Prevalence of dysthymic disorder in primary care

• Published in: Journal of affective disorders 1999-08, Vol.54 (3), p.303-308
• Main Authors: Browne, Gina, Steiner, Meir, Roberts, Jacqueline, Gafni, Amiram, Byrne, Carolyn, Bell, Barbara, Mills, Michael, Chalklin, Lori, Wallik, David, Kraemer, James, Dunn, Edward
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Adult and adolescent clinical studies; Adults; Aged; Biological and medical sciences; Diagnosis, Differential; Dysthymic disorder; Dysthymic Disorder - diagnosis; Dysthymic Disorder - epidemiology; Female; Humans; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Miscellaneous; Mood disorders; Ontario - epidemiology; Prevalence; Primary care; Primary Health Care - statistics & numerical data; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychopathology. Psychiatry
• ISSN: 0165-0327; 1573-2517
• DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0327(98)00189-X

Background: Dysthymic disorder is characterised as a chronic state of depressed mood which is not otherwise attributable to physical, psychological or social events. While it can occur alone, there is increasing evidence that the majority of individuals who meet criteria for dysthymic disorder also experience more severe episodic mood disorders throughout their lifetime, and there is also an aggregation of mood disorders within their family members. Patients with dysthymic disorder are most often seen in primary care. Some researchers suggest that the majority of these individuals are never diagnosed or are not diagnosed until a more severe episodic mood disorder develops. The objective of this study was to determine the 12-month prevalence of Axis I psychiatric disorders, and in particular dysthymic disorder, in a primary care Health Service Organization in Ontario, Canada. Methods: Eligible and consenting adults registered with a primary care Health Service Organization were screened using the modified form of the University of Michigan Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Results: Of the 6280 eligible subjects, 4327 (69%) consented to screening. Two hundred and twenty-two (5.1%) subjects screened positive for dysthymic disorder. In addition, 90% of those who screened positive for dysthymic disorder also screened positive for other Axis I disorders including major depressive disorder, panic, simple phobia, and generalized anxiety disorder. Conclusions: There is much potential for the primary care physician to play a pivotal role in the recognition and treatment of dysthymic disorder and associated Axis I disorders. A focus on the family as a unit for care may be especially important given the reported aggregation of dysthymic disorder within families.