Loading…
The bare bones of object recognition: implications from a case of object recognition impairment
Three experiments were designed to investigate the performance of a patient (RK) who could name objects when presented in conventional views but showed catastrophic failures in identification from unconventional views. The aim of all three experiments was to assess the properties of the central repr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Neuropsychologia 1999-03, Vol.37 (3), p.279-292 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e8d4f51ff2c4624f20052ff215b7956f9d262873c9640c86b2e367f480f2c4703 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e8d4f51ff2c4624f20052ff215b7956f9d262873c9640c86b2e367f480f2c4703 |
container_end_page | 292 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 279 |
container_title | Neuropsychologia |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Davidoff, J Warrington, E.K |
description | Three experiments were designed to investigate the performance of a patient (RK) who could name objects when presented in conventional views but showed catastrophic failures in identification from unconventional views. The aim of all three experiments was to assess the properties of the central representations that allow recognition of objects presented in conventional but not unconventional views. All three experiments showed that RK had problems in object identification not apparent from his naming performance. In the first experiment, RK was found to be extremely impaired at recognising the parts of objects even though he could name the whole object. In the second experiment, alterations in colour, shape and parts of objects were undetected in stimuli that he could name. In the third experiment, RK showed considerable difficulty with mirror-images and inversion tasks. The explanation for RKs impaired object recognition could not be attributed to defects to his early visual processing. We argue that RKs recognition is achieved through abstract (object-centred) representations that are global rather than local, and quite independent of their spatial framework. These abstract representations we take to be the essential bare bones for object recognition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00076-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69679644</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0028393298000761</els_id><sourcerecordid>69679644</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e8d4f51ff2c4624f20052ff215b7956f9d262873c9640c86b2e367f480f2c4703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LwzAYh4Mobk4_gpKDiB6qSZqmrReR4T8YeHCeQ5q-0UjbzKQT_Pam21APgpeEF57fm18ehA4pOaeEiosnQliRpGXKTsvijBCSi4RuoTEt8jRJM8q30fgbGaG9EN4ixDNW7KJR3FCWgrMxkvNXwJXy8XAdBOwMdtUb6B570O6ls7113SW27aKxWg1DwMa7FiusVYC_-QFX1rfQ9ftox6gmwMHmnqDn25v59D6ZPd49TK9nieaZ6BMoam4yagzTXDBuGCEZixPNqrzMhClrJlj8mY6tiS5ExSAVueEFGRI5SSfoZL134d37EkIvWxs0NI3qwC2DFKXIY5ZHMFuD2rsQPBi58LZV_lNSIgezcmVWDtpkWciVWUlj7mjzwLJqof6VWquMwPEGUEGrxnjVaRt-uDxWYGnErtYYRBsfFrwM2kKnobbRYC9rZ_9p8gXli5Sl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69679644</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The bare bones of object recognition: implications from a case of object recognition impairment</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Davidoff, J ; Warrington, E.K</creator><creatorcontrib>Davidoff, J ; Warrington, E.K</creatorcontrib><description>Three experiments were designed to investigate the performance of a patient (RK) who could name objects when presented in conventional views but showed catastrophic failures in identification from unconventional views. The aim of all three experiments was to assess the properties of the central representations that allow recognition of objects presented in conventional but not unconventional views. All three experiments showed that RK had problems in object identification not apparent from his naming performance. In the first experiment, RK was found to be extremely impaired at recognising the parts of objects even though he could name the whole object. In the second experiment, alterations in colour, shape and parts of objects were undetected in stimuli that he could name. In the third experiment, RK showed considerable difficulty with mirror-images and inversion tasks. The explanation for RKs impaired object recognition could not be attributed to defects to his early visual processing. We argue that RKs recognition is achieved through abstract (object-centred) representations that are global rather than local, and quite independent of their spatial framework. These abstract representations we take to be the essential bare bones for object recognition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00076-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10199642</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NUPSA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cerebral Cortex - blood supply ; Cerebral Cortex - pathology ; Cerebrovascular Disorders - complications ; Cerebrovascular Disorders - psychology ; Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes ; Humans ; Language ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Memory ; Memory Disorders - psychology ; Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) ; Neurology ; Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Visual Perception</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychologia, 1999-03, Vol.37 (3), p.279-292</ispartof><rights>1999 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e8d4f51ff2c4624f20052ff215b7956f9d262873c9640c86b2e367f480f2c4703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e8d4f51ff2c4624f20052ff215b7956f9d262873c9640c86b2e367f480f2c4703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1769623$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10199642$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davidoff, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warrington, E.K</creatorcontrib><title>The bare bones of object recognition: implications from a case of object recognition impairment</title><title>Neuropsychologia</title><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><description>Three experiments were designed to investigate the performance of a patient (RK) who could name