Loading…
Caffeine and Stroop Interference
In two experiments the hypothesis that caffeine reduces Stroop interference was tested. In the first experiment interference was measured as the reduction in performance when subjects had to indicate the numerosity of strings of incongruent digits, relative to neutral-symbol strings. In the second e...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior biochemistry and behavior, 1999-08, Vol.63 (4), p.589-598 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-1df8d9929a77c6d34e34ca397558ecfa7c9e6678a7db0692e00bb7b2b62b2d0a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-1df8d9929a77c6d34e34ca397558ecfa7c9e6678a7db0692e00bb7b2b62b2d0a3 |
container_end_page | 598 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 589 |
container_title | Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Kenemans, J.Leon Wieleman, Joan S.T Zeegers, Mijke Verbaten, Marinus N |
description | In two experiments the hypothesis that caffeine reduces Stroop interference was tested. In the first experiment interference was measured as the reduction in performance when subjects had to indicate the numerosity of strings of incongruent digits, relative to neutral-symbol strings. In the second experiment the incongruent condition consisted of naming the color of words referring to incongruent colors, and was compared to color naming of neutral strings. In the number-digit task 250 mg caffeine reduced interference at the level of error rates, relative to placebo. In the color-word task interference was reduced at the level of reaction times. These results were obtained with blocked presentations of incongruent and neutral conditions. The color-word experiment also contained a condition in which neutral and incongruent trials were mixed within one sequence. In this mixed condition caffeine still reduced overall reaction times, but no longer specifically interference. It is argued that this dissociation reflects a caffeine-induced increase in flexibility. The results are discussed in relation to failed previous attempts to demonstrate increased selectivity under caffeine using non-Stroop tasks, the importance of including pretreatment sessions to detect artificial effects, and the possible contribution of withdrawal effects. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0091-3057(99)00022-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69983472</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0091305799000222</els_id><sourcerecordid>69983472</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-1df8d9929a77c6d34e34ca397558ecfa7c9e6678a7db0692e00bb7b2b62b2d0a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0M9LwzAUwPEgis7pn6D0IKKH6kvaJs1JZPhjMPAwPYc0eYFI186kE_zvbdeh3jzl8nkvyZeQMwo3FCi_XQJImmZQiCsprwGAsZTtkQktRZYWVIh9MvkhR-Q4xvce5YyLQ3JEIeeslxOSzLRz6BtMdGOTZRfadp3Mmw6Dw4CNwRNy4HQd8XR3Tsnb48Pr7DldvDzNZ_eL1GQSupRaV1opmdRCGG6zHLPc6EyKoijROC2MRM5FqYWtgEuGAFUlKlZxVjELOpuSy3HvOrQfG4ydWvlosK51g-0mKi5lmeWC9bAYoQltjAGdWge_0uFLUVBDGrVNo4Z_KynVNo0a5s53F2yqFdo_U2OLHlzsgI5G1y7oxvj46yQUnPGe3Y0M-xqfHoOKxg-lrA9oOmVb_89LvgFa9H4W</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69983472</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Caffeine and Stroop Interference</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Kenemans, J.Leon ; Wieleman, Joan S.T ; Zeegers, Mijke ; Verbaten, Marinus N</creator><creatorcontrib>Kenemans, J.Leon ; Wieleman, Joan S.T ; Zeegers, Mijke ; Verbaten, Marinus N</creatorcontrib><description>In two experiments the hypothesis that caffeine reduces Stroop interference was tested. In the first experiment interference was measured as the reduction in performance when subjects had to indicate the numerosity of strings of incongruent digits, relative to neutral-symbol strings. In the second experiment the incongruent condition consisted of naming the color of words referring to incongruent colors, and was compared to color naming of neutral strings. In the number-digit task 250 mg caffeine reduced interference at the level of error rates, relative to placebo. In the color-word task interference was reduced at the level of reaction times. These results were obtained with blocked presentations of incongruent and neutral conditions. The color-word experiment also contained a condition in which neutral and incongruent trials were mixed within one sequence. In this mixed condition caffeine still reduced overall reaction times, but no longer specifically interference. It is argued that this dissociation reflects a caffeine-induced increase in flexibility. The results are discussed in relation to failed previous attempts to demonstrate increased selectivity under caffeine using non-Stroop tasks, the importance of including pretreatment sessions to detect artificial effects, and the possible contribution of withdrawal effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-3057</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5177</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0091-3057(99)00022-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10462187</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBBHAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Caffeine ; Caffeine - pharmacology ; Central Nervous System Stimulants - pharmacology ; Color Perception - physiology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Miscellaneous ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychomotor Performance - drug effects ; Reaction Time - drug effects ; Selective attention ; Stroop interference ; Withdrawal</subject><ispartof>Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior, 1999-08, Vol.63 (4), p.589-598</ispartof><rights>1999 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-1df8d9929a77c6d34e34ca397558ecfa7c9e6678a7db0692e00bb7b2b62b2d0a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-1df8d9929a77c6d34e34ca397558ecfa7c9e6678a7db0692e00bb7b2b62b2d0a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1905626$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10462187$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kenemans, J.Leon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wieleman, Joan S.