Loading…
Intraoperative MR-guided neurosurgery
For more than a decade neurosurgeons have become increasingly dependent on image guidance to perform safe, efficient, and cost‐effective surgery. Neuronavigation is frame‐based or frameless and requires obtaining computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans several days or immediate...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2008-02, Vol.27 (2), p.368-375 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4313-710d1330e198f9f48d7b714aded7743714b5522817b49f4ab29720210b3693223 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4313-710d1330e198f9f48d7b714aded7743714b5522817b49f4ab29720210b3693223 |
container_end_page | 375 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 368 |
container_title | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Hall, Walter A. Truwit, Charles L. |
description | For more than a decade neurosurgeons have become increasingly dependent on image guidance to perform safe, efficient, and cost‐effective surgery. Neuronavigation is frame‐based or frameless and requires obtaining computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans several days or immediately before surgery. Unfortunately, these systems do not allow the neurosurgeon to adjust for the brain shift that occurs once the cranium is open. This technical inability has led to the development of intraoperative MRI (ioMRI) systems ranging from 0.12–3.0T in strength. The advantages of ioMRI are the excellent soft tissue discrimination and the ability to view the operative site in three dimensions. Enhanced visualization of the intracranial lesion enables the neurosurgeon to choose a safe surgical trajectory that avoids critical structures, to maximize the extent of the tumor resection, and to exclude an intraoperative hemorrhage. All ioMRI systems provide basic T1‐ and T2‐weighted imaging capabilities but high‐field (1.5T) systems can also perform MR spectroscopy (MRS), MR venography (MRV), MR angiography (MRA), brain activation studies, chemical shift imaging, and diffusion‐weighted imaging. Identifying vascular structures by MRA or MRV may prevent injury during surgery. Demonstrating elevated phosphocholine within a tumor may improve the diagnostic yield of brain biopsy. Mapping out neurologic function may influence the surgical approach to a tumor. The optimal strength for MR‐guided neurosurgery is currently under investigation. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jmri.21273 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70253043</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70253043</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4313-710d1330e198f9f48d7b714aded7743714b5522817b49f4ab29720210b3693223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFOwkAQhjdGI4hefADDRQ8mxZ2d3W57NEQRBE2IxuNmS7ek2ALutipv72JRb55mkvn-L5OfkFOgPaCUXS1Km_cYMIl7pA2CsYCJKNz3OxUYQERlixw5t6CUxjEXh6QFEUQoItEm58NlZfVqbayu8nfTnUyDeZ2nJu0uTW1XrrZzYzfH5CDThTMnu9khz7c3T_27YPw4GPavx8GMI2AggaaASA3EURZnPEplIoFrr5OSo18T4d-LQCbcn3XCYskoA5pgGCNj2CEXjXdtV2-1cZUqczczRaGXZlU7JSkTSDl68LIBZ_5HZ02m1jYvtd0ooGpbitqWor5L8fDZzlonpUn_0F0LHoAG-MgLs_lHpUaT6fBHGjSZ3FXm8zej7asKJUqhXh4GaoR9fh96RYhfLpp4mQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70253043</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intraoperative MR-guided neurosurgery</title><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Hall, Walter A. ; Truwit, Charles L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hall, Walter A. ; Truwit, Charles L.</creatorcontrib><description>For more than a decade neurosurgeons have become increasingly dependent on image guidance to perform safe, efficient, and cost‐effective surgery. Neuronavigation is frame‐based or frameless and requires obtaining computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans several days or immediately before surgery. Unfortunately, these systems do not allow the neurosurgeon to adjust for the brain shift that occurs once the cranium is open. This technical inability has led to the development of intraoperative MRI (ioMRI) systems ranging from 0.12–3.0T in strength. The advantages of ioMRI are the excellent soft tissue discrimination and the ability to view the operative site in three dimensions. Enhanced visualization of the intracranial lesion enables the neurosurgeon to choose a safe surgical trajectory that avoids critical structures, to maximize the extent of the tumor resection, and to exclude an intraoperative hemorrhage. All ioMRI systems provide basic T1‐ and T2‐weighted imaging capabilities but high‐field (1.5T) systems can also perform MR spectroscopy (MRS), MR venography (MRV), MR angiography (MRA), brain activation studies, chemical shift imaging, and diffusion‐weighted imaging. Identifying vascular structures by MRA or MRV may prevent injury during surgery. Demonstrating elevated phosphocholine within a tumor may improve the diagnostic yield of brain biopsy. Mapping out neurologic function may influence the surgical approach to a tumor. The optimal strength for MR‐guided neurosurgery is currently under investigation. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21273</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18183585</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Biopsy - instrumentation ; Biopsy - methods ; Brain - pathology ; Brain - surgery ; Brain Mapping - instrumentation ; Brain Mapping - methods ; brain neoplasms ; Brain Neoplasms - surgery ; Deep Brain Stimulation - methods ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging ; magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional - economics ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional - instrumentation ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional - methods ; Neurosurgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Neurosurgical Procedures - methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2008-02, Vol.27 (2), p.368-375</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>(Copyright) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4313-710d1330e198f9f48d7b714aded7743714b5522817b49f4ab29720210b3693223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4313-710d1330e198f9f48d7b714aded7743714b5522817b49f4ab29720210b3693223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18183585$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hall, Walter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Truwit, Charles L.