Loading…
Effect of pregnancy on the duration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses
Background This study sought to evaluate the effect of pregnancy on the rate of deterioration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses. To avoid the fetal and maternal risks associated with anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy, the use of bioprostheses has been advocated for young women with cardiac va...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American heart journal 1999-04, Vol.137 (4), p.714-720 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-6fb3c6c95e243da6ca8c9a7c59f6f556be263eb61a3aa2fd8a5d3f4330a48d863 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-6fb3c6c95e243da6ca8c9a7c59f6f556be263eb61a3aa2fd8a5d3f4330a48d863 |
container_end_page | 720 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 714 |
container_title | The American heart journal |
container_volume | 137 |
creator | Salazar, Eduardo Espinola, Nilda Román, Lydia Casanova, José Miguel |
description | Background This study sought to evaluate the effect of pregnancy on the rate of deterioration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses. To avoid the fetal and maternal risks associated with anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy, the use of bioprostheses has been advocated for young women with cardiac valve disease who may later wish to bear children. Several reports have suggested the probability of pregnancy-related accelerated deterioration of these valves.
Methods and Results The incidence of prosthetic dysfunction and the freedom from deterioration were investigated in 48 women who had 58 pregnancies and in a control group of 167 patients in the same age range. There were 39 cases of prosthetic dysfunction (deaths plus reoperations resulting from valve failure): 12 in the pregnant group for a linearized rate of 3.5% ± 0.99% (SE) per patient-year and 27 in the control group or 3.4% ± 0.65% per patient-year (
P = not significant). The actuarial freedom from dysfunction was 90.4% (95% confidence interval 77.9 to 96.2) at 5 years and 77.0% (59.7 to 88.3) at 8 years for the pregnancy group and 86.3% (77.3 to 92.0) and 73.4% (56.6 to 84.8), respectively, for the control group (
P = not significant). In the Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, pregnancy did not influence dysfunction. A direct correlation was found between freedom from dysfunction and the patient’s age at surgery.
Conclusions Pregnancy does not accelerate the rate of deterioration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses. It is more likely that biological valves deteriorate more rapidly in these patients because of their young age. (Am Heart J 1999;137:714-20.) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0002-8703(99)70228-0 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69663222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002870399702280</els_id><sourcerecordid>69663222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-6fb3c6c95e243da6ca8c9a7c59f6f556be263eb61a3aa2fd8a5d3f4330a48d863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMo7vrxE5QeRPRQTZMmbU4isq6C4EE9h2ky0Ui3XZOusP_erLuoN0_DMM_MvDyEHBX0oqCFvHyilLK8rig_U-q8oozVOd0i44KqKpdVWW6T8Q8yInsxvqdWslruklFBE8W4GJPpxDk0Q9a7bB7wtYPOLLO-y4Y3zOwiwOBTk4ZN_-k7zOYYvIFgPbRZ4_t56GMiI8YDsuOgjXi4qfvk5XbyfHOXPzxO72-uH3JTCjnk0jXcSKMEspJbkAZqo6AyQjnphJANMsmxkQVwAOZsDcJyV3JOoaxtLfk-OV3fTa8_FhgHPfPRYNtCh_0iaqmk5IyxBIo1aFLGGNDpefAzCEtdUL0yqL8N6pUerZT-Nqhp2jvePFg0M7R_ttbKEnCyASAaaF1Iynz85SpRM7XCrtYYJhufHoOOxmNn0PqQhGvb-3-SfAHhbI2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69663222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of pregnancy on the duration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Salazar, Eduardo ; Espinola, Nilda ; Román, Lydia ; Casanova, José Miguel</creator><creatorcontrib>Salazar, Eduardo ; Espinola, Nilda ; Román, Lydia ; Casanova, José Miguel</creatorcontrib><description>Background This study sought to evaluate the effect of pregnancy on the rate of deterioration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses. To avoid the fetal and maternal risks associated with anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy, the use of bioprostheses has been advocated for young women with cardiac valve disease who may later wish to bear children. Several reports have suggested the probability of pregnancy-related accelerated deterioration of these valves.
