Loading…

Measuring developmental and functional status in children with disabilities

This study compared performance on the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIMTM), the Battelle Developmental Inventory Screening Test (BDIST), and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS) in children with developmental disabilities. The three instruments were administered to 205 ch...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Developmental medicine and child neurology 1999-03, Vol.41 (3), p.186-194, Article S0012162299000377
Main Authors: Ottenbacher, Kenneth J, Msall, Michael E, Lyon, Nancy, Duffy, Linda C, Granger, Carl V, Braun, Susan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-6b0e81a0c35973b4f10ed211c2d9a5e5d64e953466c05b634faf85a8efbe64f3
cites
container_end_page 194
container_issue 3
container_start_page 186
container_title Developmental medicine and child neurology
container_volume 41
creator Ottenbacher, Kenneth J
Msall, Michael E
Lyon, Nancy
Duffy, Linda C
Granger, Carl V
Braun, Susan
description This study compared performance on the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIMTM), the Battelle Developmental Inventory Screening Test (BDIST), and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS) in children with developmental disabilities. The three instruments were administered to 205 children with identified disabilities. All 205 children were tested using the WeeFIM instrument. The BDIST was administered to 101 children and the VABS to the remaining 104 children. Administration was counterbalanced and randomized across all three instruments. A proportional sampling plan was used to select the 205 children, who ranged in age from 11 to 87 months. A variety of medical diagnoses and levels of severity of motor, cognitive, and communication impairments were systematically included in the sample. Correlations (r) among subscales for all three instruments ranged from 0.42 to 0.92. Correlations for total scores ranged from 0.72 to 0.94. Analyses of potential moderator variables found no significant relation between age and severity of disability (r=0.05) or between socioeconomic status (SES) and severity of disability (r=0.21). Correlations with age were strongest for those subscale scores involving gross and fine motor skills. Correlations with SES and subscale scores ranged from 0.03 to 0.18. The three instruments provide important information regarding childhood performance in motor, self-care, communicative, cognitive, and social skills. The WeeFIM instrument requires less administration time and provides information directly relevant to evaluating functional outcomes for children with disabilities and their families.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0012162299000377
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69704543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0012162299000377</cupid><sourcerecordid>69704543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-6b0e81a0c35973b4f10ed211c2d9a5e5d64e953466c05b634faf85a8efbe64f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBfZk7fVZPOxzVGKX1jxYO9LNpm0KbvZmmQV_727tAdBEAaG4X3mPTwIXRJ8QzApb98xJgURRSElxpiW5RGaEiZkPi-ZPEbTMc7HfILOYtyOjODsFE0ILobhZIpeXkHFPji_zgx8QtPtWvBJNZnyJrO918l1fjhjUqmPmfOZ3rjGBPDZl0ubzLioate45CCeoxOrmggXhz1Dq4f71eIpX749Pi_ulrmmjKRc1BjmRGFNuSxpzSzBYApCdGGk4sCNYCA5ZUJozGtBmVV2ztUcbA2CWTpD1_vaXeg-eoipal3U0DTKQ9fHSsgSM87oAJI9qEMXYwBb7YJrVfiuCK5GgdUfgcPP1aG8r1swvz72xgaAHkpVWwdn1lBtuz4MjuI_tT-dX3sT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69704543</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring developmental and functional status in children with disabilities</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Ottenbacher, Kenneth J ; Msall, Michael E ; Lyon, Nancy ; Duffy, Linda C ; Granger, Carl V ; Braun, Susan</creator><creatorcontrib>Ottenbacher, Kenneth J ; Msall, Michael E ; Lyon, Nancy ; Duffy, Linda C ; Granger, Carl V ; Braun, Susan</creatorcontrib><description>This study compared performance on the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIMTM), the Battelle Developmental Inventory Screening Test (BDIST), and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS) in children with developmental disabilities. The three instruments were administered to 205 children with identified disabilities. All 205 children were tested using the WeeFIM instrument. The BDIST was administered to 101 children and the VABS to the remaining 104 children. Administration was counterbalanced and randomized across all three instruments. A proportional sampling plan was used to select the 205 children, who ranged in age from 11 to 87 months. A variety of medical diagnoses and levels of severity of motor, cognitive, and communication impairments were systematically included in the sample. Correlations (r) among subscales