Loading…

Search and Rescue Trends and the Emergency Medical Service Workload in Utah's National Parks

Objective.—To identify the emergency medical service (EMS) workload and trends associated with search and rescue (SAR) operations in Utah's National Park Service (NPS) units. Methods.—Data for this study were collected from the Annual Emergency Medical Services Report and the Annual Search and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Wilderness & environmental medicine 2008, Vol.19 (3), p.164-171
Main Authors: Heggie, Travis W, Heggie, Tracey M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b507t-dcde5469375a3a5143f8ab2930b683c10843717b6192addff0d8af6ba5818b5b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b507t-dcde5469375a3a5143f8ab2930b683c10843717b6192addff0d8af6ba5818b5b3
container_end_page 171
container_issue 3
container_start_page 164
container_title Wilderness & environmental medicine
container_volume 19
creator Heggie, Travis W
Heggie, Tracey M
description Objective.—To identify the emergency medical service (EMS) workload and trends associated with search and rescue (SAR) operations in Utah's National Park Service (NPS) units. Methods.—Data for this study were collected from the Annual Emergency Medical Services Report and the Annual Search and Rescue Report for National Park Service units in Utah from 2001–2005. Results.—There were 4762 EMS incidents reported between 2001 and 2005, including 79 fatalities (50 traumatic; 29 nontraumatic). The most common EMS transportation method was ground (1505) and helicopter (553) transport. The heaviest trauma, medical, and cardiac workload was at Glen Canyon National Recreation Area (GLCA) and the heaviest first aid workload was at Zion National Park (ZION). There were 1190 SAR operations between 2001 and 2005 involving 67 fatalities, 623 ill or injured visitors, 1813 non-ill or non-injured visitors, and 92 saves. GLCA and ZION accounted for 47% and 21% of all SAR operations. The total cost of SAR operations was $1 363 920. SAR operations most commonly occurred on weekends, involved male visitors (59%), visitors aged 20–29 years (23%), and 40–49 years (20%), and visitors participating in day hiking (221), motorized boating (196), and canyoneering (98) activities. Most SAR operations were in lake (226), desert (147), and canyon (140) environments and were resolved within 24 hours. Conclusions.—GLCA and ZION experienced heavy use of EMS resources that should be noted by EMS administrators and planners. GLCA and ZION also reported the most SAR operations. The development of techniques to prevent the need for SAR at GLCA and ZION would likely have the most potential to reduce the financial impact of SAR incidents and morbidity and mortality to visitors.
doi_str_mv 10.1580/07-WEME-OR-178.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69452663</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1580_07-WEME-OR-178.1</sage_id><els_id>1_s2_0_S1080603208701807</els_id><sourcerecordid>1595771381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b507t-dcde5469375a3a5143f8ab2930b683c10843717b6192addff0d8af6ba5818b5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1r3DAQxU1paT6ae09F9NCevJUs62N7CJSwaQpJN-wm5FIQsjTOKuu1UskO7H9fOV5YyCE9SYjfe6N5M1n2keAJYRJ_wyK_m13N8vkiJ0JOyJvskLCS5YTR8m26Y4lzjmlxkB3F-IBxUUpK32cHRArCSCEPsz9L0MGskG4tWkA0PaCbAK2Nzy_dCtBsA-EeWrNFV2Cd0Q1aQnhyBtCdD-vGa4tci247vfoa0W_dOd8m5lqHdfyQvat1E-Fkdx5nt-ezm7OL_HL-89fZj8u8Ylh0uTUWWMmnVDBNNSMlraWuiinFFZfUpC5KKoioOJkW2tq6xlbqmleaSSIrVtHj7Mvo-xj83x5ipzYuGmga3YLvo-LTkhWc0wR-fgE--D6k_0ZVEMopFwVLEB4hE3yMAWr1GNxGh60iWA2xKyzUELuaL1SKXZEk-bTz7asN2L1gl3MC8hGI-h72RV8x_D7ykGJ7chBUNC4NIU0ggOmU9e418ekLsWlcO4xuDVuI--oqFgqr5bAmw5ZgKTCRWCSDyWhQOe9b-H___wB9r8H-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213636725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Search and Rescue Trends and the Emergency Medical Service Workload in Utah's National Parks</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Heggie, Travis W ; Heggie, Tracey M</creator><creatorcontrib>Heggie, Travis W ; Heggie, Tracey M</creatorcontrib><description>Objective.—To identify the emergency medical service (EMS) workload and trends associated with search and rescue (SAR) operations in Utah's National Park Service (NPS) units. Methods.