Reinterventions for Specific Technique-Related Complications of Stapled Haemorrhoidopexy (SH): A Critical Appraisal

• Published in: Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2008-11, Vol.12 (11), p.1866-1873
• Main Authors: Sileri, Pierpaolo, Stolfi, Vito Maria, Franceschilli, Luana, Perrone, Federico, Patrizi, Lodovico, Gaspari, Achille Lucio
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 2008 Plenary Presentation; Adult; Aged; Cohort Studies; Digestive System Surgical Procedures - adverse effects; Digestive System Surgical Procedures - methods; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gastroenterology; Hemorrhoids - complications; Hemorrhoids - surgery; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - instrumentation; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods; Pain; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative - physiopathology; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology; Proctoscopy - adverse effects; Proctoscopy - methods; Recurrence; Reoperation - statistics & numerical data; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Surgery; Sutures; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1091-255X; 1873-4626
• DOI: 10.1007/s11605-008-0670-0

Introduction Stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH) is an attractive alternative to conventional haemorrhoidectomy (CH) because of reduced pain and earlier return to normal activities. However, complication rates are as high as 31%. Although some complications are similar to CH, most are specifically technique-related. In this prospective audit, we report our experience with the management of some of these complications. Methods Data on patients undergoing SH at our unit or referred to us are prospectively entered in a database. The onset or duration of specific SH-related complications as well as reinterventions for failed or complicated SH was recorded. Results From 1/03 to 10/07, 110 patients underwent SH, while 17 patients were referred after complicated/failed SH. Overall early and late complication rates after SH were 12.7% and 27.2%, respectively. Overall reintervention rate was 9.1%. Among the referred SH-group, one patient underwent Hartmann’s procedure because of rectal perforation. The remaining 16 patients experienced at least one of the following: recurrence, urgency, frequency, severe persistent anal pain, colicky abdominal pain, anal fissure and stenosis. Four patients underwent CH with regular postoperative recovery. Two patients underwent exploration under anaesthesia because of persisting pain. One patient underwent anoplasty. Conclusions SH presents unusual and challenging complications. Abuses should be minimized and longer-term studies are needed to further clarify its role.