Loading…
Can Brief Intervention through Community Dental Care Have an Effect on Adolescent Smoking?
Background. Community dental clinics are good settings for smoking intervention. The aim here was to put forward a strategy for preventing adolescent smoking by means of a brief intervention. Methods. A total of 2,586 12-year-olds participated in this follow-up study. They were asked upon arrival fo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Preventive medicine 1999-08, Vol.29 (2), p.107-111 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-9c12cfdf8c7c8a9b63e38c7403f01af6d4266eae584be2c9aa715fc5d496adda3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-9c12cfdf8c7c8a9b63e38c7403f01af6d4266eae584be2c9aa715fc5d496adda3 |
container_end_page | 111 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 107 |
container_title | Preventive medicine |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Kentala, Jukka Utriainen, Pekka Pahkala, Kimmo Mattila, Kari |
description | Background. Community dental clinics are good settings for smoking intervention. The aim here was to put forward a strategy for preventing adolescent smoking by means of a brief intervention.
Methods. A total of 2,586 12-year-olds participated in this follow-up study. They were asked upon arrival for their annual routine dental examination to complete a smoking questionnaire and were randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the usual care control group according to the last digit of their date of birth (odd or even). The intervention comprised annually inquiring about smoking, showing photographs of the harmful effects of smoking on the teeth, allowing participants to examine their own mouth with a mirror, and finally counselling them in accordance with their answer to the question on smoking habits. The smoking status reported was not verified by other means.
Results. The prevalence of smoking at the end of the 2-year follow-up was 18.1%, in the intervention group and 20.8% among the controls. However, no statistically significant differences between groups were found.
Conclusions. These results reflect the difficulties of achieving successful results with long-term smoking cessation programs with adolescents in unstable conditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1006/pmed.1999.0512 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69959636</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0091743599905121</els_id><sourcerecordid>69959636</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-9c12cfdf8c7c8a9b63e38c7403f01af6d4266eae584be2c9aa715fc5d496adda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFPGzEQRq0KRFLg2mPlE7cN412vE58QXWhBQuqhcOFiOfY4cdldp_ZuJP59vUokTpxmpHnzaeYR8o3BggGI612HdsGklAuoWfmFzBlIUUAp4ITMASQrlryqZ-RrSn8BGBPAz8iMAecCKjEnr43u6Y_o0dHHfsC4x37woafDNoZxs6VN6Lqx98M7vcsT3dJGR6QPeo80L947h2agmb-1ocVkMkP_dOHN95ubC3LqdJvw8ljPycvP--fmoXj6_euxuX0qTMVhKKRhpXHWrczSrLRciwqr3HOoHDDthOWlEKixXvE1lkZqvWS1M7XlUmhrdXVOrg65uxj-jZgG1fl8SdvqHsOYlJCylqISGVwcQBNDShGd2kXf6fiuGKjJpppsqsmmmmzmhe_H5HE9TT7wg74MrA4A5v_2HqNKxmNv0PqYxSgb_GfZ_wFbWoSE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69959636</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can Brief Intervention through Community Dental Care Have an Effect on Adolescent Smoking?</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Kentala, Jukka ; Utriainen, Pekka ; Pahkala, Kimmo ; Mattila, Kari</creator><creatorcontrib>Kentala, Jukka ; Utriainen, Pekka ; Pahkala, Kimmo ; Mattila, Kari</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Community dental clinics are good settings for smoking intervention. The aim here was to put forward a strategy for preventing adolescent smoking by means of a brief intervention.
Methods. A total of 2,586 12-year-olds participated in this follow-up study. They were asked upon arrival for their annual routine dental examination to complete a smoking questionnaire and were randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the usual care control group according to the last digit of their date of birth (odd or even). The intervention comprised annually inquiring about smoking, showing photographs of the harmful effects of smoking on the teeth, allowing participants to examine their own mouth with a mirror, and finally counselling them in accordance with their answer to the question on smoking habits. The smoking status reported was not verified by other means.
Results. The prevalence of smoking at the end of the 2-year follow-up was 18.1%, in the intervention group and 20.8% among the controls. However, no statistically significant differences between groups were found.
Conclusions. These results reflect the difficulties of achieving successful results with long-term smoking cessation programs with adolescents in unstable conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-7435</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0512</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10446036</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Community Dentistry - methods ; Dental Care - methods ; Dental Clinics ; dentistry ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; follow-up study ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; intervention ; Male ; Patient Education as Topic - methods ; Prevalence ; Program Evaluation ; Risk Factors ; smoking ; Smoking Prevention ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Preventive medicine, 1999-08, Vol.29 (2), p.107-111</ispartof><rights>1999 American Health Foundation and Academic Press</rights><rights>Copyright 1999 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-9c12cfdf8c7c8a9b63e38c7403f01af6d4266eae584be2c9aa715fc5d496adda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-9c12cfdf8c7c8a9b63e38c7403f01af6d4266eae584be2c9aa715fc5d496adda3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10446036$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kentala, Jukka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utriainen, Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pahkala, Kimmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattila, Kari</creatorcontrib><title>Can Brief Intervention through Community Dental Care Have an Effect on Adolescent Smoking?</title><title>Preventive medicine</title><addtitle>Prev Med</addtitle><description>Background. Community dental clinics are good settings for smoking intervention. The aim here was to put forward a strategy for preventing adolescent smoking by means of a brief intervention.
