Research in Industrial and Organizational Psychology From 1963 to 2007: Changes, Choices, and Trends

• Published in: Journal of applied psychology 2008-09, Vol.93 (5), p.1062-1081
• Main Authors: Cascio, Wayne F, Aguinis, Herman
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Academic discipline; Academic journals; Applied psychology; Biological and medical sciences; Content analysis; Experimentation; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; History, 20th Century; History, 21st Century; Human; Human capital; Humans; Industrial and Organizational Psychology; Industrial psychology; Miscellaneous; Occupational psychology; Personnel; Psychological research; Psychology; Psychology, Industrial - history; Psychology, Industrial - statistics & numerical data; Psychology, Social - history; Psychology, Social - statistics & numerical data; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Research - history; Research - statistics & numerical data; Research - trends; Scientific Communication; Scientists; Social change; Social conditions & trends; Social research; Studies; Trends; Universities; Work environment
• ISSN: 0021-9010; 1939-1854
• DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1062

The authors conducted a content analysis of all articles published in the Journal of Applied Psychology and Personnel Psychology from January 1963 to May 2007 ( N = 5,780) to identify the relative attention devoted to each of 15 broad topical areas and 50 more specific subareas in the field of industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology. Results revealed that (a) some areas have become more (or less) popular over time, whereas others have not changed much, and (b) there are some lagged relationships between important societal issues that involve people and work settings (i.e., human-capital trends) and I-O psychology research that addresses them. Also, much I-O psychology research does not address human-capital trends. Extrapolating results from the past 45 years to the next decade suggests that the field of I-O psychology is not likely to become more visible or more relevant to society at large or to achieve the lofty goals it has set for itself unless researchers, practitioners, universities, and professional organizations implement significant changes. In the aggregate, the changes address the broad challenge of how to narrow the academic-practitioner divide.