Auditory brainstem evoked responses and temperature monitoring during pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass

• Published in: Canadian journal of anesthesia 1999-09, Vol.46 (9), p.832-839
• Main Authors: RODRIGUEZ, R. A, EDMONDS, H. L, AUDEN, S. M, AUSTIN, E. H
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anesthesia; Biological and medical sciences; Body Temperature - physiology; Canals; Cardiopulmonary Bypass; Cooling; Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording; Electroencephalography; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology; Female; Humans; Hypothermia; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Male; Medical sciences; Monitoring, Intraoperative; Nervous system; Pediatrics; Rewarming; Temperature
• ISSN: 0832-610X; 1496-8975
• DOI: 10.1007/BF03012971

To examine the effects of temperature on auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) in infants during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass for total circulatory arrest (TCA). The relationship between ABRs (as a surrogate measure of core-brain temperature) and body temperature as measured at several temperature monitoring sites was determined. In a prospective, observational study, ABRs were recorded non-invasively at normothermia and at every 1 or 2 degrees C change in ear-canal temperature during cooling and rewarming in 15 infants (ages: 2 days to 14 months) that required TCA. The ABR latencies and amplitudes and the lowest temperatures at which an ABR was identified (the threshold) were measured during both cooling and rewarming. Temperatures from four standard temperature monitoring sites were simultaneously recorded. The latencies of ABRs increased and amplitudes decreased with cooling (P < 0.01), but rewarming reversed these effects. The ABR threshold temperature as related to each monitoring site (ear-canal, nasopharynx, esophagus and bladder) was respectively determined as 23 +/- 2.2 degrees C, 20.8 +/- 1.7 degrees C, 14.6 +/- 3.4 degrees C, and 21.5 +/- 3.8 degrees C during cooling and 21.8 +/- 1.6 degrees C, 22.4 +/- 2.0 degrees C, 27.6 +/- 3.6 degrees C, and 23.0 +/- 2.4 degrees C during rewarming. The rewarming latencies were shorter and Q10 latencies smaller than the corresponding cooling values (P < 0.01). Esophageal and bladder sites were more susceptible to temperature variations as compared with the ear-canal and nasopharynx. No temperature site reliably predicted an electrophysiological threshold. A faster latency recovery during rewarming suggests that body temperature monitoring underestimates the effects of rewarming in the core-brain. ABRs may be helpful to monitor the effects of cooling and rewarming on the core-brain during pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass.