Loading…
Prospective, randomized, double-blind study of prophylactic antibiotics in axillary lymph node dissection
Background: Antibiotic prophylaxis is controversial in patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). We determined whether preoperative antibiotics decreased incidence or treatment cost of infectious complications following ALND. Methods: Two hundred patients entered this prospective, r...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American journal of surgery 1998-09, Vol.176 (3), p.239-243 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 243 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 239 |
container_title | The American journal of surgery |
container_volume | 176 |
creator | Bold, Richard J Mansfield, Paul F Berger, David H Pollock, Raphael E Singletary, S.Eva Ames, Frederick C Balch, Charles M Hohn, David C Ross, Merrick I |
description | Background: Antibiotic prophylaxis is controversial in patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). We determined whether preoperative antibiotics decreased incidence or treatment cost of infectious complications following ALND.
Methods: Two hundred patients entered this prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Patients received either placebo or cefonicid preoperatively. Loco-regional signs of infection were monitored for 4 weeks postoperatively.
Results: There was a trend toward fewer infections in the prophylactic group (placebo 13% versus cefonicid 6%;
P = 0.080). Cefonicid significantly decreased severe infections requiring hospitalization (placebo 8% versus cefonicid 1%;
P = 0.033). Cefonicid also decreased the treatment cost of infection per patient ($49.80 versus $364.87).
Conclusions: We demonstrated a trend toward fewer overall infections and significantly fewer severe infections in patients given prophylactic antibiotics, which translated into a decrease in the cost of treatment for infectious complications. These findings support antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing ALND. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00154-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69965303</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961098001548</els_id><sourcerecordid>69965303</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e291t-81bf14393a0ce3948cf1377912cd0ab2cd679fdd1a4c250b126fcbb7443771a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kdtKxDAQhoMouh4eYSEXIgpWM003Ta5EFk8gKKjXIaeykbapTbu4Pr3ZdfEmk2G-Gf6ZH6EpkCsgwK7fCCF5JhiQc8EvCIFZkfEdNAFeigw4p7to8o8coMMYP1MKUNB9tC_KksGMTJB_7UPsnBn80l3iXrU2NP7H2Utsw6hrl-natxbHYbQrHCrc9aFbrGqVGgxW7eC1D-kbsW-x-vZ1rfoVrldNt8BtsA5bH-N6emiP0V6l6uhOtvEIfdzfvc8fs-eXh6f57XPmcgFDxkFXSaOgihhHRcFNBbQsBeTGEqXTy0pRWQuqMPmMaMhZZbQuiyJRoEp6hM7-5iapX6OLg2x8NC4pa10Yo2RCsBklNIHTLTjqxlnZ9b5J6uX2Nql-uq2raFRdpeMYH_-xvCCcM5awmz_MpaWW3vUyGu9a46zv0-bSBi-ByLVncuOZXBsiBZcbzySnv9I_iY0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69965303</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective, randomized, double-blind study of prophylactic antibiotics in axillary lymph node dissection</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Bold, Richard J ; Mansfield, Paul F ; Berger, David H ; Pollock, Raphael E ; Singletary, S.Eva ; Ames, Frederick C ; Balch, Charles M ; Hohn, David C ; Ross, Merrick I</creator><creatorcontrib>Bold, Richard J ; Mansfield, Paul F ; Berger, David H ; Pollock, Raphael E ; Singletary, S.Eva ; Ames, Frederick C ; Balch, Charles M ; Hohn, David C ; Ross, Merrick I</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Antibiotic prophylaxis is controversial in patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). We determined whether preoperative antibiotics decreased incidence or treatment cost of infectious complications following ALND.
Methods: Two hundred patients entered this prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Patients received either placebo or cefonicid preoperatively. Loco-regional signs of infection were monitored for 4 weeks postoperatively.
Results: There was a trend toward fewer infections in the prophylactic group (placebo 13% versus cefonicid 6%;
P = 0.080). Cefonicid significantly decreased severe infections requiring hospitalization (placebo 8% versus cefonicid 1%;
P = 0.033). Cefonicid also decreased the treatment cost of infection per patient ($49.80 versus $364.87).
Conclusions: We demonstrated a trend toward fewer overall infections and significantly fewer severe infections in patients given prophylactic antibiotics, which translated into a decrease in the cost of treatment for infectious complications. These findings support antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing ALND.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00154-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9776150</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJSUAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antibacterial agents ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis - economics ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis - methods ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis - statistics & numerical data ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; Axilla ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cefonicid - administration & dosage ; Cefonicid - economics ; Cephalosporins - administration & dosage ; Cephalosporins - economics ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Lymph Node Excision - economics ; Lymph Node Excision - methods ; Lymph Node Excision - statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Prospective Studies ; Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 1998-09, Vol.176 (3), p.239-243</ispartof><rights>1998 Excerpta Medica Inc.</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2408866$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9776150$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bold, Richard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansfield, Paul F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollock, Raphael E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singletary, S.Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ames, Frederick C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balch, Charles M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hohn, David C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Merrick I</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective, randomized, double-blind study of prophylactic antibiotics in axillary lymph node dissection</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Background: Antibiotic prophylaxis is controversial in patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). We determined whether preoperative antibiotics decreased incidence or treatment cost of infectious complications following ALND.
Methods: Two hundred patients entered this prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Patients received either placebo or cefonicid preoperatively. Loco-regional signs of infection were monitored for 4 weeks postoperatively.
Results: There was a trend toward fewer infections in the prophylactic group (placebo 13% versus cefonicid 6%;
P = 0.080). Cefonicid significantly decreased severe infections requiring hospitalization (placebo 8% versus cefonicid 1%;
P = 0.033). Cefonicid also decreased the treatment cost of infection per patient ($49.80 versus $364.87).
