Loading…

Comparison of ITS sequences from UK and North American sugar-beet powdery mildews and the designation of Erysiphe betae

Powdery mildew of sugar beet, a disease of major economic significance, was first described at the beginning of the 20th century, and since then there has been some confusion over the correct taxonomic identity of the causal agent. In Europe, the fungus was initially classified as the novel species...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Mycological research 2007-02, Vol.111 (2), p.204-212
Main Authors: Francis, Sally A., Roden, Brett C., Adams, Michael J., Weiland, John, Asher, Michael J.C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-46b1a11907afa673ff0f6448c23c3607ae52396f8e426b810c5213e88df909ea3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-46b1a11907afa673ff0f6448c23c3607ae52396f8e426b810c5213e88df909ea3
container_end_page 212
container_issue 2
container_start_page 204
container_title Mycological research
container_volume 111
creator Francis, Sally A.
Roden, Brett C.
Adams, Michael J.
Weiland, John
Asher, Michael J.C.
description Powdery mildew of sugar beet, a disease of major economic significance, was first described at the beginning of the 20th century, and since then there has been some confusion over the correct taxonomic identity of the causal agent. In Europe, the fungus was initially classified as the novel species Microsphaera betae, later re-named Erysiphe betae, whilst in America it was identified as E. polygoni, despite sugar-beet isolates from both regions having a host range restricted to Beta species. It is possible that more than one fungus causes the disease, as published descriptions of conidiogenesis have differed. In this study, isolates of the fungus collected from sugar beet in the UK and USA were investigated for polymorphisms in the rDNA ITS region to determine if the same species caused the disease in both countries, whether there was any justification for the retention of the name E. polygoni in the USA, and to search for evidence of a second species infecting sugar beet. From a total of 18 isolates examined, 23 ITS sequences were obtained. Fifteen of these, which included the UK and USA isolates, were identical and the remainder had single-base substitutions, indicating that the fungi were conspecific. Dendrogram analysis of Erysiphales ITS regions revealed that the UK and North American isolates were more closely related to E. heraclei than to E. polygoni. It is proposed that the species name Erysiphe betae be used for the powdery mildew fungus that infects sugar beet. No evidence was found in this study for a second sugar-beet powdery mildew species.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.mycres.2006.10.010
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70215887</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0953756206003182</els_id><sourcerecordid>70215887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-46b1a11907afa673ff0f6448c23c3607ae52396f8e426b810c5213e88df909ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1uEzEURi0EoqHwBgi8YjfBf2N7NkhVVKBq1S7arC2P5zp1lBkP9oQob1-HicQOVpY-nfvJ9x6EPlKypITKr9tlf3QJ8pIRIku0JJS8QgsqZFNpSthrtCBNzStVS3aB3uW8JYRySvlbdEEVZ0LVeoEOq9iPNoUcBxw9vnl6xBl-7WFwkLFPscfrW2yHDt_HND3jqx5ScHbAeb-xqWoBJjzGQwfpiPuw6-CQ_9DTM-AOctgMdgpz9XU65jCWvIXJwnv0xttdhg_n9xKtv18_rX5Wdw8_blZXd5UTtJ4qIVtqKW2Ist5Kxb0nXgqhHeOOy5JCzXgjvQbBZFvWdjWjHLTufEMasPwSfZl7xxTLWnkyfcgOdjs7QNxnowijtdbqvyBtlBRNIwsoZtClmHMCb8YUepuOhhJzMmO2ZjZjTmZOaTFTxj6d-_dtD93fobOKAnyeAW-jsZuixKwfWVFGiNZMcV6IbzMB5WC_AySTXTiZ6kICN5kuhn__4QVb76qO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19764996</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of ITS sequences from UK and North American sugar-beet powdery mildews and the designation of Erysiphe betae</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Francis, Sally A. ; Roden, Brett C. ; Adams, Michael J. ; Weiland, John ; Asher, Michael J.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Francis, Sally A. ; Roden, Brett C. ; Adams, Michael J. ; Weiland, John ; Asher, Michael J.C.</creatorcontrib><description>Powdery mildew of sugar beet, a disease of major economic significance, was first described at the beginning of the 20th century, and since then there has been some confusion over the correct taxonomic identity of the causal agent. In Europe, the fungus was initially classified as the novel species Microsphaera betae, later re-named Erysiphe betae, whilst in America it was identified as E. polygoni, despite sugar-beet isolates from both regions having a host range restricted to Beta species. It is possible that more than one fungus causes the disease, as published descriptions of conidiogenesis have differed. In this study, isolates of the fungus collected from sugar beet in the UK and USA were investigated for polymorphisms in the rDNA ITS region to determine if the same species caused the disease in both countries, whether there was any justification for the retention of the name E. polygoni in the USA, and to search for evidence of a second species infecting sugar beet. From a total of 18 isolates examined, 23 ITS sequences were obtained. Fifteen of these, which included the UK and USA isolates, were identical and the remainder had single-base substitutions, indicating that the fungi were conspecific. Dendrogram analysis of Erysiphales ITS regions revealed that the UK and North American isolates were more closely related to E. heraclei than to E. polygoni. It is proposed that the species name Erysiphe betae be used for the powdery mildew fungus that infects sugar beet. No evidence was found in this study for a second sugar-beet powdery mildew species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0953-7562</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.mycres.2006.10.