Competition, cooperation, or control? Tales from the British National Health Service

The British National Health Service (NHS) recently underwent a massive social experiment, inspired in large part by the ideas of U.S. experts. This involved the creation of an internal or quasi-market, separating purchaser from provider and encouraging competition among providers. After reviewing th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Health Affairs 1999-05, Vol.18 (3), p.27-39
Main Author: Le Grand, J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Budgets
Bureaucracy
Central government
Community health care
Competition
Cooperation
Cooperative Behavior
Economic Competition
Economics
Efficiency
Experiments
Experts
Financing, Government
Health
Health care
Health care policy
Health Care Reform
Health maintenance organizations
Health Policy
Health services
HMOs
Hospitals
Humans
Markets
National health insurance
Nonprofit hospitals
Performance management
Politics
Primary care
Prime ministers
Privatization
Public health
Reforms
Retention
Social policy
Social research
State Medicine - economics
State Medicine - organization & administration
Studies
United Kingdom
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-d3eea8ffef1911a25edbae4dae4643c8cb7571ba2ee38e1d98377d20f79bc26b3
cites
container_end_page 39
container_issue 3
container_start_page 27
container_title Health Affairs
container_volume 18
creator Le Grand, J
description The British National Health Service (NHS) recently underwent a massive social experiment, inspired in large part by the ideas of U.S. experts. This involved the creation of an internal or quasi-market, separating purchaser from provider and encouraging competition among providers. After reviewing the evidence concerning the impact of this experiment, I conclude that the impact in fact was minimal, partly because of the retention of central government control and partly because the experiment was based on an inadequate understanding of professional and managerial motivations. The paper draws out general lessons of the experiment for other market-oriented health care systems and examines whether the lessons are reflected in the new batch of NHS reforms initiated by the recently elected Labour Government.
doi_str_mv 10.1377/hlthaff.18.3.27
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69848806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2077465341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-d3eea8ffef1911a25edbae4dae4643c8cb7571ba2ee38e1d98377d20f79bc26b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0MFO3DAQBmALFcEWOHOrolaqeiBbj-3Ek1MFKwqVUDmwPVtOMiFBznqxs0W8PYaFS6WKgzUa6fPY8zN2DHwOUuvvvZt623VzwLmcC73DZlAolReC4wc240JjLjQU--xjjHeclwJ4tcf2gUtEqHDGlgs_rmkapsGvTrLG-zUFu218SP1qCt79yJbWUcy64Mds6ik7C-lC7LPfL9S67JJs-kl2Q-Hv0NAh2-2si3T0Wg_Yn5_ny8VlfnV98WtxepU3qsIpbyWRxa6jDioAKwpqa0uqTadUssGm1oWG2goiiQRthWnlVvBOV3UjyloesK_buevg7zcUJzMOsSHn7Ir8JpqyQoXIy3chIGKZMknwyz_wzm9C2jAawbVWZSEVJPX5_0qVUnF4fvPTK9rUI7VmHYbRhkfzln0C37agH277hyGQiaN1LnEwz8HTagI00ggtnwCOz5TA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204634016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Competition, cooperation, or control? Tales from the British National Health Service</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Le Grand, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Le Grand, J</creatorcontrib><description>The British National Health Service (NHS) recently underwent a massive social experiment, inspired in large part by the ideas of U.S. experts. This involved the creation of an internal or quasi-market, separating purchaser from provider and encouraging competition among providers. After reviewing the evidence concerning the impact of this experiment, I conclude that the impact in fact was minimal, partly because of the retention of central government control and partly because the experiment was based on an inadequate understanding of professional and managerial motivations. The paper draws out general lessons of the experiment for other market-oriented health care systems and examines whether the lessons are reflected in the new batch of NHS reforms initiated by the recently elected Labour Government.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-2715</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1544-5208</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.18.3.27</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10388198</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Health Affairs</publisher><subject>Budgets ; Bureaucracy ; Central government ; Community health care ; Competition ; Cooperation ; Cooperative Behavior ; Economic Competition ; Economics ; Efficiency ; Experiments ; Experts ; Financing, Government ; Health ; Health care ; Health care policy ; Health Care Reform ; Health maintenance organizations ; Health Policy ; Health services ; HMOs ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Markets ; National health insurance ; Nonprofit hospitals ; Performance management ; Politics ; Primary care ; Prime ministers ; Privatization ; Public health ; Reforms ; Retention ; Social policy ; Social research ; State Medicine - economics ; State Medicine - organization &amp; administration ; Studies ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Health Affairs, 1999-05, Vol.18 (3), p.27-39</ispartof><rights>Copyright Project Hope May/Jun 1999</rights><rights>Copyright The People to People Health Foundation, Inc., Project HOPE May/Jun 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-d3eea8ffef1911a25edbae4dae4643c8cb7571ba2ee38e1d98377d20f79bc26b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2077465341/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2077465341?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11687,12844,12846,21386,21393,27865,27923,27924,33222,33610,33611,33984,33985,36059,36060,43732,43947,44362,73992,74239,74666</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10388198$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Le Grand, J</creatorcontrib><title>Competition, cooperation, or control? Tales from the British National Health Service</title><title>Health Affairs</title><addtitle>Health Aff (Millwood)</addtitle><description>The British National Health Service (NHS) recently underwent a massive social experiment, inspired in large part by the ideas of U.S. experts. This involved the creation of an internal or quasi-market, separating purchaser from provider and encouraging competition among providers. After reviewing the evidence concerning the impact of this experiment, I conclude that the impact in fact was minimal, partly because of the retention of central government control and partly because the experiment was based on an inadequate understanding of professional and managerial motivations. The paper draws out general lessons of the experiment for other market-oriented health care systems and examines whether the lessons are reflected in the new batch of NHS reforms initiated by the recently elected Labour Government.