Loading…
Web Citations in the Nursing Literature: How Accurate Are They?
One problem with using Web citations is whether those documents will be available over time. We examined 573 Web citations in articles published in nursing journals and checked their availability (either by direct link or by searching the main site). There was a mean of 3.1 Web citations per article...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of professional nursing 2008-11, Vol.24 (6), p.347-351 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-54942f9525132fe13c56efb786922a8939f34e3feb14062194efb1f297621de23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-54942f9525132fe13c56efb786922a8939f34e3feb14062194efb1f297621de23 |
container_end_page | 351 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 347 |
container_title | Journal of professional nursing |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Oermann, Marilyn H. Nordstrom, Cheryl K. Ineson, Vicki Wilmes, Nancy A. |
description | One problem with using Web citations is whether those documents will be available over time. We examined 573 Web citations in articles published in nursing journals and checked their availability (either by direct link or by searching the main site). There was a mean of 3.1 Web citations per article. Most Web citations were to documents that related to clinical practice, for example, clinical guidelines and explanations of clinical conditions and treatments. Of the 573 Web citations, 414 (72.3%) were still available; of those, 229 (55.3%) were able to be accessed by direct link and the other 185 (44.7%) by searching the main Web site. However, 159 (27.7%) of the references were not available, not even by searching the Internet using key terms from the citation. Considering that more than a fourth of the Web citations in this study were no longer available, authors need to be cautious about using the Web as a primary source of information for their publications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.profnurs.2007.12.004 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69820721</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S8755722307002918</els_id><sourcerecordid>1602777411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-54942f9525132fe13c56efb786922a8939f34e3feb14062194efb1f297621de23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFrGzEQhUVpaZw0fyGIHnrbrWYkrVa9pMa0ScC0l5QcxVoeNTL2birtJuTfV8YuhVyiixj0vSfeG8YuQNQgoPm8qR_SEPop5RqFMDVgLYR6w2agJVatauEtm7VG68ogyhN2mvNGlKMMvmcnYAUiCjNjl3e04os4dmMc-sxjz8d74j-Kb-x_82UcKXXjlOgLvx6e-Nz7qczE54n47T09X35g70K3zXR-vM_Yr-_fbhfX1fLn1c1ivqy8QjVWWlmFwWrUIDEQSK8bCivTNhaxa620QSqSgVagRINgVXmFgNaUYU0oz9ing2-J_WeiPLpdzJ62266nYcqusW3Jg_AqqA1aKY0u4McX4GaYUl9CuNIoNAJ0W6DmAPk05JwouIcUd116diDcfhFu4_4tYi8zDtCVlovw4ug-rXa0_i87Nl-ArweASmuPkZLLPlLvaR0T-dGth_jaH38B10iaGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200160158</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Web Citations in the Nursing Literature: How Accurate Are They?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Oermann, Marilyn H. ; Nordstrom, Cheryl K. ; Ineson, Vicki ; Wilmes, Nancy A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Oermann, Marilyn H. ; Nordstrom, Cheryl K. ; Ineson, Vicki ; Wilmes, Nancy A.</creatorcontrib><description>One problem with using Web citations is whether those documents will be available over time. We examined 573 Web citations in articles published in nursing journals and checked their availability (either by direct link or by searching the main site). There was a mean of 3.1 Web citations per article. Most Web citations were to documents that related to clinical practice, for example, clinical guidelines and explanations of clinical conditions and treatments. Of the 573 Web citations, 414 (72.3%) were still available; of those, 229 (55.3%) were able to be accessed by direct link and the other 185 (44.7%) by searching the main Web site. However, 159 (27.7%) of the references were not available, not even by searching the Internet using key terms from the citation. Considering that more than a fourth of the Web citations in this study were no longer available, authors need to be cautious about using the Web as a primary source of information for their publications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8755-7223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8481</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2007.12.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19022207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Bibliometrics ; Citation analysis ; Citations ; Electronic publishing ; Guidelines as Topic ; Health Services Needs and Demand ; Humans ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Internet ; Internet - organization & administration ; Nursing ; Nursing literature ; Nursing Research - organization & administration ; Periodicals as Topic - standards ; Periodicals as Topic - statistics & numerical data ; Reference linking ; Time Factors ; Web citation ; Web sites</subject><ispartof>Journal of professional nursing, 2008-11, Vol.24 (6), p.347-351</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright W.B. Saunders Company/JNL Nov/Dec 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-54942f9525132fe13c56efb786922a8939f34e3feb14062194efb1f297621de23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-54942f9525132fe13c56efb786922a8939f34e3feb14062194efb1f297621de23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,31000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19022207$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oermann, Marilyn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordstrom, Cheryl K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ineson, Vicki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilmes, Nancy A.</creatorcontrib><title>Web Citations in the Nursing Literature: How Accurate Are They?</title><title>Journal of professional nursing</title><addtitle>J Prof Nurs</addtitle><description>One problem with using Web citations is whether those documents will be available over time. We examined 573 Web citations in articles published in nursing journals and checked their availability (either by direct link or by searching the main site). There was a mean of 3.1 Web citations per article. Most Web citations were to documents that related to clinical practice, for example, clinical guidelines and explanations of clinical conditions and treatments. Of the 573 Web citations, 414 (72.3%) were still available; of those, 229 (55.3%) were able to be accessed by direct link and the other 185 (44.7%) by searching the main Web site. However, 159 (27.7%) of the references were not available, not even by searching the Internet using key terms from the citation. Considering that more than a fourth of the Web citations in this study were no longer available, authors need to be cautious about using the Web as a primary source of information for their publications.