Loading…
Gender comparisons of medical students' psychosocial profiles
Objectives This study was designed to compare male and female medical students on selected personality attributes that could influence their academic attainment and personal success. Design Participants were 1157 medical students (743 men, 414 women) who completed a set of psychosocial questionnaire...
Saved in:
Published in: | Medical education 1999-05, Vol.33 (5), p.342-349 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objectives
This study was designed to compare male and female medical students on selected personality attributes that could influence their academic attainment and personal success.
Design
Participants were 1157 medical students (743 men, 414 women) who completed a set of psychosocial questionnaires measuring intensity and chronicity of loneliness, general anxiety, test anxiety, neuroticism, depression, extraversion, self‐esteem, locus of control, perceptions of parents, general health and appraisals of stressful life events. Data were analysed by employing multivariate and univariate analysis of variance and chi‐square analysis.
Setting
Jefferson Medical College.
Subjects
Medical students.
Results
Men scored significantly higher on the intensity of loneliness, and women scored higher on general anxiety, test anxiety and neuroticism scales, but the magnitudes of the effect size estimates were not large. No significant gender difference was observed on measures of chronicity of loneliness, depression, extraversion, self‐esteem, external locus of control, perception of general health and perceptions of the mother and the father. Women who experienced stressful life events, such as death in the family or personal illness, appraised these events more negatively than did their male counterparts.
Conclusions
Implications of the findings for medical education and practice are discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0308-0110 1365-2923 |
DOI: | 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00331.x |