Loading…

Averaged EMG profiles in jogging and running at different speeds

Abstract EMGs were collected from 14 muscles with surface electrodes in 10 subjects walking 1.25–2.25 m s−1 and running 1.25–4.5 m s−1 . The EMGs were rectified, interpolated in 100% of the stride, and averaged over all subjects to give an average profile. In running, these profiles could be decompo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gait & posture 2007-04, Vol.25 (4), p.604-614
Main Authors: Gazendam, Marnix G.J, Hof, At L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-31bd631a53f6f30a6a395c68bb7e2af7726c11d68c0eeab7eaf96b8adefff2183
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-31bd631a53f6f30a6a395c68bb7e2af7726c11d68c0eeab7eaf96b8adefff2183
container_end_page 614
container_issue 4
container_start_page 604
container_title Gait & posture
container_volume 25
creator Gazendam, Marnix G.J
Hof, At L
description Abstract EMGs were collected from 14 muscles with surface electrodes in 10 subjects walking 1.25–2.25 m s−1 and running 1.25–4.5 m s−1 . The EMGs were rectified, interpolated in 100% of the stride, and averaged over all subjects to give an average profile. In running, these profiles could be decomposed into 10 basic patterns, 8 of which represented only a single burst. Muscles could be divided into a quadriceps, hamstrings, calf and gluteal group, the profiles of which were composed of the same basic patterns. The amplitude of some bursts was constant, but other ones varied with running speed. This speed dependency was generally different between muscles of the same group. Many muscles show a similar profile in running as in walking. The most notable exception is the calf group, which shows activation in early stance (86–125%), together with quadriceps, instead of in late stance (26–55%) as in walking. This is also visible in low-speed running, ‘jogging’, where stance extends to 46% or 57%, instead of 30–37% as in normal running. Jogging shows some additional differences with normal running, related to this prolonged stance phase.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.06.013
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70253900</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0966636206001408</els_id><sourcerecordid>21016782</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-31bd631a53f6f30a6a395c68bb7e2af7726c11d68c0eeab7eaf96b8adefff2183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFq3DAQQEVpaTZpfyH41Ju3M9Jali8lIaRpIKWHtmchSyMj1ytvJTuQv4_d3VLoJTAwg3gzI94wdomwRUD5sd92JkyHMU9bDiC3a6B4xTao6qbkHJvXbAONlKUUkp-x85x7ANgJxd-yM5RK1aLCDbu6fqRkOnLF7de74pBGHwbKRYhFP3ZdiF1hoivSHOOfeipc8J4SxanIByKX37E33gyZ3p_yBfv5-fbHzZfy4dvd_c31Q2l3FZ9Kga2TAk0lvPQCjDSiqaxUbVsTN76uubSITioLRGZ5NL6RrTKOvPcclbhgH45zlz_-nilPeh-ypWEwkcY56xp4JRqAF0G--qsVX0B5BG0ac07k9SGFvUlPGkGvkO71X8l6lazXQLE0Xp42zO2e3L-2k9UFuDoCtAh5DJR0toGiJRcS2Um7Mby849N_I-wQYrBm-EVPlPtxTnHRrVFnrkF_X0-9XhokAO5AiWfQGqYl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21016782</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Averaged EMG profiles in jogging and running at different speeds</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Gazendam, Marnix G.J ; Hof, At L</creator><creatorcontrib>Gazendam, Marnix G.J ; Hof, At L</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract EMGs were collected from 14 muscles with surface electrodes in 10 subjects walking 1.25–2.25 m s−1 and running 1.25–4.5 m s−1 . The EMGs were rectified, interpolated in 100% of the stride, and averaged over all subjects to give an average profile. In running, these profiles could be decomposed into 10 basic patterns, 8 of which represented only a single burst. Muscles could be divided into a quadriceps, hamstrings, calf and gluteal group, the profiles of which were composed of the same basic patterns. The amplitude of some bursts was constant, but other ones varied with running speed. This speed dependency was generally different between muscles of the same group. Many muscles show a similar profile in running as in walking. The most notable exception is the calf group, which shows activation in early stance (86–125%), together with quadriceps, instead of in late stance (26–55%) as in walking. This is also visible in low-speed running, ‘jogging’, where stance extends to 46% or 57%, instead of 30–37% as in normal running. Jogging shows some additional differences with normal running, related to this prolonged stance phase.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-6362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2219</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.06.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16887351</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acceleration ; Adult ; Electromyography ; EMG ; Exercise Test ; Human running ; Humans ; Lower Extremity - physiology ; Male ; Models, Biological ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Orthopedics ; Running - physiology ; Velocity ; Walking - physiology</subject><ispartof>Gait &amp; posture, 2007-04, Vol.25 (4), p.604-614</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2006 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-31bd631a53f6f30a6a395c68bb7e2af7726c11d68c0eeab7eaf96b8adefff2183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-31bd631a53f6f30a6a395c68bb7e2af7726c11d68c0eeab7eaf96b8adefff2183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16887351$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gazendam, Marnix G.