—Data for this study were collected from the Annual Emergency Medical Services Report and the Annual Search and Rescue Report for National Park Service units in Utah from 2001–2005. Results.—There were 4762 EMS incidents reported between 2001 and 2005, including 79 fatalities (50 traumatic; 29 nontraumatic). The most common EMS transportation method was ground (1505) and helicopter (553) transport. The heaviest trauma, medical, and cardiac workload was at Glen Canyon National Recreation Area (GLCA) and the heaviest first aid workload was at Zion National Park (ZION). There were 1190 SAR operations between 2001 and 2005 involving 67 fatalities, 623 ill or injured visitors, 1813 non-ill or non-injured visitors, and 92 saves. GLCA and ZION accounted for 47% and 21% of all SAR operations. The total cost of SAR operations was $1 363 920. SAR operations most commonly occurred on weekends, involved male visitors (59%), visitors aged 20–29 years (23%), and 40–49 years (20%), and visitors participating in day hiking (221), motorized boating (196), and canyoneering (98) activities. Most SAR operations were in lake (226), desert (147), and canyon (140) environments and were resolved within 24 hours. Conclusions.—GLCA and ZION experienced heavy use of EMS resources that should be noted by EMS administrators and planners. GLCA and ZION also reported the most SAR operations. The development of techniques to prevent the need for SAR at GLCA and ZION would likely have the most potential to reduce the financial impact of SAR incidents and morbidity and mortality to visitors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1080-6032</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1534</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1580/07-WEME-OR-178.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18715128</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adult ; Athletic Injuries - economics ; Athletic Injuries - epidemiology ; Athletic Injuries - mortality ; Athletic Injuries - prevention & control ; Emergency ; Emergency Medical Services - economics ; Emergency Medical Services - statistics & numerical data ; Emergency Medical Services - trends ; Emergency Treatment - statistics & numerical data ; EMS ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; national park ; Original Research ; rescue ; Rescue Work - statistics & numerical data ; search ; Transportation of Patients - statistics & numerical data ; Utah ; Utah - epidemiology ; Workload - statistics & numerical data ; Wounds and Injuries - economics ; Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology ; Wounds and Injuries - mortality ; Wounds and Injuries - prevention & control ; Young Adult]]></subject><ispartof>Wilderness &amp; environmental medicine, 2008, Vol.19 (3), p.164-171</ispartof><rights>Wilderness Medical Society</rights><rights>2008 Wilderness Medical Society</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2008</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Fall 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b507t-dcde5469375a3a5143f8ab2930b683c10843717b6192addff0d8af6ba5818b5b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b507t-dcde5469375a3a5143f8ab2930b683c10843717b6192addff0d8af6ba5818b5b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18715128$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heggie, Travis W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heggie, Tracey M</creatorcontrib><title>Search and Rescue Trends and the Emergency Medical Service Workload in Utah's National Parks</title><title>Wilderness &amp; environmental medicine</title><addtitle>Wilderness Environ Med</addtitle><description>Objective.—To identify the emergency medical service (EMS) workload and trends associated with search and rescue (SAR) operations in Utah's National Park Service (NPS) units. Methods.—Data for this study were collected from the Annual Emergency Medical Services Report and the Annual Search and Rescue Report for National Park Service units in Utah from 2001–2005. Results.