Loading…
Comparison of ITS sequences from UK and North American sugar-beet powdery mildews and the designation of Erysiphe betae
Powdery mildew of sugar beet, a disease of major economic significance, was first described at the beginning of the 20th century, and since then there has been some confusion over the correct taxonomic identity of the causal agent. In Europe, the fungus was initially classified as the novel species...
Saved in:
Published in: | Mycological research 2007-02, Vol.111 (2), p.204-212 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-46b1a11907afa673ff0f6448c23c3607ae52396f8e426b810c5213e88df909ea3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-46b1a11907afa673ff0f6448c23c3607ae52396f8e426b810c5213e88df909ea3 |
container_end_page | 212 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 204 |
container_title | Mycological research |
container_volume | 111 |
creator | Francis, Sally A. Roden, Brett C. Adams, Michael J. Weiland, John Asher, Michael J.C. |
description | Powdery mildew of sugar beet, a disease of major economic significance, was first described at the beginning of the 20th century, and since then there has been some confusion over the correct taxonomic identity of the causal agent. In Europe, the fungus was initially classified as the novel species
Microsphaera betae, later re-named
Erysiphe betae, whilst in America it was identified as
E. polygoni, despite sugar-beet isolates from both regions having a host range restricted to
Beta species. It is possible that more than one fungus causes the disease, as published descriptions of conidiogenesis have differed. In this study, isolates of the fungus collected from sugar beet in the UK and USA were investigated for polymorphisms in the rDNA ITS region to determine if the same species caused the disease in both countries, whether there was any justification for the retention of the name
E. polygoni in the USA, and to search for evidence of a second species infecting sugar beet. From a total of 18 isolates examined, 23 ITS sequences were obtained. Fifteen of these, which included the UK and USA isolates, were identical and the remainder had single-base substitutions, indicating that the fungi were conspecific. Dendrogram analysis of
Erysiphales ITS regions revealed that the UK and North American isolates were more closely related to
E. heraclei than to
E. polygoni. It is proposed that the species name
Erysiphe betae be used for the powdery mildew fungus that infects sugar beet. No evidence was found in this study for a second sugar-beet powdery mildew species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.mycres.2006.10.010 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70215887</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0953756206003182</els_id><sourcerecordid>70215887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-46b1a11907afa673ff0f6448c23c3607ae52396f8e426b810c5213e88df909ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1uEzEURi0EoqHwBgi8YjfBf2N7NkhVVKBq1S7arC2P5zp1lBkP9oQob1-HicQOVpY-nfvJ9x6EPlKypITKr9tlf3QJ8pIRIku0JJS8QgsqZFNpSthrtCBNzStVS3aB3uW8JYRySvlbdEEVZ0LVeoEOq9iPNoUcBxw9vnl6xBl-7WFwkLFPscfrW2yHDt_HND3jqx5ScHbAeb-xqWoBJjzGQwfpiPuw6-CQ_9DTM-AOctgMdgpz9XU65jCWvIXJwnv0xttdhg_n9xKtv18_rX5Wdw8_blZXd5UTtJ4qIVtqKW2Ist5Kxb0nXgqhHeOOy5JCzXgjvQbBZFvWdjWjHLTufEMasPwSfZl7xxTLWnkyfcgOdjs7QNxnowijtdbqvyBtlBRNIwsoZtClmHMCb8YUepuOhhJzMmO2ZjZjTmZOaTFTxj6d-_dtD93fobOKAnyeAW-jsZuixKwfWVFGiNZMcV6IbzMB5WC_AySTXTiZ6kICN5kuhn__4QVb76qO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19764996</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of ITS sequences from UK and North American sugar-beet powdery mildews and the designation of Erysiphe betae</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Francis, Sally A. ; Roden, Brett C. ; Adams, Michael J. ; Weiland, John ; Asher, Michael J.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Francis, Sally A. ; Roden, Brett C. ; Adams, Michael J. ; Weiland, John ; Asher, Michael J.C.</creatorcontrib><description>Powdery mildew of sugar beet, a disease of major economic significance, was first described at the beginning of the 20th century, and since then there has been some confusion over the correct taxonomic identity of the causal agent. In Europe, the fungus was initially classified as the novel species
Microsphaera betae, later re-named
Erysiphe betae, whilst in America it was identified as
E. polygoni, despite sugar-beet isolates from both regions having a host range restricted to
Beta species. It is possible that more than one fungus causes the disease, as published descriptions of conidiogenesis have differed. In this study, isolates of the fungus collected from sugar beet in the UK and USA were investigated for polymorphisms in the rDNA ITS region to determine if the same species caused the disease in both countries, whether there was any justification for the retention of the name
E. polygoni in the USA, and to search for evidence of a second species infecting sugar beet. From a total of 18 isolates examined, 23 ITS sequences were obtained. Fifteen of these, which included the UK and USA isolates, were identical and the remainder had single-base substitutions, indicating that the fungi were conspecific. Dendrogram analysis of
Erysiphales ITS regions revealed that the UK and North American isolates were more closely related to
E. heraclei than to
E. polygoni. It is proposed that the species name
