Loading…

Caffeine and Stroop Interference

In two experiments the hypothesis that caffeine reduces Stroop interference was tested. In the first experiment interference was measured as the reduction in performance when subjects had to indicate the numerosity of strings of incongruent digits, relative to neutral-symbol strings. In the second e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior biochemistry and behavior, 1999-08, Vol.63 (4), p.589-598
Main Authors: Kenemans, J.Leon, Wieleman, Joan S.T, Zeegers, Mijke, Verbaten, Marinus N
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-1df8d9929a77c6d34e34ca397558ecfa7c9e6678a7db0692e00bb7b2b62b2d0a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-1df8d9929a77c6d34e34ca397558ecfa7c9e6678a7db0692e00bb7b2b62b2d0a3
container_end_page 598
container_issue 4
container_start_page 589
container_title Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior
container_volume 63
creator Kenemans, J.Leon
Wieleman, Joan S.T
Zeegers, Mijke
Verbaten, Marinus N
description In two experiments the hypothesis that caffeine reduces Stroop interference was tested. In the first experiment interference was measured as the reduction in performance when subjects had to indicate the numerosity of strings of incongruent digits, relative to neutral-symbol strings. In the second experiment the incongruent condition consisted of naming the color of words referring to incongruent colors, and was compared to color naming of neutral strings. In the number-digit task 250 mg caffeine reduced interference at the level of error rates, relative to placebo. In the color-word task interference was reduced at the level of reaction times. These results were obtained with blocked presentations of incongruent and neutral conditions. The color-word experiment also contained a condition in which neutral and incongruent trials were mixed within one sequence. In this mixed condition caffeine still reduced overall reaction times, but no longer specifically interference. It is argued that this dissociation reflects a caffeine-induced increase in flexibility. The results are discussed in relation to failed previous attempts to demonstrate increased selectivity under caffeine using non-Stroop tasks, the importance of including pretreatment sessions to detect artificial effects, and the possible contribution of withdrawal effects.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0091-3057(99)00022-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69983472</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0091305799000222</els_id><sourcerecordid>69983472</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-1df8d9929a77c6d34e34ca397558ecfa7c9e6678a7db0692e00bb7b2b62b2d0a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0M9LwzAUwPEgis7pn6D0IKKH6kvaJs1JZPhjMPAwPYc0eYFI186kE_zvbdeh3jzl8nkvyZeQMwo3FCi_XQJImmZQiCsprwGAsZTtkQktRZYWVIh9MvkhR-Q4xvce5YyLQ3JEIeeslxOSzLRz6BtMdGOTZRfadp3Mmw6Dw4CNwRNy4HQd8XR3Tsnb48Pr7DldvDzNZ_eL1GQSupRaV1opmdRCGG6zHLPc6EyKoijROC2MRM5FqYWtgEuGAFUlKlZxVjELOpuSy3HvOrQfG4ydWvlosK51g-0mKi5lmeWC9bAYoQltjAGdWge_0uFLUVBDGrVNo4Z_KynVNo0a5s53F2yqFdo_U2OLHlzsgI5G1y7oxvj46yQUnPGe3Y0M-xqfHoOKxg-lrA9oOmVb_89LvgFa9H4W</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69983472</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Caffeine and Stroop Interference</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Kenemans, J.Leon ; Wieleman, Joan S.T ; Zeegers, Mijke ; Verbaten, Marinus N</creator><creatorcontrib>Kenemans, J.Leon ; Wieleman, Joan S.T ; Zeegers, Mijke ; Verbaten, Marinus N</creatorcontrib><description>In two experiments the hypothesis that caffeine reduces Stroop interference was tested. In the first experiment interference was measured as the reduction in performance when subjects had to indicate the numerosity of strings of incongruent digits, relative to neutral-symbol strings. In the second experiment the incongruent condition consisted of naming the color of words referring to incongruent colors, and was compared to color naming of neutral strings. In the number-digit task 250 mg caffeine reduced interference at the level of error rates, relative to placebo. In the color-word task interference was reduced at the level of reaction times. These results were obtained with blocked presentations of incongruent and neutral conditions. The color-word experiment also contained a condition in which neutral and incongruent trials were mixed within one sequence. In this mixed condition caffeine still reduced overall reaction times, but no longer specifically interference. It is argued that this dissociation reflects a caffeine-induced increase in flexibility. The results are discussed in relation to failed previous attempts to demonstrate increased selectivity under caffeine using non-Stroop tasks, the importance of including pretreatment sessions to detect artificial effects, and the possible contribution of withdrawal effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-3057</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5177</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0091-3057(99)00022-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10462187</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBBHAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Caffeine ; Caffeine - pharmacology ; Central Nervous System Stimulants - pharmacology ; Color Perception - physiology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Miscellaneous ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychomotor Performance - drug effects ; Reaction Time - drug effects ; Selective attention ; Stroop interference ; Withdrawal</subject><ispartof>Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior, 1999-08, Vol.63 (4), p.589-598</ispartof><rights>1999 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-1df8d9929a77c6d34e34ca397558ecfa7c9e6678a7db0692e00bb7b2b62b2d0a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-1df8d9929a77c6d34e34ca397558ecfa7c9e6678a7db0692e00bb7b2b62b2d0a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1905626$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10462187$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kenemans, J.Leon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wieleman, Joan S.