Loading…

Effects of Method of Presynchronization and Source of Selenium on Uterine Health and Reproduction in Dairy Cows

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of method of presynchronization and source of supplemental Se on uterine health and reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows. Holstein cows (n=512) were assigned randomly to 2 methods of presynchronization, Presynch (2 PGF2a given 14...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of dairy science 2008-09, Vol.91 (9), p.3323-3336
Main Authors: Rutigliano, H.M., Lima, F.S., Cerri, R.L.A., Greco, L.F., Vilela, J.M., Magalhães, V., Silvestre, F.T., Thatcher, W.W., Santos, J.E.P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-800562b70e8a94072c01d0e3fbdd1a7c0edbc0b7479ad6e46bd9835e3cdc58bb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-800562b70e8a94072c01d0e3fbdd1a7c0edbc0b7479ad6e46bd9835e3cdc58bb3
container_end_page 3336
container_issue 9
container_start_page 3323
container_title Journal of dairy science
container_volume 91
creator Rutigliano, H.M.
Lima, F.S.
Cerri, R.L.A.
Greco, L.F.
Vilela, J.M.
Magalhães, V.
Silvestre, F.T.
Thatcher, W.W.
Santos, J.E.P.
description The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of method of presynchronization and source of supplemental Se on uterine health and reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows. Holstein cows (n=512) were assigned randomly to 2 methods of presynchronization, Presynch (2 PGF2a given 14 d apart) or CIDR-PS (controlled internal drug releasing inserted for 7 d with an injection of PGF2a at removal) and 2 sources of Se, sodium selenite (SS) or selenized yeast (SY) supplemented at 0.3 mg/kg from 25 d before calving to 80 d in milk (DIM) arranged in a 2×2 factorial. Cows were inseminated following the Ovsynch protocol (d 0 GnRH, d 7 PGF2a, d 9 GnRH, timed artificial insemination (AI) 12h after the final GnRH) starting at 12 and 3 d after Presynch and CIDR-PS, respectively. Cows were diagnosed for pregnancy at 28, 42, and 56 d after AI. Source of Se did not influence uterine health and resumption of cyclicity, but fewer CIDR-PS than Presynch cows were cyclic at the beginning of the Ovsynch, although differences in the proportion cyclic may have been caused by the timing when corpus luteum evaluations were performed in the different pre-synchronization treatments. Ovulatory responses were not influenced by source of Se. However, the CIDR-PS increased ovulation to the first GnRH, double ovulation to the final GnRH, and size of ovulatory follicle at PGF2a and final GnRH of the Ovsynch, but did not influence ovulation at the final GnRH of the Ovsynch. Concentrations of estradiol during the Ovsynch increased with follicle diameter and were greater for cows receiving CIDR-PS than Presynch, but they were not influenced by source of Se. Pregnancy per AI on d 28 (32.7%), 42 (28.5%), and 56 (25.9%) after AI, and pregnancy loss (20.5%) from 28 to 56 d were not influenced by source of Se or method of presynchronization. Although cows receiving CIDR-PS had an increased incidence of ovulation to the first GnRH (73.2 vs. 57.8%) and double ovulation to the final GnRH of the Ovsynch (18.7 vs. 9.0%), both of which enhanced pregnancy, the CIDR-PS protocol did not improve pregnancy per AI or reduce pregnancy loss compared with presynchronization with PGF2a alone.