Erysiphe betae be used for the powdery mildew fungus that infects sugar beet. No evidence was found in this study for a second sugar-beet powdery mildew species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0953-7562</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.mycres.2006.10.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17324758</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Ascomycota - genetics ; Base Sequence ; Beta spp ; Beta vulgaris ; Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris ; DNA, Fungal - chemistry ; DNA, Fungal - genetics ; DNA, Intergenic - chemistry ; DNA, Intergenic - genetics ; Erysiphales ; Erysiphe betae ; Erysiphe polygoni ; genetic polymorphism ; Genetic Variation ; host plants ; internal transcribed spacers ; Molecular Sequence Data ; Molecular systematicsPlant pathology ; Phylogeny ; Plant Diseases - microbiology ; Plant Leaves - microbiology ; plant pathogenic fungi ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; powdery mildew ; Powdery mildews ; ribosomal DNA ; Sequence Alignment ; sequence analysis ; sugar beet</subject><ispartof>Mycological research, 2007-02, Vol.111 (2), p.204-212</ispartof><rights>2006 The British Mycological Society</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-46b1a11907afa673ff0f6448c23c3607ae52396f8e426b810c5213e88df909ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-46b1a11907afa673ff0f6448c23c3607ae52396f8e426b810c5213e88df909ea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17324758$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Francis, Sally A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roden, Brett C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiland, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asher, Michael J.C.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of ITS sequences from UK and North American sugar-beet powdery mildews and the designation of Erysiphe betae</title><title>Mycological research</title><addtitle>Mycol Res</addtitle><description>Powdery mildew of sugar beet, a disease of major economic significance, was first described at the beginning of the 20th century, and since then there has been some confusion over the correct taxonomic identity of the causal agent. In Europe, the fungus was initially classified as the novel species
Microsphaera betae, later re-named
Erysiphe betae, whilst in America it was identified as
E. polygoni, despite sugar-beet isolates from both regions having a host range restricted to
Beta species. It is possible that more than one fungus causes the disease, as published descriptions of conidiogenesis have differed. In this study, isolates of the fungus collected from sugar beet in the UK and USA were investigated for polymorphisms in the rDNA ITS region to determine if the same species caused the disease in both countries, whether there was any justification for the retention of the name
E. polygoni in the USA, and to search for evidence of a second species infecting sugar beet. From a total of 18 isolates examined, 23 ITS sequences were obtained. Fifteen of these, which included the UK and USA isolates, were identical and the remainder had single-base substitutions, indicating that the fungi were conspecific. Dendrogram analysis of
Erysiphales ITS regions revealed that the UK and North American isolates were more closely related to
E. heraclei than to
E. polygoni. It is proposed that the species name
Erysiphe betae be used for the powdery mildew fungus that infects sugar beet. No evidence was found in this study for a second sugar-beet powdery mildew species.</description><subject>Ascomycota - genetics</subject><subject>Base Sequence</subject><subject>Beta spp</subject><subject>Beta vulgaris</subject><subject>Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris</subject><subject>DNA, Fungal - chemistry</subject><subject>DNA, Fungal - genetics</subject><subject>DNA, Intergenic - chemistry</subject><subject>DNA, Intergenic - genetics</subject><subject>Erysiphales</subject><subject>Erysiphe betae</subject><subject>Erysiphe polygoni</subject><subject>genetic polymorphism</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>host plants</subject><subject>internal transcribed spacers</subject><subject>Molecular Sequence Data</subject><subject>Molecular systematicsPlant pathology</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Plant Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Plant Leaves - microbiology</subject><subject>plant pathogenic fungi</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>powdery mildew</subject><subject>Powdery mildews</subject><subject>ribosomal DNA</subject><subject>Sequence Alignment</subject><subject>sequence analysis</subject><subject>sugar beet</subject><issn>0953-7562</issn><issn>1469-8102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1uEzEURi0EoqHwBgi8YjfBf2N7NkhVVKBq1S7arC2P5zp1lBkP9oQob1-HicQOVpY-nfvJ9x6EPlKypITKr9tlf3QJ8pIRIku0JJS8QgsqZFNpSthrtCBNzStVS3aB3uW8JYRySvlbdEEVZ0LVeoEOq9iPNoUcBxw9vnl6xBl-7WFwkLFPscfrW2yHDt_HND3jqx5ScHbAeb-xqWoBJjzGQwfpiPuw6-CQ_9DTM-AOctgMdgpz9XU65jCWvIXJwnv0xttdhg_n9xKtv18_rX5Wdw8_blZXd5UTtJ4qIVtqKW2Ist5Kxb0nXgqhHeOOy5JCzXgjvQbBZFvWdjWjHLTufEMasPwSfZl7xxTLWnkyfcgOdjs7QNxnowijtdbqvyBtlBRNIwsoZtClmHMCb8YUepuOhhJzMmO2ZjZjTmZOaTFTxj6d-_dtD93fobOKAnyeAW-jsZuixKwfWVFGiNZMcV6IbzMB5WC_AySTXTiZ6kICN5kuhn__4QVb76qO</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Francis, Sally A.</creator><creator>Roden, Brett C.</creator><creator>Adams, Michael J.</creator><creator>Weiland, John</creator><creator>Asher, Michael J.C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>Comparison of ITS sequences from UK and North American sugar-beet powdery mildews and the designation of Erysiphe betae</title><author>Francis, Sally A. ; Roden, Brett C. ; Adams, Michael J. ; Weiland, John ; Asher, Michael J.