Loading…

A study of the impact of screening or selective radiography on the treatment and postdelivery outcome for edentulous patients

Objective. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of radiographic findings on complete denture treatment and on the postdelivery course of those patients who had pretreatment radiographs (the screening group) and those who did not (the selection group). Method. In total, 375 cases were r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 1998-09, Vol.86 (3), p.353-359
Main Authors: Bohay, Richard N, Stephens, Russell G, Kogon, Stanley L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a9ccd3411b5c8fb39192d0587a2e51c75b0e75c0cac623e2a117c0db2eb782163
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a9ccd3411b5c8fb39192d0587a2e51c75b0e75c0cac623e2a117c0db2eb782163
container_end_page 359
container_issue 3
container_start_page 353
container_title Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics
container_volume 86
creator Bohay, Richard N
Stephens, Russell G
Kogon, Stanley L
description Objective. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of radiographic findings on complete denture treatment and on the postdelivery course of those patients who had pretreatment radiographs (the screening group) and those who did not (the selection group). Method. In total, 375 cases were randomly selected by systematic sampling. Data collected included patient demographic information and denture history, predenture fabrication radiographic findings, and postdenture delivery complaints. Results. Of the screening patients, 100% had pretreatment radiographs made; this compared with 13.5% of the selection patients. In the screening group, 68.3% of patients had one or more positive radiographic findings recorded. Of the screening patients, 8.3% received treatment before denture fabrication; this compared with 1.2% of the selection patients. Of the 375 cases, 2 screening patients had postdelivery complaints that required management other than denture adjustment. Conclusion. The results indicate that there is weak scientific support for the guideline recommending routine pretreatment radiography for new denture patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90185-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69965348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1079210498901858</els_id><sourcerecordid>69965348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a9ccd3411b5c8fb39192d0587a2e51c75b0e75c0cac623e2a117c0db2eb782163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9rFjEQh4Mota1-hEIOInpYzZ83u8lJStEqFDyo4C1kJ7NtZHezJtlCD353s-_72qunZJjnNzM8hFxw9o4z3r7_xllnGsHZ7o3Rbw3jWjX6CTnlSuhGGvXzaf3_Q56Ts5x_McZaacwJOTFdq3dCn5I_lzSX1T_QONByhzRMi4OyVRkS4hzmWxoTzTgilHCPNDkf4m1yy13NzPtMSejKhHOhbvZ0ibl4HCubKrEWiBPSoc5AX5F1jGumiyuhFvkFeTa4MePL43tOfnz6-P3qc3Pz9frL1eVNA1Kb0jgD4OWO816BHnppuBGeKd05gYpDp3qGnQIGDlohUTjOO2C-F9h3WvBWnpPXh7lLir9XzMVOIQOOo5ux3mNbY1old7qC6gBCijknHOySwuTSg-XMbtrtXrvdnFqj7V673XIXxwVrP6F_TB091_6rY99lcOOQ3AwhP2JCGtbqDftwwLDKuA-YbIYqCtCHVP1bH8N_DvkLCTihrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69965348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A study of the impact of screening or selective radiography on the treatment and postdelivery outcome for edentulous patients</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bohay, Richard N ; Stephens, Russell G ; Kogon, Stanley L</creator><creatorcontrib>Bohay, Richard N ; Stephens, Russell G ; Kogon, Stanley L</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of radiographic findings on complete denture treatment and on the postdelivery course of those patients who had pretreatment radiographs (the screening group) and those who did not (the selection group). Method. In total, 375 cases were randomly selected by systematic sampling. Data collected included patient demographic information and denture history, predenture fabrication radiographic findings, and postdenture delivery complaints. Results. Of the screening patients, 100% had pretreatment radiographs made; this compared with 13.5% of the selection patients. In the screening group, 68.3% of patients had one or more positive radiographic findings recorded. Of the screening patients, 8.3% received treatment before denture fabrication; this compared with 1.2% of the selection patients. Of the 375 cases, 2 screening patients had postdelivery complaints that required management other than denture adjustment. Conclusion. The results indicate that there is weak scientific support for the guideline recommending routine pretreatment radiography for new denture patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1079-2104</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-395X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90185-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9768428</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>St. Louis, MO: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Dentistry ; Denture, Complete ; Female ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Mouth, Edentulous - diagnostic imaging ; Mouth, Edentulous - rehabilitation ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology. Orbit ; Patient Satisfaction ; Patient Selection ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Radiography, Dental - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Radiography, Panoramic - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><ispartof>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 1998-09, Vol.86 (3), p.353-359</ispartof><rights>1998</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a9ccd3411b5c8fb39192d0587a2e51c75b0e75c0cac623e2a117c0db2eb782163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a9ccd3411b5c8fb39192d0587a2e51c75b0e75c0cac623e2a117c0db2eb782163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2390688$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9768428$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bohay, Richard N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Russell G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogon, Stanley L</creatorcontrib><title>A study of the impact of screening or selective radiography on the treatment and postdelivery outcome for edentulous patients</title><title>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics</title><addtitle>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod</addtitle><description>Objective. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of radiographic findings on complete denture treatment and on the postdelivery course of those patients who had pretreatment radiographs (the screening group) and those who did not (the selection group). Method. In total, 375 cases were randomly selected by systematic sampling. Data collected included patient demographic information and denture history, predenture fabrication radiographic findings, and postdenture delivery complaints. Results. Of the screening patients, 100% had pretreatment radiographs made; this compared with 13.5% of the selection patients. In the screening group, 68.3% of patients had one or more positive radiographic findings recorded. Of the screening patients, 8.3% received treatment before denture fabrication; this compared with 1.2% of the selection patients. Of the 375 cases, 2 screening patients had postdelivery complaints that required management other than denture adjustment. Conclusion. The results indicate that there is weak scientific support for the guideline recommending routine pretreatment radiography for new denture patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Denture, Complete</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mouth, Edentulous - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mouth, Edentulous - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology. Orbit</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Radiography, Panoramic - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>1079-2104</issn><issn>1528-395X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9rFjEQh4Mota1-hEIOInpYzZ83u8lJStEqFDyo4C1kJ7NtZHezJtlCD353s-_72qunZJjnNzM8hFxw9o4z3r7_xllnGsHZ7o3Rbw3jWjX6CTnlSuhGGvXzaf3_Q56Ts5x_McZaacwJOTFdq3dCn5I_lzSX1T_QONByhzRMi4OyVRkS4hzmWxoTzTgilHCPNDkf4m1yy13NzPtMSejKhHOhbvZ0ibl4HCubKrEWiBPSoc5AX5F1jGumiyuhFvkFeTa4MePL43tOfnz6-P3qc3Pz9frL1eVNA1Kb0jgD4OWO816BHnppuBGeKd05gYpDp3qGnQIGDlohUTjOO2C-F9h3WvBWnpPXh7lLir9XzMVOIQOOo5ux3mNbY1old7qC6gBCijknHOySwuTSg-XMbtrtXrvdnFqj7V673XIXxwVrP6F_TB091_6rY99lcOOQ3AwhP2JCGtbqDftwwLDKuA-YbIYqCtCHVP1bH8N_DvkLCTihrg</recordid><startdate>19980901</startdate><enddate>19980901</enddate><creator>Bohay, Richard N</creator><creator>Stephens, Russell G</creator><creator>Kogon, Stanley L</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980901</creationdate><title>A study of the impact of screening or selective radiography on the treatment and postdelivery outcome for edentulous patients</title><author>Bohay, Richard N ; Stephens, Russell G ; Kogon, Stanley L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a9ccd3411b5c8fb39192d0587a2e51c75b0e75c0cac623e2a117c0db2eb782163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Denture, Complete</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mouth, Edentulous - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mouth, Edentulous - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology. Orbit</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Radiography, Panoramic - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bohay, Richard N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Russell G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogon, Stanley L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bohay, Richard N</au><au>Stephens, Russell G</au><au>Kogon, Stanley L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A study of the impact of screening or selective radiography on the treatment and postdelivery outcome for edentulous patients</atitle><jtitle>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics</jtitle><addtitle>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod</addtitle><date>1998-09-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>353</spage><epage>359</epage><pages>353-359</pages><issn>1079-2104</issn><eissn>1528-395X</eissn><abstract>Objective. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of radiographic findings on complete denture treatment and on the postdelivery course of those patients who had pretreatment radiographs (the screening group) and those who did not (the selection group). Method. In total, 375 cases were randomly selected by systematic sampling. Data collected included patient demographic information and denture history, predenture fabrication radiographic findings, and postdenture delivery complaints. Results. Of the screening patients, 100% had pretreatment radiographs made; this compared with 13.5% of the selection patients. In the screening group, 68.3% of patients had one or more positive radiographic findings recorded. Of the screening patients, 8.3% received treatment before denture fabrication; this compared with 1.2% of the selection patients. Of the 375 cases, 2 screening patients had postdelivery complaints that required management other than denture adjustment. Conclusion. The results indicate that there is weak scientific support for the guideline recommending routine pretreatment radiography for new denture patients.</abstract><cop>St. Louis, MO</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>9768428</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90185-8</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1079-2104
ispartof Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 1998-09, Vol.86 (3), p.353-359
issn 1079-2104
1528-395X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69965348
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Dentistry
Denture, Complete
Female
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Mouth, Edentulous - diagnostic imaging
Mouth, Edentulous - rehabilitation
Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology. Orbit
Patient Satisfaction
Patient Selection
Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry
Radiography, Dental - statistics & numerical data
Radiography, Panoramic - statistics & numerical data
title A study of the impact of screening or selective radiography on the treatment and postdelivery outcome for edentulous patients
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T20%3A10%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20study%20of%20the%20impact%20of%20screening%20or%20selective%20radiography%20on%20the%20treatment%20and%20postdelivery%20outcome%20for%20edentulous%20patients&rft.jtitle=Oral%20surgery,%20oral%20medicine,%20oral%20pathology,%20oral%20radiology%20and%20endodontics&rft.au=Bohay,%20Richard%20N&rft.date=1998-09-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=353&rft.epage=359&rft.pages=353-359&rft.issn=1079-2104&rft.eissn=1528-395X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90185-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69965348%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a9ccd3411b5c8fb39192d0587a2e51c75b0e75c0cac623e2a117c0db2eb782163%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69965348&rft_id=info:pmid/9768428&rfr_iscdi=true