Loading…
Pancreaticogastrostomy for reconstruction of pancreatic stump after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinoma
Background: Management of the pancreatic stump after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is still a matter of debate. Pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) is used commonly but is associated with a significant incidence of pancreatic leaks. Pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) is an alternative that has been reported to be s...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American journal of surgery 1998-09, Vol.176 (3), p.274-278 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background: Management of the pancreatic stump after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is still a matter of debate. Pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) is used commonly but is associated with a significant incidence of pancreatic leaks. Pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) is an alternative that has been reported to be safer.
Methods: The study is a retrospective analysis of all patients having PD for ampullary carcinoma in one surgical unit at All India Institute of Medical Sciences over 18 years, with PG being the only drainage procedure for the pancreatic stump.
Results: Among 125 patients having PD for ampullary carcinoma, overall morbidity rate was 28%, mortality rate was 4.8%, with no cases of leakage from the pancreaticogastrostomy.
Conclusions: In world literature (including the current series), the leakage rate of PG is 2.5% (14 of 553) with only 2 deaths (2 of 14) due to leakage from PG. Our large experience and these data conclusively prove the safety of pancreaticogastrostomy, which should be the drainage procedure of choice for the pancreatic stump following pancreaticoduodenectomy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00139-1 |