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17324758</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Ascomycota - genetics ; Base Sequence ; Beta spp ; Beta vulgaris ; Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris ; DNA, Fungal - chemistry ; DNA, Fungal - genetics ; DNA, Intergenic - chemistry ; DNA, Intergenic - genetics ; Erysiphales ; Erysiphe betae ; Erysiphe polygoni ; genetic polymorphism ; Genetic Variation ; host plants ; internal transcribed spacers ; Molecular Sequence Data ; Molecular systematicsPlant pathology ; Phylogeny ; Plant Diseases - microbiology ; Plant Leaves - microbiology ; plant pathogenic fungi ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; powdery mildew ; Powdery mildews ; ribosomal DNA ; Sequence Alignment ; sequence analysis ; sugar beet</subject><ispartof>Mycological research, 2007-02, Vol.111 (2), p.204-212</ispartof><rights>2006 The British Mycological Society</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-46b1a11907afa673ff0f6448c23c3607ae52396f8e426b810c5213e88df909ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-46b1a11907afa673ff0f6448c23c3607ae52396f8e426b810c5213e88df909ea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17324758$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Francis, Sally A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roden, Brett C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiland, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asher, Michael J.C.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of ITS sequences from UK and North American sugar-beet powdery mildews and the designation of Erysiphe betae</title><title>Mycological research</title><addtitle>Mycol Res</addtitle><description>Powdery mildew of sugar beet, a disease of major economic significance, was first described at the beginning of the 20th century, and since then there has been some confusion over the correct taxonomic identity of the causal agent. In Europe, the fungus was initially classified as the novel species Microsphaera betae, later re-named Erysiphe betae, whilst in America it was identified as E. polygoni, despite sugar-beet isolates from both regions having a host range restricted to Beta species. It is possible that more than one fungus causes the disease, as published descriptions of conidiogenesis have differed. In this study, isolates of the fungus collected from sugar beet in the UK and USA were investigated for polymorphisms in the rDNA ITS region to determine if the same species caused the disease in both countries, whether there was any justification for the retention of the name E. polygoni in the USA, and to search for evidence of a second species infecting sugar beet. From a total of 18 isolates examined, 23 ITS sequences were obtained. Fifteen of these, which included the UK and USA isolates, were identical and the remainder had single-base substitutions, indicating that the fungi were conspecific. Dendrogram analysis of Erysiphales ITS regions revealed that the UK and North American isolates were more closely related to E. heraclei than to E. polygoni. It is proposed that the species name Erysiphe betae be used for the powdery mildew fungus that infects sugar beet. No evidence was found in this study for a second sugar-beet powdery mildew species.</description><subject>Ascomycota - genetics</subject><subject>Base Sequence</subject><subject>Beta spp</subject><subject>Beta vulgaris</subject><subject>Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris</subject><subject>DNA, Fungal - chemistry</subject><subject>DNA, Fungal - genetics</subject><subject>DNA, Intergenic - chemistry</subject><subject>DNA, Intergenic - genetics</subject><subject>Erysiphales</subject><subject>Erysiphe betae</subject><subject>Erysiphe polygoni</subject><subject>genetic polymorphism</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>host plants</subject><subject>internal transcribed spacers</subject><subject>Molecular Sequence Data</subject><subject>Molecular systematicsPlant pathology</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Plant Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Plant Leaves - microbiology</subject><subject>plant pathogenic fungi</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>powdery mildew</subject><subject>Powdery mildews</subject><subject>ribosomal DNA</subject><subject>Sequence Alignment</subject><subject>sequence analysis</subject><subject>sugar beet</subject><issn>0953-7562</issn><issn>1469-8102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1uEzEURi0EoqHwBgi8YjfBf2N7NkhVVKBq1S7arC2P5zp1lBkP9oQob1-HicQOVpY-nfvJ9x6EPlKypITKr9tlf3QJ8pIRIku0JJS8QgsqZFNpSthrtCBNzStVS3aB3uW8JYRySvlbdEEVZ0LVeoEOq9iPNoUcBxw9vnl6xBl-7WFwkLFPscfrW2yHDt_HND3jqx5ScHbAeb-xqWoBJjzGQwfpiPuw6-CQ_9DTM-AOctgMdgpz9XU65jCWvIXJwnv0xttdhg_n9xKtv18_rX5Wdw8_blZXd5UTtJ4qIVtqKW2Ist5Kxb0nXgqhHeOOy5JCzXgjvQbBZFvWdjWjHLTufEMasPwSfZl7xxTLWnkyfcgOdjs7QNxnowijtdbqvyBtlBRNIwsoZtClmHMCb8YUepuOhhJzMmO2ZjZjTmZOaTFTxj6d-_dtD93fobOKAnyeAW-jsZuixKwfWVFGiNZMcV6IbzMB5WC_AySTXTiZ6kICN5kuhn__4QVb76qO</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Francis, Sally A.</creator><creator>Roden, Brett C.</creator><creator>Adams, Michael J.</creator><creator>Weiland, John</creator><creator>Asher, Michael J.C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>Comparison of ITS sequences from UK and North American sugar-beet powdery mildews and the designation of Erysiphe betae</title><author>Francis, Sally A. ; Roden, Brett C. ; Adams, Michael J. ; Weiland, John ; Asher, Michael J.