Structure of the ovaries and follicular epithelium morphogenesis in Drosophila and its kin

• Published in: Development genes and evolution 2008-08, Vol.218 (8), p.399-411
• Main Authors: Jaglarz, Mariusz K, Krzeminski, Wieslaw, Bilinski, Szczepan M
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal Genetics and Genomics; Animals; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Cell Biology; Developmental Biology; Diptera; Diptera - classification; Diptera - embryology; Drosophila melanogaster - cytology; Drosophila melanogaster - embryology; Drosophila melanogaster - ultrastructure; Epithelium - embryology; Epithelium - ultrastructure; Evolutionary Biology; Female; Insect ovary; Life Sciences; Morphogenesis; oogenesis; Ovarian Follicle - cytology; Ovarian Follicle - embryology; Ovarian Follicle - ultrastructure; Phylogeny; Plant Genetics and Genomics; Polar cells; Review; Zoology
• ISSN: 0949-944X; 1432-041X
• DOI: 10.1007/s00427-008-0233-0

In insects, the ovarian follicular epithelium morphogenesis has been intensively studied and best characterized in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. It is well established that initially identical somatic follicular cells (FCs) form a simple epithelium overlying the germline cells, but during oogenesis, they diversify into a number of morphologically distinct subpopulations each responsible for creating specific eggshell structures. In addition, some FC subpopulations (e.g. polar cells) are indispensable in establishing antero-posterior and dorso-ventral ovarian follicle axes and patterning of the developing embryo. The morphological and molecular changes that occur during follicular epithelium morphogenesis in Drosophila are frequently considered as a paradigm of the FC diversification in all flies. However, recent comparative studies indicate that, in dipterans, the functioning of the ovarian follicles is diverse, group-specific and may significantly differ from the Drosophila model system. We discuss the similarities and differences of the ovary structure and follicular epithelium morphogenesis in different dipteran groups and put them into a phylognetic context. We suggest that the migratory activity of the FCs represents an evolutionary novelty that evolved in the ancestors of higher dipterans (Brachycera). Subsequently, during evolution of this subgroup, the number of migrating FC subpopulations has gradually increased from one (in Orthorrhapha) to four (in Cyclorrhapha).