Conclusions: We demonstrated a trend toward fewer overall infections and significantly fewer severe infections in patients given prophylactic antibiotics, which translated into a decrease in the cost of treatment for infectious complications. These findings support antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing ALND.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Antibacterial agents</subject><subject>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - economics</subject><subject>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - methods</subject><subject>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Axilla</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cefonicid - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Cefonicid - economics</subject><subject>Cephalosporins - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Cephalosporins - economics</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infusions, Intravenous</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision - economics</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision - methods</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kdtKxDAQhoMouh4eYSEXIgpWM003Ta5EFk8gKKjXIaeykbapTbu4Pr3ZdfEmk2G-Gf6ZH6EpkCsgwK7fCCF5JhiQc8EvCIFZkfEdNAFeigw4p7to8o8coMMYP1MKUNB9tC_KksGMTJB_7UPsnBn80l3iXrU2NP7H2Utsw6hrl-natxbHYbQrHCrc9aFbrGqVGgxW7eC1D-kbsW-x-vZ1rfoVrldNt8BtsA5bH-N6emiP0V6l6uhOtvEIfdzfvc8fs-eXh6f57XPmcgFDxkFXSaOgihhHRcFNBbQsBeTGEqXTy0pRWQuqMPmMaMhZZbQuiyJRoEp6hM7-5iapX6OLg2x8NC4pa10Yo2RCsBklNIHTLTjqxlnZ9b5J6uX2Nql-uq2raFRdpeMYH_-xvCCcM5awmz_MpaWW3vUyGu9a46zv0-bSBi-ByLVncuOZXBsiBZcbzySnv9I_iY0</recordid><startdate>19980901</startdate><enddate>19980901</enddate><creator>Bold, Richard J</creator><creator>Mansfield, Paul F</creator><creator>Berger, David H</creator><creator>Pollock, Raphael E</creator><creator>Singletary, S.Eva</creator><creator>Ames, Frederick C</creator><creator>Balch, Charles M</creator><creator>Hohn, David C</creator><creator>Ross, Merrick I</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980901</creationdate><title>Prospective, randomized, double-blind study of prophylactic antibiotics in axillary lymph node dissection</title><author>Bold, Richard J ; Mansfield, Paul F ; Berger, David H ; Pollock, Raphael E ; Singletary, S.Eva ; Ames, Frederick C ; Balch, Charles M ; Hohn, David C ; Ross, Merrick I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e291t-81bf14393a0ce3948cf1377912cd0ab2cd679fdd1a4c250b126fcbb7443771a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Antibacterial agents</topic><topic>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - economics</topic><topic>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - methods</topic><topic>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Axilla</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cefonicid - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Cefonicid - economics</topic><topic>Cephalosporins - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Cephalosporins - economics</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infusions, Intravenous</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision - economics</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision - methods</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bold, Richard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansfield, Paul F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollock, Raphael E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singletary, S.Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ames, Frederick C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balch, Charles M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hohn, David C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Merrick I</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bold, Richard J</au><au>Mansfield, Paul F</au><au>Berger, David H</au><au>Pollock, Raphael E</au><au>Singletary, S.Eva</au><au>Ames, Frederick C</au><au>Balch, Charles M</au><au>Hohn, David C</au><au>Ross, Merrick I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective, randomized, double-blind study of prophylactic antibiotics in axillary lymph node dissection</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>1998-09-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>176</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>243</epage><pages>239-243</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><coden>AJSUAB</coden><abstract>Background: Antibiotic prophylaxis is controversial in patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). We determined whether preoperative antibiotics decreased incidence or treatment cost of infectious complications following ALND.
Methods: Two hundred patients entered this prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Patients received either placebo or cefonicid preoperatively. Loco-regional signs of infection were monitored for 4 weeks postoperatively.
Results: There was a trend toward fewer infections in the prophylactic group (placebo 13% versus cefonicid 6%;
P = 0.080). Cefonicid significantly decreased severe infections requiring hospitalization (placebo 8% versus cefonicid 1%;
P = 0.033). Cefonicid also decreased the treatment cost of infection per patient ($49.80 versus $364.87).
Conclusions: We demonstrated a trend toward fewer overall infections and significantly fewer severe infections in patients given prophylactic antibiotics, which translated into a decrease in the cost of treatment for infectious complications. These findings support antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing ALND.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9776150</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00154-8</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9610 |
ispartof | The American journal of surgery, 1998-09, Vol.176 (3), p.239-243 |
issn | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69965303 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Antibacterial agents Antibiotic Prophylaxis - economics Antibiotic Prophylaxis - methods Antibiotic Prophylaxis - statistics & numerical data Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents Axilla Biological and medical sciences Cefonicid - administration & dosage Cefonicid - economics Cephalosporins - administration & dosage Cephalosporins - economics Cost-Benefit Analysis Double-Blind Method Female Humans Infusions, Intravenous Lymph Node Excision - economics Lymph Node Excision - methods Lymph Node Excision - statistics & numerical data Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Pharmacology. Drug treatments Prospective Studies Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control |
title | Prospective, randomized, double-blind study of prophylactic antibiotics in axillary lymph node dissection |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A57%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective,%20randomized,%20double-blind%20study%20of%20prophylactic%20antibiotics%20in%20axillary%20lymph%20node%20dissection&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Bold,%20Richard%20J&rft.date=1998-09-01&rft.volume=176&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=243&rft.pages=239-243&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft.coden=AJSUAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00154-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69965303%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e291t-81bf14393a0ce3948cf1377912cd0ab2cd679fdd1a4c250b126fcbb7443771a73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69965303&rft_id=info:pmid/9776150&rfr_iscdi=true |