Loading…

The bare bones of object recognition: implications from a case of object recognition impairment

Three experiments were designed to investigate the performance of a patient (RK) who could name objects when presented in conventional views but showed catastrophic failures in identification from unconventional views. The aim of all three experiments was to assess the properties of the central repr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neuropsychologia 1999-03, Vol.37 (3), p.279-292
Main Authors: Davidoff, J, Warrington, E.K
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e8d4f51ff2c4624f20052ff215b7956f9d262873c9640c86b2e367f480f2c4703
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e8d4f51ff2c4624f20052ff215b7956f9d262873c9640c86b2e367f480f2c4703
container_end_page 292
container_issue 3
container_start_page 279
container_title Neuropsychologia
container_volume 37
creator Davidoff, J
Warrington, E.K
description Three experiments were designed to investigate the performance of a patient (RK) who could name objects when presented in conventional views but showed catastrophic failures in identification from unconventional views. The aim of all three experiments was to assess the properties of the central representations that allow recognition of objects presented in conventional but not unconventional views. All three experiments showed that RK had problems in object identification not apparent from his naming performance. In the first experiment, RK was found to be extremely impaired at recognising the parts of objects even though he could name the whole object. In the second experiment, alterations in colour, shape and parts of objects were undetected in stimuli that he could name. In the third experiment, RK showed considerable difficulty with mirror-images and inversion tasks. The explanation for RKs impaired object recognition could not be attributed to defects to his early visual processing. We argue that RKs recognition is achieved through abstract (object-centred) representations that are global rather than local, and quite independent of their spatial framework. These abstract representations we take to be the essential bare bones for object recognition.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00076-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69679644</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0028393298000761</els_id><sourcerecordid>69679644</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e8d4f51ff2c4624f20052ff215b7956f9d262873c9640c86b2e367f480f2c4703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LwzAYh4Mobk4_gpKDiB6qSZqmrReR4T8YeHCeQ5q-0UjbzKQT_Pam21APgpeEF57fm18ehA4pOaeEiosnQliRpGXKTsvijBCSi4RuoTEt8jRJM8q30fgbGaG9EN4ixDNW7KJR3FCWgrMxkvNXwJXy8XAdBOwMdtUb6B570O6ls7113SW27aKxWg1DwMa7FiusVYC_-QFX1rfQ9ftox6gmwMHmnqDn25v59D6ZPd49TK9nieaZ6BMoam4yagzTXDBuGCEZixPNqrzMhClrJlj8mY6tiS5ExSAVueEFGRI5SSfoZL134d37EkIvWxs0NI3qwC2DFKXIY5ZHMFuD2rsQPBi58LZV_lNSIgezcmVWDtpkWciVWUlj7mjzwLJqof6VWquMwPEGUEGrxnjVaRt-uDxWYGnErtYYRBsfFrwM2kKnobbRYC9rZ_9p8gXli5Sl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69679644</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The bare bones of object recognition: implications from a case of object recognition impairment</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Davidoff, J ; Warrington, E.K</creator><creatorcontrib>Davidoff, J ; Warrington, E.K</creatorcontrib><description>Three experiments were designed to investigate the performance of a patient (RK) who could name objects when presented in conventional views but showed catastrophic failures in identification from unconventional views. The aim of all three experiments was to assess the properties of the central representations that allow recognition of objects presented in conventional but not unconventional views. All three experiments showed that RK had problems in object identification not apparent from his naming performance. In the first experiment, RK was found to be extremely impaired at recognising the parts of objects even though he could name the whole object. In the second experiment, alterations in colour, shape and parts of objects were undetected in stimuli that he could name. In the third experiment, RK showed considerable difficulty with mirror-images and inversion tasks. The explanation for RKs impaired object recognition could not be attributed to defects to his early visual processing. We argue that RKs recognition is achieved through abstract (object-centred) representations that are global rather than local, and quite independent of their spatial framework. These abstract representations we take to be the essential bare bones for object recognition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00076-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10199642</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NUPSA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cerebral Cortex - blood supply ; Cerebral Cortex - pathology ; Cerebrovascular Disorders - complications ; Cerebrovascular Disorders - psychology ; Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes ; Humans ; Language ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Memory ; Memory Disorders - psychology ; Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) ; Neurology ; Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Visual Perception</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychologia, 1999-03, Vol.37 (3), p.279-292</ispartof><rights>1999 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e8d4f51ff2c4624f20052ff215b7956f9d262873c9640c86b2e367f480f2c4703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e8d4f51ff2c4624f20052ff215b7956f9d262873c9640c86b2e367f480f2c4703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1769623$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10199642$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davidoff, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warrington, E.K</creatorcontrib><title>The bare bones of object recognition: implications from a case of object recognition impairment</title><title>Neuropsychologia</title><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><description>Three experiments were designed to investigate the