Diagnostic Criteria for Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction: Proposed Standards for Clinical Practice and Research

Over the past 10 years, widespread and concerted research efforts have led to increasingly sophisticated and efficient methods and instruments for detecting exaggeration or fabrication of cognitive dysfunction. Despite these psychometric advances, the process of diagnosing malingering remains diffic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical neuropsychologist 1999-11, Vol.13 (4), p.545-561
Main Authors: Slick, Daniel J., Sherman, Elisabeth M.S., Iverson, Grant L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cognition Disorders - diagnosis
Cognition Disorders - psychology
Conversion Disorder - diagnosis
Diagnosis, Differential
Factitious Disorders - diagnosis
Humans
Malingering - diagnosis
Malingering - psychology
Neuropsychological Tests
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Reference Standards
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-e48be972d94a47f28484f443cd9f38b706dde1c3eeeec7e78aaf3d4eacaaebfa3
cites
container_end_page 561
container_issue 4
container_start_page 545
container_title Clinical neuropsychologist
container_volume 13
creator Slick, Daniel J.
Sherman, Elisabeth M.S.
Iverson, Grant L.
description Over the past 10 years, widespread and concerted research efforts have led to increasingly sophisticated and efficient methods and instruments for detecting exaggeration or fabrication of cognitive dysfunction. Despite these psychometric advances, the process of diagnosing malingering remains difficult and largely idiosyncratic. This article presents a proposed set of diagnostic criteria that define psychometric, behavioral, and collateral data indicative of possible, probable, and definite malingering of cognitive dysfunction, for use in clinical practice and for defining populations for clinical research. Relevant literature is reviewed, and limitations and benefits of the proposed criteria are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT545
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69474455</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69474455</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-e48be972d94a47f28484f443cd9f38b706dde1c3eeeec7e78aaf3d4eacaaebfa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1vFDEMhiMEoqXwF9CcUDkMJBvPV3sp2raAKB-Ccugp8ibOEjSbLEmGav892U6ROOJLrPjxa-lh7FjwV4J37Wsh-6YGDu2xGIZBiJdCnnA4FfXN6eV1A80Ddig6gBoEwMPS_8UP2JOUfnIuWlh0j9mB4D1voe0PWT53uPYhZaerZXSZosPKhlh9xNH5NUUy1SeaYtBh7V12v6k63yU7eZ1d8CfVlxi2IRXoW0ZvMJp0t70sy07jWOZYSE1VmVZfKRFG_eMpe2RxTPTs_j1i3y8vrpfv6qvPb98v31zVWg5Nrgn6FQ3dwgyA0NlFDz1YAKnNYGW_6nhrDAktqZTuqOsRrTRAqBFpZVEesRdz7jaGXxOlrDYuaRpH9BSmpNoBiq2mKeDZDOoYUopk1Ta6DcadElztzau9SrVXqWbz5UNxUELdqDvzJeL5_a1ptSHzT8CsugAfZsD5YmiDtyGORmXcjSHaiF67pOR_n_sDSqicKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69474455</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic Criteria for Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction: Proposed Standards for Clinical Practice and Research</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Slick, Daniel J. ; Sherman, Elisabeth M.S. ; Iverson, Grant L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Slick, Daniel J. ; Sherman, Elisabeth M.S. ; Iverson, Grant L.</creatorcontrib><description>Over the past 10 years, widespread and concerted research efforts have led to increasingly sophisticated and efficient methods and instruments for detecting exaggeration or fabrication of cognitive dysfunction. Despite these psychometric advances, the process of diagnosing malingering remains difficult and largely idiosyncratic. This article presents a proposed set of diagnostic criteria that define psychometric, behavioral, and collateral data indicative of possible, probable, and definite malingering of cognitive dysfunction, for use in clinical practice and for defining populations for clinical research. Relevant literature is reviewed, and limitations and benefits of the proposed criteria are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1385-4046</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-4144</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT545</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10806468</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis ; Cognition Disorders - psychology ; Conversion Disorder - diagnosis ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Factitious Disorders - diagnosis ; Humans ; Malingering - diagnosis ; Malingering - psychology ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Reference Standards</subject><ispartof>Clinical neuropsychologist, 1999-11, Vol.13 (4), p.545-561</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-e48be972d94a47f28484f443cd9f38b706dde1c3eeeec7e78aaf3d4eacaaebfa3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10806468$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Slick, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Elisabeth M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iverson, Grant L.