Loading…
Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures
Abstract Objectives The purpose of this laboratory study was to evaluate the influence of different cleaning methods after saliva contamination and after using a silicone disclosing medium on the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. The hypothesis was that the resin-ceramic bond strength and its...
Saved in:
Published in: | Dental materials 2007-04, Vol.23 (4), p.506-512 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-fd42ce2dca94108d309b6a462e78a8401d473e8763a78261837166217aac8a793 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-fd42ce2dca94108d309b6a462e78a8401d473e8763a78261837166217aac8a793 |
container_end_page | 512 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 506 |
container_title | Dental materials |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Quaas, A.C Yang, B Kern, M |
description | Abstract Objectives The purpose of this laboratory study was to evaluate the influence of different cleaning methods after saliva contamination and after using a silicone disclosing medium on the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. The hypothesis was that the resin-ceramic bond strength and its durability are related to the ceramic surface condition. Methods Plexiglas tubes filled with composite resin were bonded to air-abraded zirconia ceramic disks using a phosphate monomer containing composite resin. Four surface cleaning methods were used after contaminating the ceramic surface: air abrasion with 50 μm Al2 O3 at 2.5 bar pressure for 15 s, cleaning with 37% phosphoric acid for 60 s once or for 30 s twice, or cleaning in 96% isopropanol for 15 s. The specimens of the control group were not cleaned after using the silicone disclosing medium. For each combination 16 specimens were bonded in an alignment apparatus. Subgroups of eight bonded specimens were tested for tensile bond strength (TBS) after storage for either 3 or 150 days combined with 37,500 thermal cycles. The statistical analyses were performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by multiple pair-wise comparisons using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results The mean TBS ranged from 6.6 to 49.9 MPa after 3 days and from 0 to 19.8 MPa after 150 days. Air abrasion of the ceramic surface provided statistically significantly higher bond strengths than the other cleaning methods after 3 and 150 days. Alcohol cleaning of the ceramic did not provide durable bond strengths over time. Significance Ceramic cleaning methods after try-in procedures have a significant influence on the resin-ceramic bond strength. Air abrasion of contaminated zirconia ceramic is the most effective. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.008 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70208931</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0109564106000856</els_id><sourcerecordid>29915388</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-fd42ce2dca94108d309b6a462e78a8401d473e8763a78261837166217aac8a793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk2LFDEQhoMo7uzqPxDJyVu3lY_Jx0WQxdWFBQX14iVkkmrJ2JNek-6F9debZgYEL3MKCc_7VqXeIuQVg54BU2_3fcQ8-7HnAKoH0QOYJ2TDjLYdgNVPyQYY2G6rJLsgl7XuAUByy56TC6aMFVslNuTHF5_9Q_L0hvIe6G7KMeWfdJ5omJr7IWU_Y6R_Umn3hgUs7TFQP8xYaEzDgKW1QcOIPq_K-zIFjEvB-oI8G_xY8eXpvCLfbz58u_7U3X3-eHv9_q4LUuu5G6LkAXkM3koGJgqwO-Wl4qiNNxJYlFqg0Up4bbhiRmimFGfa-2C8tuKKvDn6ttK_F6yzO6QacBx9xmmpTgOH9l12FhTAOAiQZ0FuLdsKYxooj2AoU60FB3df0sGXR8fArSm5vTum5NaUHAjXUmqy1yf_ZXfA-E90iqUB744Atrk9JCyuhoS5DTYVDLOLUzpX4X-DMKacgh9_4SPW_bSU3DJxzFXuwH1dN2VdFFBtSUxr4S_2nLhX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>29915388</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Quaas, A.C ; Yang, B ; Kern, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Quaas, A.C ; Yang, B ; Kern, M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives The purpose of this laboratory study was to evaluate the influence of different cleaning methods after saliva contamination and after using a silicone disclosing medium on the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. The hypothesis was that the resin-ceramic bond strength and its durability are related to the ceramic surface condition. Methods Plexiglas tubes filled with composite resin were bonded to air-abraded zirconia ceramic disks using a phosphate monomer containing composite resin. Four surface cleaning methods were used after contaminating the ceramic surface: air abrasion with 50 μm Al2 O3 at 2.5 bar pressure for 15 s, cleaning with 37% phosphoric acid for 60 s once or for 30 s twice, or cleaning in 96% isopropanol for 15 s. The specimens of the control group were not cleaned after using the silicone disclosing medium. For each combination 16 specimens were bonded in an alignment apparatus. Subgroups of eight bonded specimens were tested for tensile bond strength (TBS) after storage for either 3 or 150 days combined with 37,500 thermal cycles. The statistical analyses were performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by multiple pair-wise comparisons using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results