—There were 4762 EMS incidents reported between 2001 and 2005, including 79 fatalities (50 traumatic; 29 nontraumatic). The most common EMS transportation method was ground (1505) and helicopter (553) transport. The heaviest trauma, medical, and cardiac workload was at Glen Canyon National Recreation Area (GLCA) and the heaviest first aid workload was at Zion National Park (ZION). There were 1190 SAR operations between 2001 and 2005 involving 67 fatalities, 623 ill or injured visitors, 1813 non-ill or non-injured visitors, and 92 saves. GLCA and ZION accounted for 47% and 21% of all SAR operations. The total cost of SAR operations was $1 363 920. SAR operations most commonly occurred on weekends, involved male visitors (59%), visitors aged 20–29 years (23%), and 40–49 years (20%), and visitors participating in day hiking (221), motorized boating (196), and canyoneering (98) activities. Most SAR operations were in lake (226), desert (147), and canyon (140) environments and were resolved within 24 hours. Conclusions.—GLCA and ZION experienced heavy use of EMS resources that should be noted by EMS administrators and planners. GLCA and ZION also reported the most SAR operations. The development of techniques to prevent the need for SAR at GLCA and ZION would likely have the most potential to reduce the financial impact of SAR incidents and morbidity and mortality to visitors.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Athletic Injuries - economics</subject><subject>Athletic Injuries - epidemiology</subject><subject>Athletic Injuries - mortality</subject><subject>Athletic Injuries - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Emergency</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - economics</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - trends</subject><subject>Emergency Treatment - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>EMS</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>national park</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>rescue</subject><subject>Rescue Work - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>search</subject><subject>Transportation of Patients - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Utah</subject><subject>Utah - epidemiology</subject><subject>Workload - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - economics</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - mortality</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1080-6032</issn><issn>1545-1534</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFks1r3DAQxU1paT6ae09F9NCevJUs62N7CJSwaQpJN-wm5FIQsjTOKuu1UskO7H9fOV5YyCE9SYjfe6N5M1n2keAJYRJ_wyK_m13N8vkiJ0JOyJvskLCS5YTR8m26Y4lzjmlxkB3F-IBxUUpK32cHRArCSCEPsz9L0MGskG4tWkA0PaCbAK2Nzy_dCtBsA-EeWrNFV2Cd0Q1aQnhyBtCdD-vGa4tci247vfoa0W_dOd8m5lqHdfyQvat1E-Fkdx5nt-ezm7OL_HL-89fZj8u8Ylh0uTUWWMmnVDBNNSMlraWuiinFFZfUpC5KKoioOJkW2tq6xlbqmleaSSIrVtHj7Mvo-xj83x5ipzYuGmga3YLvo-LTkhWc0wR-fgE--D6k_0ZVEMopFwVLEB4hE3yMAWr1GNxGh60iWA2xKyzUELuaL1SKXZEk-bTz7asN2L1gl3MC8hGI-h72RV8x_D7ykGJ7chBUNC4NIU0ggOmU9e418ekLsWlcO4xuDVuI--oqFgqr5bAmw5ZgKTCRWCSDyWhQOe9b-H___wB9r8H-</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Heggie, Travis W</creator><creator>Heggie, Tracey M</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Search and Rescue Trends and the Emergency Medical Service Workload in Utah's National Parks</title><author>Heggie, Travis W ; Heggie, Tracey M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b507t-dcde5469375a3a5143f8ab2930b683c10843717b6192addff0d8af6ba5818b5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Athletic Injuries - economics</topic><topic>Athletic Injuries - epidemiology</topic><topic>Athletic Injuries - mortality</topic><topic>Athletic Injuries - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Emergency</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - economics</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - trends</topic><topic>Emergency Treatment - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>EMS</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>national park</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>rescue</topic><topic>Rescue Work - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>search</topic><topic>Transportation of Patients - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Utah</topic><topic>Utah - epidemiology</topic><topic>Workload - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - economics</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - mortality</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heggie, Travis W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heggie, Tracey M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Wilderness &amp; environmental medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heggie, Travis W</au><au>Heggie, Tracey M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Search and Rescue Trends and the Emergency Medical Service Workload in Utah's National Parks</atitle><jtitle>Wilderness &amp; environmental medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Wilderness Environ Med</addtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>164</spage><epage>171</epage><pages>164-171</pages><issn>1080-6032</issn><eissn>1545-1534</eissn><abstract>Objective.