for all three instruments ranged from 0.42 to 0.92. Correlations for total scores ranged from 0.72 to 0.94. Analyses of potential moderator variables found no significant relation between age and severity of disability (r=0.05) or between socioeconomic status (SES) and severity of disability (r=0.21). Correlations with age were strongest for those subscale scores involving gross and fine motor skills. Correlations with SES and subscale scores ranged from 0.03 to 0.18. The three instruments provide important information regarding childhood performance in motor, self-care, communicative, cognitive, and social skills. The WeeFIM instrument requires less administration time and provides information directly relevant to evaluating functional outcomes for children with disabilities and their families.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-1622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8749</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0012162299000377</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10210251</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Child ; Child, Preschool ; Cognition Disorders - diagnosis ; Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis ; Health Status ; Humans ; Infant ; Motor Skills Disorders - diagnosis ; Original Articles ; Severity of Illness Index ; Social Class</subject><ispartof>Developmental medicine and child neurology, 1999-03, Vol.41 (3), p.186-194, Article S0012162299000377</ispartof><rights>1999 Mac Keith Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-6b0e81a0c35973b4f10ed211c2d9a5e5d64e953466c05b634faf85a8efbe64f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10210251$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ottenbacher, Kenneth J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Msall, Michael E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyon, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffy, Linda C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granger, Carl V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, Susan</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring developmental and functional status in children with disabilities</title><title>Developmental medicine and child neurology</title><addtitle>Dev. med. child neurol</addtitle><description>This study compared performance on the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIMTM), the Battelle Developmental Inventory Screening Test (BDIST), and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS) in children with developmental disabilities. The three instruments were administered to 205 children with identified disabilities. All 205 children were tested using the WeeFIM instrument. The BDIST was administered to 101 children and the VABS to the remaining 104 children. Administration was counterbalanced and randomized across all three instruments. A proportional sampling plan was used to select the 205 children, who ranged in age from 11 to 87 months. A variety of medical diagnoses and levels of severity of motor, cognitive, and communication impairments were systematically included in the sample. Correlations (r) among subscales for all three instruments ranged from 0.42 to 0.92. Correlations for total scores ranged from 0.72 to 0.94. Analyses of potential moderator variables found no significant relation between age and severity of disability (r=0.05) or between socioeconomic status (SES) and severity of disability (r=0.21). Correlations with age were strongest for those subscale scores involving gross and fine motor skills. Correlations with SES and subscale scores ranged from 0.03 to 0.18. The three instruments provide important information regarding childhood performance in motor, self-care, communicative, cognitive, and social skills. The WeeFIM instrument requires less administration time and provides information directly relevant to evaluating functional outcomes for children with disabilities and their families.</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Motor Skills Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><issn>0012-1622</issn><issn>1469-8749</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBfZk7fVZPOxzVGKX1jxYO9LNpm0KbvZmmQV_727tAdBEAaG4X3mPTwIXRJ8QzApb98xJgURRSElxpiW5RGaEiZkPi-ZPEbTMc7HfILOYtyOjODsFE0ILobhZIpeXkHFPji_zgx8QtPtWvBJNZnyJrO918l1fjhjUqmPmfOZ3rjGBPDZl0ubzLioate45CCeoxOrmggXhz1Dq4f71eIpX749Pi_ulrmmjKRc1BjmRGFNuSxpzSzBYApCdGGk4sCNYCA5ZUJozGtBmVV2ztUcbA2CWTpD1_vaXeg-eoipal3U0DTKQ9fHSsgSM87oAJI9qEMXYwBb7YJrVfiuCK5GgdUfgcPP1aG8r1swvz72xgaAHkpVWwdn1lBtuz4MjuI_tT-dX3sT</recordid><startdate>19990301</startdate><enddate>19990301</enddate><creator>Ottenbacher, Kenneth J</creator><creator>Msall, Michael E</creator><creator>Lyon, Nancy</creator><creator>Duffy, Linda C</creator><creator>Granger, Carl