Loading…
Chlamydia transmission : Concurrency, reproduction number, and the epidemic trajectory
To identify factors that influence individual and group transmission of Chlamydia, the authors conducted community-wide contact tracing of chlamydia cases in Colorado Springs, Colorado, from mid-1996 to mid-1997. Case patients identified persons with whom they had had contact during the 6 months pre...
Saved in:
Published in: | American journal of epidemiology 1999-12, Vol.150 (12), p.1331-1339 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1339 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1331 |
container_title | American journal of epidemiology |
container_volume | 150 |
creator | POTTERAT, J. J ZIMMERMAN-ROGERS, H MUTH, S. Q ROTHENBERG, R. B GREEN, D. L TAYLOR, J. E BONNEY, M. S WHITE, H. A |
description | To identify factors that influence individual and group transmission of Chlamydia, the authors conducted community-wide contact tracing of chlamydia cases in Colorado Springs, Colorado, from mid-1996 to mid-1997. Case patients identified persons with whom they had had contact during the 6 months preceding diagnosis; contacts were actively sought and offered DNA amplification testing. Sexual contact networks were used to identify "source cases" and "spread cases," permitting estimation of the basic reproduction number (R0) for individuals and groups. Network and epidemiologic factors influencing R0 were assessed using univariate and multivariate procedures. Of 1,309 case patients, 1,131 (86%) were interviewed, and 2,409 contacts were identified. The 1,131 interviewed cases yielded 623.9 computed spread cases, for an overall R0 of 0.55. Few subgroups analyzed yielded a mean R0 exceeding unity-an observation in keeping with routine surveillance information which suggests that chlamydia incidence is declining in Colorado Springs. Concurrency, a network measure of simultaneous partnerships, was the most powerful predictor of transmission. Direct estimation of basic reproduction numbers for chlamydia using contact tracing techniques is feasible and can produce useful data with which to prioritize control efforts, evaluate interventions, and gauge the place of chlamydia on the epidemic continuum. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69356037</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69356037</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p267t-2a50bfb67518067b163baf9f140ba0a19613968911c7f8b4f7df79d560fc2a613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0D1PwzAQBmALgWgp_AWUATE1kr9yrtlQRAGpEguwRrZjq64SJ9jJkH9PKooYmW54H726uzO0JFxADrSAc7TEGNNcUqALdJXSAWNCZIEv0YJgwFwIWKLPct-odqq9yoaoQmp9Sr4L2UNWdsGMMdpgpnUWbR-7ejTDMQtjq21cZyrU2bC3me19bVtvjg0Ha4YuTtfowqkm2ZvTXKGP7dN7-ZLv3p5fy8dd3lMQQ05VgbXTIAqywSA0AaaVk45wrBVWRAJhEjaSECPcRnMnaidkXQB2hqo5XKH7n955va_RpqGaDzC2aVSw3ZgqkGzGTPwLiQCCqeAzvD3BUbe2rvroWxWn6vdlM7g7AZWMatz8NePTn6OMcwbsG3z9dWA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17610274</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chlamydia transmission : Concurrency, reproduction number, and the epidemic trajectory</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>POTTERAT, J. J ; ZIMMERMAN-ROGERS, H ; MUTH, S. Q ; ROTHENBERG, R. B ; GREEN, D. L ; TAYLOR, J. E ; BONNEY, M. S ; WHITE, H. A</creator><creatorcontrib>POTTERAT, J. J ; ZIMMERMAN-ROGERS, H ; MUTH, S. Q ; ROTHENBERG, R. B ; GREEN, D. L ; TAYLOR, J. E ; BONNEY, M. S ; WHITE, H. A</creatorcontrib><description>To identify factors that influence individual and group transmission of Chlamydia, the authors conducted community-wide contact tracing of chlamydia cases in Colorado Springs, Colorado, from mid-1996 to mid-1997. Case patients identified persons with whom they had had contact during the 6 months preceding diagnosis; contacts were actively sought and offered DNA amplification testing. Sexual contact networks were used to identify "source cases" and "spread cases," permitting estimation of the basic reproduction number (R0) for individuals and groups. Network and epidemiologic factors influencing R0 were assessed using univariate and multivariate procedures. Of 1,309 case patients, 1,131 (86%) were interviewed, and 2,409 contacts were identified. The 1,131 interviewed cases yielded 623.9 computed spread cases, for an overall R0 of 0.55. Few subgroups analyzed yielded a mean R0 exceeding unity-an observation in keeping with routine surveillance information which suggests that chlamydia incidence is declining in Colorado Springs. Concurrency, a network measure of simultaneous partnerships, was the most powerful predictor of transmission. Direct estimation of basic reproduction numbers for chlamydia using contact tracing techniques is feasible and can produce useful data with which to prioritize control efforts, evaluate interventions, and gauge the place of chlamydia on the epidemic continuum.