Loading…
A study of the impact of screening or selective radiography on the treatment and postdelivery outcome for edentulous patients
Objective. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of radiographic findings on complete denture treatment and on the postdelivery course of those patients who had pretreatment radiographs (the screening group) and those who did not (the selection group). Method. In total, 375 cases were r...
Saved in:
Published in: | Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 1998-09, Vol.86 (3), p.353-359 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a9ccd3411b5c8fb39192d0587a2e51c75b0e75c0cac623e2a117c0db2eb782163 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a9ccd3411b5c8fb39192d0587a2e51c75b0e75c0cac623e2a117c0db2eb782163 |
container_end_page | 359 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 353 |
container_title | Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics |
container_volume | 86 |
creator | Bohay, Richard N Stephens, Russell G Kogon, Stanley L |
description | Objective.
The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of radiographic findings on complete denture treatment and on the postdelivery course of those patients who had pretreatment radiographs (the screening group) and those who did not (the selection group).
Method.
In total, 375 cases were randomly selected by systematic sampling. Data collected included patient demographic information and denture history, predenture fabrication radiographic findings, and postdenture delivery complaints.
Results.
Of the screening patients, 100% had pretreatment radiographs made; this compared with 13.5% of the selection patients. In the screening group, 68.3% of patients had one or more positive radiographic findings recorded. Of the screening patients, 8.3% received treatment before denture fabrication; this compared with 1.2% of the selection patients. Of the 375 cases, 2 screening patients had postdelivery complaints that required management other than denture adjustment.
Conclusion.
The results indicate that there is weak scientific support for the guideline recommending routine pretreatment radiography for new denture patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90185-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69965348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1079210498901858</els_id><sourcerecordid>69965348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a9ccd3411b5c8fb39192d0587a2e51c75b0e75c0cac623e2a117c0db2eb782163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9rFjEQh4Mota1-hEIOInpYzZ83u8lJStEqFDyo4C1kJ7NtZHezJtlCD353s-_72qunZJjnNzM8hFxw9o4z3r7_xllnGsHZ7o3Rbw3jWjX6CTnlSuhGGvXzaf3_Q56Ts5x_McZaacwJOTFdq3dCn5I_lzSX1T_QONByhzRMi4OyVRkS4hzmWxoTzTgilHCPNDkf4m1yy13NzPtMSejKhHOhbvZ0ibl4HCubKrEWiBPSoc5AX5F1jGumiyuhFvkFeTa4MePL43tOfnz6-P3qc3Pz9frL1eVNA1Kb0jgD4OWO816BHnppuBGeKd05gYpDp3qGnQIGDlohUTjOO2C-F9h3WvBWnpPXh7lLir9XzMVOIQOOo5ux3mNbY1old7qC6gBCijknHOySwuTSg-XMbtrtXrvdnFqj7V673XIXxwVrP6F_TB091_6rY99lcOOQ3AwhP2JCGtbqDftwwLDKuA-YbIYqCtCHVP1bH8N_DvkLCTihrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69965348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A study of the impact of screening or selective radiography on the treatment and postdelivery outcome for edentulous patients</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bohay, Richard N ; Stephens, Russell G ; Kogon, Stanley L</creator><creatorcontrib>Bohay, Richard N ; Stephens, Russell G ; Kogon, Stanley L</creatorcontrib><description>Objective.
The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of radiographic findings on complete denture treatment and on the postdelivery course of those patients who had pretreatment radiographs (the screening group) and those who did not (the selection group).
Method.
In total, 375 cases were randomly selected by systematic sampling. Data collected included patient demographic information and denture history, predenture fabrication radiographic findings, and postdenture delivery complaints.
Results.
Of the screening patients, 100% had pretreatment radiographs made; this compared with 13.5% of the selection patients. In the screening group, 68.3% of patients had one or more positive radiographic findings recorded. Of the screening patients, 8.3% received treatment before denture fabrication; this compared with 1.2% of the selection patients. Of the 375 cases, 2 screening patients had postdelivery complaints that required management other than denture adjustment.
Conclusion.
The results indicate that there is weak scientific support for the guideline recommending routine pretreatment radiography for new denture patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1079-2104</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-395X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90185-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9768428</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>St. Louis, MO: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Dentistry ; Denture, Complete ; Female ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Mouth, Edentulous - diagnostic imaging ; Mouth, Edentulous - rehabilitation ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology. Orbit ; Patient Satisfaction ; Patient Selection ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Radiography, Dental - statistics & numerical data ; Radiography, Panoramic - statistics & numerical data</subject><ispartof>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 1998-09, Vol.86 (3), p.353-359</ispartof><rights>1998</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a9ccd3411b5c8fb39192d0587a2e51c75b0e75c0cac623e2a117c0db2eb782163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a9ccd3411b5c8fb39192d0587a2e51c75b0e75c0cac623e2a117c0db2eb782163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2390688$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9768428$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bohay, Richard N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Russell G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogon, Stanley L</creatorcontrib><title>A study of the impact of screening or selective radiography on the treatment and postdelivery outcome for edentulous patients</title><title>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics</title><addtitle>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod</addtitle><description>Objective.
The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of radiographic findings on complete denture treatment and on the postdelivery course of those patients who had pretreatment radiographs (the screening group) and those who did not (the selection group).
Method.
