Influence of Age on the Clinical Presentation of Prolactinomas in Male Patients

• Published in: Gerontology (Basel) 1999-05, Vol.45 (3), p.160-164
• Main Authors: Delgrange, Etienne, Maiter, Dominique, Donckier, Julian, Tourniaire, Jacques
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adrenocorticotropic Hormone - blood; Adult; Aged; Aging - physiology; Biological and medical sciences; Clinical Section; Dopamine Agonists - administration & dosage; Endocrinopathies; Ergolines - administration & dosage; Humans; Hypopituitarism - diagnostic imaging; Hypopituitarism - drug therapy; Hypothalamus. Hypophysis. Epiphysis (diseases); Luteinizing Hormone - blood; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Non tumoral diseases. Target tissue resistance. Benign neoplasms; Pituitary Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Pituitary Neoplasms - drug therapy; Prolactin - blood; Prolactinoma - diagnostic imaging; Prolactinoma - drug therapy; Radiography; Testosterone - blood
• ISSN: 0304-324X; 1423-0003
• DOI: 10.1159/000022079

Objective: Secreting pituitary adenomas are usually not considered a disease of older people. However, in male patients, prolactin-secreting pituitary tumours occur at a similar frequency throughout the entire life span, giving the opportunity to study in this gender the influence of age on the clinical presentation and response to treatment of these tumours. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study including 9 male patients aged ≥60 (range 60–73) years and 10 aged ≤30 (range 17–30) years presenting with a prolactinoma in order to compare clinical presentation, results of pituitary function tests, and response to dopamine agonist therapy between older and younger patients. Results: Four of the 9 elderly as well as the 10 younger patients came to medical attention for typical features of male prolactinomas including visual field defect in 5 (2 elderly), headaches in 2 (1 elderly), impotence in 3 (1 elderly), gynaecomastia and/or galactorrhoea in 2, and arrested puberty in 2. The remaining 5 older people presented for other various reasons: symptoms related to cortisol deficiency in 2, lethargy with clinical signs of hypopituitarism in 1, spontaneous multiple vertebral fractures in 1, and incidental discovery of a pituitary mass in 1. Basal prolactin levels (3,051±4,151 vs. 3,365 ± 4,949 µg/l) and mean tumour diameter (30 ± 16 vs. 25 ± 13 mm) were similar in old and young patients. Cortisol deficiency was significantly more frequent in the elderly (n = 6) than in the young (n = 1) patients (p 0.02, Fisher’s exact test). Secondary hypothyroidism was found in 2 elderly only, but not in young patients. Sixteen patients (8 elderly) received bromocriptine therapy for at least 6 months with a good tolerance. Normalization of the prolactin levels was achieved in 6 older (75%) and 4 younger patients (50%). Conclusions: The presentation of a prolactinoma in the elderly man is very heterogeneous and can be misleading. At the time of diagnosis, hypopituitarism is more frequent among older than younger patients despite a similar tumour size. We found dopamine agonists equally effective in the elderly.