</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic Criteria for Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction: Proposed Standards for Clinical Practice and Research</title><title>Clinical neuropsychologist</title><addtitle>Clin Neuropsychol</addtitle><description>Over the past 10 years, widespread and concerted research efforts have led to increasingly sophisticated and efficient methods and instruments for detecting exaggeration or fabrication of cognitive dysfunction. Despite these psychometric advances, the process of diagnosing malingering remains difficult and largely idiosyncratic. This article presents a proposed set of diagnostic criteria that define psychometric, behavioral, and collateral data indicative of possible, probable, and definite malingering of cognitive dysfunction, for use in clinical practice and for defining populations for clinical research. Relevant literature is reviewed, and limitations and benefits of the proposed criteria are discussed.</description><subject>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Conversion Disorder - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Factitious Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Malingering - diagnosis</subject><subject>Malingering - psychology</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><issn>1385-4046</issn><issn>1744-4144</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1vFDEMhiMEoqXwF9CcUDkMJBvPV3sp2raAKB-Ccugp8ibOEjSbLEmGav892U6ROOJLrPjxa-lh7FjwV4J37Wsh-6YGDu2xGIZBiJdCnnA4FfXN6eV1A80Ddig6gBoEwMPS_8UP2JOUfnIuWlh0j9mB4D1voe0PWT53uPYhZaerZXSZosPKhlh9xNH5NUUy1SeaYtBh7V12v6k63yU7eZ1d8CfVlxi2IRXoW0ZvMJp0t70sy07jWOZYSE1VmVZfKRFG_eMpe2RxTPTs_j1i3y8vrpfv6qvPb98v31zVWg5Nrgn6FQ3dwgyA0NlFDz1YAKnNYGW_6nhrDAktqZTuqOsRrTRAqBFpZVEesRdz7jaGXxOlrDYuaRpH9BSmpNoBiq2mKeDZDOoYUopk1Ta6DcadElztzau9SrVXqWbz5UNxUELdqDvzJeL5_a1ptSHzT8CsugAfZsD5YmiDtyGORmXcjSHaiF67pOR_n_sDSqicKA</recordid><startdate>199911</startdate><enddate>199911</enddate><creator>Slick, Daniel J.</creator><creator>Sherman, Elisabeth M.S.</creator><creator>Iverson, Grant L.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199911</creationdate><title>Diagnostic Criteria for Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction: Proposed Standards for Clinical Practice and Research</title><author>Slick, Daniel J. ; Sherman, Elisabeth M.S. ; Iverson, Grant L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-e48be972d94a47f28484f443cd9f38b706dde1c3eeeec7e78aaf3d4eacaaebfa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Conversion Disorder - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Factitious Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Malingering - diagnosis</topic><topic>Malingering - psychology</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Slick, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Elisabeth M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iverson, Grant L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical neuropsychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Slick, Daniel J.</au><au>Sherman, Elisabeth M.S.</au><au>Iverson, Grant L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic Criteria for Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction: Proposed Standards for Clinical Practice and Research</atitle><jtitle>Clinical neuropsychologist</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Neuropsychol</addtitle><date>1999-11</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>545</spage><epage>561</epage><pages>545-561</pages><issn>1385-4046</issn><eissn>1744-4144</eissn><abstract>Over the past 10 years, widespread and concerted research efforts have led to increasingly sophisticated and efficient methods and instruments for detecting exaggeration or fabrication of cognitive dysfunction. Despite these psychometric advances, the process of diagnosing malingering remains difficult and largely idiosyncratic. This article presents a proposed set of diagnostic criteria that define psychometric, behavioral, and collateral data indicative of possible, probable, and definite malingering of cognitive dysfunction, for use in clinical practice and for defining populations for clinical research. Relevant literature is reviewed, and limitations and benefits of the proposed criteria are discussed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><pmid>10806468</pmid><doi>10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT545</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1385-4046
ispartof Clinical neuropsychologist, 1999-11, Vol.13 (4), p.545-561
issn 1385-4046
1744-4144
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69474455
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list)
subjects Cognition Disorders - diagnosis
Cognition Disorders - psychology
Conversion Disorder - diagnosis
Diagnosis, Differential
Factitious Disorders - diagnosis
Humans
Malingering - diagnosis
Malingering - psychology
Neuropsychological Tests
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Reference Standards
title Diagnostic Criteria for Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction: Proposed Standards for Clinical Practice and Research
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T20%3A29%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20Criteria%20for%20Malingered%20Neurocognitive%20Dysfunction:%20Proposed%20Standards%20for%20Clinical%20Practice%20and%20Research&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20neuropsychologist&rft.au=Slick,%20Daniel%20J.&rft.date=1999-11&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=545&rft.epage=561&rft.pages=545-561&rft.issn=1385-4046&rft.eissn=1744-4144&rft_id=info:doi/10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT545&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69474455%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-e48be972d94a47f28484f443cd9f38b706dde1c3eeeec7e78aaf3d4eacaaebfa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69474455&rft_id=info:pmid/10806468&rfr_iscdi=true