The mean TBS ranged from 6.6 to 49.9 MPa after 3 days and from 0 to 19.8 MPa after 150 days. Air abrasion of the ceramic surface provided statistically significantly higher bond strengths than the other cleaning methods after 3 and 150 days. Alcohol cleaning of the ceramic did not provide durable bond strengths over time. Significance Ceramic cleaning methods after try-in procedures have a significant influence on the resin-ceramic bond strength. Air abrasion of contaminated zirconia ceramic is the most effective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0109-5641</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16893563</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>2-Propanol ; Advanced Basic Science ; Air ; Air abrasion ; Aluminum Oxide ; Bond strength ; Cercon ; Cleaning methods ; Composite Resins ; Decontamination - methods ; Dental Bonding ; Dental Porcelain ; Dental Stress Analysis ; Dentistry ; Drug Storage ; Fit checker ; Materials Testing ; Panavia F 2.0 ; Phosphoric Acids ; Resin Cements ; Saliva ; Silicone disclosing medium ; Silicones ; Surface Properties ; Tensile Strength ; Zirconia ceramic ; Zirconium</subject><ispartof>Dental materials, 2007-04, Vol.23 (4), p.506-512</ispartof><rights>2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-fd42ce2dca94108d309b6a462e78a8401d473e8763a78261837166217aac8a793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-fd42ce2dca94108d309b6a462e78a8401d473e8763a78261837166217aac8a793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16893563$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quaas, A.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kern, M</creatorcontrib><title>Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures</title><title>Dental materials</title><addtitle>Dent Mater</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives The purpose of this laboratory study was to evaluate the influence of different cleaning methods after saliva contamination and after using a silicone disclosing medium on the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. The hypothesis was that the resin-ceramic bond strength and its durability are related to the ceramic surface condition. Methods Plexiglas tubes filled with composite resin were bonded to air-abraded zirconia ceramic disks using a phosphate monomer containing composite resin. Four surface cleaning methods were used after contaminating the ceramic surface: air abrasion with 50 μm Al2 O3 at 2.5 bar pressure for 15 s, cleaning with 37% phosphoric acid for 60 s once or for 30 s twice, or cleaning in 96% isopropanol for 15 s. The specimens of the control group were not cleaned after using the silicone disclosing medium. For each combination 16 specimens were bonded in an alignment apparatus. Subgroups of eight bonded specimens were tested for tensile bond strength (TBS) after storage for either 3 or 150 days combined with 37,500 thermal cycles. The statistical analyses were performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by multiple pair-wise comparisons using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results The mean TBS ranged from 6.6 to 49.9 MPa after 3 days and from 0 to 19.8 MPa after 150 days. Air abrasion of the ceramic surface provided statistically significantly higher bond strengths than the other cleaning methods after 3 and 150 days. Alcohol cleaning of the ceramic did not provide durable bond strengths over time. Significance Ceramic cleaning methods after try-in procedures have a significant influence on the resin-ceramic bond strength. Air abrasion of contaminated zirconia ceramic is the most effective.</description><subject>2-Propanol</subject><subject>Advanced Basic Science</subject><subject>Air</subject><subject>Air abrasion</subject><subject>Aluminum Oxide</subject><subject>Bond strength</subject><subject>Cercon</subject><subject>Cleaning methods</subject><subject>Composite Resins</subject><subject>Decontamination - methods</subject><subject>Dental Bonding</subject><subject>Dental Porcelain</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Drug Storage</subject><subject>Fit checker</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Panavia F 2.0</subject><subject>Phosphoric Acids</subject><subject>Resin Cements</subject><subject>Saliva</subject><subject>Silicone disclosing medium</subject><subject>Silicones</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Tensile Strength</subject><subject>Zirconia ceramic</subject><subject>Zirconium</subject><issn>0109-5641</issn><issn>1879-0097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkk2LFDEQhoMo7uzqPxDJyVu3lY_Jx0WQxdWFBQX14iVkkmrJ2JNek-6F9debZgYEL3MKCc_7VqXeIuQVg54BU2_3fcQ8-7HnAKoH0QOYJ2TDjLYdgNVPyQYY2G6rJLsgl7XuAUByy56TC6aMFVslNuTHF5_9Q_L0hvIe6G7KMeWfdJ5omJr7IWU_Y6R_Umn3hgUs7TFQP8xYaEzDgKW1QcOIPq_K-zIFjEvB-oI8G_xY8eXpvCLfbz58u_7U3X3-eHv9_q4LUuu5G6LkAXkM3koGJgqwO-Wl4qiNNxJYlFqg0Up4bbhiRmimFGfa-2C8tuKKvDn6ttK_F6yzO6QacBx9xmmpTgOH9l12FhTAOAiQZ0FuLdsKYxooj2AoU60FB3df0sGXR8fArSm5vTum5NaUHAjXUmqy1yf_ZXfA-E90iqUB744Atrk9JCyuhoS5DTYVDLOLUzpX4X-DMKacgh9_4SPW_bSU3DJxzFXuwH1dN2VdFFBtSUxr4S_2nLhX</recordid><startdate>20070401</startdate><enddate>20070401</enddate><creator>Quaas, A.C</creator><creator>Yang, B</creator><creator>Kern, M</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070401</creationdate><title>Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures</title><author>Quaas, A.C ; Yang, B ; Kern, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-fd42ce2dca94108d309b6a462e78a8401d473e8763a78261837166217aac8a793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>2-Propanol</topic><topic>Advanced Basic Science</topic><topic>Air</topic><topic>Air abrasion</topic><topic>Aluminum Oxide</topic><topic>Bond strength</topic><topic>Cercon</topic><topic>Cleaning methods</topic><topic>Composite Resins</topic><topic>Decontamination - methods</topic><topic>Dental Bonding</topic><topic>Dental Porcelain</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Drug Storage</topic><topic>Fit checker</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Panavia F 2.0</topic><topic>Phosphoric Acids</topic><topic>Resin Cements</topic><topic>Saliva</topic><topic>Silicone disclosing medium</topic><topic>Silicones</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Tensile Strength</topic><topic>Zirconia ceramic</topic><topic>Zirconium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quaas, A.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kern, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Dental materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quaas, A.C</au><au>Yang, B</au><au>Kern, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures</atitle><jtitle>Dental materials</jtitle><addtitle>Dent Mater</addtitle><date>2007-04-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>506</spage><epage>512</epage><pages>506-512</pages><issn>0109-5641</issn><eissn>1879-0097</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives The purpose of this laboratory study was to evaluate the influence of different cleaning methods after saliva contamination and after using a silicone disclosing medium on the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. The hypothesis was that the resin-ceramic bond strength and its durability are related to the ceramic surface condition. Methods Plexiglas tubes filled with composite resin were bonded to air-abraded zirconia ceramic disks using a phosphate monomer containing composite resin. Four surface cleaning methods were used after contaminating the ceramic surface: air abrasion with 50 μm Al2 O3 at 2.5 bar pressure for 15 s, cleaning with 37% phosphoric acid for 60 s once or for 30 s twice, or cleaning in 96% isopropanol for 15 s. The specimens of the control group were not cleaned after using the silicone disclosing medium. For each combination 16 specimens were bonded in an alignment apparatus. Subgroups of eight bonded specimens were tested for tensile bond strength (TBS) after storage for either 3 or 150 days combined with 37,500 thermal cycles. The statistical analyses were performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by multiple pair-wise comparisons using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results The mean TBS ranged from 6.6 to 49.9 MPa after 3 days and from 0 to 19.8 MPa after 150 days. Air abrasion of the ceramic surface provided statistically significantly higher bond strengths than the other cleaning methods after 3 and 150 days. Alcohol cleaning of the ceramic did not provide durable bond strengths over time. Significance Ceramic cleaning methods after try-in procedures have a significant influence on the resin-ceramic bond strength. Air abrasion of contaminated zirconia ceramic is the most effective.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16893563</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.008</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0109-5641 |
ispartof | Dental materials, 2007-04, Vol.23 (4), p.506-512 |
issn | 0109-5641 1879-0097 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70208931 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | 2-Propanol Advanced Basic Science Air Air abrasion Aluminum Oxide Bond strength Cercon Cleaning methods Composite Resins Decontamination - methods Dental Bonding Dental Porcelain Dental Stress Analysis Dentistry Drug Storage Fit checker Materials Testing Panavia F 2.0 Phosphoric Acids Resin Cements Saliva Silicone disclosing medium Silicones Surface Properties Tensile Strength Zirconia ceramic Zirconium |
title | Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T08%3A36%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Panavia%20F%202.0%20bonding%20to%20contaminated%20zirconia%20ceramic%20after%20different%20cleaning%20procedures&rft.jtitle=Dental%20materials&rft.au=Quaas,%20A.C&rft.date=2007-04-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=506&rft.epage=512&rft.pages=506-512&rft.issn=0109-5641&rft.eissn=1879-0097&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29915388%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-fd42ce2dca94108d309b6a462e78a8401d473e8763a78261837166217aac8a793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=29915388&rft_id=info:pmid/16893563&rfr_iscdi=true |