doi_str_mv 10.3168/jds.2008-1005
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69492470</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022030208710476</els_id><sourcerecordid>69492470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-800562b70e8a94072c01d0e3fbdd1a7c0edbc0b7479ad6e46bd9835e3cdc58bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhSMEokvhyBUiJLiljO3YiY9oKRSpCMSyZ8uxJ12vsnZrJ1TbX1-nu6ISEifbms9v5s0ritcEzhgR7cetTWcUoK0IAH9SLAinvGJEtk-LBQClFTCgJ8WLlLb5SSjw58UJaRvBuSSLIpz3PZoxlaEvv-O4CXa-_YyY9t5sYvDuTo8u-FJ7W67CFA3OwAoH9G7albmyHjE6j-UF6mHcPIC_8DoGO5mHn86Xn7WL-3IZbtPL4lmvh4Svjudpsf5y_nt5UV3--Ppt-emyMpyLsWqzGUG7BrDVsoaGGiAWkPWdtUQ3BtB2BrqmbqS2AmvRWdkyjsxYw9uuY6fFh4NuHuRmwjSqnUsGh0F7DFNSQtaS1g1k8N0_4Da79Hk2RSRvCYhaZKg6QCaGlCL26jq6nY57RUDNMagcg5pjUHMMmX9zFJ26HdpH-rj3DLw_AjoZPfRRe-PSX46CYIK1_NHGxl1tbl1ElXZ6GLIsmVtKoqRijLIMvj2AvQ5KX8Ustl5RIAwIZ5zK2WhzIDCv_Y_DqJJx6A3aLGtGZYP7j5t7sR65TA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195810646</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Method of Presynchronization and Source of Selenium on Uterine Health and Reproduction in Dairy Cows</title><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rutigliano, H.M. ; Lima, F.S. ; Cerri, R.L.A. ; Greco, L.F. ; Vilela, J.M. ; Magalhães, V. ; Silvestre, F.T. ; Thatcher, W.W. ; Santos, J.E.P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rutigliano, H.M. ; Lima, F.S. ; Cerri, R.L.A. ; Greco, L.F. ; Vilela, J.M. ; Magalhães, V. ; Silvestre, F.T. ; Thatcher, W.W. ; Santos, J.E.P.</creatorcontrib><description>The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of method of presynchronization and source of supplemental Se on uterine health and reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows. Holstein cows (n=512) were assigned randomly to 2 methods of presynchronization, Presynch (2 PGF2a given 14 d apart) or CIDR-PS (controlled internal drug releasing inserted for 7 d with an injection of PGF2a at removal) and 2 sources of Se, sodium selenite (SS) or selenized yeast (SY) supplemented at 0.3 mg/kg from 25 d before calving to 80 d in milk (DIM) arranged in a 2×2 factorial. Cows were inseminated following the Ovsynch protocol (d 0 GnRH, d 7 PGF2a, d 9 GnRH, timed artificial insemination (AI) 12h after the final GnRH) starting at 12 and 3 d after Presynch and CIDR-PS, respectively. Cows were diagnosed for pregnancy at 28, 42, and 56 d after AI. Source of Se did not influence uterine health and resumption of cyclicity, but fewer CIDR-PS than Presynch cows were cyclic at the beginning of the Ovsynch, although differences in the proportion cyclic may have been caused by the timing when corpus luteum evaluations were performed in the different pre-synchronization treatments. Ovulatory responses were not influenced by source of Se. However, the CIDR-PS increased ovulation to the first GnRH, double ovulation to the final GnRH, and size of ovulatory follicle at PGF2a and final GnRH of the Ovsynch, but did not influence ovulation at the final GnRH of the Ovsynch. Concentrations of estradiol during the Ovsynch increased with follicle diameter and were greater for cows receiving CIDR-PS than Presynch, but they were not influenced by source of Se. Pregnancy per AI on d 28 (32.7%), 42 (28.5%), and 56 (25.9%) after AI, and pregnancy loss (20.5%) from 28 to 56 d were not influenced by source of Se or method of presynchronization. Although cows receiving CIDR-PS had an increased incidence of ovulation to the first GnRH (73.2 vs. 57.8%) and double ovulation to the final GnRH of the Ovsynch (18.7 vs. 9.0%), both of which enhanced pregnancy, the CIDR-PS protocol did not improve pregnancy per AI or reduce pregnancy loss compared with presynchronization with PGF2a alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18765591</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JDSCAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Savoy, IL: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Abortion, Veterinary ; Animal productions ; Animals ; artificial insemination ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Constitution ; Cattle ; Cattle Diseases - physiopathology ; dairy cow ; dairy cows ; Dairying - methods ; dietary mineral supplements ; dietary minerals ; dietary nutrient sources ; Dietary Supplements ; Endometritis - physiopathology ; Endometritis - veterinary ; estrus synchronization ; Estrus Synchronization - methods ; Female ; female fertility ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; gonadotropin-releasing hormone ; hormone supplements ; methodology ; Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams ; Ovsynch ; ovulation ; Pregnancy ; pregnancy rate ; Presynch ; presynchronization ; Random Allocation ; reproduction ; Reproduction - drug effects ; reproductive efficiency ; Risk Factors ; selenium ; Selenium - administration &amp; dosage ; Selenium - pharmacology ; Sodium Selenite - administration &amp; dosage ; Sodium Selenite - pharmacology ; Terrestrial animal productions ; uterine diseases ; uterus ; Uterus - drug effects ; Vertebrates ; Yeasts - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 2008-09, Vol.91 (9), p.3323-3336</ispartof><rights>2008 American Dairy Science Association</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Dairy Science Association Sep 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-800562b70e8a94072c01d0e3fbdd1a7c0edbc0b7479ad6e46bd9835e3cdc58bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-800562b70e8a94072c01d0e3fbdd1a7c0edbc0b7479ad6e46bd9835e3cdc58bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030208710476$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20636385$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18765591$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rutigliano, H.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, F.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerri, R.L.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greco, L.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilela, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magalhães, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvestre, F.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thatcher, W.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, J.E.P.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Method of Presynchronization and Source of Selenium on Uterine Health and Reproduction in Dairy Cows</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><description>The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of method of presynchronization and source of supplemental Se on uterine health and reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows. Holstein cows (n=512) were assigned randomly to 2 methods of presynchronization, Presynch (2 PGF2a given 14 d apart) or CIDR-PS (controlled internal drug releasing inserted for 7 d with an injection of PGF2a at removal) and 2 sources of Se, sodium selenite (SS) or selenized yeast (SY) supplemented at 0.3 mg/kg from 25 d before calving to 80 d in milk (DIM) arranged in a 2×2 factorial. Cows were inseminated following the Ovsynch protocol (d 0 GnRH, d 7 PGF2a, d 9 GnRH, timed artificial insemination (AI) 12h after the final GnRH) starting at 12 and 3 d after Presynch and CIDR-PS, respectively. Cows were diagnosed for pregnancy at 28, 42, and 56 d after AI. Source of Se did not influence uterine health and resumption of cyclicity, but fewer CIDR-PS than Presynch cows were cyclic at the beginning of the Ovsynch, although differences in the proportion cyclic may have been caused by the timing when corpus luteum evaluations were performed in the different pre-synchronization treatments. Ovulatory responses were not influenced by source of Se. However, the CIDR-PS increased ovulation to the first GnRH, double ovulation to the final GnRH, and size of ovulatory follicle at PGF2a and final GnRH of the Ovsynch, but did not influence ovulation at the final GnRH of the Ovsynch. Concentrations of estradiol during the Ovsynch increased with follicle diameter and were greater for cows receiving CIDR-PS than Presynch, but they were not influenced by source of Se. Pregnancy per AI on d 28 (32.7%), 42 (28.5%), and 56 (25.9%) after AI, and pregnancy loss (20.5%) from 28 to 56 d were not influenced by source of Se or method of presynchronization. Although cows receiving CIDR-PS had an increased incidence of ovulation to the first GnRH (73.2 vs. 57.8%) and double ovulation to the final GnRH of the Ovsynch (18.7 vs. 9.0%), both of which enhanced pregnancy, the CIDR-PS protocol did not improve pregnancy per AI or reduce pregnancy loss compared with presynchronization with PGF2a alone.</description><subject>Abortion, Veterinary</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>artificial insemination</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Constitution</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>dairy cow</subject><subject>dairy cows</subject><subject>Dairying - methods</subject><subject>dietary mineral supplements</subject><subject>dietary minerals</subject><subject>dietary nutrient sources</subject><subject>Dietary Supplements</subject><subject>Endometritis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Endometritis - veterinary</subject><subject>estrus synchronization</subject><subject>Estrus Synchronization - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>female fertility</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>gonadotropin-releasing hormone</subject><subject>hormone supplements</subject><subject>methodology</subject><subject>Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams</subject><subject>Ovsynch</subject><subject>ovulation</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>pregnancy