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeegers, Mijke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbaten, Marinus N</creatorcontrib><title>Caffeine and Stroop Interference</title><title>Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior</title><addtitle>Pharmacol Biochem Behav</addtitle><description>In two experiments the hypothesis that caffeine reduces Stroop interference was tested. In the first experiment interference was measured as the reduction in performance when subjects had to indicate the numerosity of strings of incongruent digits, relative to neutral-symbol strings. In the second experiment the incongruent condition consisted of naming the color of words referring to incongruent colors, and was compared to color naming of neutral strings. In the number-digit task 250 mg caffeine reduced interference at the level of error rates, relative to placebo. In the color-word task interference was reduced at the level of reaction times. These results were obtained with blocked presentations of incongruent and neutral conditions. The color-word experiment also contained a condition in which neutral and incongruent trials were mixed within one sequence. In this mixed condition caffeine still reduced overall reaction times, but no longer specifically interference. It is argued that this dissociation reflects a caffeine-induced increase in flexibility. The results are discussed in relation to failed previous attempts to demonstrate increased selectivity under caffeine using non-Stroop tasks, the importance of including pretreatment sessions to detect artificial effects, and the possible contribution of withdrawal effects.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Caffeine</subject><subject>Caffeine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Central Nervous System Stimulants - pharmacology</subject><subject>Color Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - drug effects</subject><subject>Reaction Time - drug effects</subject><subject>Selective attention</subject><subject>Stroop interference</subject><subject>Withdrawal</subject><issn>0091-3057</issn><issn>1873-5177</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0M9LwzAUwPEgis7pn6D0IKKH6kvaJs1JZPhjMPAwPYc0eYFI186kE_zvbdeh3jzl8nkvyZeQMwo3FCi_XQJImmZQiCsprwGAsZTtkQktRZYWVIh9MvkhR-Q4xvce5YyLQ3JEIeeslxOSzLRz6BtMdGOTZRfadp3Mmw6Dw4CNwRNy4HQd8XR3Tsnb48Pr7DldvDzNZ_eL1GQSupRaV1opmdRCGG6zHLPc6EyKoijROC2MRM5FqYWtgEuGAFUlKlZxVjELOpuSy3HvOrQfG4ydWvlosK51g-0mKi5lmeWC9bAYoQltjAGdWge_0uFLUVBDGrVNo4Z_KynVNo0a5s53F2yqFdo_U2OLHlzsgI5G1y7oxvj46yQUnPGe3Y0M-xqfHoOKxg-lrA9oOmVb_89LvgFa9H4W</recordid><startdate>19990801</startdate><enddate>19990801</enddate><creator>Kenemans, J.Leon</creator><creator>Wieleman, Joan S.T</creator><creator>Zeegers, Mijke</creator><creator>Verbaten, Marinus N</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990801</creationdate><title>Caffeine and Stroop Interference</title><author>Kenemans, J.Leon ; Wieleman, Joan S.T ; Zeegers, Mijke ; Verbaten, Marinus N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-1df8d9929a77c6d34e34ca397558ecfa7c9e6678a7db0692e00bb7b2b62b2d0a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Caffeine</topic><topic>Caffeine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Central Nervous System Stimulants - pharmacology</topic><topic>Color Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - drug effects</topic><topic>Reaction Time - drug effects</topic><topic>Selective attention</topic><topic>Stroop interference</topic><topic>Withdrawal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kenemans, J.Leon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wieleman, Joan S.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeegers, Mijke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbaten, Marinus N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kenemans, J.Leon</au><au>Wieleman, Joan S.T</au><au>Zeegers, Mijke</au><au>Verbaten, Marinus N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Caffeine and Stroop Interference</atitle><jtitle>Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior</jtitle><addtitle>Pharmacol Biochem Behav</addtitle><date>1999-08-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>589</spage><epage>598</epage><pages>589-598</pages><issn>0091-3057</issn><eissn>1873-5177</eissn><coden>PBBHAU</coden><abstract>In two experiments the hypothesis that caffeine reduces Stroop interference was tested. In the first experiment interference was measured as the reduction in performance when subjects had to indicate the numerosity of strings of incongruent digits, relative to neutral-symbol strings. In the second experiment the incongruent condition consisted of naming the color of words referring to incongruent colors, and was compared to color naming of neutral strings. In the number-digit task 250 mg caffeine reduced interference at the level of error rates, relative to placebo. In the color-word task interference was reduced at the level of reaction times. These results were obtained with blocked presentations of incongruent and neutral conditions. The color-word experiment also contained a condition in which neutral and incongruent trials were mixed within one sequence. In this mixed condition caffeine still reduced overall reaction times, but no longer specifically interference. It is argued that this dissociation reflects a caffeine-induced increase in flexibility. The results are discussed in relation to failed previous attempts to demonstrate increased selectivity under caffeine using non-Stroop tasks, the importance of including pretreatment sessions to detect artificial effects, and the possible contribution of withdrawal effects.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10462187</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0091-3057(99)00022-2</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-3057
ispartof Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior, 1999-08, Vol.63 (4), p.589-598
issn 0091-3057
1873-5177
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69983472
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Adult
Behavioral psychophysiology
Biological and medical sciences
Caffeine
Caffeine - pharmacology
Central Nervous System Stimulants - pharmacology
Color Perception - physiology
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Miscellaneous
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychomotor Performance - drug effects
Reaction Time - drug effects
Selective attention
Stroop interference
Withdrawal
title Caffeine and Stroop Interference
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T12%3A49%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Caffeine%20and%20Stroop%20Interference&rft.jtitle=Pharmacology,%20biochemistry%20and%20behavior&rft.au=Kenemans,%20J.Leon&rft.date=1999-08-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=589&rft.epage=598&rft.pages=589-598&rft.issn=0091-3057&rft.eissn=1873-5177&rft.coden=PBBHAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0091-3057(99)00022-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69983472%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-1df8d9929a77c6d34e34ca397558ecfa7c9e6678a7db0692e00bb7b2b62b2d0a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69983472&rft_id=info:pmid/10462187&rfr_iscdi=true