Methods and Results The incidence of prosthetic dysfunction and the freedom from deterioration were investigated in 48 women who had 58 pregnancies and in a control group of 167 patients in the same age range. There were 39 cases of prosthetic dysfunction (deaths plus reoperations resulting from valve failure): 12 in the pregnant group for a linearized rate of 3.5% ± 0.99% (SE) per patient-year and 27 in the control group or 3.4% ± 0.65% per patient-year (
P = not significant). The actuarial freedom from dysfunction was 90.4% (95% confidence interval 77.9 to 96.2) at 5 years and 77.0% (59.7 to 88.3) at 8 years for the pregnancy group and 86.3% (77.3 to 92.0) and 73.4% (56.6 to 84.8), respectively, for the control group (
P = not significant). In the Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, pregnancy did not influence dysfunction. A direct correlation was found between freedom from dysfunction and the patient’s age at surgery.
Conclusions Pregnancy does not accelerate the rate of deterioration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses. It is more likely that biological valves deteriorate more rapidly in these patients because of their young age. (Am Heart J 1999;137:714-20.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8703</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6744</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8703(99)70228-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10097235</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AHJOA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - etiology ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Animals ; Anticoagulants - adverse effects ; Anticoagulants - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bioprosthesis - standards ; Case-Control Studies ; Cattle ; Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Heart Valve Diseases - mortality ; Heart Valve Diseases - therapy ; Heart Valve Prosthesis - standards ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular - mortality ; Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular - therapy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Reoperation ; Survival Analysis</subject><ispartof>The American heart journal, 1999-04, Vol.137 (4), p.714-720</ispartof><rights>1999 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-6fb3c6c95e243da6ca8c9a7c59f6f556be263eb61a3aa2fd8a5d3f4330a48d863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-6fb3c6c95e243da6ca8c9a7c59f6f556be263eb61a3aa2fd8a5d3f4330a48d863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1758295$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10097235$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salazar, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espinola, Nilda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Román, Lydia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casanova, José Miguel</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of pregnancy on the duration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses</title><title>The American heart journal</title><addtitle>Am Heart J</addtitle><description>Background This study sought to evaluate the effect of pregnancy on the rate of deterioration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses. To avoid the fetal and maternal risks associated with anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy, the use of bioprostheses has been advocated for young women with cardiac valve disease who may later wish to bear children. Several reports have suggested the probability of pregnancy-related accelerated deterioration of these valves.
Methods and Results The incidence of prosthetic dysfunction and the freedom from deterioration were investigated in 48 women who had 58 pregnancies and in a control group of 167 patients in the same age range. There were 39 cases of prosthetic dysfunction (deaths plus reoperations resulting from valve failure): 12 in the pregnant group for a linearized rate of 3.5% ± 0.99% (SE) per patient-year and 27 in the control group or 3.4% ± 0.65% per patient-year (
P = not significant). The actuarial freedom from dysfunction was 90.4% (95% confidence interval 77.9 to 96.2) at 5 years and 77.0% (59.7 to 88.3) at 8 years for the pregnancy group and 86.3% (77.3 to 92.0) and 73.4% (56.6 to 84.8), respectively, for the control group (
P = not significant). In the Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, pregnancy did not influence dysfunction. A direct correlation was found between freedom from dysfunction and the patient’s age at surgery.
