Loading…

Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures

Abstract Objectives The purpose of this laboratory study was to evaluate the influence of different cleaning methods after saliva contamination and after using a silicone disclosing medium on the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. The hypothesis was that the resin-ceramic bond strength and its...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Dental materials 2007-04, Vol.23 (4), p.506-512
Main Authors: Quaas, A.C, Yang, B, Kern, M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-fd42ce2dca94108d309b6a462e78a8401d473e8763a78261837166217aac8a793
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-fd42ce2dca94108d309b6a462e78a8401d473e8763a78261837166217aac8a793
container_end_page 512
container_issue 4
container_start_page 506
container_title Dental materials
container_volume 23
creator Quaas, A.C
Yang, B
Kern, M
description Abstract Objectives The purpose of this laboratory study was to evaluate the influence of different cleaning methods after saliva contamination and after using a silicone disclosing medium on the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. The hypothesis was that the resin-ceramic bond strength and its durability are related to the ceramic surface condition. Methods Plexiglas tubes filled with composite resin were bonded to air-abraded zirconia ceramic disks using a phosphate monomer containing composite resin. Four surface cleaning methods were used after contaminating the ceramic surface: air abrasion with 50 μm Al2 O3 at 2.5 bar pressure for 15 s, cleaning with 37% phosphoric acid for 60 s once or for 30 s twice, or cleaning in 96% isopropanol for 15 s. The specimens of the control group were not cleaned after using the silicone disclosing medium. For each combination 16 specimens were bonded in an alignment apparatus. Subgroups of eight bonded specimens were tested for tensile bond strength (TBS) after storage for either 3 or 150 days combined with 37,500 thermal cycles. The statistical analyses were performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by multiple pair-wise comparisons using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results The mean TBS ranged from 6.6 to 49.9 MPa after 3 days and from 0 to 19.8 MPa after 150 days. Air abrasion of the ceramic surface provided statistically significantly higher bond strengths than the other cleaning methods after 3 and 150 days. Alcohol cleaning of the ceramic did not provide durable bond strengths over time. Significance Ceramic cleaning methods after try-in procedures have a significant influence on the resin-ceramic bond strength. Air abrasion of contaminated zirconia ceramic is the most effective.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.008
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70208931</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0109564106000856</els_id><sourcerecordid>29915388</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-fd42ce2dca94108d309b6a462e78a8401d473e8763a78261837166217aac8a793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk2LFDEQhoMo7uzqPxDJyVu3lY_Jx0WQxdWFBQX14iVkkmrJ2JNek-6F9debZgYEL3MKCc_7VqXeIuQVg54BU2_3fcQ8-7HnAKoH0QOYJ2TDjLYdgNVPyQYY2G6rJLsgl7XuAUByy56TC6aMFVslNuTHF5_9Q_L0hvIe6G7KMeWfdJ5omJr7IWU_Y6R_Umn3hgUs7TFQP8xYaEzDgKW1QcOIPq_K-zIFjEvB-oI8G_xY8eXpvCLfbz58u_7U3X3-eHv9_q4LUuu5G6LkAXkM3koGJgqwO-Wl4qiNNxJYlFqg0Up4bbhiRmimFGfa-2C8tuKKvDn6ttK_F6yzO6QacBx9xmmpTgOH9l12FhTAOAiQZ0FuLdsKYxooj2AoU60FB3df0sGXR8fArSm5vTum5NaUHAjXUmqy1yf_ZXfA-E90iqUB744Atrk9JCyuhoS5DTYVDLOLUzpX4X-DMKacgh9_4SPW_bSU3DJxzFXuwH1dN2VdFFBtSUxr4S_2nLhX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>29915388</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Quaas, A.C ; Yang, B ; Kern, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Quaas, A.C ; Yang, B ; Kern, M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives The purpose of this laboratory study was to evaluate the influence of different cleaning methods after saliva contamination and after using a silicone disclosing medium on the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. The hypothesis was that the resin-ceramic bond strength and its durability are related to the ceramic surface condition. Methods Plexiglas tubes filled with composite resin were bonded to air-abraded zirconia ceramic disks using a phosphate monomer containing composite resin. Four surface cleaning methods were used after contaminating the ceramic surface: air abrasion with 50 μm Al2 O3 at 2.5 bar pressure for 15 s, cleaning with 37% phosphoric acid for 60 s once or for 30 s twice, or cleaning in 96% isopropanol for 15 s. The specimens of the control group were not cleaned after using the silicone disclosing medium. For each combination 16 specimens were bonded in an alignment apparatus. Subgroups of eight bonded specimens were tested for tensile bond strength (TBS) after storage for either 3 or 150 days combined with 37,500 thermal cycles. The statistical analyses were performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by multiple pair-wise comparisons