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Citation analysis</subject><subject>Citations</subject><subject>Electronic publishing</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Health Services Needs and Demand</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Internet - organization & administration</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing literature</subject><subject>Nursing Research - organization & administration</subject><subject>Periodicals as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Periodicals as Topic - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Reference linking</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Web citation</subject><subject>Web sites</subject><issn>8755-7223</issn><issn>1532-8481</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFrGzEQhUVpaZw0fyGIHnrbrWYkrVa9pMa0ScC0l5QcxVoeNTL2birtJuTfV8YuhVyiixj0vSfeG8YuQNQgoPm8qR_SEPop5RqFMDVgLYR6w2agJVatauEtm7VG68ogyhN2mvNGlKMMvmcnYAUiCjNjl3e04os4dmMc-sxjz8d74j-Kb-x_82UcKXXjlOgLvx6e-Nz7qczE54n47T09X35g70K3zXR-vM_Yr-_fbhfX1fLn1c1ivqy8QjVWWlmFwWrUIDEQSK8bCivTNhaxa620QSqSgVagRINgVXmFgNaUYU0oz9ing2-J_WeiPLpdzJ62266nYcqusW3Jg_AqqA1aKY0u4McX4GaYUl9CuNIoNAJ0W6DmAPk05JwouIcUd116diDcfhFu4_4tYi8zDtCVlovw4ug-rXa0_i87Nl-ArweASmuPkZLLPlLvaR0T-dGth_jaH38B10iaGw</recordid><startdate>20081101</startdate><enddate>20081101</enddate><creator>Oermann, Marilyn H.</creator><creator>Nordstrom, Cheryl K.</creator><creator>Ineson, Vicki</creator><creator>Wilmes, Nancy A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>W.B. Saunders Company/JNL</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081101</creationdate><title>Web Citations in the Nursing Literature: How Accurate Are They?</title><author>Oermann, Marilyn H. ; Nordstrom, Cheryl K. ; Ineson, Vicki ; Wilmes, Nancy A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-54942f9525132fe13c56efb786922a8939f34e3feb14062194efb1f297621de23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Citation analysis</topic><topic>Citations</topic><topic>Electronic publishing</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Health Services Needs and Demand</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Internet - organization & administration</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing literature</topic><topic>Nursing Research - organization & administration</topic><topic>Periodicals as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Periodicals as Topic - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Reference linking</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Web citation</topic><topic>Web sites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oermann, Marilyn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordstrom, Cheryl K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ineson, Vicki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilmes, Nancy A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of professional nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oermann, Marilyn H.</au><au>Nordstrom, Cheryl K.</au><au>Ineson, Vicki</au><au>Wilmes, Nancy A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Web Citations in the Nursing Literature: How Accurate Are They?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of professional nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Prof Nurs</addtitle><date>2008-11-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>347</spage><epage>351</epage><pages>347-351</pages><issn>8755-7223</issn><eissn>1532-8481</eissn><abstract>One problem with using Web citations is whether those documents will be available over time. We examined 573 Web citations in articles published in nursing journals and checked their availability (either by direct link or by searching the main site). There was a mean of 3.1 Web citations per article. Most Web citations were to documents that related to clinical practice, for example, clinical guidelines and explanations of clinical conditions and treatments. Of the 573 Web citations, 414 (72.3%) were still available; of those, 229 (55.3%) were able to be accessed by direct link and the other 185 (44.7%) by searching the main Web site. However, 159 (27.7%) of the references were not available, not even by searching the Internet using key terms from the citation. Considering that more than a fourth of the Web citations in this study were no longer available, authors need to be cautious about using the Web as a primary source of information for their publications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19022207</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.profnurs.2007.12.004</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 8755-7223 |
ispartof | Journal of professional nursing, 2008-11, Vol.24 (6), p.347-351 |
issn | 8755-7223 1532-8481 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69820721 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Accuracy Bibliometrics Citation analysis Citations Electronic publishing Guidelines as Topic Health Services Needs and Demand Humans Information Storage and Retrieval Internet Internet - organization & administration Nursing Nursing literature Nursing Research - organization & administration Periodicals as Topic - standards Periodicals as Topic - statistics & numerical data Reference linking Time Factors Web citation Web sites |
title | Web Citations in the Nursing Literature: How Accurate Are They? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T23%3A00%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Web%20Citations%20in%20the%20Nursing%20Literature:%20How%20Accurate%20Are%20They?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20professional%20nursing&rft.au=Oermann,%20Marilyn%20H.&rft.date=2008-11-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=347&rft.epage=351&rft.pages=347-351&rft.issn=8755-7223&rft.eissn=1532-8481&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.profnurs.2007.12.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1602777411%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-54942f9525132fe13c56efb786922a8939f34e3feb14062194efb1f297621de23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200160158&rft_id=info:pmid/19022207&rfr_iscdi=true |