effect of residual feed intake classification on forage intake by grazing beef cows

• Published in: Journal of animal science 2008-10, Vol.86 (10), p.2670-2679
• Main Authors: Meyer, A.M, Kerley, M.S, Kallenbach, R.L
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal Feed; Animal Husbandry - methods; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; Animal productions; Animal reproduction; Animals; beef cows; Biological and medical sciences; body condition; Body Weight; calves; Cattle; Cattle - growth & development; cow feeding; Diet - veterinary; Dietary supplements; dry matter intake; Feed and pet food industries; feed conversion; feed intake; feed supplements; Feeding Behavior; Feeds; Female; Food industries; forage; forage quality; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; grazing; heat sums; liveweight gain; pregnancy; residual feed intake; Seasons; simulation models; stocking rate; Terrestrial animal productions; Vertebrates; Weight Gain
• ISSN: 0021-8812; 1525-3163
• DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0642

Although feed intake and efficiency differences in growing cattle of low and high residual feed intake (RFI) classification have been established, little is known about the difference in grazed forage intake between beef cows of known RFI classification. Two experiments were conducted using Hereford cows for which RFI had been determined as heifers using the GrowSafe 4000E feed intake system, after which heifers had been divided into thirds as low RFI, mid RFI, and high RFI. During Exp. 1, 2 replicates of low and high RFI cows (n = 7/replicate) in mid- to late-gestation were blocked to 1 of 4 non-endophyte-infected tall fescue paddocks (1.8 to 2.4 ha), which they grazed continuously for 84 d during summer. Using grazing exclosures, weekly rising plate meter readings, and forage harvests every 21 d, average forage DMI was calculated. Low and high RFI groups did not differ (P > 0.05) in BW change or BCS change over the trial (19.5 vs. 22.1 kg of BW gain and 0.11 vs. 0.10 BCS gain), but low RFI cows had a 21% numerically lower DMI than high RFI cows (12.4 vs. 15.6 kg/d; P = 0.23). The average area needed per paddock over the trial was similar for low and high RFI cows (1.71 vs. 1.82 ha; P = 0.35), and the average DM on offer over the trial was less for low RFI than for high RFI cows (4,215 vs. 4,376 kg; P = 0.06). During Exp. 2, 3 replicates of low and high RFI cows with their calves (n = 4 pair/replicate) strip-grazed stockpiled and early spring growth tall fescue paddocks (0.7 to 0.9 ha) for 60 d in late winter and early spring. Because of limiting forage availability and quality at trial initiation, cow-calf pairs were also fed 3.31 kg/pair of pelleted soyhulls daily. Pre- and post-grazed forage samples were harvested for 4 grazing periods, and forage growth was estimated using a growing degree days calculation and on-site weather station data. Performance did not differ (P > 0.05) between low and high RFI cows throughout the experiment (18.4 vs. 26.6 kg of BW gain and -0.04 vs. 0.15 BCS gain). Despite the utilization of forage offered being similar for low and high RFI cow-calf pairs (P > 0.05), low RFI cows and their calves had an 11% numerically lower DMI than high RFI pairs (12.5 vs. 14.1 kg/d; P = 0.12). We concluded that either no intake differences existed between low and high RFI cows or that current methodology and small animal numbers limited our ability to detect differences.