Loading…
BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations and risk of breast cancer:: Public health perspectives
Content: Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the second most common cause of cancer death among U.S. women. In 1998, about 178,700 new cases will be diagnosed and 43,500 women will die from the disease. Mutations in the BRCA1 gene, which was cloned in 1994 and is located on chromosome 17q, h...
Saved in:
Published in: | American journal of preventive medicine 1999-02, Vol.16 (2), p.91-98 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 98 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 91 |
container_title | American journal of preventive medicine |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Coughlin, Steven S Khoury, Muin J Steinberg, Karen K |
description | Content: Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the second most common cause of cancer death among U.S. women. In 1998, about 178,700 new cases will be diagnosed and 43,500 women will die from the disease. Mutations in the BRCA1 gene, which was cloned in 1994 and is located on chromosome 17q, have been identified as causes of predisposition to breast, ovarian, and other cancers. A second breast cancer gene, BRCA2, has been localized to chromosome 13q. Using inferential procedures, the overall carrier frequency of BRCA1 gene mutations has been estimated at 1 in 500 in the general U.S. population. Recent studies have indicated that the carrier frequency of a specific BRCA1 allele, the 185delAG mutation, may be as high as 0.8% to 1% among women of Ashkenazi Jewish descent.
Conclusions: Due to the proliferation of laboratories offering genetic tests for breast cancer susceptibility, their appropriate use in public health needs careful scrutiny. Several issues are raised when such genetic tests are considered for population-based prevention programs for breast cancer. Public health agencies, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, are important to monitoring and evaluating genetic testing done outside of research protocols. If genetic tests for breast cancer are to be incorporated into future prevention programs, evaluation is needed of whether the testing can have the intended effect. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00136-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69785902</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749379798001366</els_id><sourcerecordid>69785902</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e263t-5c337c8d12a78375223291ea0f0133e8a90036dcf70c00ac693335c23f8e85083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtO5DAQRS3ECJrHJ4C8QsMiM2VXxw82iGkBMxISiMfacjsVMKSTxk6Q-HvSDcyqSqqjq7qHsQMBvwQI9fsO9NQWqK3-ac0xgEBVqA02EUZjIRXoTTb5j2yznZyfAUAbYbfYtgCcojHTCXv4czs7E9y3FV9tkj9SS3wx9L6PXZvXhxTzC-9qPk_kc8-DbwOlkxN-M8ybGPgT-aZ_4ktKeUmhj2-U99iP2jeZ9r_mLnu4OL-f_S2uri__zc6uCpIK-6IMiDqYSkivDepSSpRWkId6rINkvAVAVYVaQwDwQVlELIPE2pApweAuO_rMXabudaDcu0XMgZrGt9QN2SmrTWlBjuDhFzjMF1S5ZYoLn97dt4gROP0EaHz3LVJyOUQai1YxjaVc1cURdiv1bq3erbw6a9xavVP4AWgycjw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69785902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations and risk of breast cancer:: Public health perspectives</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Coughlin, Steven S ; Khoury, Muin J ; Steinberg, Karen K</creator><creatorcontrib>Coughlin, Steven S ; Khoury, Muin J ; Steinberg, Karen K</creatorcontrib><description>Content: Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the second most common cause of cancer death among U.S. women. In 1998, about 178,700 new cases will be diagnosed and 43,500 women will die from the disease. Mutations in the BRCA1 gene, which was cloned in 1994 and is located on chromosome 17q, have been identified as causes of predisposition to breast, ovarian, and other cancers. A second breast cancer gene, BRCA2, has been localized to chromosome 13q. Using inferential procedures, the overall carrier frequency of BRCA1 gene mutations has been estimated at 1 in 500 in the general U.S. population. Recent studies have indicated that the carrier frequency of a specific BRCA1 allele, the 185delAG mutation, may be as high as 0.8% to 1% among women of Ashkenazi Jewish descent.