using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results The mean TBS ranged from 6.6 to 49.9 MPa after 3 days and from 0 to 19.8 MPa after 150 days. Air abrasion of the ceramic surface provided statistically significantly higher bond strengths than the other cleaning methods after 3 and 150 days. Alcohol cleaning of the ceramic did not provide durable bond strengths over time. Significance Ceramic cleaning methods after try-in procedures have a significant influence on the resin-ceramic bond strength. Air abrasion of contaminated zirconia ceramic is the most effective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0109-5641</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16893563</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>2-Propanol ; Advanced Basic Science ; Air ; Air abrasion ; Aluminum Oxide ; Bond strength ; Cercon ; Cleaning methods ; Composite Resins ; Decontamination - methods ; Dental Bonding ; Dental Porcelain ; Dental Stress Analysis ; Dentistry ; Drug Storage ; Fit checker ; Materials Testing ; Panavia F 2.0 ; Phosphoric Acids ; Resin Cements ; Saliva ; Silicone disclosing medium ; Silicones ; Surface Properties ; Tensile Strength ; Zirconia ceramic ; Zirconium</subject><ispartof>Dental materials, 2007-04, Vol.23 (4), p.506-512</ispartof><rights>2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-fd42ce2dca94108d309b6a462e78a8401d473e8763a78261837166217aac8a793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-fd42ce2dca94108d309b6a462e78a8401d473e8763a78261837166217aac8a793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16893563$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quaas, A.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kern, M</creatorcontrib><title>Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures</title><title>Dental materials</title><addtitle>Dent Mater</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives The purpose of this laboratory study was to evaluate the influence of different cleaning methods after saliva contamination and after using a silicone disclosing medium on the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. The hypothesis was that the resin-ceramic bond strength and its durability are related to the ceramic surface condition. Methods Plexiglas tubes filled with composite resin were bonded to air-abraded zirconia ceramic disks using a phosphate monomer containing composite resin. Four surface cleaning methods were used after contaminating the ceramic surface: air abrasion with 50 μm Al2 O3 at 2.5 bar pressure for 15 s, cleaning with 37% phosphoric acid for 60 s once or for 30 s twice, or cleaning in 96% isopropanol for 15 s. The specimens of the control group were not cleaned after using the silicone disclosing medium. For each combination 16 specimens were bonded in an alignment apparatus. Subgroups of eight bonded specimens were tested for tensile bond strength (TBS) after storage for either 3 or 150 days combined with 37,500 thermal cycles. The statistical analyses were performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by multiple pair-wise comparisons using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results The mean TBS ranged from 6.6 to 49.9 MPa after 3 days and from 0 to 19.8 MPa after 150 days. Air abrasion of the ceramic surface provided statistically significantly higher bond strengths than the other cleaning methods after 3 and 150 days. Alcohol cleaning of the ceramic did not provide durable bond strengths over time. Significance Ceramic cleaning methods after try-in procedures have a significant influence on the resin-ceramic bond strength. Air abrasion of contaminated zirconia ceramic is the most effective.</description><subject>2-Propanol</subject><subject>Advanced Basic Science</subject><subject>Air</subject><subject>Air abrasion</subject><subject>Aluminum Oxide</subject><subject>Bond strength</subject><subject>Cercon</subject><subject>Cleaning methods</subject><subject>Composite Resins</subject><subject>Decontamination - methods</subject><subject>Dental Bonding</subject><subject>Dental Porcelain</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Drug Storage</subject><subject>Fit checker</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Panavia F 2.0</subject><subject>Phosphoric Acids</subject><subject>Resin Cements</subject><subject>Saliva</subject><subject>Silicone disclosing medium</subject><subject>Silicones</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Tensile Strength</subject><subject>Zirconia ceramic</subject><subject>Zirconium</subject><issn>0109-5641</issn><issn>1879-0097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkk2LFDEQhoMo7uzqPxDJyVu3lY_Jx0WQxdWFBQX14iVkkmrJ2JNek-6F9debZgYEL3MKCc_7VqXeIuQVg54BU2_3fcQ8-7HnAKoH0QOYJ2TDjLYdgNVPyQYY2G6rJLsgl7XuAUByy56TC6aMFVslNuTHF5_9Q_L0hvIe6G7KMeWfdJ5omJr7IWU_Y6R_Umn3hgUs7TFQP8xYaEzDgKW1QcOIPq_K-zIFjEvB-oI8G_xY8eXpvCLfbz58u_7U3X3-eHv9_q4LUuu5G6LkAXkM3koGJgqwO-Wl4qiNNxJYlFqg0Up4bbhiRmimFGfa-2C8tuKKvDn6ttK_F6yzO6QacBx9xmmpTgOH9l12FhTAOAiQZ0FuLdsKYxooj2AoU60FB3df0sGXR8fArSm5vTum5NaUHAjXUmqy1yf_ZXfA-E90iqUB744Atrk9JCyuhoS5DTYVDLOLUzpX4X-DMKacgh9_4SPW_bSU3DJxzFXuwH1dN2VdFFBtSUxr4S_2nLhX</recordid><startdate>20070401</startdate><enddate>20070401</enddate><creator>Quaas, A.C</creator><creator>Yang, B</creator><creator>Kern, M</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070401</creationdate><title>Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures</title><author>Quaas, A.C ; Yang, B ; Kern, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-fd42ce2dca94108d309b6a462e78a8401d473e8763a78261837166217aac8a793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>2-Propanol</topic><topic>Advanced Basic Science</topic><topic>Air</topic><topic>Air abrasion</topic><topic>Aluminum Oxide</topic><topic>Bond strength</topic><topic>Cercon</topic><topic>Cleaning methods</topic><topic>Composite Resins</topic><topic>Decontamination - methods</topic><topic>Dental Bonding</topic><topic>Dental Porcelain</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Drug Storage</topic><topic>Fit checker</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Panavia F 2.0</topic><topic>Phosphoric Acids</topic><topic>Resin Cements</topic><topic>Saliva</topic><topic>Silicone disclosing medium</topic><topic>Silicones</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Tensile Strength</topic><topic>Zirconia ceramic</topic><topic>Zirconium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quaas, A.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kern, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Dental materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quaas, A.C</au><au>Yang, B</au><au>Kern, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures</atitle><jtitle>Dental materials</jtitle><addtitle>Dent Mater</addtitle><date>2007-04-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>506</spage><epage>512</epage><pages>506-512</pages><issn>0109-5641</issn><eissn>1879-0097</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives The purpose of this laboratory study was to evaluate the influence of different cleaning methods after saliva contamination and after using a silicone disclosing medium on the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. The hypothesis was that the resin-ceramic bond strength and its durability are related to the ceramic surface condition. Methods Plexiglas tubes filled with composite resin were bonded to air-abraded zirconia ceramic disks using a phosphate monomer containing composite resin. Four surface cleaning methods were used after contaminating the ceramic surface: air abrasion with 50 μm Al2 O3 at 2.5 bar pressure for 15 s, cleaning with 37% phosphoric acid for 60 s once or for 30 s twice, or cleaning in 96% isopropanol for 15 s. The specimens of the control group were not cleaned after using the silicone disclosing medium. For each combination 16 specimens were bonded in an alignment apparatus. Subgroups of eight bonded specimens were tested for tensile bond strength (TBS) after storage for either 3 or 150 days combined with 37,500 thermal cycles. The statistical analyses were performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by multiple pair-wise comparisons using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results The mean TBS ranged from 6.6 to 49.9 MPa after 3 days and from 0 to 19.8 MPa after 150 days. Air abrasion of the ceramic surface provided statistically significantly higher bond strengths than the other cleaning methods after 3 and 150 days. Alcohol cleaning of the ceramic did not provide durable bond strengths over time. Significance Ceramic cleaning methods after try-in procedures have a significant influence on the resin-ceramic bond strength. Air abrasion of contaminated zirconia ceramic is the most effective.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16893563</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.008</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0109-5641
ispartof Dental materials, 2007-04, Vol.23 (4), p.506-512
issn 0109-5641
1879-0097
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70208931
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects 2-Propanol
Advanced Basic Science
Air
Air abrasion
Aluminum Oxide
Bond strength
Cercon
Cleaning methods
Composite Resins
Decontamination - methods
Dental Bonding
Dental Porcelain
Dental Stress Analysis
Dentistry
Drug Storage
Fit checker
Materials Testing
Panavia F 2.0
Phosphoric Acids
Resin Cements
Saliva
Silicone disclosing medium
Silicones
Surface Properties
Tensile Strength
Zirconia ceramic
Zirconium
title Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T08%3A36%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Panavia%20F%202.0%20bonding%20to%20contaminated%20zirconia%20ceramic%20after%20different%20cleaning%20procedures&rft.jtitle=Dental%20materials&rft.au=Quaas,%20A.C&rft.date=2007-04-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=506&rft.epage=512&rft.pages=506-512&rft.issn=0109-5641&rft.eissn=1879-0097&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29915388%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-fd42ce2dca94108d309b6a462e78a8401d473e8763a78261837166217aac8a793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=29915388&rft_id=info:pmid/16893563&rfr_iscdi=true