V</creator><creator>Braun, Susan</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990301</creationdate><title>Measuring developmental and functional status in children with disabilities</title><author>Ottenbacher, Kenneth J ; Msall, Michael E ; Lyon, Nancy ; Duffy, Linda C ; Granger, Carl V ; Braun, Susan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-6b0e81a0c35973b4f10ed211c2d9a5e5d64e953466c05b634faf85a8efbe64f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Motor Skills Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ottenbacher, Kenneth J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Msall, Michael E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyon, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffy, Linda C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granger, Carl V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, Susan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Developmental medicine and child neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ottenbacher, Kenneth J</au><au>Msall, Michael E</au><au>Lyon, Nancy</au><au>Duffy, Linda C</au><au>Granger, Carl V</au><au>Braun, Susan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring developmental and functional status in children with disabilities</atitle><jtitle>Developmental medicine and child neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Dev. med. child neurol</addtitle><date>1999-03-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>186</spage><epage>194</epage><pages>186-194</pages><artnum>S0012162299000377</artnum><issn>0012-1622</issn><eissn>1469-8749</eissn><abstract>This study compared performance on the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIMTM), the Battelle Developmental Inventory Screening Test (BDIST), and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS) in children with developmental disabilities. The three instruments were administered to 205 children with identified disabilities. All 205 children were tested using the WeeFIM instrument. The BDIST was administered to 101 children and the VABS to the remaining 104 children. Administration was counterbalanced and randomized across all three instruments. A proportional sampling plan was used to select the 205 children, who ranged in age from 11 to 87 months. A variety of medical diagnoses and levels of severity of motor, cognitive, and communication impairments were systematically included in the sample. Correlations (r) among subscales for all three instruments ranged from 0.42 to 0.92. Correlations for total scores ranged from 0.72 to 0.94. Analyses of potential moderator variables found no significant relation between age and severity of disability (r=0.05) or between socioeconomic status (SES) and severity of disability (r=0.21). Correlations with age were strongest for those subscale scores involving gross and fine motor skills. Correlations with SES and subscale scores ranged from 0.03 to 0.18. The three instruments provide important information regarding childhood performance in motor, self-care, communicative, cognitive, and social skills. The WeeFIM instrument requires less administration time and provides information directly relevant to evaluating functional outcomes for children with disabilities and their families.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>10210251</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0012162299000377</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-1622
ispartof Developmental medicine and child neurology, 1999-03, Vol.41 (3), p.186-194, Article S0012162299000377
issn 0012-1622
1469-8749
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69704543
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Child
Child, Preschool
Cognition Disorders - diagnosis
Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis
Health Status
Humans
Infant
Motor Skills Disorders - diagnosis
Original Articles
Severity of Illness Index
Social Class
title Measuring developmental and functional status in children with disabilities
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A04%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20developmental%20and%20functional%20status%20in%20children%20with%20disabilities&rft.jtitle=Developmental%20medicine%20and%20child%20neurology&rft.au=Ottenbacher,%20Kenneth%20J&rft.date=1999-03-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=186&rft.epage=194&rft.pages=186-194&rft.artnum=S0012162299000377&rft.issn=0012-1622&rft.eissn=1469-8749&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0012162299000377&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69704543%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-6b0e81a0c35973b4f10ed211c2d9a5e5d64e953466c05b634faf85a8efbe64f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69704543&rft_id=info:pmid/10210251&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0012162299000377&rfr_iscdi=true