Loading…

Do early branching lineages signify ancestral traits?

A reverence for ancestors that has pre-occupied humans since time immemorial persists to the present. Reconstructing ancestry is the focus of many biological studies but failure to distinguish between present-day descendants and long-dead ancestors has led to incorrect interpretation of phylogenetic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam) 2005-03, Vol.20 (3), p.122-128
Main Authors: Crisp, Michael D., Cook, Lyn G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-b5549d19514976236a82e34a12c13e41e3078b8a1a4316196ece1be712cee98e3
cites
container_end_page 128
container_issue 3
container_start_page 122
container_title Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam)
container_volume 20
creator Crisp, Michael D.
Cook, Lyn G.
description A reverence for ancestors that has pre-occupied humans since time immemorial persists to the present. Reconstructing ancestry is the focus of many biological studies but failure to distinguish between present-day descendants and long-dead ancestors has led to incorrect interpretation of phylogenetic trees. This has resulted in erroneous reconstruction of traits such as morphology and ancestral areas. Misinterpretation becomes evident when authors use the terms ‘basal’ or ‘early diverging’ to refer to extant taxa. Here, we discuss the correct interpretation of trees and methods for reconstructing the ancestral features of organisms using recently developed statistical models. These models can be inaccurate unless they use information that is independent of phylogenies, such as genetics, molecular and developmental biology, functional morphology, geological and climatic processes, and the fossil record.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.tree.2004.11.010
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70157481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169534704003404</els_id><sourcerecordid>17487559</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-b5549d19514976236a82e34a12c13e41e3078b8a1a4316196ece1be712cee98e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQgIMotlb_gAfZi952zWySTQKCSH1CwYueQzad1pTtbk22Qv-9KS30pjlMDvPN6yPkEmgBFKrbRdEHxKKklBcABQV6RIagZJkrptgxGSZI54JxOSBnMS5oeprrUzKASlJgQgyJeOwytKHZZHWwrfvy7TxrfIt2jjGLft762SZLCYx9sE2Wgu_j_Tk5mdkm4sX-H5HP56eP8Ws-eX95Gz9McscV9HktBNdT0AK4llXJKqtKZNxC6YAhB2RUqlpZsJxBBbpCh1CjTHlErZCNyM2u7yp03-u0g1n66LBpbIvdOpp0hZBp1L8gJEoKoRNY7kAXuhgDzswq-KUNGwPUbK2ahdlaNVurBsAkq6noat99XS9xeijZa0zA9R6w0dlmtlXp44GTwGVVqcTd7ThM0n48BhOdx2R36gO63kw7_9cevwmnk40</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17487559</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do early branching lineages signify ancestral traits?</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Crisp, Michael D. ; Cook, Lyn G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Crisp, Michael D. ; Cook, Lyn G.</creatorcontrib><description>A reverence for ancestors that has pre-occupied humans since time immemorial persists to the present. Reconstructing ancestry is the focus of many biological studies but failure to distinguish between present-day descendants and long-dead ancestors has led to incorrect interpretation of phylogenetic trees. This has resulted in erroneous reconstruction of traits such as morphology and ancestral areas. Misinterpretation becomes evident when authors use the terms ‘basal’ or ‘early diverging’ to refer to extant taxa. Here, we discuss the correct interpretation of trees and methods for reconstructing the ancestral features of organisms using recently developed statistical models. These models can be inaccurate unless they use information that is independent of phylogenies, such as genetics, molecular and developmental biology, functional morphology, geological and climatic processes, and the fossil record.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-5347</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.11.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16701355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Biological evolution ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</subject><ispartof>Trends in ecology &amp; evolution (Amsterdam), 2005-03, Vol.20 (3), p.122-128</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-b5549d19514976236a82e34a12c13e41e3078b8a1a4316196ece1be712cee98e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17147668$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16701355$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crisp, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Lyn G.</creatorcontrib><title>Do early branching lineages signify ancestral traits?