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeegers, Mijke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbaten, Marinus N</creatorcontrib><title>Caffeine and Stroop Interference</title><title>Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior</title><addtitle>Pharmacol Biochem Behav</addtitle><description>In two experiments the hypothesis that caffeine reduces Stroop interference was tested. In the first experiment interference was measured as the reduction in performance when subjects had to indicate the numerosity of strings of incongruent digits, relative to neutral-symbol strings. In the second experiment the incongruent condition consisted of naming the color of words referring to incongruent colors, and was compared to color naming of neutral strings. In the number-digit task 250 mg caffeine reduced interference at the level of error rates, relative to placebo. In the color-word task interference was reduced at the level of reaction times. These results were obtained with blocked presentations of incongruent and neutral conditions. The color-word experiment also contained a condition in which neutral and incongruent trials were mixed within one sequence. In this mixed condition caffeine still reduced overall reaction times, but no longer specifically interference. It is argued that this dissociation reflects a caffeine-induced increase in flexibility. The results are discussed in relation to failed previous attempts to demonstrate increased selectivity under caffeine using non-Stroop tasks, the importance of including pretreatment sessions to detect artificial effects, and the possible contribution of withdrawal effects.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Caffeine</subject><subject>Caffeine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Central Nervous System Stimulants - pharmacology</subject><subject>Color Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - drug effects</subject><subject>Reaction Time - drug effects</subject><subject>Selective attention</subject><subject>Stroop interference</subject><subject>Withdrawal</subject><issn>0091-3057</issn><issn>1873-5177</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0M9LwzAUwPEgis7pn6D0IKKH6kvaJs1JZPhjMPAwPYc0eYFI186kE_zvbdeh3jzl8nkvyZeQMwo3FCi_XQJImmZQiCsprwGAsZTtkQktRZYWVIh9MvkhR-Q4xvce5YyLQ3JEIeeslxOSzLRz6BtMdGOTZRfadp3Mmw6Dw4CNwRNy4HQd8XR3Tsnb48Pr7DldvDzNZ_eL1GQSupRaV1opmdRCGG6zHLPc6EyKoijROC2MRM5FqYWtgEuGAFUlKlZxVjELOpuSy3HvOrQfG4ydWvlosK51g-0mKi5lmeWC9bAYoQltjAGdWge_0uFLUVBDGrVNo4Z_KynVNo0a5s53F2yqFdo_U2OLHlzsgI5G1y7oxvj46yQUnPGe3Y0M-xqfHoOKxg-lrA9oOmVb_89LvgFa9H4W</recordid><startdate>19990801</startdate><enddate>19990801</enddate><creator>Kenemans, J.Leon</creator><creator>Wieleman, Joan S.T</creator><creator>Zeegers, Mijke</creator><creator>Verbaten, Marinus N</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990801</creationdate><title>Caffeine and Stroop Interference</title><author>Kenemans, J.Leon ; Wieleman, Joan S.T ; Zeegers, Mijke ; Verbaten, Marinus N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-1df8d9929a77c6d34e34ca397558ecfa7c9e6678a7db0692e00bb7b2b62b2d0a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Caffeine</topic><topic>Caffeine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Central Nervous System Stimulants - pharmacology</topic><topic>Color Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - drug effects</topic><topic>Reaction Time - drug effects</topic><topic>Selective attention</topic><topic>Stroop interference</topic><topic>Withdrawal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kenemans, J.Leon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wieleman, Joan S.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeegers, Mijke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbaten, Marinus N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kenemans, J.Leon</au><au>Wieleman, Joan S.T</au><au>Zeegers, Mijke</au><au>Verbaten, Marinus N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Caffeine and Stroop Interference</atitle><jtitle>Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior</jtitle><addtitle>Pharmacol Biochem Behav</addtitle><date>1999-08-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>589</spage><epage>598</epage><pages>589-598</pages><issn>0091-3057</issn><eissn>1873-5177</eissn><coden>PBBHAU</coden><abstract>In two experiments the hypothesis that caffeine reduces Stroop interference was tested. In the first experiment interference was measured as the reduction in performance when subjects had to indicate the numerosity of strings of incongruent digits, relative to neutral-symbol strings. In the second experiment the incongruent condition consisted of naming the color of words referring to incongruent colors, and was compared to color naming of neutral strings. In the number-digit task 250 mg caffeine reduced interference at the level of error rates, relative to placebo. In the color-word task interference was reduced at the level of reaction times. These results were obtained with blocked presentations of incongruent and neutral conditions. The color-word experiment also contained a condition in which neutral and incongruent trials were mixed within one sequence. In this mixed condition caffeine still reduced overall reaction times, but no longer specifically interference. It is argued that this dissociation reflects a caffeine-induced increase in flexibility. The results are discussed in relation to failed previous attempts to demonstrate increased selectivity under caffeine using non-Stroop tasks, the importance of including pretreatment sessions to detect artificial effects, and the possible contribution of withdrawal effects.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10462187</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0091-3057(99)00022-2</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0091-3057 |
ispartof | Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior, 1999-08, Vol.63 (4), p.589-598 |
issn | 0091-3057 1873-5177 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69983472 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Adult Behavioral psychophysiology Biological and medical sciences Caffeine Caffeine - pharmacology Central Nervous System Stimulants - pharmacology Color Perception - physiology Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Miscellaneous Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychomotor Performance - drug effects Reaction Time - drug effects Selective attention Stroop interference Withdrawal |
title | Caffeine and Stroop Interference |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T12%3A49%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Caffeine%20and%20Stroop%20Interference&rft.jtitle=Pharmacology,%20biochemistry%20and%20behavior&rft.au=Kenemans,%20J.Leon&rft.date=1999-08-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=589&rft.epage=598&rft.pages=589-598&rft.issn=0091-3057&rft.eissn=1873-5177&rft.coden=PBBHAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0091-3057(99)00022-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69983472%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-1df8d9929a77c6d34e34ca397558ecfa7c9e6678a7db0692e00bb7b2b62b2d0a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69983472&rft_id=info:pmid/10462187&rfr_iscdi=true |