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hof, At L</creatorcontrib><title>Averaged EMG profiles in jogging and running at different speeds</title><title>Gait &amp; posture</title><addtitle>Gait Posture</addtitle><description>Abstract EMGs were collected from 14 muscles with surface electrodes in 10 subjects walking 1.25–2.25 m s−1 and running 1.25–4.5 m s−1 . The EMGs were rectified, interpolated in 100% of the stride, and averaged over all subjects to give an average profile. In running, these profiles could be decomposed into 10 basic patterns, 8 of which represented only a single burst. Muscles could be divided into a quadriceps, hamstrings, calf and gluteal group, the profiles of which were composed of the same basic patterns. The amplitude of some bursts was constant, but other ones varied with running speed. This speed dependency was generally different between muscles of the same group. Many muscles show a similar profile in running as in walking. The most notable exception is the calf group, which shows activation in early stance (86–125%), together with quadriceps, instead of in late stance (26–55%) as in walking. This is also visible in low-speed running, ‘jogging’, where stance extends to 46% or 57%, instead of 30–37% as in normal running. Jogging shows some additional differences with normal running, related to this prolonged stance phase.</description><subject>Acceleration</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>EMG</subject><subject>Exercise Test</subject><subject>Human running</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lower Extremity - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Running - physiology</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Walking - physiology</subject><issn>0966-6362</issn><issn>1879-2219</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkcFq3DAQQEVpaTZpfyH41Ju3M9Jali8lIaRpIKWHtmchSyMj1ytvJTuQv4_d3VLoJTAwg3gzI94wdomwRUD5sd92JkyHMU9bDiC3a6B4xTao6qbkHJvXbAONlKUUkp-x85x7ANgJxd-yM5RK1aLCDbu6fqRkOnLF7de74pBGHwbKRYhFP3ZdiF1hoivSHOOfeipc8J4SxanIByKX37E33gyZ3p_yBfv5-fbHzZfy4dvd_c31Q2l3FZ9Kga2TAk0lvPQCjDSiqaxUbVsTN76uubSITioLRGZ5NL6RrTKOvPcclbhgH45zlz_-nilPeh-ypWEwkcY56xp4JRqAF0G--qsVX0B5BG0ac07k9SGFvUlPGkGvkO71X8l6lazXQLE0Xp42zO2e3L-2k9UFuDoCtAh5DJR0toGiJRcS2Um7Mby849N_I-wQYrBm-EVPlPtxTnHRrVFnrkF_X0-9XhokAO5AiWfQGqYl</recordid><startdate>20070401</startdate><enddate>20070401</enddate><creator>Gazendam, Marnix G.J</creator><creator>Hof, At L</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070401</creationdate><title>Averaged EMG profiles in jogging and running at different speeds</title><author>Gazendam, Marnix G.J ; Hof, At L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-31bd631a53f6f30a6a395c68bb7e2af7726c11d68c0eeab7eaf96b8adefff2183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Acceleration</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>EMG</topic><topic>Exercise Test</topic><topic>Human running</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lower Extremity - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Running - physiology</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Walking - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gazendam, Marnix G.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hof, At L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gait &amp; posture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gazendam, Marnix G.J</au><au>Hof, At L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Averaged EMG profiles in jogging and running at different speeds</atitle><jtitle>Gait &amp; posture</jtitle><addtitle>Gait Posture</addtitle><date>2007-04-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>604</spage><epage>614</epage><pages>604-614</pages><issn>0966-6362</issn><eissn>1879-2219</eissn><abstract>Abstract EMGs were collected from 14 muscles with surface electrodes in 10 subjects walking 1.25–2.25 m s−1 and running 1.25–4.5 m s−1 . The EMGs were rectified, interpolated in 100% of the stride, and averaged over all subjects to give an average profile. In running, these profiles could be decomposed into 10 basic patterns, 8 of which represented only a single burst. Muscles could be divided into a quadriceps, hamstrings, calf and gluteal group, the profiles of which were composed of the same basic patterns. The amplitude of some bursts was constant, but other ones varied with running speed. This speed dependency was generally different between muscles of the same group. Many muscles show a similar profile in running as in walking. The most notable exception is the calf group, which shows activation in early stance (86–125%), together with quadriceps, instead of in late stance (26–55%) as in walking. This is also visible in low-speed running, ‘jogging’, where stance extends to 46% or 57%, instead of 30–37% as in normal running. Jogging shows some additional differences with normal running, related to this prolonged stance phase.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>16887351</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.06.013</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0966-6362
ispartof Gait & posture, 2007-04, Vol.25 (4), p.604-614
issn 0966-6362
1879-2219
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70253900
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Acceleration
Adult
Electromyography
EMG
Exercise Test
Human running
Humans
Lower Extremity - physiology
Male
Models, Biological
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Orthopedics
Running - physiology
Velocity
Walking - physiology
title Averaged EMG profiles in jogging and running at different speeds
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T08%3A02%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Averaged%20EMG%20profiles%20in%20jogging%20and%20running%20at%20different%20speeds&rft.jtitle=Gait%20&%20posture&rft.au=Gazendam,%20Marnix%20G.J&rft.date=2007-04-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=604&rft.epage=614&rft.pages=604-614&rft.issn=0966-6362&rft.eissn=1879-2219&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.06.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21016782%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-31bd631a53f6f30a6a395c68bb7e2af7726c11d68c0eeab7eaf96b8adefff2183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21016782&rft_id=info:pmid/16887351&rfr_iscdi=true