Loading…

Optimal selection and preparation of fresh frozen corticocancellous allografts for cervical interbody spinal fusion

Iliac crest corticocancellous allografts for anterior interbody fusion were harvested from six cadavers. The grafts were cut sequentially from left and right crests and randomly assigned to tricortical or bicortical preparations. Their compression strengths then were determined and compared by match...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 1998-11, Vol.23 (21), p.2295-2298
Main Authors: KUMMER, F. J, DEYU CHEN, SPIVAK, J. M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-4009383b64846e1e06b94ef43dc61657ee6e2efd04e4710d4973f8fa731f79823
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-4009383b64846e1e06b94ef43dc61657ee6e2efd04e4710d4973f8fa731f79823
container_end_page 2298
container_issue 21
container_start_page 2295
container_title Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)
container_volume 23
creator KUMMER, F. J
DEYU CHEN
SPIVAK, J. M
description Iliac crest corticocancellous allografts for anterior interbody fusion were harvested from six cadavers. The grafts were cut sequentially from left and right crests and randomly assigned to tricortical or bicortical preparations. Their compression strengths then were determined and compared by matched pair analysis. To quantify the failure strength of the grafts from different iliac locations and determine the optimal type of preparation of the grafts for anterior interbody fusion. Iliac crest corticocancellous autografts and allografts commonly are used for interbody cervical fusions. However, graft strengths for specific sites have not been determined fully. Six paired, fresh frozen, iliac crests were sectioned using a customized miter box into multiple 1-cm-thick grafts 1.5 cm in depth to simulate cervical interbody grafts. The left and right sides of each pair were randomly assigned to tricortical and bicortical preparations. The samples were tested by applying a compressive load to failure using a specialized fixture to simulate vertebral body loading. The grafts closer to the anterosuperior iliac spine had significantly higher failure loads and failure strengths than those closer to the posterosuperior iliac spine. The strengths of the bicortical grafts were 72 +/- 14% of the strengths of the tricortical grafts (P < 0.001). Anterior iliac crest grafts were stronger in compression, even after removal of one cortical surface, than posterior iliac crest grafts.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00007632-199811010-00009
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70068138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70068138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-4009383b64846e1e06b94ef43dc61657ee6e2efd04e4710d4973f8fa731f79823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMlOwzAQhi0EKqXwCEg-IG4BO3Yc-4gqNqlSL3COXGcMQWkc7AQJnp7pQvHBo9n-mfkIoZzdcGbKW4avVCLPuDGac8ZZtgmZIzLlRa4zzgtzTKZMqDzLpVCn5CylD6xQgpsJmRidM8PMlKRlPzRr29IELbihCR21XU37CL2NdusHT32E9I5_-IGOuhCHxgVnOwdtG8ZELZq3aP2QqA-ROohfjUPNphsgrkL9TVPfdBjwY0LFc3LibZvgYm9n5PXh_mX-lC2Wj8_zu0XmhDBDJvEeocVKSS0VcGBqZSR4KWqnuCpKAAU5-JpJkCVntTSl8NrbUnBf4oFiRq53un0MnyOkoVo3abOz7QDXrkrEoTmOmBG9K3QxpBTBV31EKPG74qza8K7-eFcH3tuQwdbL_YxxtYb60LgHjPmrfd4mROIjUmvSv36hC621-AWviIoB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70068138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimal selection and preparation of fresh frozen corticocancellous allografts for cervical interbody spinal fusion</title><source>LWW_医学期刊</source><creator>KUMMER, F. J ; DEYU CHEN ; SPIVAK, J. M</creator><creatorcontrib>KUMMER, F. J ; DEYU CHEN ; SPIVAK, J. M</creatorcontrib><description>Iliac crest corticocancellous allografts for anterior interbody fusion were harvested from six cadavers. The grafts were cut sequentially from left and right crests and randomly assigned to tricortical or bicortical preparations. Their compression strengths then were determined and compared by matched pair analysis. To quantify the failure strength of the grafts from different iliac locations and determine the optimal type of preparation of the grafts for anterior interbody fusion. Iliac crest corticocancellous autografts and allografts commonly are used for interbody cervical fusions. However, graft strengths for specific sites have not been determined fully. Six paired, fresh frozen, iliac crests were sectioned using a customized miter box into multiple 1-cm-thick grafts 1.5 cm in depth to simulate cervical interbody grafts. The left and right sides of each pair were randomly assigned to tricortical and bicortical