Loading…

Comparison of performance-based and patient-reported measures of function in anterior-cruciate-ligament-deficient individuals

There is a dearth of reliable and valid instrumentation that measures disability following injury and/or surgery of the knee joint that is responsive to clinically significant changes over time. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether performance-based or patient-reported measures...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy 1998-12, Vol.28 (6), p.392-399
Main Authors: Borsa, P A, Lephart, S M, Irrgang, J J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:There is a dearth of reliable and valid instrumentation that measures disability following injury and/or surgery of the knee joint that is responsive to clinically significant changes over time. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether performance-based or patient-reported measures of function are more effective in estimating disability in individuals with an anterior-cruciate-ligament (ACL)-deficient knee. Subjective rating of knee function was used as the criterion measure for disability, and selected performance-based and patient-reported measures were used as estimation variables. Twenty-nine individuals with an ACL-deficient knee participated in this investigation. Step-wise regression analysis revealed that the Cincinnati Knee Scale, Lysholm Knee Scale, and hop index were the most effective estimates of disability. The results demonstrate that patient-reported measures are more related to the patient's level of disability in individuals with an ACL-deficient knee. More research is necessary to substantiate these findings.
ISSN:0190-6011
1938-1344
DOI:10.2519/jospt.1998.28.6.392