Study of the Possible Mechanisms Involved in the Mucosal Immune System Activation by Lactic Acid Bacteria

• Published in: Journal of dairy science 1999-06, Vol.82 (6), p.1108-1114
• Main Authors: Perdigón, G., Vintiñi, E., Alvarez, S., Medina, M., Medici, M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Antibodies, Bacterial - analysis; Antigens, Bacterial - immunology; B-Lymphocytes - immunology; Biological and medical sciences; Biotechnology; Bronchi - cytology; Bronchi - immunology; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Fundamental immunology; Immunity; Immunobiology; Immunoglobulin A - analysis; Immunoglobulin M - analysis; immunomodulation; intestinal interactions; Intestinal Mucosa - immunology; Intestines - cytology; Intestines - immunology; lactic acid bacteria; Lactobacillus - immunology; Lymphocyte Count; Lymphoid Tissue - cytology; Lymphoid Tissue - immunology; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Modulation of the immune response (stimulation, suppression)
• ISSN: 0022-0302; 1525-3198
• DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75333-6

The induction of a mucosal immune response is not easy due to the development of oral tolerance, but under some conditions, bacteria can activate this immune system. Antigens administered orally can interact with M cells of Peyer's patches or bind to the epithelial cells. We have demonstrated that certain lactic acid bacteria are able to induce specific secretory immunity, and others will enhance the gut inflammatory immune response. The aim of this work was to establish the reason for these different behaviors and to define possible mechanisms involved in the interaction of lactic acid bacteria at the intestinal level. We studied IgA+ and IgM+ B cells comparatively in bronchus and intestine and CD4+ T cells and IgA anti-lactic acid bacteria antibodies in the intestinal fluid, induced by oral administration of Lactobacillus casei, Lb. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus, Lb. acidophilus, Lb. plantarum, Lb. rhamnosus, Lactococcus lactis, and Streptococcus salivarius ssp. thermophilus. The increase in the IgA+ B cells in the bronchus means that these lactic acid bacteria were able to induce the IgA cycle by interaction with M cells from Peyer's patches or intestinal epithelial cells. The IgM+ cells increased when the stimulus did not induce the switch from IgM+ to IgA+. The increase in the CD4+ cells suggests interaction of Peyer's patches and enhancement of the B- and T-cell migration. The anti-lactic acid bacteria antibody is related to the processing and presentation of the microorganisms to the immune cells. We demonstrated that Lb. casei and Lb. plantarum were able to interact with Peyer's patch cells and showed an increase in IgA+, CD4+ cells, and antibodies specific for the stimulating strain. Lactobacillus acidophilus induced gut mucosal activation by interaction with the epithelial cells without increase in the immune cells associated with the bronchus. Although Lb. rhamnosus and Strep. salivarius ssp. thermophilus interact with epithelial cells, they also induced an immune response against their epitopes. Lactococcus lactis and Lb. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus induced an increase of IgA+ cells entering the IgA cycle but not CD4+ cells; thus, these bacteria would have been bound to epithelial cells that activated B lymphocytes without processing and presenting of their epitopes. We did not determine specific antibodies against Lc. lactis or Lb. bulgaricus.