preparations. The samples were tested by applying a compressive load to failure using a specialized fixture to simulate vertebral body loading. The grafts closer to the anterosuperior iliac spine had significantly higher failure loads and failure strengths than those closer to the posterosuperior iliac spine. The strengths of the bicortical grafts were 72 +/- 14% of the strengths of the tricortical grafts (P &lt; 0.001). Anterior iliac crest grafts were stronger in compression, even after removal of one cortical surface, than posterior iliac crest grafts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-2436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199811010-00009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9820909</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SPINDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Density ; Bone Transplantation - methods ; Cadaver ; Cervical Vertebrae - surgery ; Cryopreservation ; Female ; Humans ; Ilium - transplantation ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Orthopedic surgery ; Spinal Fusion - methods ; Stress, Mechanical ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Time Factors ; Tissue and Organ Procurement ; Transplantation, Homologous ; Weight-Bearing</subject><ispartof>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 1998-11, Vol.23 (21), p.2295-2298</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-4009383b64846e1e06b94ef43dc61657ee6e2efd04e4710d4973f8fa731f79823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-4009383b64846e1e06b94ef43dc61657ee6e2efd04e4710d4973f8fa731f79823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1585888$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9820909$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KUMMER, F. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEYU CHEN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SPIVAK, J. M</creatorcontrib><title>Optimal selection and preparation of fresh frozen corticocancellous allografts for cervical interbody spinal fusion</title><title>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</title><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><description>Iliac crest corticocancellous allografts for anterior interbody fusion were harvested from six cadavers. The grafts were cut sequentially from left and right crests and randomly assigned to tricortical or bicortical preparations. Their compression strengths then were determined and compared by matched pair analysis. To quantify the failure strength of the grafts from different iliac locations and determine the optimal type of preparation of the grafts for anterior interbody fusion. Iliac crest corticocancellous autografts and allografts commonly are used for interbody cervical fusions. However, graft strengths for specific sites have not been determined fully. Six paired, fresh frozen, iliac crests were sectioned using a customized miter box into multiple 1-cm-thick grafts 1.5 cm in depth to simulate cervical interbody grafts. The left and right sides of each pair were randomly assigned to tricortical and bicortical preparations. The samples were tested by applying a compressive load to failure using a specialized fixture to simulate vertebral body loading. The grafts closer to the anterosuperior iliac spine had significantly higher failure loads and failure strengths than those closer to the posterosuperior iliac spine. The strengths of the bicortical grafts were 72 +/- 14% of the strengths of the tricortical grafts (P &lt; 0.001). Anterior iliac crest grafts were stronger in compression, even after removal of one cortical surface, than posterior iliac crest grafts.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ilium - transplantation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - methods</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tissue and Organ Procurement</subject><subject>Transplantation, Homologous</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing</subject><issn>0362-2436</issn><issn>1528-1159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkMlOwzAQhi0EKqXwCEg-IG4BO3Yc-4gqNqlSL3COXGcMQWkc7AQJnp7pQvHBo9n-mfkIoZzdcGbKW4avVCLPuDGac8ZZtgmZIzLlRa4zzgtzTKZMqDzLpVCn5CylD6xQgpsJmRidM8PMlKRlPzRr29IELbihCR21XU37CL2NdusHT32E9I5_-IGOuhCHxgVnOwdtG8ZELZq3aP2QqA-ROohfjUPNphsgrkL9TVPfdBjwY0LFc3LibZvgYm9n5PXh_mX-lC2Wj8_zu0XmhDBDJvEeocVKSS0VcGBqZSR4KWqnuCpKAAU5-JpJkCVntTSl8NrbUnBf4oFiRq53un0MnyOkoVo3abOz7QDXrkrEoTmOmBG9K3QxpBTBV31EKPG74qza8K7-eFcH3tuQwdbL_YxxtYb60LgHjPmrfd4mROIjUmvSv36hC621-AWviIoB</recordid><startdate>19981101</startdate><enddate>19981101</enddate><creator>KUMMER, F. J</creator><creator>DEYU CHEN</creator><creator>SPIVAK, J. M</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981101</creationdate><title>Optimal selection and preparation of fresh frozen corticocancellous allografts for cervical interbody spinal fusion</title><author>KUMMER, F. J ; DEYU CHEN ; SPIVAK, J. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-4009383b64846e1e06b94ef43dc61657ee6e2efd04e4710d4973f8fa731f79823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ilium - transplantation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - methods</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tissue and Organ Procurement</topic><topic>Transplantation, Homologous</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KUMMER, F. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEYU CHEN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SPIVAK, J. M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KUMMER, F. J</au><au>DEYU CHEN</au><au>SPIVAK, J. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimal selection and preparation of fresh frozen corticocancellous allografts for cervical interbody spinal fusion</atitle><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><date>1998-11-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>2295</spage><epage>2298</epage><pages>2295-2298</pages><issn>0362-2436</issn><eissn>1528-1159</eissn><coden>SPINDD</coden><abstract>Iliac crest corticocancellous allografts for anterior interbody fusion were harvested from six cadavers. The grafts were cut sequentially from left and right crests and randomly assigned to tricortical or bicortical preparations. Their compression strengths then were determined and compared by matched pair analysis. To quantify the failure strength of the grafts from different iliac locations and determine the optimal type of preparation of the grafts for anterior interbody fusion. Iliac crest corticocancellous autografts and allografts commonly are used for interbody cervical fusions. However, graft strengths for specific sites have not been determined fully. Six paired, fresh frozen, iliac crests were sectioned using a customized miter box into multiple 1-cm-thick grafts 1.5 cm in depth to simulate cervical interbody grafts. The left and right sides of each pair were randomly assigned to tricortical and bicortical preparations. The samples were tested by applying a compressive load to failure using a specialized fixture to simulate vertebral body loading. The grafts closer to the anterosuperior iliac spine had significantly higher failure loads and failure strengths than those closer to the posterosuperior iliac spine. The strengths of the bicortical grafts were 72 +/- 14% of the strengths of the tricortical grafts (P &lt; 0.001). Anterior iliac crest grafts were stronger in compression, even after removal of one cortical surface, than posterior iliac crest grafts.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>9820909</pmid><doi>10.1097/00007632-199811010-00009</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0362-2436
ispartof Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 1998-11, Vol.23 (21), p.2295-2298
issn 0362-2436
1528-1159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70068138
source LWW_医学期刊
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Bone Density
Bone Transplantation - methods
Cadaver
Cervical Vertebrae - surgery
Cryopreservation
Female
Humans
Ilium - transplantation
Male
Medical sciences
Orthopedic surgery
Spinal Fusion - methods
Stress, Mechanical
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Time Factors
Tissue and Organ Procurement
Transplantation, Homologous
Weight-Bearing
title Optimal selection and preparation of fresh frozen corticocancellous allografts for cervical interbody spinal fusion
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T01%3A47%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimal%20selection%20and%20preparation%20of%20fresh%20frozen%20corticocancellous%20allografts%20for%20cervical%20interbody%20spinal%20fusion&rft.jtitle=Spine%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.%201976)&rft.au=KUMMER,%20F.%20J&rft.date=1998-11-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=2295&rft.epage=2298&rft.pages=2295-2298&rft.issn=0362-2436&rft.eissn=1528-1159&rft.coden=SPINDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00007632-199811010-00009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70068138%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-4009383b64846e1e06b94ef43dc61657ee6e2efd04e4710d4973f8fa731f79823%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70068138&rft_id=info:pmid/9820909&rfr_iscdi=true