Loading…

An extended index to quantify normality of gait in children

Abstract Clinical gait analysis aims to quantify and assess the mechanics of walking and identify deviations from ‘normal’ movement patterns. To facilitate the use of clinical equipment, protocols are required to process data and produce a few meaningful summary measurements which can, in turn, be u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gait & posture 2007-04, Vol.25 (4), p.549-554
Main Authors: Chester, Victoria L, Tingley, Maureen, Biden, Edmund N
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Clinical gait analysis aims to quantify and assess the mechanics of walking and identify deviations from ‘normal’ movement patterns. To facilitate the use of clinical equipment, protocols are required to process data and produce a few meaningful summary measurements which can, in turn, be used to flag gait abnormalities. Earlier work produced a one-dimensional index of gait, calculated from sagittal hip, knee and ankle rotation angle patterns. The objective of this study was to extend the original index, incorporating kinematic and kinetic data from multiple planes, while allowing for correlations between component measures. A one-dimensional index of normal gait was developed, based on normative gait data ( N = 45 children, aged 3–13 years). The new one-dimensional index was calculated using correlation patterns between seven component indices, each of which has diagnostic interpretation. The effectiveness of the new index was tested using immature normative data ( N = 14) and hypotonic data ( N = 10). Approximately 85% of immature normative children and 100% of hypotonic children were classified as either unusual or extreme by the one-dimensional index. These data reduction protocols improve objective gait analyses in the clinical setting.
ISSN:0966-6362
1879-2219
DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.06.004