</creatorcontrib><title>Intraoperative MR-guided neurosurgery</title><title>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><description>For more than a decade neurosurgeons have become increasingly dependent on image guidance to perform safe, efficient, and cost‐effective surgery. Neuronavigation is frame‐based or frameless and requires obtaining computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans several days or immediately before surgery. Unfortunately, these systems do not allow the neurosurgeon to adjust for the brain shift that occurs once the cranium is open. This technical inability has led to the development of intraoperative MRI (ioMRI) systems ranging from 0.12–3.0T in strength. The advantages of ioMRI are the excellent soft tissue discrimination and the ability to view the operative site in three dimensions. Enhanced visualization of the intracranial lesion enables the neurosurgeon to choose a safe surgical trajectory that avoids critical structures, to maximize the extent of the tumor resection, and to exclude an intraoperative hemorrhage. All ioMRI systems provide basic T1‐ and T2‐weighted imaging capabilities but high‐field (1.5T) systems can also perform MR spectroscopy (MRS), MR venography (MRV), MR angiography (MRA), brain activation studies, chemical shift imaging, and diffusion‐weighted imaging. Identifying vascular structures by MRA or MRV may prevent injury during surgery. Demonstrating elevated phosphocholine within a tumor may improve the diagnostic yield of brain biopsy. Mapping out neurologic function may influence the surgical approach to a tumor. The optimal strength for MR‐guided neurosurgery is currently under investigation. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Biopsy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Brain - pathology</subject><subject>Brain - surgery</subject><subject>Brain Mapping - instrumentation</subject><subject>Brain Mapping - methods</subject><subject>brain neoplasms</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Deep Brain Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional - economics</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional - instrumentation</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional - methods</subject><subject>Neurosurgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Neurosurgical Procedures - methods</subject><issn>1053-1807</issn><issn>1522-2586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFOwkAQhjdGI4hefADDRQ8mxZ2d3W57NEQRBE2IxuNmS7ek2ALutipv72JRb55mkvn-L5OfkFOgPaCUXS1Km_cYMIl7pA2CsYCJKNz3OxUYQERlixw5t6CUxjEXh6QFEUQoItEm58NlZfVqbayu8nfTnUyDeZ2nJu0uTW1XrrZzYzfH5CDThTMnu9khz7c3T_27YPw4GPavx8GMI2AggaaASA3EURZnPEplIoFrr5OSo18T4d-LQCbcn3XCYskoA5pgGCNj2CEXjXdtV2-1cZUqczczRaGXZlU7JSkTSDl68LIBZ_5HZ02m1jYvtd0ooGpbitqWor5L8fDZzlonpUn_0F0LHoAG-MgLs_lHpUaT6fBHGjSZ3FXm8zej7asKJUqhXh4GaoR9fh96RYhfLpp4mQ</recordid><startdate>200802</startdate><enddate>200802</enddate><creator>Hall, Walter A.</creator><creator>Truwit, Charles L.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200802</creationdate><title>Intraoperative MR-guided neurosurgery</title><author>Hall, Walter A. ; Truwit, Charles L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4313-710d1330e198f9f48d7b714aded7743714b5522817b49f4ab29720210b3693223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Biopsy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Brain - pathology</topic><topic>Brain - surgery</topic><topic>Brain Mapping - instrumentation</topic><topic>Brain Mapping - methods</topic><topic>brain neoplasms</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Deep Brain Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional - economics</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional - instrumentation</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional - methods</topic><topic>Neurosurgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Neurosurgical Procedures - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hall, Walter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Truwit, Charles L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hall, Walter A.</au><au>Truwit, Charles L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intraoperative MR-guided neurosurgery</atitle><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><date>2008-02</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>368</spage><epage>375</epage><pages>368-375</pages><issn>1053-1807</issn><eissn>1522-2586</eissn><abstract>For more than a decade neurosurgeons have become increasingly dependent on image guidance to perform safe, efficient, and cost‐effective surgery. Neuronavigation is frame‐based or frameless and requires obtaining computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans several days or immediately before surgery. Unfortunately, these systems do not allow the neurosurgeon to adjust for the brain shift that occurs once the cranium is open. This technical inability has led to the development of intraoperative MRI (ioMRI) systems ranging from 0.12–3.0T in strength. The advantages of ioMRI are the excellent soft tissue discrimination and the ability to view the operative site in three dimensions. Enhanced visualization of the intracranial lesion enables the neurosurgeon to choose a safe surgical trajectory that avoids critical structures, to maximize the extent of the tumor resection, and to exclude an intraoperative hemorrhage. All ioMRI systems provide basic T1‐ and T2‐weighted imaging capabilities but high‐field (1.5T) systems can also perform MR spectroscopy (MRS), MR venography (MRV), MR angiography (MRA), brain activation studies, chemical shift imaging, and diffusion‐weighted imaging. Identifying vascular structures by MRA or MRV may prevent injury during surgery. Demonstrating elevated phosphocholine within a tumor may improve the diagnostic yield of brain biopsy. Mapping out neurologic function may influence the surgical approach to a tumor. The optimal strength for MR‐guided neurosurgery is currently under investigation. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>18183585</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmri.21273</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-1807 |
ispartof | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2008-02, Vol.27 (2), p.368-375 |
issn | 1053-1807 1522-2586 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70253043 |
source | Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list) |
subjects | Biopsy - instrumentation Biopsy - methods Brain - pathology Brain - surgery Brain Mapping - instrumentation Brain Mapping - methods brain neoplasms Brain Neoplasms - surgery Deep Brain Stimulation - methods Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional - economics Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional - instrumentation Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional - methods Neurosurgical Procedures - adverse effects Neurosurgical Procedures - methods |
title | Intraoperative MR-guided neurosurgery |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T10%3A14%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraoperative%20MR-guided%20neurosurgery&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Hall,%20Walter%20A.&rft.date=2008-02&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=368&rft.epage=375&rft.pages=368-375&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmri.21273&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70253043%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4313-710d1330e198f9f48d7b714aded7743714b5522817b49f4ab29720210b3693223%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70253043&rft_id=info:pmid/18183585&rfr_iscdi=true |