Conclusions Pregnancy does not accelerate the rate of deterioration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses. It is more likely that biological valves deteriorate more rapidly in these patients because of their young age. (Am Heart J 1999;137:714-20.)</description><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - etiology</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anticoagulants - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bioprosthesis - standards</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Heart Valve Diseases - mortality</subject><subject>Heart Valve Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis - standards</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular - mortality</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular - therapy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><issn>0002-8703</issn><issn>1097-6744</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMo7vrxE5QeRPRQTZMmbU4isq6C4EE9h2ky0Ui3XZOusP_erLuoN0_DMM_MvDyEHBX0oqCFvHyilLK8rig_U-q8oozVOd0i44KqKpdVWW6T8Q8yInsxvqdWslruklFBE8W4GJPpxDk0Q9a7bB7wtYPOLLO-y4Y3zOwiwOBTk4ZN_-k7zOYYvIFgPbRZ4_t56GMiI8YDsuOgjXi4qfvk5XbyfHOXPzxO72-uH3JTCjnk0jXcSKMEspJbkAZqo6AyQjnphJANMsmxkQVwAOZsDcJyV3JOoaxtLfk-OV3fTa8_FhgHPfPRYNtCh_0iaqmk5IyxBIo1aFLGGNDpefAzCEtdUL0yqL8N6pUerZT-Nqhp2jvePFg0M7R_ttbKEnCyASAaaF1Iynz85SpRM7XCrtYYJhufHoOOxmNn0PqQhGvb-3-SfAHhbI2Q</recordid><startdate>19990401</startdate><enddate>19990401</enddate><creator>Salazar, Eduardo</creator><creator>Espinola, Nilda</creator><creator>Román, Lydia</creator><creator>Casanova, José Miguel</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990401</creationdate><title>Effect of pregnancy on the duration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses</title><author>Salazar, Eduardo ; Espinola, Nilda ; Román, Lydia ; Casanova, José Miguel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-6fb3c6c95e243da6ca8c9a7c59f6f556be263eb61a3aa2fd8a5d3f4330a48d863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Abortion, Spontaneous - etiology</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anticoagulants - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bioprosthesis - standards</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Heart Valve Diseases - mortality</topic><topic>Heart Valve Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis - standards</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular - mortality</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular - therapy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salazar, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espinola, Nilda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Román, Lydia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casanova, José Miguel</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American heart journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salazar, Eduardo</au><au>Espinola, Nilda</au><au>Román, Lydia</au><au>Casanova, José Miguel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of pregnancy on the duration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses</atitle><jtitle>The American heart journal</jtitle><addtitle>Am Heart J</addtitle><date>1999-04-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>714</spage><epage>720</epage><pages>714-720</pages><issn>0002-8703</issn><eissn>1097-6744</eissn><coden>AHJOA2</coden><abstract>Background This study sought to evaluate the effect of pregnancy on the rate of deterioration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses. To avoid the fetal and maternal risks associated with anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy, the use of bioprostheses has been advocated for young women with cardiac valve disease who may later wish to bear children. Several reports have suggested the probability of pregnancy-related accelerated deterioration of these valves.
Methods and Results The incidence of prosthetic dysfunction and the freedom from deterioration were investigated in 48 women who had 58 pregnancies and in a control group of 167 patients in the same age range. There were 39 cases of prosthetic dysfunction (deaths plus reoperations resulting from valve failure): 12 in the pregnant group for a linearized rate of 3.5% ± 0.99% (SE) per patient-year and 27 in the control group or 3.4% ± 0.65% per patient-year (
P = not significant). The actuarial freedom from dysfunction was 90.4% (95% confidence interval 77.9 to 96.2) at 5 years and 77.0% (59.7 to 88.3) at 8 years for the pregnancy group and 86.3% (77.3 to 92.0) and 73.4% (56.6 to 84.8), respectively, for the control group (
P = not significant). In the Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, pregnancy did not influence dysfunction. A direct correlation was found between freedom from dysfunction and the patient’s age at surgery.
Conclusions Pregnancy does not accelerate the rate of deterioration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses. It is more likely that biological valves deteriorate more rapidly in these patients because of their young age. (Am Heart J 1999;137:714-20.)</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>10097235</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-8703(99)70228-0</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-8703 |
ispartof | The American heart journal, 1999-04, Vol.137 (4), p.714-720 |
issn | 0002-8703 1097-6744 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69663222 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Abortion, Spontaneous - etiology Adolescent Adult Age Factors Animals Anticoagulants - adverse effects Anticoagulants - therapeutic use Biological and medical sciences Bioprosthesis - standards Case-Control Studies Cattle Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy Female Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Heart Valve Diseases - mortality Heart Valve Diseases - therapy Heart Valve Prosthesis - standards Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation Humans Medical sciences Pregnancy Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular - mortality Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular - therapy Pregnancy Outcome Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta Proportional Hazards Models Reoperation Survival Analysis |
title | Effect of pregnancy on the duration of bovine pericardial bioprostheses |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T23%3A17%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20pregnancy%20on%20the%20duration%20of%20bovine%20pericardial%20bioprostheses&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20heart%20journal&rft.au=Salazar,%20Eduardo&rft.date=1999-04-01&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=714&rft.epage=720&rft.pages=714-720&rft.issn=0002-8703&rft.eissn=1097-6744&rft.coden=AHJOA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-8703(99)70228-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69663222%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-6fb3c6c95e243da6ca8c9a7c59f6f556be263eb61a3aa2fd8a5d3f4330a48d863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69663222&rft_id=info:pmid/10097235&rfr_iscdi=true |