objects when presented in conventional views but showed catastrophic failures in identification from unconventional views. The aim of all three experiments was to assess the properties of the central representations that allow recognition of objects presented in conventional but not unconventional views. All three experiments showed that RK had problems in object identification not apparent from his naming performance. In the first experiment, RK was found to be extremely impaired at recognising the parts of objects even though he could name the whole object. In the second experiment, alterations in colour, shape and parts of objects were undetected in stimuli that he could name. In the third experiment, RK showed considerable difficulty with mirror-images and inversion tasks. The explanation for RKs impaired object recognition could not be attributed to defects to his early visual processing. We argue that RKs recognition is achieved through abstract (object-centred) representations that are global rather than local, and quite independent of their spatial framework. These abstract representations we take to be the essential bare bones for object recognition.</description><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - blood supply</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - pathology</subject><subject>Cerebrovascular Disorders - complications</subject><subject>Cerebrovascular Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><issn>0028-3932</issn><issn>1873-3514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9LwzAYh4Mobk4_gpKDiB6qSZqmrReR4T8YeHCeQ5q-0UjbzKQT_Pam21APgpeEF57fm18ehA4pOaeEiosnQliRpGXKTsvijBCSi4RuoTEt8jRJM8q30fgbGaG9EN4ixDNW7KJR3FCWgrMxkvNXwJXy8XAdBOwMdtUb6B570O6ls7113SW27aKxWg1DwMa7FiusVYC_-QFX1rfQ9ftox6gmwMHmnqDn25v59D6ZPd49TK9nieaZ6BMoam4yagzTXDBuGCEZixPNqrzMhClrJlj8mY6tiS5ExSAVueEFGRI5SSfoZL134d37EkIvWxs0NI3qwC2DFKXIY5ZHMFuD2rsQPBi58LZV_lNSIgezcmVWDtpkWciVWUlj7mjzwLJqof6VWquMwPEGUEGrxnjVaRt-uDxWYGnErtYYRBsfFrwM2kKnobbRYC9rZ_9p8gXli5Sl</recordid><startdate>19990301</startdate><enddate>19990301</enddate><creator>Davidoff, J</creator><creator>Warrington, E.K</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990301</creationdate><title>The bare bones of object recognition: implications from a case of object recognition impairment</title><author>Davidoff, J ; Warrington, E.K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e8d4f51ff2c4624f20052ff215b7956f9d262873c9640c86b2e367f480f2c4703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - blood supply</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - pathology</topic><topic>Cerebrovascular Disorders - complications</topic><topic>Cerebrovascular Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davidoff, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warrington, E.K</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davidoff, J</au><au>Warrington, E.K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The bare bones of object recognition: implications from a case of object recognition impairment</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><date>1999-03-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>292</epage><pages>279-292</pages><issn>0028-3932</issn><eissn>1873-3514</eissn><coden>NUPSA6</coden><abstract>Three experiments were designed to investigate the performance of a patient (RK) who could name objects when presented in conventional views but showed catastrophic failures in identification from unconventional views. The aim of all three experiments was to assess the properties of the central representations that allow recognition of objects presented in conventional but not unconventional views. All three experiments showed that RK had problems in object identification not apparent from his naming performance. In the first experiment, RK was found to be extremely impaired at recognising the parts of objects even though he could name the whole object. In the second experiment, alterations in colour, shape and parts of objects were undetected in stimuli that he could name. In the third experiment, RK showed considerable difficulty with mirror-images and inversion tasks. The explanation for RKs impaired object recognition could not be attributed to defects to his early visual processing. We argue that RKs recognition is achieved through abstract (object-centred) representations that are global rather than local, and quite independent of their spatial framework. These abstract representations we take to be the essential bare bones for object recognition.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>10199642</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00076-1</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-3932 |
ispartof | Neuropsychologia, 1999-03, Vol.37 (3), p.279-292 |
issn | 0028-3932 1873-3514 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69679644 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Adult and adolescent clinical studies Aged Biological and medical sciences Cerebral Cortex - blood supply Cerebral Cortex - pathology Cerebrovascular Disorders - complications Cerebrovascular Disorders - psychology Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes Humans Language Male Medical sciences Memory Memory Disorders - psychology Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) Neurology Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Visual Perception |
title | The bare bones of object recognition: implications from a case of object recognition impairment |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A51%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20bare%20bones%20of%20object%20recognition:%20implications%20from%20a%20case%20of%20object%20recognition%20impairment&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychologia&rft.au=Davidoff,%20J&rft.date=1999-03-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=292&rft.pages=279-292&rft.issn=0028-3932&rft.eissn=1873-3514&rft.coden=NUPSA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00076-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69679644%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e8d4f51ff2c4624f20052ff215b7956f9d262873c9640c86b2e367f480f2c4703%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69679644&rft_id=info:pmid/10199642&rfr_iscdi=true |