Determination of skeletal muscle and fat-free mass by nuclear and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry methods in men and women aged 51-84 y (1-3)

Skeletal muscle mass (SMM) and fat-free mass (FFM) are important variables in nutritional studies. Accurate techniques for measuring these variables have not been thoroughly validated in elderly subjects. The objectives of this study were to 1) compare SMM values derived from dual-energy X-ray absor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of clinical nutrition 1999-08, Vol.70 (2), p.228-233
Main Authors: Hansen, R D, Raja, C, Aslani, A, Smith, R C, Allen, B J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Absorptiometry, Photon
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging
Anthropometry - methods
Body Composition
Electric Impedance
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Muscle, Skeletal - anatomy & histology
Muscle, Skeletal - diagnostic imaging
Muscular system
Nitrogen
Potassium
Skeletal system
X-rays
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Skeletal muscle mass (SMM) and fat-free mass (FFM) are important variables in nutritional studies. Accurate techniques for measuring these variables have not been thoroughly validated in elderly subjects. The objectives of this study were to 1) compare SMM values derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with those calculated by a nuclear method from total body potassium (TBK) and total body nitrogen (TBN) measurement (both: KN) in older subjects, and 2) assess the accuracy of FFM measurement by DXA in these subjects. TBK, TBN, DXA (model XR36; Norland, Fort Atkinson, WI), bioimpedance, and anthropometric measurements were performed on healthy women (n = 50) and men (n = 25) aged 51-84 y. Mean SMM by KN was not significantly different from SMM by DXA in either sex. SMM by KN predicted SMM by DXA with an SEE of 2.1 kg (r = 0.95, P < 0.0001 for women and men together). In the men, FFM by DXA agreed well with FFM estimated by TBK, skinfold thicknesses, bioimpedance analysis, and a multicompartment model. In women, FFM by DXA was 4-5 kg less than that by the other methods (P < 0.01). Truncal fat was related to intermethod FFM differences (r = 0.58, P < 0.0001). These data indicate that 1) either the nuclear or the DXA method can be applied to estimate SMM in healthy older subjects, and 2) the Norland DXA instrument significantly underestimates FFM in older women, in part, because of the influence of truncal adiposity.
ISSN:0002-9165
1938-3207
DOI:10.1093/ajcn.70.2.228