Methods. A total of 2,586 12-year-olds participated in this follow-up study. They were asked upon arrival for their annual routine dental examination to complete a smoking questionnaire and were randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the usual care control group according to the last digit of their date of birth (odd or even). The intervention comprised annually inquiring about smoking, showing photographs of the harmful effects of smoking on the teeth, allowing participants to examine their own mouth with a mirror, and finally counselling them in accordance with their answer to the question on smoking habits. The smoking status reported was not verified by other means.
Results. The prevalence of smoking at the end of the 2-year follow-up was 18.1%, in the intervention group and 20.8% among the controls. However, no statistically significant differences between groups were found.
Conclusions. These results reflect the difficulties of achieving successful results with long-term smoking cessation programs with adolescents in unstable conditions.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Community Dentistry - methods</subject><subject>Dental Care - methods</subject><subject>Dental Clinics</subject><subject>dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>follow-up study</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>smoking</subject><subject>Smoking Prevention</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0091-7435</issn><issn>1096-0260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFPGzEQRq0KRFLg2mPlE7cN412vE58QXWhBQuqhcOFiOfY4cdldp_ZuJP59vUokTpxmpHnzaeYR8o3BggGI612HdsGklAuoWfmFzBlIUUAp4ITMASQrlryqZ-RrSn8BGBPAz8iMAecCKjEnr43u6Y_o0dHHfsC4x37woafDNoZxs6VN6Lqx98M7vcsT3dJGR6QPeo80L947h2agmb-1ocVkMkP_dOHN95ubC3LqdJvw8ljPycvP--fmoXj6_euxuX0qTMVhKKRhpXHWrczSrLRciwqr3HOoHDDthOWlEKixXvE1lkZqvWS1M7XlUmhrdXVOrg65uxj-jZgG1fl8SdvqHsOYlJCylqISGVwcQBNDShGd2kXf6fiuGKjJpppsqsmmmmzmhe_H5HE9TT7wg74MrA4A5v_2HqNKxmNv0PqYxSgb_GfZ_wFbWoSE</recordid><startdate>19990801</startdate><enddate>19990801</enddate><creator>Kentala, Jukka</creator><creator>Utriainen, Pekka</creator><creator>Pahkala, Kimmo</creator><creator>Mattila, Kari</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990801</creationdate><title>Can Brief Intervention through Community Dental Care Have an Effect on Adolescent Smoking?</title><author>Kentala, Jukka ; Utriainen, Pekka ; Pahkala, Kimmo ; Mattila, Kari</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-9c12cfdf8c7c8a9b63e38c7403f01af6d4266eae584be2c9aa715fc5d496adda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Community Dentistry - methods</topic><topic>Dental Care - methods</topic><topic>Dental Clinics</topic><topic>dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>follow-up study</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>smoking</topic><topic>Smoking Prevention</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kentala, Jukka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utriainen, Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pahkala, Kimmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattila, Kari</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Preventive medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kentala, Jukka</au><au>Utriainen, Pekka</au><au>Pahkala, Kimmo</au><au>Mattila, Kari</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can Brief Intervention through Community Dental Care Have an Effect on Adolescent Smoking?</atitle><jtitle>Preventive medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Prev Med</addtitle><date>1999-08-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>107</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>107-111</pages><issn>0091-7435</issn><eissn>1096-0260</eissn><abstract>Background. Community dental clinics are good settings for smoking intervention. The aim here was to put forward a strategy for preventing adolescent smoking by means of a brief intervention.
Methods. A total of 2,586 12-year-olds participated in this follow-up study. They were asked upon arrival for their annual routine dental examination to complete a smoking questionnaire and were randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the usual care control group according to the last digit of their date of birth (odd or even). The intervention comprised annually inquiring about smoking, showing photographs of the harmful effects of smoking on the teeth, allowing participants to examine their own mouth with a mirror, and finally counselling them in accordance with their answer to the question on smoking habits. The smoking status reported was not verified by other means.
Results. The prevalence of smoking at the end of the 2-year follow-up was 18.1%, in the intervention group and 20.8% among the controls. However, no statistically significant differences between groups were found.
Conclusions. These results reflect the difficulties of achieving successful results with long-term smoking cessation programs with adolescents in unstable conditions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10446036</pmid><doi>10.1006/pmed.1999.0512</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0091-7435 |
ispartof | Preventive medicine, 1999-08, Vol.29 (2), p.107-111 |
issn | 0091-7435 1096-0260 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69959636 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Community Dentistry - methods Dental Care - methods Dental Clinics dentistry Female Follow-Up Studies follow-up study Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Humans intervention Male Patient Education as Topic - methods Prevalence Program Evaluation Risk Factors smoking Smoking Prevention Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Can Brief Intervention through Community Dental Care Have an Effect on Adolescent Smoking? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T10%3A02%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20Brief%20Intervention%20through%20Community%20Dental%20Care%20Have%20an%20Effect%20on%20Adolescent%20Smoking?&rft.jtitle=Preventive%20medicine&rft.au=Kentala,%20Jukka&rft.date=1999-08-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=107-111&rft.issn=0091-7435&rft.eissn=1096-0260&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/pmed.1999.0512&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69959636%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-9c12cfdf8c7c8a9b63e38c7403f01af6d4266eae584be2c9aa715fc5d496adda3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69959636&rft_id=info:pmid/10446036&rfr_iscdi=true |