Loading…

A Comparison of Hybridization Efficiency between Flat Glass and Channel Glass Solid Supports

Two different solid supports, channel glass and flat glass, were compared for their affect on the sensitivity and efficiency of DNA hybridization reactions. Both solid supports were tested using a set of arrayed, synthetic oligonucleotides that are designed to detect short insertion/deletion polymor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular biotechnology 2008-01, Vol.38 (1), p.71-80
Main Authors: Betanzos-Cabrera, Gabriel, Harker, Brent W., Doktycz, Mitchel J., Weber, James L., Beattie, Kenneth L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Two different solid supports, channel glass and flat glass, were compared for their affect on the sensitivity and efficiency of DNA hybridization reactions. Both solid supports were tested using a set of arrayed, synthetic oligonucleotides that are designed to detect short insertion/deletion polymorphisms (SIDPs). A total of 13 different human SIDPs were chosen for analysis. Capture probes, designed for this test set, were covalently immobilized on substrates. Hybridization efficiency was assessed using fluorescently labeled stacking probes which were preannealed to the target and then hybridized to the support-bound oligonucleotide array; the hybridization pattern was detected by fluorescence imaging. It was found that structural features of nucleic acid capture probes tethered to a solid support and the molecular basis of their interaction with targets in solution have direct implications on the hybridization process. Our results demonstrate that channel glass has a number of practical advantages over flat glass including higher sensitivity and a faster hybridization rate.
ISSN:1073-6085
1559-0305
DOI:10.1007/s12033-007-9001-z