</title><title>Trends in ecology &amp; evolution (Amsterdam)</title><addtitle>Trends Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>A reverence for ancestors that has pre-occupied humans since time immemorial persists to the present. Reconstructing ancestry is the focus of many biological studies but failure to distinguish between present-day descendants and long-dead ancestors has led to incorrect interpretation of phylogenetic trees. This has resulted in erroneous reconstruction of traits such as morphology and ancestral areas. Misinterpretation becomes evident when authors use the terms ‘basal’ or ‘early diverging’ to refer to extant taxa. Here, we discuss the correct interpretation of trees and methods for reconstructing the ancestral features of organisms using recently developed statistical models. These models can be inaccurate unless they use information that is independent of phylogenies, such as genetics, molecular and developmental biology, functional morphology, geological and climatic processes, and the fossil record.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological evolution</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</subject><issn>0169-5347</issn><issn>1872-8383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQgIMotlb_gAfZi952zWySTQKCSH1CwYueQzad1pTtbk22Qv-9KS30pjlMDvPN6yPkEmgBFKrbRdEHxKKklBcABQV6RIagZJkrptgxGSZI54JxOSBnMS5oeprrUzKASlJgQgyJeOwytKHZZHWwrfvy7TxrfIt2jjGLft762SZLCYx9sE2Wgu_j_Tk5mdkm4sX-H5HP56eP8Ws-eX95Gz9McscV9HktBNdT0AK4llXJKqtKZNxC6YAhB2RUqlpZsJxBBbpCh1CjTHlErZCNyM2u7yp03-u0g1n66LBpbIvdOpp0hZBp1L8gJEoKoRNY7kAXuhgDzswq-KUNGwPUbK2ahdlaNVurBsAkq6noat99XS9xeijZa0zA9R6w0dlmtlXp44GTwGVVqcTd7ThM0n48BhOdx2R36gO63kw7_9cevwmnk40</recordid><startdate>20050301</startdate><enddate>20050301</enddate><creator>Crisp, Michael D.</creator><creator>Cook, Lyn G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050301</creationdate><title>Do early branching lineages signify ancestral traits?</title><author>Crisp, Michael D. ; Cook, Lyn G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-b5549d19514976236a82e34a12c13e41e3078b8a1a4316196ece1be712cee98e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological evolution</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crisp, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Lyn G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Trends in ecology &amp; evolution (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crisp, Michael D.</au><au>Cook, Lyn G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do early branching lineages signify ancestral traits?</atitle><jtitle>Trends in ecology &amp; evolution (Amsterdam)</jtitle><addtitle>Trends Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2005-03-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>122</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>122-128</pages><issn>0169-5347</issn><eissn>1872-8383</eissn><abstract>A reverence for ancestors that has pre-occupied humans since time immemorial persists to the present. Reconstructing ancestry is the focus of many biological studies but failure to distinguish between present-day descendants and long-dead ancestors has led to incorrect interpretation of phylogenetic trees. This has resulted in erroneous reconstruction of traits such as morphology and ancestral areas. Misinterpretation becomes evident when authors use the terms ‘basal’ or ‘early diverging’ to refer to extant taxa. Here, we discuss the correct interpretation of trees and methods for reconstructing the ancestral features of organisms using recently developed statistical models. These models can be inaccurate unless they use information that is independent of phylogenies, such as genetics, molecular and developmental biology, functional morphology, geological and climatic processes, and the fossil record.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16701355</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tree.2004.11.010</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-5347
ispartof Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam), 2005-03, Vol.20 (3), p.122-128
issn 0169-5347
1872-8383
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70157481
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Biological evolution
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution
title Do early branching lineages signify ancestral traits?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T06%3A15%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20early%20branching%20lineages%20signify%20ancestral%20traits?&rft.jtitle=Trends%20in%20ecology%20&%20evolution%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Crisp,%20Michael%20D.&rft.date=2005-03-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=122&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=122-128&rft.issn=0169-5347&rft.eissn=1872-8383&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tree.2004.11.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17487559%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-b5549d19514976236a82e34a12c13e41e3078b8a1a4316196ece1be712cee98e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17487559&rft_id=info:pmid/16701355&rfr_iscdi=true