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-46b1a11907afa673ff0f6448c23c3607ae52396f8e426b810c5213e88df909ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Ascomycota - genetics</topic><topic>Base Sequence</topic><topic>Beta spp</topic><topic>Beta vulgaris</topic><topic>Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris</topic><topic>DNA, Fungal - chemistry</topic><topic>DNA, Fungal - genetics</topic><topic>DNA, Intergenic - chemistry</topic><topic>DNA, Intergenic - genetics</topic><topic>Erysiphales</topic><topic>Erysiphe betae</topic><topic>Erysiphe polygoni</topic><topic>genetic polymorphism</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>host plants</topic><topic>internal transcribed spacers</topic><topic>Molecular Sequence Data</topic><topic>Molecular systematicsPlant pathology</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Plant Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Plant Leaves - microbiology</topic><topic>plant pathogenic fungi</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>powdery mildew</topic><topic>Powdery mildews</topic><topic>ribosomal DNA</topic><topic>Sequence Alignment</topic><topic>sequence analysis</topic><topic>sugar beet</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Francis, Sally A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roden, Brett C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiland, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asher, Michael J.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Mycological research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Francis, Sally A.</au><au>Roden, Brett C.</au><au>Adams, Michael J.</au><au>Weiland, John</au><au>Asher, Michael J.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of ITS sequences from UK and North American sugar-beet powdery mildews and the designation of Erysiphe betae</atitle><jtitle>Mycological research</jtitle><addtitle>Mycol Res</addtitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>204</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>204-212</pages><issn>0953-7562</issn><eissn>1469-8102</eissn><abstract>Powdery mildew of sugar beet, a disease of major economic significance, was first described at the beginning of the 20th century, and since then there has been some confusion over the correct taxonomic identity of the causal agent. In Europe, the fungus was initially classified as the novel species Microsphaera betae, later re-named Erysiphe betae, whilst in America it was identified as E. polygoni, despite sugar-beet isolates from both regions having a host range restricted to Beta species. It is possible that more than one fungus causes the disease, as published descriptions of conidiogenesis have differed. In this study, isolates of the fungus collected from sugar beet in the UK and USA were investigated for polymorphisms in the rDNA ITS region to determine if the same species caused the disease in both countries, whether there was any justification for the retention of the name E. polygoni in the USA, and to search for evidence of a second species infecting sugar beet. From a total of 18 isolates examined, 23 ITS sequences were obtained. Fifteen of these, which included the UK and USA isolates, were identical and the remainder had single-base substitutions, indicating that the fungi were conspecific. Dendrogram analysis of Erysiphales ITS regions revealed that the UK and North American isolates were more closely related to E. heraclei than to E. polygoni. It is proposed that the species name Erysiphe betae be used for the powdery mildew fungus that infects sugar beet. No evidence was found in this study for a second sugar-beet powdery mildew species.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>17324758</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.mycres.2006.10.010</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0953-7562
ispartof Mycological research, 2007-02, Vol.111 (2), p.204-212
issn 0953-7562
1469-8102
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70215887
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Ascomycota - genetics
Base Sequence
Beta spp
Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
DNA, Fungal - chemistry
DNA, Fungal - genetics
DNA, Intergenic - chemistry
DNA, Intergenic - genetics
Erysiphales
Erysiphe betae
Erysiphe polygoni
genetic polymorphism
Genetic Variation
host plants
internal transcribed spacers
Molecular Sequence Data
Molecular systematicsPlant pathology
Phylogeny
Plant Diseases - microbiology
Plant Leaves - microbiology
plant pathogenic fungi
Polymerase Chain Reaction
powdery mildew
Powdery mildews
ribosomal DNA
Sequence Alignment
sequence analysis
sugar beet
title Comparison of ITS sequences from UK and North American sugar-beet powdery mildews and the designation of Erysiphe betae
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T04%3A51%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20ITS%20sequences%20from%20UK%20and%20North%20American%20sugar-beet%20powdery%20mildews%20and%20the%20designation%20of%20Erysiphe%20betae&rft.jtitle=Mycological%20research&rft.au=Francis,%20Sally%20A.&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=204&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=204-212&rft.issn=0953-7562&rft.eissn=1469-8102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.mycres.2006.10.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70215887%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-46b1a11907afa673ff0f6448c23c3607ae52396f8e426b810c5213e88df909ea3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19764996&rft_id=info:pmid/17324758&rfr_iscdi=true