, M. ; Henderson, H.</creatorcontrib><description>In a single centre, randomised, double‐blind study, 54 patients underwent intraocular surgery under peribulbar anaesthesia with either ropivacaine 1% or a mixture of bupivacaine 0.75% and lignocaine 2%, both with hyaluronidase 7.5 iu.ml−1. There were no significant differences in volume of anaesthetic required, time to onset of block, peri‐operative pain scores or frequency of adverse events between the ropivacaine group and the lignocaine and bupivacaine group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2409</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.01069.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10594416</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANASAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Amides ; Anaesthetics, local ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia depending on type of surgery ; Anesthesia, Local - methods ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Anesthetics, Combined ; Anesthetics, Local ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bupivacaine ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Lidocaine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures ; Orthopedic surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Otorhinolaryngologic surgery. Stomatology. Ophtalmology. Investigation and treatment technics ; peribulbar block ; Postoperative Complications ; Ropivacaine ; ropivacaine. Anaesthesia, local</subject><ispartof>Anaesthesia, 1999-12, Vol.54 (12), p.1178-1182</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4459-655750bb32e592c8d9c24c7dc4de4c37f1210ec081928f907aa2d9c4c8898f663</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1201674$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10594416$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McLure, H. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, A. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westcott, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, H.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of 1% ropivacaine with a mixture of 0.75% bupivacaine and 2% lignocaine for peribulbar anaesthesia</title><title>Anaesthesia</title><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><description>In a single centre, randomised, double‐blind study, 54 patients underwent intraocular surgery under peribulbar anaesthesia with either ropivacaine 1% or a mixture of bupivacaine 0.75% and lignocaine 2%, both with hyaluronidase 7.5 iu.ml−1. There were no significant differences in volume of anaesthetic required, time to onset of block, peri‐operative pain scores or frequency of adverse events between the ropivacaine group and the lignocaine and bupivacaine group.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Amides</subject><subject>Anaesthetics, local</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia depending on type of surgery</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Local - methods</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Combined</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bupivacaine</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lidocaine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Otorhinolaryngologic surgery. Stomatology. Ophtalmology. Investigation and treatment technics</subject><subject>peribulbar block</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Ropivacaine</subject><subject>ropivacaine. Anaesthesia, local</subject><issn>0003-2409</issn><issn>1365-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0MFP3SAcwHGyzMyn7l9YOPh2a_1BgcJlyYtxamLmRc-EUjp5aUsHr_P539uuL-pxJwh84Jd8EcIEcgJMXGxzUgieUWAsJ0qpHAgIle8_odXbxWe0AoAiowzUMTpJaQtAqCTyCzomwBVjRKxQ2GAbusFEn0KPQ4PJGscw-L_GGt87_Ox3T9jgzu93Y3QzgLzka1yN78b0NaZr3PrffVhOmhDx4KKvxrYycQLGpd2TS96coaPGtMl9Payn6PHn1cPlTXZ3f317ubnLLGNcZYLzkkNVFdRxRa2slaXMlrVltWO2KBtCCTgLkigqGwWlMXQyzEqpZCNEcYq-L_8OMfwZp-m688m6tjW9C2PSQhV8qjRDuUAbQ0rRNXqIvjPxRRPQc2y91XNTPTfVc2z9L7beT0-_HWaMVefqDw-XuhM4PwCTrGmbaHrr07ujQETJJvZjYc--dS__PV9vfm2u5m3xCikKmS8</recordid><startdate>199912</startdate><enddate>199912</enddate><creator>McLure, H. A.</creator><creator>Rubin, A. P.</creator><creator>Westcott, M.</creator><creator>Henderson, H.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199912</creationdate><title>A comparison of 1% ropivacaine with a mixture of 0.75% bupivacaine and 2% lignocaine for peribulbar anaesthesia</title><author>McLure, H. A. ; Rubin, A. P. ; Westcott, M. ; Henderson, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4459-655750bb32e592c8d9c24c7dc4de4c37f1210ec081928f907aa2d9c4c8898f663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Amides</topic><topic>Anaesthetics, local</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia depending on type of surgery</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Local - methods</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Combined</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bupivacaine</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lidocaine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Otorhinolaryngologic surgery. Stomatology. Ophtalmology. Investigation and treatment technics</topic><topic>peribulbar block</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Ropivacaine</topic><topic>ropivacaine. Anaesthesia, local</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McLure, H. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, A. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westcott, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McLure, H. A.</au><au>Rubin, A. P.</au><au>Westcott, M.</au><au>Henderson, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of 1% ropivacaine with a mixture of 0.75% bupivacaine and 2% lignocaine for peribulbar anaesthesia</atitle><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><date>1999-12</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1178</spage><epage>1182</epage><pages>1178-1182</pages><issn>0003-2409</issn><eissn>1365-2044</eissn><coden>ANASAB</coden><abstract>In a single centre, randomised, double‐blind study, 54 patients underwent intraocular surgery under peribulbar anaesthesia with either ropivacaine 1% or a mixture of bupivacaine 0.75% and lignocaine 2%, both with hyaluronidase 7.5 iu.ml−1. There were no significant differences in volume of anaesthetic required, time to onset of block, peri‐operative pain scores or frequency of adverse events between the ropivacaine group and the lignocaine and bupivacaine group.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>10594416</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.01069.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0003-2409
ispartof	Anaesthesia, 1999-12, Vol.54 (12), p.1178-1182
issn	0003-2409 1365-2044
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69352046
source	Wiley
subjects	Aged Aged, 80 and over Amides Anaesthetics, local Anesthesia Anesthesia depending on type of surgery Anesthesia, Local - methods Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Anesthetics, Combined Anesthetics, Local Biological and medical sciences Bupivacaine Double-Blind Method Female Humans Lidocaine Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures Orthopedic surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Otorhinolaryngologic surgery. Stomatology. Ophtalmology. Investigation and treatment technics peribulbar block Postoperative Complications Ropivacaine ropivacaine. Anaesthesia, local
title	A comparison of 1% ropivacaine with a mixture of 0.75% bupivacaine and 2% lignocaine for peribulbar anaesthesia
url	http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A28%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%201%25%20ropivacaine%20with%20a%20mixture%20of%200.75%25%20bupivacaine%20and%202%25%20lignocaine%20for%20peribulbar%20anaesthesia&rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia&rft.au=McLure,%20H.%20A.&rft.date=1999-12&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1178&rft.epage=1182&rft.pages=1178-1182&rft.issn=0003-2409&rft.eissn=1365-2044&rft.coden=ANASAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.01069.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69352046%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4459-655750bb32e592c8d9c24c7dc4de4c37f1210ec081928f907aa2d9c4c8898f663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69352046&rft_id=info:pmid/10594416&rfr_iscdi=true