Loading…

Can Brief Intervention through Community Dental Care Have an Effect on Adolescent Smoking?

Background. Community dental clinics are good settings for smoking intervention. The aim here was to put forward a strategy for preventing adolescent smoking by means of a brief intervention. Methods. A total of 2,586 12-year-olds participated in this follow-up study. They were asked upon arrival fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Preventive medicine 1999-08, Vol.29 (2), p.107-111
Main Authors: Kentala, Jukka, Utriainen, Pekka, Pahkala, Kimmo, Mattila, Kari
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-9c12cfdf8c7c8a9b63e38c7403f01af6d4266eae584be2c9aa715fc5d496adda3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-9c12cfdf8c7c8a9b63e38c7403f01af6d4266eae584be2c9aa715fc5d496adda3
container_end_page 111
container_issue 2
container_start_page 107
container_title Preventive medicine
container_volume 29
creator Kentala, Jukka
Utriainen, Pekka
Pahkala, Kimmo
Mattila, Kari
description Background. Community dental clinics are good settings for smoking intervention. The aim here was to put forward a strategy for preventing adolescent smoking by means of a brief intervention. Methods. A total of 2,586 12-year-olds participated in this follow-up study. They were asked upon arrival for their annual routine dental examination to complete a smoking questionnaire and were randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the usual care control group according to the last digit of their date of birth (odd or even). The intervention comprised annually inquiring about smoking, showing photographs of the harmful effects of smoking on the teeth, allowing participants to examine their own mouth with a mirror, and finally counselling them in accordance with their answer to the question on smoking habits. The smoking status reported was not verified by other means. Results. The prevalence of smoking at the end of the 2-year follow-up was 18.1%, in the intervention group and 20.8% among the controls. However, no statistically significant differences between groups were found. Conclusions. These results reflect the difficulties of achieving successful results with long-term smoking cessation programs with adolescents in unstable conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/pmed.1999.0512
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69959636</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0091743599905121</els_id><sourcerecordid>69959636</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-9c12cfdf8c7c8a9b63e38c7403f01af6d4266eae584be2c9aa715fc5d496adda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFPGzEQRq0KRFLg2mPlE7cN412vE58QXWhBQuqhcOFiOfY4cdldp_ZuJP59vUokTpxmpHnzaeYR8o3BggGI612HdsGklAuoWfmFzBlIUUAp4ITMASQrlryqZ-RrSn8BGBPAz8iMAecCKjEnr43u6Y_o0dHHfsC4x37woafDNoZxs6VN6Lqx98M7vcsT3dJGR6QPeo80L947h2agmb-1ocVkMkP_dOHN95ubC3LqdJvw8ljPycvP--fmoXj6_euxuX0qTMVhKKRhpXHWrczSrLRciwqr3HOoHDDthOWlEKixXvE1lkZqvWS1M7XlUmhrdXVOrg65uxj-jZgG1fl8SdvqHsOYlJCylqISGVwcQBNDShGd2kXf6fiuGKjJpppsqsmmmmzmhe_H5HE9TT7wg74MrA4A5v_2HqNKxmNv0PqYxSgb_GfZ_wFbWoSE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69959636</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can Brief Intervention through Community Dental Care Have an Effect on Adolescent Smoking?</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Kentala, Jukka ; Utriainen, Pekka ; Pahkala, Kimmo ; Mattila, Kari</creator><creatorcontrib>Kentala, Jukka ; Utriainen, Pekka ; Pahkala, Kimmo ; Mattila, Kari</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Community dental clinics are good settings for smoking intervention. The aim here was to put forward a strategy for preventing adolescent smoking by means of a brief intervention. Methods. A total of 2,586 12-year-olds participated in this follow-up study. They were asked upon arrival for their annual routine dental examination to complete a smoking questionnaire and were randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the usual care control group according to the last digit of their date of birth (odd or even). The intervention comprised annually inquiring about smoking, showing photographs of the harmful effects of smoking on the teeth, allowing participants to examine their own mouth with a mirror, and finally counselling them in accordance with their answer to the question on smoking habits. The smoking status reported was not verified by other means. Results. The prevalence of smoking at the end of the 2-year follow-up was 18.1%, in the intervention group and 20.8% among the controls. However, no statistically significant differences between groups were found. Conclusions. These results reflect the difficulties of achieving successful results with long-term smoking cessation programs with adolescents in unstable conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-7435</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0512</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10446036</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Community Dentistry - methods ; Dental Care - methods ; Dental Clinics ; dentistry ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; follow-up study ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; intervention ; Male ; Patient Education as Topic - methods ; Prevalence ; Program Evaluation ; Risk Factors ; smoking ; Smoking Prevention ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Preventive medicine, 1999-08, Vol.29 (2), p.107-111</ispartof><rights>1999 American Health Foundation and Academic Press</rights><rights>Copyright 1999 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-9c12cfdf8c7c8a9b63e38c7403f01af6d4266eae584be2c9aa715fc5d496adda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-9c12cfdf8c7c8a9b63e38c7403f01af6d4266eae584be2c9aa715fc5d496adda3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10446036$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kentala, Jukka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utriainen, Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pahkala, Kimmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattila, Kari</creatorcontrib><title>Can Brief Intervention through Community Dental Care Have an Effect on Adolescent Smoking?