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-6256</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10604776</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJEPAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cary, NC: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Bacterial diseases ; Bacterial diseases of the genital system ; Biological and medical sciences ; Case-Control Studies ; Chlamydia ; Chlamydia Infections - epidemiology ; Chlamydia Infections - transmission ; Colorado - epidemiology ; Communicable Disease Control ; Disease Outbreaks ; Epidemiologic Methods ; Female ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Reproduction ; Sexually Transmitted Diseases - epidemiology ; Sexually Transmitted Diseases - transmission</subject><ispartof>American journal of epidemiology, 1999-12, Vol.150 (12), p.1331-1339</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1234436$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10604776$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>POTTERAT, J. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZIMMERMAN-ROGERS, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUTH, S. Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROTHENBERG, R. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GREEN, D. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAYLOR, J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BONNEY, M. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHITE, H. A</creatorcontrib><title>Chlamydia transmission : Concurrency, reproduction number, and the epidemic trajectory</title><title>American journal of epidemiology</title><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><description>To identify factors that influence individual and group transmission of Chlamydia, the authors conducted community-wide contact tracing of chlamydia cases in Colorado Springs, Colorado, from mid-1996 to mid-1997. Case patients identified persons with whom they had had contact during the 6 months preceding diagnosis; contacts were actively sought and offered DNA amplification testing. Sexual contact networks were used to identify "source cases" and "spread cases," permitting estimation of the basic reproduction number (R0) for individuals and groups. Network and epidemiologic factors influencing R0 were assessed using univariate and multivariate procedures. Of 1,309 case patients, 1,131 (86%) were interviewed, and 2,409 contacts were identified. The 1,131 interviewed cases yielded 623.9 computed spread cases, for an overall R0 of 0.55. Few subgroups analyzed yielded a mean R0 exceeding unity-an observation in keeping with routine surveillance information which suggests that chlamydia incidence is declining in Colorado Springs. Concurrency, a network measure of simultaneous partnerships, was the most powerful predictor of transmission. Direct estimation of basic reproduction numbers for chlamydia using contact tracing techniques is feasible and can produce useful data with which to prioritize control efforts, evaluate interventions, and gauge the place of chlamydia on the epidemic continuum.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases of the genital system</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Chlamydia</subject><subject>Chlamydia Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Chlamydia Infections - transmission</subject><subject>Colorado - epidemiology</subject><subject>Communicable Disease Control</subject><subject>Disease Outbreaks</subject><subject>Epidemiologic Methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - transmission</subject><issn>0002-9262</issn><issn>1476-6256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0D1PwzAQBmALgWgp_AWUATE1kr9yrtlQRAGpEguwRrZjq64SJ9jJkH9PKooYmW54H726uzO0JFxADrSAc7TEGNNcUqALdJXSAWNCZIEv0YJgwFwIWKLPct-odqq9yoaoQmp9Sr4L2UNWdsGMMdpgpnUWbR-7ejTDMQtjq21cZyrU2bC3me19bVtvjg0Ha4YuTtfowqkm2ZvTXKGP7dN7-ZLv3p5fy8dd3lMQQ05VgbXTIAqywSA0AaaVk45wrBVWRAJhEjaSECPcRnMnaidkXQB2hqo5XKH7n955va_RpqGaDzC2aVSw3ZgqkGzGTPwLiQCCqeAzvD3BUbe2rvroWxWn6vdlM7g7AZWMatz8NePTn6OMcwbsG3z9dWA</recordid><startdate>19991215</startdate><enddate>19991215</enddate><creator>POTTERAT, J. J</creator><creator>ZIMMERMAN-ROGERS, H</creator><creator>MUTH, S. Q</creator><creator>ROTHENBERG, R. B</creator><creator>GREEN, D. L</creator><creator>TAYLOR, J. E</creator><creator>BONNEY, M. S</creator><creator>WHITE, H. A</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991215</creationdate><title>Chlamydia transmission : Concurrency, reproduction number, and the epidemic trajectory</title><author>POTTERAT, J. J ; ZIMMERMAN-ROGERS, H ; MUTH, S. Q ; ROTHENBERG, R. B ; GREEN, D. L ; TAYLOR, J. E ; BONNEY, M. S ; WHITE, H. A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p267t-2a50bfb67518067b163baf9f140ba0a19613968911c7f8b4f7df79d560fc2a613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases of the genital system</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Chlamydia</topic><topic>Chlamydia Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Chlamydia Infections - transmission</topic><topic>Colorado - epidemiology</topic><topic>Communicable Disease Control</topic><topic>Disease Outbreaks</topic><topic>Epidemiologic Methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - transmission</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>POTTERAT, J. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZIMMERMAN-ROGERS, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUTH, S. Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROTHENBERG, R. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GREEN, D. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAYLOR, J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BONNEY, M. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHITE, H. A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>POTTERAT, J. J</au><au>ZIMMERMAN-ROGERS, H</au><au>MUTH, S. Q</au><au>ROTHENBERG, R. B</au><au>GREEN, D. L</au><au>TAYLOR, J. E</au><au>BONNEY, M. S</au><au>WHITE, H. A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chlamydia transmission : Concurrency, reproduction number, and the epidemic trajectory</atitle><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><date>1999-12-15</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>150</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1331</spage><epage>1339</epage><pages>1331-1339</pages><issn>0002-9262</issn><eissn>1476-6256</eissn><coden>AJEPAS</coden><abstract>To identify factors that influence individual and group transmission of Chlamydia, the authors conducted community-wide contact tracing of chlamydia cases in Colorado Springs, Colorado, from mid-1996 to mid-1997. Case patients identified persons with whom they had had contact during the 6 months preceding diagnosis; contacts were actively sought and offered DNA amplification testing. Sexual contact networks were used to identify "source cases" and "spread cases," permitting estimation of the basic reproduction number (R0) for individuals and groups. Network and epidemiologic factors influencing R0 were assessed using univariate and multivariate procedures. Of 1,309 case patients, 1,131 (86%) were interviewed, and 2,409 contacts were identified. The 1,131 interviewed cases yielded 623.9 computed spread cases, for an overall R0 of 0.55. Few subgroups analyzed yielded a mean R0 exceeding unity-an observation in keeping with routine surveillance information which suggests that chlamydia incidence is declining in Colorado Springs. Concurrency, a network measure of simultaneous partnerships, was the most powerful predictor of transmission. Direct estimation of basic reproduction numbers for chlamydia using contact tracing techniques is feasible and can produce useful data with which to prioritize control efforts, evaluate interventions, and gauge the place of chlamydia on the epidemic continuum.</abstract><cop>Cary, NC</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>10604776</pmid><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9262 |
ispartof | American journal of epidemiology, 1999-12, Vol.150 (12), p.1331-1339 |
issn | 0002-9262 1476-6256 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69356037 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Bacterial diseases Bacterial diseases of the genital system Biological and medical sciences Case-Control Studies Chlamydia Chlamydia Infections - epidemiology Chlamydia Infections - transmission Colorado - epidemiology Communicable Disease Control Disease Outbreaks Epidemiologic Methods Female Human bacterial diseases Humans Infectious diseases Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Reproduction Sexually Transmitted Diseases - epidemiology Sexually Transmitted Diseases - transmission |
title | Chlamydia transmission : Concurrency, reproduction number, and the epidemic trajectory |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T12%3A58%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chlamydia%20transmission%20:%20Concurrency,%20reproduction%20number,%20and%20the%20epidemic%20trajectory&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20epidemiology&rft.au=POTTERAT,%20J.%20J&rft.date=1999-12-15&rft.volume=150&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1331&rft.epage=1339&rft.pages=1331-1339&rft.issn=0002-9262&rft.eissn=1476-6256&rft.coden=AJEPAS&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69356037%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p267t-2a50bfb67518067b163baf9f140ba0a19613968911c7f8b4f7df79d560fc2a613%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17610274&rft_id=info:pmid/10604776&rfr_iscdi=true |