Conclusions: Due to the proliferation of laboratories offering genetic tests for breast cancer susceptibility, their appropriate use in public health needs careful scrutiny. Several issues are raised when such genetic tests are considered for population-based prevention programs for breast cancer. Public health agencies, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, are important to monitoring and evaluating genetic testing done outside of research protocols. If genetic tests for breast cancer are to be incorporated into future prevention programs, evaluation is needed of whether the testing can have the intended effect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-3797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2607</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00136-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10343884</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bioethics ; BRCA1 ; BRCA2 Protein ; breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control ; cancer genetics ; Ethics, Medical ; Female ; Gene Frequency - genetics ; Genes, BRCA1 ; Genetic Carrier Screening ; Genetic Predisposition to Disease - genetics ; genetic testing ; Genetic Testing - methods ; Genetic Testing - standards ; germline mutation ; Humans ; Jews - genetics ; Mutation - genetics ; Neoplasm Proteins - genetics ; ovarian cancer ; Public Health Practice - standards ; Quality of Health Care ; Risk Factors ; screening ; Transcription Factors - genetics ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>American journal of preventive medicine, 1999-02, Vol.16 (2), p.91-98</ispartof><rights>1999 American Journal of Preventive Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10343884$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coughlin, Steven S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoury, Muin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Karen K</creatorcontrib><title>BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations and risk of breast cancer:: Public health perspectives</title><title>American journal of preventive medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Prev Med</addtitle><description>Content: Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the second most common cause of cancer death among U.S. women. In 1998, about 178,700 new cases will be diagnosed and 43,500 women will die from the disease. Mutations in the BRCA1 gene, which was cloned in 1994 and is located on chromosome 17q, have been identified as causes of predisposition to breast, ovarian, and other cancers. A second breast cancer gene, BRCA2, has been localized to chromosome 13q. Using inferential procedures, the overall carrier frequency of BRCA1 gene mutations has been estimated at 1 in 500 in the general U.S. population. Recent studies have indicated that the carrier frequency of a specific BRCA1 allele, the 185delAG mutation, may be as high as 0.8% to 1% among women of Ashkenazi Jewish descent.
Conclusions: Due to the proliferation of laboratories offering genetic tests for breast cancer susceptibility, their appropriate use in public health needs careful scrutiny. Several issues are raised when such genetic tests are considered for population-based prevention programs for breast cancer. Public health agencies, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, are important to monitoring and evaluating genetic testing done outside of research protocols. If genetic tests for breast cancer are to be incorporated into future prevention programs, evaluation is needed of whether the testing can have the intended effect.</description><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>BRCA1</subject><subject>BRCA2 Protein</subject><subject>breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control</subject><subject>cancer genetics</subject><subject>Ethics, Medical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene Frequency - genetics</subject><subject>Genes, BRCA1</subject><subject>Genetic Carrier Screening</subject><subject>Genetic Predisposition to Disease - genetics</subject><subject>genetic testing</subject><subject>Genetic Testing - methods</subject><subject>Genetic Testing - standards</subject><subject>germline mutation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Jews - genetics</subject><subject>Mutation - genetics</subject><subject>Neoplasm Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>ovarian cancer</subject><subject>Public Health Practice - standards</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>Transcription Factors - genetics</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0749-3797</issn><issn>1873-2607</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMtO5DAQRS3ECJrHJ4C8QsMiM2VXxw82iGkBMxISiMfacjsVMKSTxk6Q-HvSDcyqSqqjq7qHsQMBvwQI9fsO9NQWqK3-ac0xgEBVqA02EUZjIRXoTTb5j2yznZyfAUAbYbfYtgCcojHTCXv4czs7E9y3FV9tkj9SS3wx9L6PXZvXhxTzC-9qPk_kc8-DbwOlkxN-M8ybGPgT-aZ_4ktKeUmhj2-U99iP2jeZ9r_mLnu4OL-f_S2uri__zc6uCpIK-6IMiDqYSkivDepSSpRWkId6rINkvAVAVYVaQwDwQVlELIPE2pApweAuO_rMXabudaDcu0XMgZrGt9QN2SmrTWlBjuDhFzjMF1S5ZYoLn97dt4gROP0EaHz3LVJyOUQai1YxjaVc1cURdiv1bq3erbw6a9xavVP4AWgycjw</recordid><startdate>19990201</startdate><enddate>19990201</enddate><creator>Coughlin, Steven S</creator><creator>Khoury, Muin J</creator><creator>Steinberg, Karen