rate</subject><subject>Presynch</subject><subject>presynchronization</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>reproduction</subject><subject>Reproduction - drug effects</subject><subject>reproductive efficiency</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>selenium</subject><subject>Selenium - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Selenium - pharmacology</subject><subject>Sodium Selenite - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Sodium Selenite - pharmacology</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>uterine diseases</subject><subject>uterus</subject><subject>Uterus - drug effects</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Yeasts - chemistry</subject><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhSMEokvhyBUiJLiljO3YiY9oKRSpCMSyZ8uxJ12vsnZrJ1TbX1-nu6ISEifbms9v5s0ritcEzhgR7cetTWcUoK0IAH9SLAinvGJEtk-LBQClFTCgJ8WLlLb5SSjw58UJaRvBuSSLIpz3PZoxlaEvv-O4CXa-_YyY9t5sYvDuTo8u-FJ7W67CFA3OwAoH9G7albmyHjE6j-UF6mHcPIC_8DoGO5mHn86Xn7WL-3IZbtPL4lmvh4Svjudpsf5y_nt5UV3--Ppt-emyMpyLsWqzGUG7BrDVsoaGGiAWkPWdtUQ3BtB2BrqmbqS2AmvRWdkyjsxYw9uuY6fFh4NuHuRmwjSqnUsGh0F7DFNSQtaS1g1k8N0_4Da79Hk2RSRvCYhaZKg6QCaGlCL26jq6nY57RUDNMagcg5pjUHMMmX9zFJ26HdpH-rj3DLw_AjoZPfRRe-PSX46CYIK1_NHGxl1tbl1ElXZ6GLIsmVtKoqRijLIMvj2AvQ5KX8Ustl5RIAwIZ5zK2WhzIDCv_Y_DqJJx6A3aLGtGZYP7j5t7sR65TA</recordid><startdate>20080901</startdate><enddate>20080901</enddate><creator>Rutigliano, H.M.</creator><creator>Lima, F.S.</creator><creator>Cerri, R.L.A.</creator><creator>Greco, L.F.</creator><creator>Vilela, J.M.</creator><creator>Magalhães, V.</creator><creator>Silvestre, F.T.</creator><creator>Thatcher, W.W.</creator><creator>Santos, J.E.P.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>American Dairy Science Association</general><general>Am Dairy Sci Assoc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080901</creationdate><title>Effects of Method of Presynchronization and Source of Selenium on Uterine Health and Reproduction in Dairy Cows</title><author>Rutigliano, H.M. ; Lima, F.S. ; Cerri, R.L.A. ; Greco, L.F. ; Vilela, J.M. ; Magalhães, V. ; Silvestre, F.T. ; Thatcher, W.W. ; Santos, J.E.P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-800562b70e8a94072c01d0e3fbdd1a7c0edbc0b7479ad6e46bd9835e3cdc58bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Abortion, Veterinary</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>artificial insemination</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Constitution</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>dairy cow</topic><topic>dairy cows</topic><topic>Dairying - methods</topic><topic>dietary mineral supplements</topic><topic>dietary minerals</topic><topic>dietary nutrient sources</topic><topic>Dietary Supplements</topic><topic>Endometritis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Endometritis - veterinary</topic><topic>estrus synchronization</topic><topic>Estrus Synchronization - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>female fertility</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>gonadotropin-releasing hormone</topic><topic>hormone supplements</topic><topic>methodology</topic><topic>Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams</topic><topic>Ovsynch</topic><topic>ovulation</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>pregnancy rate</topic><topic>Presynch</topic><topic>presynchronization</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>reproduction</topic><topic>Reproduction - drug effects</topic><topic>reproductive efficiency</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>selenium</topic><topic>Selenium - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Selenium - pharmacology</topic><topic>Sodium Selenite - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Sodium Selenite - pharmacology</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>uterine diseases</topic><topic>uterus</topic><topic>Uterus - drug effects</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Yeasts - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rutigliano, H.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, F.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerri, R.L.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greco, L.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilela, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magalhães, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvestre, F.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thatcher, W.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, J.E.P.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rutigliano, H.M.</au><au>Lima, F.S.</au><au>Cerri, R.L.A.</au><au>Greco, L.F.</au><au>Vilela, J.M.</au><au>Magalhães, V.</au><au>Silvestre, F.T.</au><au>Thatcher, W.W.