—To identify the emergency medical service (EMS) workload and trends associated with search and rescue (SAR) operations in Utah's National Park Service (NPS) units. Methods.—Data for this study were collected from the Annual Emergency Medical Services Report and the Annual Search and Rescue Report for National Park Service units in Utah from 2001–2005. Results.—There were 4762 EMS incidents reported between 2001 and 2005, including 79 fatalities (50 traumatic; 29 nontraumatic). The most common EMS transportation method was ground (1505) and helicopter (553) transport. The heaviest trauma, medical, and cardiac workload was at Glen Canyon National Recreation Area (GLCA) and the heaviest first aid workload was at Zion National Park (ZION). There were 1190 SAR operations between 2001 and 2005 involving 67 fatalities, 623 ill or injured visitors, 1813 non-ill or non-injured visitors, and 92 saves. GLCA and ZION accounted for 47% and 21% of all SAR operations. The total cost of SAR operations was $1 363 920. SAR operations most commonly occurred on weekends, involved male visitors (59%), visitors aged 20–29 years (23%), and 40–49 years (20%), and visitors participating in day hiking (221), motorized boating (196), and canyoneering (98) activities. Most SAR operations were in lake (226), desert (147), and canyon (140) environments and were resolved within 24 hours. Conclusions.—GLCA and ZION experienced heavy use of EMS resources that should be noted by EMS administrators and planners. GLCA and ZION also reported the most SAR operations. The development of techniques to prevent the need for SAR at GLCA and ZION would likely have the most potential to reduce the financial impact of SAR incidents and morbidity and mortality to visitors.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18715128</pmid><doi>10.1580/07-WEME-OR-178.1</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1080-6032
ispartof Wilderness & environmental medicine, 2008, Vol.19 (3), p.164-171
issn 1080-6032
1545-1534
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69452663
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Athletic Injuries - economics
Athletic Injuries - epidemiology
Athletic Injuries - mortality
Athletic Injuries - prevention & control
Emergency
Emergency Medical Services - economics
Emergency Medical Services - statistics & numerical data
Emergency Medical Services - trends
Emergency Treatment - statistics & numerical data
EMS
Female
Humans
Male
national park
Original Research
rescue
Rescue Work - statistics & numerical data
search
Transportation of Patients - statistics & numerical data
Utah
Utah - epidemiology
Workload - statistics & numerical data
Wounds and Injuries - economics
Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology
Wounds and Injuries - mortality
Wounds and Injuries - prevention & control
Young Adult
title Search and Rescue Trends and the Emergency Medical Service Workload in Utah's National Parks
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T04%3A08%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Search%20and%20Rescue%20Trends%20and%20the%20Emergency%20Medical%20Service%20Workload%20in%20Utah's%20National%20Parks&rft.jtitle=Wilderness%20&%20environmental%20medicine&rft.au=Heggie,%20Travis%20W&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=164&rft.epage=171&rft.pages=164-171&rft.issn=1080-6032&rft.eissn=1545-1534&rft_id=info:doi/10.1580/07-WEME-OR-178.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1595771381%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b507t-dcde5469375a3a5143f8ab2930b683c10843717b6192addff0d8af6ba5818b5b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213636725&rft_id=info:pmid/18715128&rft_sage_id=10.1580_07-WEME-OR-178.1&rfr_iscdi=true