Loading…

Web Citations in the Nursing Literature: How Accurate Are They?

One problem with using Web citations is whether those documents will be available over time. We examined 573 Web citations in articles published in nursing journals and checked their availability (either by direct link or by searching the main site). There was a mean of 3.1 Web citations per article...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of professional nursing 2008-11, Vol.24 (6), p.347-351
Main Authors: Oermann, Marilyn H., Nordstrom, Cheryl K., Ineson, Vicki, Wilmes, Nancy A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-54942f9525132fe13c56efb786922a8939f34e3feb14062194efb1f297621de23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-54942f9525132fe13c56efb786922a8939f34e3feb14062194efb1f297621de23
container_end_page 351
container_issue 6
container_start_page 347
container_title Journal of professional nursing
container_volume 24
creator Oermann, Marilyn H.
Nordstrom, Cheryl K.
Ineson, Vicki
Wilmes, Nancy A.
description One problem with using Web citations is whether those documents will be available over time. We examined 573 Web citations in articles published in nursing journals and checked their availability (either by direct link or by searching the main site). There was a mean of 3.1 Web citations per article. Most Web citations were to documents that related to clinical practice, for example, clinical guidelines and explanations of clinical conditions and treatments. Of the 573 Web citations, 414 (72.3%) were still available; of those, 229 (55.3%) were able to be accessed by direct link and the other 185 (44.7%) by searching the main Web site. However, 159 (27.7%) of the references were not available, not even by searching the Internet using key terms from the citation. Considering that more than a fourth of the Web citations in this study were no longer available, authors need to be cautious about using the Web as a primary source of information for their publications.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.profnurs.2007.12.004
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69820721</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S8755722307002918</els_id><sourcerecordid>1602777411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-54942f9525132fe13c56efb786922a8939f34e3feb14062194efb1f297621de23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFrGzEQhUVpaZw0fyGIHnrbrWYkrVa9pMa0ScC0l5QcxVoeNTL2birtJuTfV8YuhVyiixj0vSfeG8YuQNQgoPm8qR_SEPop5RqFMDVgLYR6w2agJVatauEtm7VG68ogyhN2mvNGlKMMvmcnYAUiCjNjl3e04os4dmMc-sxjz8d74j-Kb-x_82UcKXXjlOgLvx6e-Nz7qczE54n47T09X35g70K3zXR-vM_Yr-_fbhfX1fLn1c1ivqy8QjVWWlmFwWrUIDEQSK8bCivTNhaxa620QSqSgVagRINgVXmFgNaUYU0oz9ing2-J_WeiPLpdzJ62266nYcqusW3Jg_AqqA1aKY0u4McX4GaYUl9CuNIoNAJ0W6DmAPk05JwouIcUd116diDcfhFu4_4tYi8zDtCVlovw4ug-rXa0_i87Nl-ArweASmuPkZLLPlLvaR0T-dGth_jaH38B10iaGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200160158</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Web Citations in the Nursing Literature: How Accurate Are They?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Oermann, Marilyn H. ; Nordstrom, Cheryl K. ; Ineson, Vicki ; Wilmes, Nancy A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Oermann, Marilyn H. ; Nordstrom, Cheryl K. ; Ineson, Vicki ; Wilmes, Nancy A.</creatorcontrib><description>One problem with using Web citations is whether those documents will be available over time. We examined 573 Web citations in articles published in nursing journals and checked their availability (either by direct link or by searching the main site). There was a mean of 3.1 Web citations per article. Most Web citations were to documents that related to clinical practice, for example, clinical guidelines and explanations of clinical conditions and treatments. Of the 573 Web citations, 414 (72.3%) were still available; of those, 229 (55.3%) were able to be accessed by direct link and the other 185 (44.7%) by searching the main Web site. However, 159 (27.7%) of the references were not available, not even by searching the Internet using key terms from the citation. Considering that more than a fourth of the Web citations in this study were no longer available, authors need to be cautious about using the Web as a primary source of information for their publications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8755-7223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8481</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2007.12.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19022207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Bibliometrics ; Citation analysis ; Citations ; Electronic publishing ; Guidelines as Topic ; Health Services Needs and Demand ; Humans ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Internet ; Internet - organization &amp; administration ; Nursing ; Nursing literature ; Nursing Research - organization &amp; administration ; Periodicals as Topic - standards ; Periodicals as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Reference linking ; Time Factors ; Web citation ; Web sites</subject><ispartof>Journal of professional nursing, 2008-11, Vol.24 (6), p.347-351</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright W.B. Saunders Company/JNL Nov/Dec 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-54942f9525132fe13c56efb786922a8939f34e3feb14062194efb1f297621de23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-54942f9525132fe13c56efb786922a8939f34e3feb14062194efb1f297621de23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,31000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19022207$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oermann, Marilyn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordstrom, Cheryl K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ineson, Vicki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilmes, Nancy A.</creatorcontrib><title>Web Citations in the Nursing Literature: How Accurate Are They?</title><title>Journal of professional nursing</title><addtitle>J Prof Nurs</addtitle><description>One problem with using Web citations is whether those documents will be available over time. We examined 573 Web citations in articles published in nursing journals and checked their availability (either by direct link or by searching the main site). There was a mean of 3.1 Web citations per article. Most Web citations were to documents that related to clinical practice, for example, clinical guidelines and explanations of clinical conditions and treatments. Of the 573 Web citations, 414 (72.3%) were still available; of those, 229 (55.3%) were able to be accessed by direct link and the other 185 (44.7%) by searching the main Web site. However, 159 (27.7%) of the references were not available, not even by searching the Internet using key terms from the citation. Considering that more than a fourth of the Web citations in this study were no longer available, authors need to be cautious about using the Web as a primary source of information for their publications.