</au><au>Santos, J.E.P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Method of Presynchronization and Source of Selenium on Uterine Health and Reproduction in Dairy Cows</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><date>2008-09-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3323</spage><epage>3336</epage><pages>3323-3336</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><coden>JDSCAE</coden><abstract>The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of method of presynchronization and source of supplemental Se on uterine health and reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows. Holstein cows (n=512) were assigned randomly to 2 methods of presynchronization, Presynch (2 PGF2a given 14 d apart) or CIDR-PS (controlled internal drug releasing inserted for 7 d with an injection of PGF2a at removal) and 2 sources of Se, sodium selenite (SS) or selenized yeast (SY) supplemented at 0.3 mg/kg from 25 d before calving to 80 d in milk (DIM) arranged in a 2×2 factorial. Cows were inseminated following the Ovsynch protocol (d 0 GnRH, d 7 PGF2a, d 9 GnRH, timed artificial insemination (AI) 12h after the final GnRH) starting at 12 and 3 d after Presynch and CIDR-PS, respectively. Cows were diagnosed for pregnancy at 28, 42, and 56 d after AI. Source of Se did not influence uterine health and resumption of cyclicity, but fewer CIDR-PS than Presynch cows were cyclic at the beginning of the Ovsynch, although differences in the proportion cyclic may have been caused by the timing when corpus luteum evaluations were performed in the different pre-synchronization treatments. Ovulatory responses were not influenced by source of Se. However, the CIDR-PS increased ovulation to the first GnRH, double ovulation to the final GnRH, and size of ovulatory follicle at PGF2a and final GnRH of the Ovsynch, but did not influence ovulation at the final GnRH of the Ovsynch. Concentrations of estradiol during the Ovsynch increased with follicle diameter and were greater for cows receiving CIDR-PS than Presynch, but they were not influenced by source of Se. Pregnancy per AI on d 28 (32.7%), 42 (28.5%), and 56 (25.9%) after AI, and pregnancy loss (20.5%) from 28 to 56 d were not influenced by source of Se or method of presynchronization. Although cows receiving CIDR-PS had an increased incidence of ovulation to the first GnRH (73.2 vs. 57.8%) and double ovulation to the final GnRH of the Ovsynch (18.7 vs. 9.0%), both of which enhanced pregnancy, the CIDR-PS protocol did not improve pregnancy per AI or reduce pregnancy loss compared with presynchronization with PGF2a alone.</abstract><cop>Savoy, IL</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18765591</pmid><doi>10.3168/jds.2008-1005</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0302
ispartof Journal of dairy science, 2008-09, Vol.91 (9), p.3323-3336
issn 0022-0302
1525-3198
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69492470
source EZB Free E-Journals; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Abortion, Veterinary
Animal productions
Animals
artificial insemination
Biological and medical sciences
Body Constitution
Cattle
Cattle Diseases - physiopathology
dairy cow
dairy cows
Dairying - methods
dietary mineral supplements
dietary minerals
dietary nutrient sources
Dietary Supplements
Endometritis - physiopathology
Endometritis - veterinary
estrus synchronization
Estrus Synchronization - methods
Female
female fertility
Food industries
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
gonadotropin-releasing hormone
hormone supplements
methodology
Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams
Ovsynch
ovulation
Pregnancy
pregnancy rate
Presynch
presynchronization
Random Allocation
reproduction
Reproduction - drug effects
reproductive efficiency
Risk Factors
selenium
Selenium - administration & dosage
Selenium - pharmacology
Sodium Selenite - administration & dosage
Sodium Selenite - pharmacology
Terrestrial animal productions
uterine diseases
uterus
Uterus - drug effects
Vertebrates
Yeasts - chemistry
title Effects of Method of Presynchronization and Source of Selenium on Uterine Health and Reproduction in Dairy Cows
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A36%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Method%20of%20Presynchronization%20and%20Source%20of%20Selenium%20on%20Uterine%20Health%20and%20Reproduction%20in%20Dairy%20Cows&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Rutigliano,%20H.M.&rft.date=2008-09-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3323&rft.epage=3336&rft.pages=3323-3336&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft.coden=JDSCAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.2008-1005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69492470%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-800562b70e8a94072c01d0e3fbdd1a7c0edbc0b7479ad6e46bd9835e3cdc58bb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195810646&rft_id=info:pmid/18765591&rfr_iscdi=true