performance of a patient (RK) who could name objects when presented in conventional views but showed catastrophic failures in identification from unconventional views. The aim of all three experiments was to assess the properties of the central representations that allow recognition of objects presented in conventional but not unconventional views. All three experiments showed that RK had problems in object identification not apparent from his naming performance. In the first experiment, RK was found to be extremely impaired at recognising the parts of objects even though he could name the whole object. In the second experiment, alterations in colour, shape and parts of objects were undetected in stimuli that he could name. In the third experiment, RK showed considerable difficulty with mirror-images and inversion tasks. The explanation for RKs impaired object recognition could not be attributed to defects to his early visual processing. We argue that RKs recognition is achieved through abstract (object-centred) representations that are global rather than local, and quite independent of their spatial framework. These abstract representations we take to be the essential bare bones for object recognition.</description><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - blood supply</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - pathology</subject><subject>Cerebrovascular Disorders - complications</subject><subject>Cerebrovascular Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><issn>0028-3932</issn><issn>1873-3514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9LwzAYh4Mobk4_gpKDiB6qSZqmrReR4T8YeHCeQ5q-0UjbzKQT_Pam21APgpeEF57fm18ehA4pOaeEiosnQliRpGXKTsvijBCSi4RuoTEt8jRJM8q30fgbGaG9EN4ixDNW7KJR3FCWgrMxkvNXwJXy8XAdBOwMdtUb6B570O6ls7113SW27aKxWg1DwMa7FiusVYC_-QFX1rfQ9ftox6gmwMHmnqDn25v59D6ZPd49TK9nieaZ6BMoam4yagzTXDBuGCEZixPNqrzMhClrJlj8mY6tiS5ExSAVueEFGRI5SSfoZL134d37EkIvWxs0NI3qwC2DFKXIY5ZHMFuD2rsQPBi58LZV_lNSIgezcmVWDtpkWciVWUlj7mjzwLJqof6VWquMwPEGUEGrxnjVaRt-uDxWYGnErtYYRBsfFrwM2kKnobbRYC9rZ_9p8gXli5Sl</recordid><startdate>19990301</startdate><enddate>19990301</enddate><creator>Davidoff, J</creator><creator>Warrington, E.K</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990301</creationdate><title>The bare bones of object recognition: implications from a case of object recognition impairment</title><author>Davidoff, J ; Warrington, E.K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e8d4f51ff2c4624f20052ff215b7956f9d262873c9640c86b2e367f480f2c4703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - blood supply</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - pathology</topic><topic>Cerebrovascular Disorders - complications</topic><topic>Cerebrovascular Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davidoff, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warrington, E.K</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davidoff, J</au><au>Warrington, E.K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The bare bones of object recognition: implications from a case of object recognition impairment</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><date>1999-03-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>292</epage><pages>279-292</pages><issn>0028-3932</issn><eissn>1873-3514</eissn><coden>NUPSA6</coden><abstract>Three experiments were designed to investigate the performance of a patient (RK) who could name objects when presented in conventional views but showed catastrophic failures in identification from unconventional views. The aim of all three experiments was to assess the properties of the central representations that allow recognition of objects presented in conventional but not unconventional views. All three experiments showed that RK had problems in object identification not apparent from his naming performance. In the first experiment, RK was found to be extremely impaired at recognising the parts of objects even though he could name the whole object. In the second experiment, alterations in colour, shape and parts of objects were undetected in stimuli that he could name. In the third experiment, RK showed considerable difficulty with mirror-images and inversion tasks. The explanation for RKs impaired object recognition could not be attributed to defects to his early visual processing. We argue that RKs recognition is achieved through abstract (object-centred) representations that are global rather than local, and quite independent of their spatial framework. These abstract representations we take to be the essential bare bones for object recognition.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>10199642</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00076-1</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-3932
ispartof Neuropsychologia, 1999-03, Vol.37 (3), p.279-292
issn 0028-3932
1873-3514
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69679644
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Cerebral Cortex - blood supply
Cerebral Cortex - pathology
Cerebrovascular Disorders - complications
Cerebrovascular Disorders - psychology
Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes
Humans
Language
Male
Medical sciences
Memory
Memory Disorders - psychology
Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)
Neurology
Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Visual Perception
title The bare bones of object recognition: implications from a case of object recognition impairment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A51%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20bare%20bones%20of%20object%20recognition:%20implications%20from%20a%20case%20of%20object%20recognition%20impairment&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychologia&rft.au=Davidoff,%20J&rft.date=1999-03-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=292&rft.pages=279-292&rft.issn=0028-3932&rft.eissn=1873-3514&rft.coden=NUPSA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00076-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69679644%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e8d4f51ff2c4624f20052ff215b7956f9d262873c9640c86b2e367f480f2c4703%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69679644&rft_id=info:pmid/10199642&rfr_iscdi=true