In total, 375 cases were randomly selected by systematic sampling. Data collected included patient demographic information and denture history, predenture fabrication radiographic findings, and postdenture delivery complaints.
Results.
Of the screening patients, 100% had pretreatment radiographs made; this compared with 13.5% of the selection patients. In the screening group, 68.3% of patients had one or more positive radiographic findings recorded. Of the screening patients, 8.3% received treatment before denture fabrication; this compared with 1.2% of the selection patients. Of the 375 cases, 2 screening patients had postdelivery complaints that required management other than denture adjustment.
Conclusion.
The results indicate that there is weak scientific support for the guideline recommending routine pretreatment radiography for new denture patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Denture, Complete</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mouth, Edentulous - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mouth, Edentulous - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology. Orbit</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Radiography, Panoramic - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>1079-2104</issn><issn>1528-395X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9rFjEQh4Mota1-hEIOInpYzZ83u8lJStEqFDyo4C1kJ7NtZHezJtlCD353s-_72qunZJjnNzM8hFxw9o4z3r7_xllnGsHZ7o3Rbw3jWjX6CTnlSuhGGvXzaf3_Q56Ts5x_McZaacwJOTFdq3dCn5I_lzSX1T_QONByhzRMi4OyVRkS4hzmWxoTzTgilHCPNDkf4m1yy13NzPtMSejKhHOhbvZ0ibl4HCubKrEWiBPSoc5AX5F1jGumiyuhFvkFeTa4MePL43tOfnz6-P3qc3Pz9frL1eVNA1Kb0jgD4OWO816BHnppuBGeKd05gYpDp3qGnQIGDlohUTjOO2C-F9h3WvBWnpPXh7lLir9XzMVOIQOOo5ux3mNbY1old7qC6gBCijknHOySwuTSg-XMbtrtXrvdnFqj7V673XIXxwVrP6F_TB091_6rY99lcOOQ3AwhP2JCGtbqDftwwLDKuA-YbIYqCtCHVP1bH8N_DvkLCTihrg</recordid><startdate>19980901</startdate><enddate>19980901</enddate><creator>Bohay, Richard N</creator><creator>Stephens, Russell G</creator><creator>Kogon, Stanley L</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980901</creationdate><title>A study of the impact of screening or selective radiography on the treatment and postdelivery outcome for edentulous patients</title><author>Bohay, Richard N ; Stephens, Russell G ; Kogon, Stanley L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a9ccd3411b5c8fb39192d0587a2e51c75b0e75c0cac623e2a117c0db2eb782163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Denture, Complete</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mouth, Edentulous - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mouth, Edentulous - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology. Orbit</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Radiography, Panoramic - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bohay, Richard N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Russell G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogon, Stanley L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bohay, Richard N</au><au>Stephens, Russell G</au><au>Kogon, Stanley L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A study of the impact of screening or selective radiography on the treatment and postdelivery outcome for edentulous patients</atitle><jtitle>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics</jtitle><addtitle>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod</addtitle><date>1998-09-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>353</spage><epage>359</epage><pages>353-359</pages><issn>1079-2104</issn><eissn>1528-395X</eissn><abstract>Objective.
The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of radiographic findings on complete denture treatment and on the postdelivery course of those patients who had pretreatment radiographs (the screening group) and those who did not (the selection group).
Method.
In total, 375 cases were randomly selected by systematic sampling. Data collected included patient demographic information and denture history, predenture fabrication radiographic findings, and postdenture delivery complaints.
Results.
Of the screening patients, 100% had pretreatment radiographs made; this compared with 13.5% of the selection patients. In the screening group, 68.3% of patients had one or more positive radiographic findings recorded. Of the screening patients, 8.3% received treatment before denture fabrication; this compared with 1.2% of the selection patients. Of the 375 cases, 2 screening patients had postdelivery complaints that required management other than denture adjustment.
Conclusion.
The results indicate that there is weak scientific support for the guideline recommending routine pretreatment radiography for new denture patients.</abstract><cop>St. Louis, MO</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>9768428</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90185-8</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1079-2104 |
ispartof | Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 1998-09, Vol.86 (3), p.353-359 |
issn | 1079-2104 1528-395X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69965348 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Dentistry Denture, Complete Female Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Male Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data Medical sciences Middle Aged Mouth, Edentulous - diagnostic imaging Mouth, Edentulous - rehabilitation Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology. Orbit Patient Satisfaction Patient Selection Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry Radiography, Dental - statistics & numerical data Radiography, Panoramic - statistics & numerical data |
title | A study of the impact of screening or selective radiography on the treatment and postdelivery outcome for edentulous patients |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T20%3A10%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20study%20of%20the%20impact%20of%20screening%20or%20selective%20radiography%20on%20the%20treatment%20and%20postdelivery%20outcome%20for%20edentulous%20patients&rft.jtitle=Oral%20surgery,%20oral%20medicine,%20oral%20pathology,%20oral%20radiology%20and%20endodontics&rft.au=Bohay,%20Richard%20N&rft.date=1998-09-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=353&rft.epage=359&rft.pages=353-359&rft.issn=1079-2104&rft.eissn=1528-395X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90185-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69965348%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a9ccd3411b5c8fb39192d0587a2e51c75b0e75c0cac623e2a117c0db2eb782163%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69965348&rft_id=info:pmid/9768428&rfr_iscdi=true |