</description><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Bureaucracy</subject><subject>Central government</subject><subject>Community health care</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Economic Competition</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Financing, Government</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health Care Reform</subject><subject>Health maintenance organizations</subject><subject>Health Policy</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>HMOs</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>National health insurance</subject><subject>Nonprofit hospitals</subject><subject>Performance management</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Prime ministers</subject><subject>Privatization</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>State Medicine - economics</subject><subject>State Medicine - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0278-2715</issn><issn>1544-5208</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0MFO3DAQBmALFcEWOHOrolaqeiBbj-3Ek1MFKwqVUDmwPVtOMiFBznqxs0W8PYaFS6WKgzUa6fPY8zN2DHwOUuvvvZt623VzwLmcC73DZlAolReC4wc240JjLjQU--xjjHeclwJ4tcf2gUtEqHDGlgs_rmkapsGvTrLG-zUFu218SP1qCt79yJbWUcy64Mds6ik7C-lC7LPfL9S67JJs-kl2Q-Hv0NAh2-2si3T0Wg_Yn5_ny8VlfnV98WtxepU3qsIpbyWRxa6jDioAKwpqa0uqTadUssGm1oWG2goiiQRthWnlVvBOV3UjyloesK_buevg7zcUJzMOsSHn7Ir8JpqyQoXIy3chIGKZMknwyz_wzm9C2jAawbVWZSEVJPX5_0qVUnF4fvPTK9rUI7VmHYbRhkfzln0C37agH277hyGQiaN1LnEwz8HTagI00ggtnwCOz5TA</recordid><startdate>19990501</startdate><enddate>19990501</enddate><creator>Le Grand, J</creator><general>Health Affairs</general><general>The People to People Health Foundation, Inc., Project HOPE</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990501</creationdate><title>Competition, cooperation, or control? Tales from the British National Health Service</title><author>Le Grand, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-d3eea8ffef1911a25edbae4dae4643c8cb7571ba2ee38e1d98377d20f79bc26b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Bureaucracy</topic><topic>Central government</topic><topic>Community health care</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Economic Competition</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Financing, Government</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health Care Reform</topic><topic>Health maintenance organizations</topic><topic>Health Policy</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>HMOs</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>National health insurance</topic><topic>Nonprofit hospitals</topic><topic>Performance management</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Prime ministers</topic><topic>Privatization</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>State Medicine - economics</topic><topic>State Medicine - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Le Grand, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health Affairs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Le Grand, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Competition, cooperation, or control? Tales from the British National Health Service</atitle><jtitle>Health Affairs</jtitle><addtitle>Health Aff (Millwood)</addtitle><date>1999-05-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>27</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>27-39</pages><issn>0278-2715</issn><eissn>1544-5208</eissn><abstract>The British National Health Service (NHS) recently underwent a massive social experiment, inspired in large part by the ideas of U.S. experts. This involved the creation of an internal or quasi-market, separating purchaser from provider and encouraging competition among providers. After reviewing the evidence concerning the impact of this experiment, I conclude that the impact in fact was minimal, partly because of the retention of central government control and partly because the experiment was based on an inadequate understanding of professional and managerial motivations. The paper draws out general lessons of the experiment for other market-oriented health care systems and examines whether the lessons are reflected in the new batch of NHS reforms initiated by the recently elected Labour Government.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Health Affairs</pub><pmid>10388198</pmid><doi>10.1377/hlthaff.18.3.27</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-2715
ispartof Health Affairs, 1999-05, Vol.18 (3), p.27-39
issn 0278-2715
1544-5208
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69848806
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Politics Collection; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Budgets
Bureaucracy
Central government
Community health care
Competition
Cooperation
Cooperative Behavior
Economic Competition
Economics
Efficiency
Experiments
Experts
Financing, Government
Health
Health care
Health care policy
Health Care Reform
Health maintenance organizations
Health Policy
Health services
HMOs
Hospitals
Humans
Markets
National health insurance
Nonprofit hospitals
Performance management
Politics
Primary care
Prime ministers
Privatization
Public health
Reforms
Retention
Social policy
Social research
State Medicine - economics
State Medicine - organization & administration
Studies
United Kingdom
title Competition, cooperation, or control? Tales from the British National Health Service
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T14%3A46%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Competition,%20cooperation,%20or%20control?%20Tales%20from%20the%20British%20National%20Health%20Service&rft.jtitle=Health%20Affairs&rft.au=Le%20Grand,%20J&rft.date=1999-05-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=27-39&rft.issn=0278-2715&rft.eissn=1544-5208&rft_id=info:doi/10.1377/hlthaff.18.3.27&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2077465341%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-d3eea8ffef1911a25edbae4dae4643c8cb7571ba2ee38e1d98377d20f79bc26b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204634016&rft_id=info:pmid/10388198&rfr_iscdi=true