Measuring the complexity of cell cycle arrest and killing of drugs: Kinetics of phase‐specific effects induced by Taxol

• Published in: Cytometry (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 1999-10, Vol.37 (2), p.113-124
• Main Authors: Sena, Giovanni, Onado, Carlo, Cappella, Paolo, Montalenti, Francesco, Ubezio, Paolo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic - pharmacology; apoptosis; Apoptosis - genetics; cell cycle; Cell Division - drug effects; cell proliferation; chemotherapy; DNA, Neoplasm - analysis; DNA, Neoplasm - drug effects; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Flow Cytometry; Histocytochemistry; Humans; In Situ Nick-End Labeling; Interphase - drug effects; Interphase - physiology; mathematical models; Mitosis - drug effects; Paclitaxel - pharmacology; S Phase - drug effects; Taxol; Time Factors; Tumor Cells, Cultured
• ISSN: 0196-4763; 1097-0320
• DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19991001)37:2<113::AID-CYTO4>3.0.CO;2-M

Background: Paclitaxel (Taxol) is known to act mainly in mitosis, interfering with microtubule dynamics, but effects on the other cells cycle phases have been reported also. However, a comparative picture of perturbation and killing in the G1, S and G2M phases after drug treatment is lacking. The approach developed by our group tackles the problem of the complexity of cell cycle effects with the aid of a computer program simulating cell cycle progression and new quantities measuring cell‐cycle arrest and death. Methods: The program generates data that were compared with those given by absolute cell counts and by different flow cytometry techniques, enabling us to follow the fate of G1 and G2M blocked cells either re‐entering the cycle or dying, distinguishing cytostatic and cytotoxic effects. Apoptosis was analyzed in order to refine the description of cytotoxic effects. Results: We estimated the number of blocked and dead cells after short‐term Taxol treatments in a range of concentrations and post‐drug incubation times. G2M block was immediately active at low concentrations but was reversible, becoming irreversible only at the highest concentrations. G1block became active later, allowing cell cycle progression of cells initially in G1, but was still active 48 h post‐treatment, at intermediate concentrations. S‐phase delay was detected after 24 h. The death rate was much higher within G1than G2M blocked cells. Conclusions: Our analysis unraveled the complexity of cell cycle effects of the drug, and revealed the activity of G1 checkpoint, hidden by a prompter but less cytotoxic G2M block. Cytometry 37:113–124, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.