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-46b1a11907afa673ff0f6448c23c3607ae52396f8e426b810c5213e88df909ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Ascomycota - genetics</topic><topic>Base Sequence</topic><topic>Beta spp</topic><topic>Beta vulgaris</topic><topic>Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris</topic><topic>DNA, Fungal - chemistry</topic><topic>DNA, Fungal - genetics</topic><topic>DNA, Intergenic - chemistry</topic><topic>DNA, Intergenic - genetics</topic><topic>Erysiphales</topic><topic>Erysiphe betae</topic><topic>Erysiphe polygoni</topic><topic>genetic polymorphism</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>host plants</topic><topic>internal transcribed spacers</topic><topic>Molecular Sequence Data</topic><topic>Molecular systematicsPlant pathology</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Plant Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Plant Leaves - microbiology</topic><topic>plant pathogenic fungi</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>powdery mildew</topic><topic>Powdery mildews</topic><topic>ribosomal DNA</topic><topic>Sequence Alignment</topic><topic>sequence analysis</topic><topic>sugar beet</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Francis, Sally A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roden, Brett C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiland, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asher, Michael J.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Mycological research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Francis, Sally A.</au><au>Roden, Brett C.</au><au>Adams, Michael J.</au><au>Weiland, John</au><au>Asher, Michael J.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of ITS sequences from UK and North American sugar-beet powdery mildews and the designation of Erysiphe betae</atitle><jtitle>Mycological research</jtitle><addtitle>Mycol Res</addtitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>204</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>204-212</pages><issn>0953-7562</issn><eissn>1469-8102</eissn><abstract>Powdery mildew of sugar beet, a disease of major economic significance, was first described at the beginning of the 20th century, and since then there has been some confusion over the correct taxonomic identity of the causal agent. In Europe, the fungus was initially classified as the novel species
Microsphaera betae, later re-named
Erysiphe betae, whilst in America it was identified as
E. polygoni, despite sugar-beet isolates from both regions having a host range restricted to
Beta species. It is possible that more than one fungus causes the disease, as published descriptions of conidiogenesis have differed. In this study, isolates of the fungus collected from sugar beet in the UK and USA were investigated for polymorphisms in the rDNA ITS region to determine if the same species caused the disease in both countries, whether there was any justification for the retention of the name
E. polygoni in the USA, and to search for evidence of a second species infecting sugar beet. From a total of 18 isolates examined, 23 ITS sequences were obtained. Fifteen of these, which included the UK and USA isolates, were identical and the remainder had single-base substitutions, indicating that the fungi were conspecific. Dendrogram analysis of
Erysiphales ITS regions revealed that the UK and North American isolates were more closely related to
E. heraclei than to
E. polygoni. It is proposed that the species name
Erysiphe betae be used for the powdery mildew fungus that infects sugar beet. No evidence was found in this study for a second sugar-beet powdery mildew species.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>17324758</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.mycres.2006.10.010</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0953-7562 |
ispartof | Mycological research, 2007-02, Vol.111 (2), p.204-212 |
issn | 0953-7562 1469-8102 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70215887 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Ascomycota - genetics Base Sequence Beta spp Beta vulgaris Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris DNA, Fungal - chemistry DNA, Fungal - genetics DNA, Intergenic - chemistry DNA, Intergenic - genetics Erysiphales Erysiphe betae Erysiphe polygoni genetic polymorphism Genetic Variation host plants internal transcribed spacers Molecular Sequence Data Molecular systematicsPlant pathology Phylogeny Plant Diseases - microbiology Plant Leaves - microbiology plant pathogenic fungi Polymerase Chain Reaction powdery mildew Powdery mildews ribosomal DNA Sequence Alignment sequence analysis sugar beet |
title | Comparison of ITS sequences from UK and North American sugar-beet powdery mildews and the designation of Erysiphe betae |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T04%3A51%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20ITS%20sequences%20from%20UK%20and%20North%20American%20sugar-beet%20powdery%20mildews%20and%20the%20designation%20of%20Erysiphe%20betae&rft.jtitle=Mycological%20research&rft.au=Francis,%20Sally%20A.&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=204&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=204-212&rft.issn=0953-7562&rft.eissn=1469-8102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.mycres.2006.10.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70215887%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-46b1a11907afa673ff0f6448c23c3607ae52396f8e426b810c5213e88df909ea3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19764996&rft_id=info:pmid/17324758&rfr_iscdi=true |