Loading…
Faculty Ratings as Part of a Competency-Based Evaluation Clinic Grading System
The traditional system for determining grades in dental school clinic courses has been counts of productivity and daily marks for degree of technical excellence. One dental school with a competency-based educational model has redesigned its evaluation system to include assessment of understanding as...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Evaluation & the health professions 1999-03, Vol.22 (1), p.86-106 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-3e259c119396ffc613409086d605db32b076206eeff406865e950fe83a816d013 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-3e259c119396ffc613409086d605db32b076206eeff406865e950fe83a816d013 |
| container_end_page | 106 |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 86 |
| container_title | Evaluation & the health professions |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | Chambers, David W. |
| description | The traditional system for determining grades in dental school clinic courses has been counts of productivity and daily marks for degree of technical excellence. One dental school with a competency-based educational model has redesigned its evaluation system to include assessment of understanding as well as performance of procedures, diagnosis and judgment, and patient management. Competency tests were instituted in all disciplines to replace the required volume of work. A quarterly rating system was developed to replace daily grading. Results from one of the first administrations of the ratings are presented. They show excellent face validity and rater consistency in some cases. Gradients of generalizability are reported, demonstrating that the ratings satisfy the school’s standard for grade defensibility. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/01632789922034185 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69706528</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ592476</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_01632789922034185</sage_id><sourcerecordid>39383550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-3e259c119396ffc613409086d605db32b076206eeff406865e950fe83a816d013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVtP3DAQha2qqCzQH1Cpqqw-8BaYsWM7fiyr5SYEiMtz5HUmKCiXxU4q7b8nqyBagRBP83C-c2ZGh7EfCAeIxhwCailMZq0QIFPM1Bc2Q6VEIi1mX9lsoycjYLbZToyPACiUMt_YNoJUYLWasctj54e6X_Mb11ftQ-Qu8msXet6V3PF516yop9avkyMXqeCLv64eRrJr-byu2srzk-CK0chv17GnZo9tla6O9P1l7rL748Xd_DS5uDo5m_-5SHyKqk8kCWU9opVWl6XXKFOwkOlCgyqWUizBaAGaqCxT0JlWZBWUlEmXoS4A5S7bn3JXoXsaKPZ5U0VPde1a6oaYa2tAK5F9CiqTImizAX-_AR-7IbTjE7kQKIW2IEYIJ8iHLsZAZb4KVePCOkfIN5Xk7yoZPb9egodlQ8V_jqmDEfg5ARQq_yovzpUVqdGjfDDJ0T3Qv6M-XvgMNsuZcg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221326902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Faculty Ratings as Part of a Competency-Based Evaluation Clinic Grading System</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ERIC</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Chambers, David W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chambers, David W.</creatorcontrib><description>The traditional system for determining grades in dental school clinic courses has been counts of productivity and daily marks for degree of technical excellence. One dental school with a competency-based educational model has redesigned its evaluation system to include assessment of understanding as well as performance of procedures, diagnosis and judgment, and patient management. Competency tests were instituted in all disciplines to replace the required volume of work. A quarterly rating system was developed to replace daily grading. Results from one of the first administrations of the ratings are presented. They show excellent face validity and rater consistency in some cases. Gradients of generalizability are reported, demonstrating that the ratings satisfy the school’s standard for grade defensibility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-2787</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3918</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/01632789922034185</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10350965</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EHPRDK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Academic Ability ; Academic Standards ; Accreditation (Institutions) ; Bias ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Clinical practice ; Competence ; Competency Based Education ; Competency Based Evaluation ; Competency tests ; Competency-Based Education - organization & administration ; Curriculum ; Dental Schools ; Dental Students ; Dentistry ; Education, Dental - organization & administration ; Educational Objectives ; Evaluation ; Faculty, Dental ; Grades (Scholastic) ; Grading ; Graduation Requirements ; Health technology assessment ; Higher Education ; Humans ; Measurement Techniques ; Models, Educational ; Outcomes of Education ; Patients ; Predictive Validity ; Professional Development ; Professional Education ; Quality Control ; Rating Scales ; Reproducibility of Results ; San Francisco ; Student Characteristics ; Student Evaluation ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Teacher Improvement ; Teacher Qualifications ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods ; Test Construction ; USA ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Evaluation & the health professions, 1999-03, Vol.22 (1), p.86-106</ispartof><rights>Copyright Sage Publications, Inc. Mar 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-3e259c119396ffc613409086d605db32b076206eeff406865e950fe83a816d013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-3e259c119396ffc613409086d605db32b076206eeff406865e950fe83a816d013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30978,30979,79110</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ592476$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10350965$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chambers, David W.</creatorcontrib><title>Faculty Ratings as Part of a Competency-Based Evaluation Clinic Grading System</title><title>Evaluation & the health professions</title><addtitle>Eval Health Prof</addtitle><description>The traditional system for determining grades in dental school clinic courses has been counts of productivity and daily marks for degree of technical excellence. One dental school with a competency-based educational model has redesigned its evaluation system to include assessment of understanding as well as performance of procedures, diagnosis and judgment, and patient management. Competency tests were instituted in all disciplines to replace the required volume of work. A quarterly rating system was developed to replace daily grading. Results from one of the first administrations of the ratings are presented. They show excellent face validity and rater consistency in some cases. Gradients of generalizability are reported, demonstrating that the ratings satisfy the school’s standard for grade defensibility.