Loading…
Comparison of Stress Experienced by Family Members of Patients Treated in Hospital at Home with That of Those Receiving Traditional Acute Hospital Care
OBJECTIVES: To compare differences in the stress experienced by family members of patients cared for in a physician‐led substitutive Hospital at Home (HaH) and those receiving traditional acute hospital care. DESIGN: Survey questionnaire completed as a component of a prospective, nonrandomized clini...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2008-01, Vol.56 (1), p.117-123 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | OBJECTIVES: To compare differences in the stress experienced by family members of patients cared for in a physician‐led substitutive Hospital at Home (HaH) and those receiving traditional acute hospital care.
DESIGN: Survey questionnaire completed as a component of a prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial of a substitutive HaH care model.
SETTING: Three Medicare managed care health systems and a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fourteen community‐dwelling elderly patients who required acute hospital admission for community‐acquired pneumonia, exacerbation of chronic heart failure, exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or cellulitis.
INTERVENTION: Treatment in a substitutive HaH model.
MEASUREMENTS: Fifteen‐question survey questionnaire asking family members whether they experienced a potentially stressful situation and, if so, whether stress was associated with the situation while the patient received care.
RESULTS: The mean and median number of experiences, of a possible 15, that caused stress for family members of HaH patients was significantly lower than for family members of acute care hospital patients (mean ± standard deviation 1.7 ± 1.8 vs 4.3 ± 3.1, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-8614 1532-5415 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01459.x |