Loading…

Effect of pregnancy on the duration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses

Background This study sought to evaluate the effect of pregnancy on the rate of deterioration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses. To avoid the fetal and maternal risks associated with anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy, the use of bioprostheses has been advocated for young women with cardiac va...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American heart journal 1999-04, Vol.137 (4), p.714-720
Main Authors: Salazar, Eduardo, Espinola, Nilda, Román, Lydia, Casanova, José Miguel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-6fb3c6c95e243da6ca8c9a7c59f6f556be263eb61a3aa2fd8a5d3f4330a48d863
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-6fb3c6c95e243da6ca8c9a7c59f6f556be263eb61a3aa2fd8a5d3f4330a48d863
container_end_page 720
container_issue 4
container_start_page 714
container_title The American heart journal
container_volume 137
creator Salazar, Eduardo
Espinola, Nilda
Román, Lydia
Casanova, José Miguel
description Background This study sought to evaluate the effect of pregnancy on the rate of deterioration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses. To avoid the fetal and maternal risks associated with anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy, the use of bioprostheses has been advocated for young women with cardiac valve disease who may later wish to bear children. Several reports have suggested the probability of pregnancy-related accelerated deterioration of these valves. Methods and Results The incidence of prosthetic dysfunction and the freedom from deterioration were investigated in 48 women who had 58 pregnancies and in a control group of 167 patients in the same age range. There were 39 cases of prosthetic dysfunction (deaths plus reoperations resulting from valve failure): 12 in the pregnant group for a linearized rate of 3.5% ± 0.99% (SE) per patient-year and 27 in the control group or 3.4% ± 0.65% per patient-year ( P = not significant). The actuarial freedom from dysfunction was 90.4% (95% confidence interval 77.9 to 96.2) at 5 years and 77.0% (59.7 to 88.3) at 8 years for the pregnancy group and 86.3% (77.3 to 92.0) and 73.4% (56.6 to 84.8), respectively, for the control group ( P = not significant). In the Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, pregnancy did not influence dysfunction. A direct correlation was found between freedom from dysfunction and the patient’s age at surgery. Conclusions Pregnancy does not accelerate the rate of deterioration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses. It is more likely that biological valves deteriorate more rapidly in these patients because of their young age. (Am Heart J 1999;137:714-20.)
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0002-8703(99)70228-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69663222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002870399702280</els_id><sourcerecordid>69663222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-6fb3c6c95e243da6ca8c9a7c59f6f556be263eb61a3aa2fd8a5d3f4330a48d863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMo7vrxE5QeRPRQTZMmbU4isq6C4EE9h2ky0Ui3XZOusP_erLuoN0_DMM_MvDyEHBX0oqCFvHyilLK8rig_U-q8oozVOd0i44KqKpdVWW6T8Q8yInsxvqdWslruklFBE8W4GJPpxDk0Q9a7bB7wtYPOLLO-y4Y3zOwiwOBTk4ZN_-k7zOYYvIFgPbRZ4_t56GMiI8YDsuOgjXi4qfvk5XbyfHOXPzxO72-uH3JTCjnk0jXcSKMEspJbkAZqo6AyQjnphJANMsmxkQVwAOZsDcJyV3JOoaxtLfk-OV3fTa8_FhgHPfPRYNtCh_0iaqmk5IyxBIo1aFLGGNDpefAzCEtdUL0yqL8N6pUerZT-Nqhp2jvePFg0M7R_ttbKEnCyASAaaF1Iynz85SpRM7XCrtYYJhufHoOOxmNn0PqQhGvb-3-SfAHhbI2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69663222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of pregnancy on the duration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Salazar, Eduardo ; Espinola, Nilda ; Román, Lydia ; Casanova, José Miguel</creator><creatorcontrib>Salazar, Eduardo ; Espinola, Nilda ; Román, Lydia ; Casanova, José Miguel</creatorcontrib><description>Background This study sought to evaluate the effect of pregnancy on the rate of deterioration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses. To avoid the fetal and maternal risks associated with anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy, the use of bioprostheses has been advocated for young women with cardiac valve disease who may later wish to bear children. Several reports have suggested the probability of pregnancy-related accelerated deterioration of these valves. Methods and Results The incidence of prosthetic dysfunction and the freedom from deterioration were investigated in 48 women who had 58 pregnancies and in a control group of 167 patients in the same age range. There were 39 cases of prosthetic dysfunction (deaths plus reoperations resulting from valve failure): 12 in the pregnant group for a linearized rate of 3.5% ± 0.99% (SE) per patient-year and 27 in the control group or 3.4% ± 0.65% per patient-year ( P = not significant). The actuarial freedom from dysfunction was 90.4% (95% confidence interval 77.9 to 96.2) at 5 years and 77.0% (59.7 to 88.3) at 8 years for the pregnancy group and 86.3% (77.3 to 92.0) and 73.4% (56.6 to 84.8), respectively, for the control group ( P = not significant). In the Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, pregnancy did not influence dysfunction. A direct correlation was found between freedom from dysfunction and the patient’s age at surgery. Conclusions Pregnancy does not accelerate the rate of deterioration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses. It is more likely that biological valves deteriorate more rapidly in these patients because of their young age. (Am Heart J 1999;137:714-20.