</title><title>Preventive medicine</title><addtitle>Prev Med</addtitle><description>Background. Community dental clinics are good settings for smoking intervention. The aim here was to put forward a strategy for preventing adolescent smoking by means of a brief intervention. Methods. A total of 2,586 12-year-olds participated in this follow-up study. They were asked upon arrival for their annual routine dental examination to complete a smoking questionnaire and were randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the usual care control group according to the last digit of their date of birth (odd or even). The intervention comprised annually inquiring about smoking, showing photographs of the harmful effects of smoking on the teeth, allowing participants to examine their own mouth with a mirror, and finally counselling them in accordance with their answer to the question on smoking habits. The smoking status reported was not verified by other means. Results. The prevalence of smoking at the end of the 2-year follow-up was 18.1%, in the intervention group and 20.8% among the controls. However, no statistically significant differences between groups were found. Conclusions. These results reflect the difficulties of achieving successful results with long-term smoking cessation programs with adolescents in unstable conditions.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Community Dentistry - methods</subject><subject>Dental Care - methods</subject><subject>Dental Clinics</subject><subject>dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>follow-up study</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>smoking</subject><subject>Smoking Prevention</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0091-7435</issn><issn>1096-0260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFPGzEQRq0KRFLg2mPlE7cN412vE58QXWhBQuqhcOFiOfY4cdldp_ZuJP59vUokTpxmpHnzaeYR8o3BggGI612HdsGklAuoWfmFzBlIUUAp4ITMASQrlryqZ-RrSn8BGBPAz8iMAecCKjEnr43u6Y_o0dHHfsC4x37woafDNoZxs6VN6Lqx98M7vcsT3dJGR6QPeo80L947h2agmb-1ocVkMkP_dOHN95ubC3LqdJvw8ljPycvP--fmoXj6_euxuX0qTMVhKKRhpXHWrczSrLRciwqr3HOoHDDthOWlEKixXvE1lkZqvWS1M7XlUmhrdXVOrg65uxj-jZgG1fl8SdvqHsOYlJCylqISGVwcQBNDShGd2kXf6fiuGKjJpppsqsmmmmzmhe_H5HE9TT7wg74MrA4A5v_2HqNKxmNv0PqYxSgb_GfZ_wFbWoSE</recordid><startdate>19990801</startdate><enddate>19990801</enddate><creator>Kentala, Jukka</creator><creator>Utriainen, Pekka</creator><creator>Pahkala, Kimmo</creator><creator>Mattila, Kari</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990801</creationdate><title>Can Brief Intervention through Community Dental Care Have an Effect on Adolescent Smoking?</title><author>Kentala, Jukka ; Utriainen, Pekka ; Pahkala, Kimmo ; Mattila, Kari</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-9c12cfdf8c7c8a9b63e38c7403f01af6d4266eae584be2c9aa715fc5d496adda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Community Dentistry - methods</topic><topic>Dental Care - methods</topic><topic>Dental Clinics</topic><topic>dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>follow-up study</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>smoking</topic><topic>Smoking Prevention</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kentala, Jukka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utriainen, Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pahkala, Kimmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattila, Kari</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Preventive medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kentala, Jukka</au><au>Utriainen, Pekka</au><au>Pahkala, Kimmo</au><au>Mattila, Kari</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can Brief Intervention through Community Dental Care Have an Effect on Adolescent Smoking?</atitle><jtitle>Preventive medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Prev Med</addtitle><date>1999-08-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>107</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>107-111</pages><issn>0091-7435</issn><eissn>1096-0260</eissn><abstract>Background. Community dental clinics are good settings for smoking intervention. The aim here was to put forward a strategy for preventing adolescent smoking by means of a brief intervention. Methods. A total of 2,586 12-year-olds participated in this follow-up study. They were asked upon arrival for their annual routine dental examination to complete a smoking questionnaire and were randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the usual care control group according to the last digit of their date of birth (odd or even). The intervention comprised annually inquiring about smoking, showing photographs of the harmful effects of smoking on the teeth, allowing participants to examine their own mouth with a mirror, and finally counselling them in accordance with their answer to the question on smoking habits. The smoking status reported was not verified by other means. Results. The prevalence of smoking at the end of the 2-year follow-up was 18.1%, in the intervention group and 20.8% among the controls. However, no statistically significant differences between groups were found. Conclusions. These results reflect the difficulties of achieving successful results with long-term smoking cessation programs with adolescents in unstable conditions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10446036</pmid><doi>10.1006/pmed.1999.0512</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-7435
ispartof Preventive medicine, 1999-08, Vol.29 (2), p.107-111
issn 0091-7435
1096-0260
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69959636
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Adolescent
Community Dentistry - methods
Dental Care - methods
Dental Clinics
dentistry
Female
Follow-Up Studies
follow-up study
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
intervention
Male
Patient Education as Topic - methods
Prevalence
Program Evaluation
Risk Factors
smoking
Smoking Prevention
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Can Brief Intervention through Community Dental Care Have an Effect on Adolescent Smoking?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T10%3A02%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20Brief%20Intervention%20through%20Community%20Dental%20Care%20Have%20an%20Effect%20on%20Adolescent%20Smoking?&rft.jtitle=Preventive%20medicine&rft.au=Kentala,%20Jukka&rft.date=1999-08-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=107-111&rft.issn=0091-7435&rft.eissn=1096-0260&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/pmed.1999.0512&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69959636%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-9c12cfdf8c7c8a9b63e38c7403f01af6d4266eae584be2c9aa715fc5d496adda3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69959636&rft_id=info:pmid/10446036&rfr_iscdi=true