</description><subject>Academic Ability</subject><subject>Academic Standards</subject><subject>Accreditation (Institutions)</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Clinical practice</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Competency Based Education</subject><subject>Competency Based Evaluation</subject><subject>Competency tests</subject><subject>Competency-Based Education - organization & administration</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Dental Schools</subject><subject>Dental Students</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Education, Dental - organization & administration</subject><subject>Educational Objectives</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Faculty, Dental</subject><subject>Grades (Scholastic)</subject><subject>Grading</subject><subject>Graduation Requirements</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Measurement Techniques</subject><subject>Models, Educational</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Predictive Validity</subject><subject>Professional Development</subject><subject>Professional Education</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Rating Scales</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>San Francisco</subject><subject>Student Characteristics</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Teacher Improvement</subject><subject>Teacher Qualifications</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0163-2787</issn><issn>1552-3918</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVtP3DAQha2qqCzQH1Cpqqw-8BaYsWM7fiyr5SYEiMtz5HUmKCiXxU4q7b8nqyBagRBP83C-c2ZGh7EfCAeIxhwCailMZq0QIFPM1Bc2Q6VEIi1mX9lsoycjYLbZToyPACiUMt_YNoJUYLWasctj54e6X_Mb11ftQ-Qu8msXet6V3PF516yop9avkyMXqeCLv64eRrJr-byu2srzk-CK0chv17GnZo9tla6O9P1l7rL748Xd_DS5uDo5m_-5SHyKqk8kCWU9opVWl6XXKFOwkOlCgyqWUizBaAGaqCxT0JlWZBWUlEmXoS4A5S7bn3JXoXsaKPZ5U0VPde1a6oaYa2tAK5F9CiqTImizAX-_AR-7IbTjE7kQKIW2IEYIJ8iHLsZAZb4KVePCOkfIN5Xk7yoZPb9egodlQ8V_jqmDEfg5ARQq_yovzpUVqdGjfDDJ0T3Qv6M-XvgMNsuZcg</recordid><startdate>19990301</startdate><enddate>19990301</enddate><creator>Chambers, David W.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990301</creationdate><title>Faculty Ratings as Part of a Competency-Based Evaluation Clinic Grading System</title><author>Chambers, David W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-3e259c119396ffc613409086d605db32b076206eeff406865e950fe83a816d013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Academic Ability</topic><topic>Academic Standards</topic><topic>Accreditation (Institutions)</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Clinical practice</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Competency Based Education</topic><topic>Competency Based Evaluation</topic><topic>Competency tests</topic><topic>Competency-Based Education - organization & administration</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Dental Schools</topic><topic>Dental Students</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Education, Dental - organization & administration</topic><topic>Educational Objectives</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Faculty, Dental</topic><topic>Grades (Scholastic)</topic><topic>Grading</topic><topic>Graduation Requirements</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Measurement Techniques</topic><topic>Models, Educational</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Predictive Validity</topic><topic>Professional Development</topic><topic>Professional Education</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Rating Scales</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>San Francisco</topic><topic>Student Characteristics</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Teacher Improvement</topic><topic>Teacher Qualifications</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chambers, David W.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Evaluation & the health professions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chambers, David W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ592476</ericid><atitle>Faculty Ratings as Part of a Competency-Based Evaluation Clinic Grading System</atitle><jtitle>Evaluation & the health professions</jtitle><addtitle>Eval Health Prof</addtitle><date>1999-03-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>86</spage><epage>106</epage><pages>86-106</pages><issn>0163-2787</issn><eissn>1552-3918</eissn><coden>EHPRDK</coden><abstract>The traditional system for determining grades in dental school clinic courses has been counts of productivity and daily marks for degree of technical excellence. One dental school with a competency-based educational model has redesigned its evaluation system to include assessment of understanding as well as performance of procedures, diagnosis and judgment, and patient management. Competency tests were instituted in all disciplines to replace the required volume of work. A quarterly rating system was developed to replace daily grading. Results from one of the first administrations of the ratings are presented. They show excellent face validity and rater consistency in some cases. Gradients of generalizability are reported, demonstrating that the ratings satisfy the school’s standard for grade defensibility.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><pmid>10350965</pmid><doi>10.1177/01632789922034185</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0163-2787 |
| ispartof | Evaluation & the health professions, 1999-03, Vol.22 (1), p.86-106 |
| issn | 0163-2787 1552-3918 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69706528 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ERIC; SAGE |
| subjects | Academic Ability Academic Standards Accreditation (Institutions) Bias Clinical Competence - standards Clinical practice Competence Competency Based Education Competency Based Evaluation Competency tests Competency-Based Education - organization & administration Curriculum Dental Schools Dental Students Dentistry Education, Dental - organization & administration Educational Objectives Evaluation Faculty, Dental Grades (Scholastic) Grading Graduation Requirements Health technology assessment Higher Education Humans Measurement Techniques Models, Educational Outcomes of Education Patients Predictive Validity Professional Development Professional Education Quality Control Rating Scales Reproducibility of Results San Francisco Student Characteristics Student Evaluation Surveys and Questionnaires Teacher Improvement Teacher Qualifications Teachers Teaching Methods Test Construction USA Validity |
| title | Faculty Ratings as Part of a Competency-Based Evaluation Clinic Grading System |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T13%3A05%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Faculty%20Ratings%20as%20Part%20of%20a%20Competency-Based%20Evaluation%20Clinic%20Grading%20System&rft.jtitle=Evaluation%20&%20the%20health%20professions&rft.au=Chambers,%20David%20W.&rft.date=1999-03-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=86&rft.epage=106&rft.pages=86-106&rft.issn=0163-2787&rft.eissn=1552-3918&rft.coden=EHPRDK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/01632789922034185&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E39383550%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-3e259c119396ffc613409086d605db32b076206eeff406865e950fe83a816d013%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221326902&rft_id=info:pmid/10350965&rft_ericid=EJ592476&rft_sage_id=10.1177_01632789922034185&rfr_iscdi=true |