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Citation analysis</subject><subject>Citations</subject><subject>Electronic publishing</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Health Services Needs and Demand</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Internet - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing literature</subject><subject>Nursing Research - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Periodicals as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Periodicals as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Reference linking</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Web citation</subject><subject>Web sites</subject><issn>8755-7223</issn><issn>1532-8481</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFrGzEQhUVpaZw0fyGIHnrbrWYkrVa9pMa0ScC0l5QcxVoeNTL2birtJuTfV8YuhVyiixj0vSfeG8YuQNQgoPm8qR_SEPop5RqFMDVgLYR6w2agJVatauEtm7VG68ogyhN2mvNGlKMMvmcnYAUiCjNjl3e04os4dmMc-sxjz8d74j-Kb-x_82UcKXXjlOgLvx6e-Nz7qczE54n47T09X35g70K3zXR-vM_Yr-_fbhfX1fLn1c1ivqy8QjVWWlmFwWrUIDEQSK8bCivTNhaxa620QSqSgVagRINgVXmFgNaUYU0oz9ing2-J_WeiPLpdzJ62266nYcqusW3Jg_AqqA1aKY0u4McX4GaYUl9CuNIoNAJ0W6DmAPk05JwouIcUd116diDcfhFu4_4tYi8zDtCVlovw4ug-rXa0_i87Nl-ArweASmuPkZLLPlLvaR0T-dGth_jaH38B10iaGw</recordid><startdate>20081101</startdate><enddate>20081101</enddate><creator>Oermann, Marilyn H.</creator><creator>Nordstrom, Cheryl K.</creator><creator>Ineson, Vicki</creator><creator>Wilmes, Nancy A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>W.B. Saunders Company/JNL</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081101</creationdate><title>Web Citations in the Nursing Literature: How Accurate Are They?</title><author>Oermann, Marilyn H. ; Nordstrom, Cheryl K. ; Ineson, Vicki ; Wilmes, Nancy A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-54942f9525132fe13c56efb786922a8939f34e3feb14062194efb1f297621de23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Citation analysis</topic><topic>Citations</topic><topic>Electronic publishing</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Health Services Needs and Demand</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Internet - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing literature</topic><topic>Nursing Research - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Periodicals as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Periodicals as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Reference linking</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Web citation</topic><topic>Web sites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oermann, Marilyn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordstrom, Cheryl K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ineson, Vicki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilmes, Nancy A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of professional nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oermann, Marilyn H.</au><au>Nordstrom, Cheryl K.</au><au>Ineson, Vicki</au><au>Wilmes, Nancy A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Web Citations in the Nursing Literature: How Accurate Are They?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of professional nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Prof Nurs</addtitle><date>2008-11-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>347</spage><epage>351</epage><pages>347-351</pages><issn>8755-7223</issn><eissn>1532-8481</eissn><abstract>One problem with using Web citations is whether those documents will be available over time. We examined 573 Web citations in articles published in nursing journals and checked their availability (either by direct link or by searching the main site). There was a mean of 3.1 Web citations per article. Most Web citations were to documents that related to clinical practice, for example, clinical guidelines and explanations of clinical conditions and treatments. Of the 573 Web citations, 414 (72.3%) were still available; of those, 229 (55.3%) were able to be accessed by direct link and the other 185 (44.7%) by searching the main Web site. However, 159 (27.7%) of the references were not available, not even by searching the Internet using key terms from the citation. Considering that more than a fourth of the Web citations in this study were no longer available, authors need to be cautious about using the Web as a primary source of information for their publications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19022207</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.profnurs.2007.12.004</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 8755-7223
ispartof Journal of professional nursing, 2008-11, Vol.24 (6), p.347-351
issn 8755-7223
1532-8481
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69820721
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Accuracy
Bibliometrics
Citation analysis
Citations
Electronic publishing
Guidelines as Topic
Health Services Needs and Demand
Humans
Information Storage and Retrieval
Internet
Internet - organization & administration
Nursing
Nursing literature
Nursing Research - organization & administration
Periodicals as Topic - standards
Periodicals as Topic - statistics & numerical data
Reference linking
Time Factors
Web citation
Web sites
title Web Citations in the Nursing Literature: How Accurate Are They?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T23%3A00%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Web%20Citations%20in%20the%20Nursing%20Literature:%20How%20Accurate%20Are%20They?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20professional%20nursing&rft.au=Oermann,%20Marilyn%20H.&rft.date=2008-11-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=347&rft.epage=351&rft.pages=347-351&rft.issn=8755-7223&rft.eissn=1532-8481&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.profnurs.2007.12.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1602777411%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-54942f9525132fe13c56efb786922a8939f34e3feb14062194efb1f297621de23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200160158&rft_id=info:pmid/19022207&rfr_iscdi=true