Differing expression of MMPs‐1 and ‐9 and urokinase receptor between diffuse‐ and intestinal‐type gastric carcinoma

• Published in: International journal of cancer 1999-02, Vol.84 (1), p.74-79
• Main Authors: Migita, Takashi, Sato, Eiichi, Saito, Kazuya, Mizoi, Takayuki, Shiiba, Ken‐ichi, Matsuno, Seiki, Nagura, Hiroshi, Ohtani, Haruo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Antigens, CD - metabolism; Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic - metabolism; Biological and medical sciences; Collagenases - biosynthesis; Gastric Mucosa - enzymology; Gastric Mucosa - metabolism; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Macrophages - metabolism; Matrix Metalloproteinase 1; Matrix Metalloproteinase 9; Medical sciences; Receptors, Cell Surface - biosynthesis; Receptors, Urokinase Plasminogen Activator; Stomach Neoplasms - enzymology; Stomach Neoplasms - metabolism; Stomach Neoplasms - pathology; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus; Tumors; Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator - metabolism
• ISSN: 0020-7136; 1097-0215
• DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990219)84:1<74::AID-IJC14>3.0.CO;2-I

Gastric cancer is classified into intestinal and diffuse types, which exhibit different biological behavior. Urokinase‐type plasminogen activator (uPA), its receptor (uPAR) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs)‐1 and ‐9 are considered to play important roles in cancer invasion and metastasis. We have already suggested a functional duality of these matrix‐degrading enzymes/factors; they may also be involved in the matrix turnover (remodeling) or host immune/inflammatory reactions as far as they are expressed by host cells. We performed a retrospective study on the immuno‐histochemical expression of these enzymes/factors in surgical specimens from patients with gastric cancer, including 26 with the diffuse and 78 with the intestinal type. We also evaluated macrophages since they are major sources of uPAR. The positivity rate for uPA in cancer cells was significantly lower in diffuse‐type than in intestinal‐type. Stromal expression was seen mainly along the invasive margin (tumor–host interface). The degree of stromal expression of uPAR and MMP‐9 and the macrophage number were markedly decreased in diffuse‐type compared with intestinal‐type. Stromal expression of uPAR and macrophage number in intestinal‐type were higher in patients without liver metastasis than in patients with liver metastasis, while uPA expression in cancer cells was more pronounced in patients with liver metastasis. Studies using frozen sections revealed that the expression of MMP‐1, restricted to the stromal area, was more decreased in diffuse‐type (18 patients) than in intestinal‐type (21 patients). Our results show that the in situ expression of matrix‐degrading enzymes/factors in gastric cancer is significantly more diminished in diffuse‐type than in intestinal‐type, suggesting a multifunctional aspect of the matrix‐degradation process in cancer tissue. Int. J. Cancer (Pred. Oncol.) 84:74–79, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.