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8703</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6744</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8703(99)70228-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10097235</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AHJOA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - etiology ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Animals ; Anticoagulants - adverse effects ; Anticoagulants - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bioprosthesis - standards ; Case-Control Studies ; Cattle ; Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Heart Valve Diseases - mortality ; Heart Valve Diseases - therapy ; Heart Valve Prosthesis - standards ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular - mortality ; Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular - therapy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Reoperation ; Survival Analysis</subject><ispartof>The American heart journal, 1999-04, Vol.137 (4), p.714-720</ispartof><rights>1999 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-6fb3c6c95e243da6ca8c9a7c59f6f556be263eb61a3aa2fd8a5d3f4330a48d863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-6fb3c6c95e243da6ca8c9a7c59f6f556be263eb61a3aa2fd8a5d3f4330a48d863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1758295$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10097235$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salazar, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espinola, Nilda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Román, Lydia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casanova, José Miguel</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of pregnancy on the duration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses</title><title>The American heart journal</title><addtitle>Am Heart J</addtitle><description>Background This study sought to evaluate the effect of pregnancy on the rate of deterioration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses. To avoid the fetal and maternal risks associated with anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy, the use of bioprostheses has been advocated for young women with cardiac valve disease who may later wish to bear children. Several reports have suggested the probability of pregnancy-related accelerated deterioration of these valves. Methods and Results The incidence of prosthetic dysfunction and the freedom from deterioration were investigated in 48 women who had 58 pregnancies and in a control group of 167 patients in the same age range. There were 39 cases of prosthetic dysfunction (deaths plus reoperations resulting from valve failure): 12 in the pregnant group for a linearized rate of 3.5% ± 0.99% (SE) per patient-year and 27 in the control group or 3.4% ± 0.65% per patient-year ( P = not significant). The actuarial freedom from dysfunction was 90.4% (95% confidence interval 77.9 to 96.2) at 5 years and 77.0% (59.7 to 88.3) at 8 years for the pregnancy group and 86.3% (77.3 to 92.0) and 73.4% (56.6 to 84.8), respectively, for the control group ( P = not significant). In the Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, pregnancy did not influence dysfunction. A direct correlation was found between freedom from dysfunction and the patient’s age at surgery. Conclusions Pregnancy does not accelerate the rate of deterioration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses. It is more likely that biological valves deteriorate more rapidly in these patients because of their young age. (Am Heart J 1999;137:714-20.)</description><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - etiology</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anticoagulants - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bioprosthesis - standards</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Heart Valve Diseases - mortality</subject><subject>Heart Valve Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis - standards</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular - mortality</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular - therapy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><issn>0002-8703</issn><issn>1097-6744</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMo7vrxE5QeRPRQTZMmbU4isq6C4EE9h2ky0Ui3XZOusP_erLuoN0_DMM_MvDyEHBX0oqCFvHyilLK8rig_U-q8oozVOd0i44KqKpdVWW6T8Q8yInsxvqdWslruklFBE8W4GJPpxDk0Q9a7bB7wtYPOLLO-y4Y3zOwiwOBTk4ZN_-k7zOYYvIFgPbRZ4_t56GMiI8YDsuOgjXi4qfvk5XbyfHOXPzxO72-uH3JTCjnk0jXcSKMEspJbkAZqo6AyQjnphJANMsmxkQVwAOZsDcJyV3JOoaxtLfk-OV3fTa8_FhgHPfPRYNtCh_0iaqmk5IyxBIo1aFLGGNDpefAzCEtdUL0yqL8N6pUerZT-Nqhp2jvePFg0M7R_ttbKEnCyASAaaF1Iynz85SpRM7XCrtYYJhufHoOOxmNn0PqQhGvb-3-SfAHhbI2Q</recordid><startdate>19990401</startdate><enddate>19990401</enddate><creator>Salazar, Eduardo</creator><creator>Espinola, Nilda</creator><creator>Román, Lydia</creator><creator>Casanova, José Miguel</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990401</creationdate><title>Effect of pregnancy on the duration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses</title><author>Salazar, Eduardo ; Espinola, Nilda ; Román, Lydia ; Casanova, José Miguel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-6fb3c6c95e243da6ca8c9a7c59f6f556be263eb61a3aa2fd8a5d3f4330a48d863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Abortion, Spontaneous - etiology</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anticoagulants - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bioprosthesis - standards</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Heart Valve Diseases - mortality</topic><topic>Heart Valve Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis - standards</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular - mortality</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular - therapy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salazar, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espinola, Nilda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Román, Lydia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casanova, José Miguel</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American heart journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salazar, Eduardo</au><au>Espinola, Nilda</au><au>Román, Lydia</au><au>Casanova, José Miguel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of pregnancy on the duration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses</atitle><jtitle>The American heart journal</jtitle><addtitle>Am Heart J</addtitle><date>1999-04-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>714</spage><epage>720</epage><pages>714-720</pages><issn>0002-8703</issn><eissn>1097-6744</eissn><coden>AHJOA2</coden><abstract>Background This study sought to evaluate the effect of pregnancy on the rate of deterioration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses. To avoid the fetal and maternal risks associated with anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy, the use of bioprostheses has been advocated for young women with cardiac valve disease who may later wish to bear children. Several reports have suggested the probability of pregnancy-related accelerated deterioration of these valves. Methods and Results The incidence of prosthetic dysfunction and the freedom from deterioration were investigated in 48 women who had 58 pregnancies and in a control group of 167 patients in the same age range. There were 39 cases of prosthetic dysfunction (deaths plus reoperations resulting from valve failure): 12 in the pregnant group for a linearized rate of 3.5% ± 0.99% (SE) per patient-year and 27 in the control group or 3.4% ± 0.65% per patient-year ( P = not significant). The actuarial freedom from dysfunction was 90.4% (95% confidence interval 77.9 to 96.2) at 5 years and 77.0% (59.7 to 88.3) at 8 years for the pregnancy group and 86.3% (77.3 to 92.0) and 73.4% (56.6 to 84.8), respectively, for the control group ( P = not significant). In the Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, pregnancy did not influence dysfunction. A direct correlation was found between freedom from dysfunction and the patient’s age at surgery. Conclusions Pregnancy does not accelerate the rate of deterioration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses. It is more likely that biological valves deteriorate more rapidly in these patients because of their young age. (Am Heart J 1999;137:714-20.)</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>10097235</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-8703(99)70228-0</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-8703
ispartof The American heart journal, 1999-04, Vol.137 (4), p.714-720
issn 0002-8703
1097-6744
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69663222
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Abortion, Spontaneous - etiology
Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Animals
Anticoagulants - adverse effects
Anticoagulants - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Bioprosthesis - standards
Case-Control Studies
Cattle
Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy
Female
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Heart Valve Diseases - mortality
Heart Valve Diseases - therapy
Heart Valve Prosthesis - standards
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
Humans
Medical sciences
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular - mortality
Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular - therapy
Pregnancy Outcome
Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta
Proportional Hazards Models
Reoperation
Survival Analysis
title Effect of pregnancy on the duration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T23%3A17%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20pregnancy%20on%20the%20duration%20of%20bovine%20pericardial%20bioprostheses&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20heart%20journal&rft.au=Salazar,%20Eduardo&rft.date=1999-04-01&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=714&rft.epage=720&rft.pages=714-720&rft.issn=0002-8703&rft.eissn=1097-6744&rft.coden=AHJOA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-8703(99)70228-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69663222%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-6fb3c6c95e243da6ca8c9a7c59f6f556be263eb61a3aa2fd8a5d3f4330a48d863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69663222&rft_id=info:pmid/10097235&rfr_iscdi=true