K</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990201</creationdate><title>BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations and risk of breast cancer:: Public health perspectives</title><author>Coughlin, Steven S ; Khoury, Muin J ; Steinberg, Karen K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e263t-5c337c8d12a78375223291ea0f0133e8a90036dcf70c00ac693335c23f8e85083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>BRCA1</topic><topic>BRCA2 Protein</topic><topic>breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control</topic><topic>cancer genetics</topic><topic>Ethics, Medical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene Frequency - genetics</topic><topic>Genes, BRCA1</topic><topic>Genetic Carrier Screening</topic><topic>Genetic Predisposition to Disease - genetics</topic><topic>genetic testing</topic><topic>Genetic Testing - methods</topic><topic>Genetic Testing - standards</topic><topic>germline mutation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Jews - genetics</topic><topic>Mutation - genetics</topic><topic>Neoplasm Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>ovarian cancer</topic><topic>Public Health Practice - standards</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>Transcription Factors - genetics</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coughlin, Steven S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoury, Muin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Karen K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of preventive medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coughlin, Steven S</au><au>Khoury, Muin J</au><au>Steinberg, Karen K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations and risk of breast cancer:: Public health perspectives</atitle><jtitle>American journal of preventive medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Prev Med</addtitle><date>1999-02-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>91-98</pages><issn>0749-3797</issn><eissn>1873-2607</eissn><abstract>Content: Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the second most common cause of cancer death among U.S. women. In 1998, about 178,700 new cases will be diagnosed and 43,500 women will die from the disease. Mutations in the BRCA1 gene, which was cloned in 1994 and is located on chromosome 17q, have been identified as causes of predisposition to breast, ovarian, and other cancers. A second breast cancer gene, BRCA2, has been localized to chromosome 13q. Using inferential procedures, the overall carrier frequency of BRCA1 gene mutations has been estimated at 1 in 500 in the general U.S. population. Recent studies have indicated that the carrier frequency of a specific BRCA1 allele, the 185delAG mutation, may be as high as 0.8% to 1% among women of Ashkenazi Jewish descent.
Conclusions: Due to the proliferation of laboratories offering genetic tests for breast cancer susceptibility, their appropriate use in public health needs careful scrutiny. Several issues are raised when such genetic tests are considered for population-based prevention programs for breast cancer. Public health agencies, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, are important to monitoring and evaluating genetic testing done outside of research protocols. If genetic tests for breast cancer are to be incorporated into future prevention programs, evaluation is needed of whether the testing can have the intended effect.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10343884</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00136-6</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0749-3797 |
ispartof | American journal of preventive medicine, 1999-02, Vol.16 (2), p.91-98 |
issn | 0749-3797 1873-2607 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69785902 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Bioethics BRCA1 BRCA2 Protein breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology Breast Neoplasms - genetics Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control cancer genetics Ethics, Medical Female Gene Frequency - genetics Genes, BRCA1 Genetic Carrier Screening Genetic Predisposition to Disease - genetics genetic testing Genetic Testing - methods Genetic Testing - standards germline mutation Humans Jews - genetics Mutation - genetics Neoplasm Proteins - genetics ovarian cancer Public Health Practice - standards Quality of Health Care Risk Factors screening Transcription Factors - genetics United States - epidemiology |
title | BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations and risk of breast cancer:: Public health perspectives |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T13%3A34%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=BRCA1%20and%20BRCA2%20gene%20mutations%20and%20risk%20of%20breast%20cancer::%20Public%20health%20perspectives&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20preventive%20medicine&rft.au=Coughlin,%20Steven%20S&rft.date=1999-02-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=91-98&rft.issn=0749-3797&rft.eissn=1873-2607&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00136-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69785902%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e263t-5c337c8d12a78375223291ea0f0133e8a90036dcf70c00ac693335c23f8e85083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69785902&rft_id=info:pmid/10343884&rfr_iscdi=true |