Loading…
Limited Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging of the Middle Ear: A Comparison with Multislice Helical Computed Tomography
Purpose: To determine the applicability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in otological imaging, and to compare its accuracy with the routinely used multislice helical CT (MSCT) for imaging of the middle- and inner-ear areas. Material and Methods: Thirteen unoperated human cadaver temporal bon...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta radiologica (1987) 2007-03, Vol.48 (2), p.207-212 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-624f6736643b4ba666b8dffdf467c1e5d50bb9b645b0b7c9879c2d9ad41c78923 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 212 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 207 |
container_title | Acta radiologica (1987) |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Peltonen, L. I. Aarnisalo, A. A. Kortesniemi, M. K. Suomalainen, A. Jero, J. Robinson, S. |
description | Purpose: To determine the applicability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in otological imaging, and to compare its accuracy with the routinely used multislice helical CT (MSCT) for imaging of the middle- and inner-ear areas.
Material and Methods: Thirteen unoperated human cadaver temporal bones were imaged with CBCT and MSCT. Sixteen landmarks of the middle and adjacent inner ear were evaluated and compared for their conspicuity according to a modified Likert scale. Total scores and scores for subgroups including landmarks of specific clinical interest were also compared.
Results: No significant differences were found between the imaging techniques or subgroups when scores of individual structures were compared. While the middle ear itself was visible in all cases with CBCT, parts of the inner ear were "cut off" in four cases due to the limited field of view. For the same reason, the evaluation of the whole mastoid was not possible with CBCT. The cochlear and vestibular aqueducts were not visualized in either CT techniques. The contrast-to-noise ratio was more than 50% lower in CBCT than in MSCT, but still adequate for diagnostic task.
Conclusion: CBCT proved to be at least as accurate as routinely used MSCT in revealing the clinically and surgically important middle-ear structures. The results show that high-quality imaging of the middle ear is possible with the current CBCT device. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/02841850601080465 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70257628</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_02841850601080465</sage_id><sourcerecordid>70257628</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-624f6736643b4ba666b8dffdf467c1e5d50bb9b645b0b7c9879c2d9ad41c78923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtv1DAURi0EotPCD2CDvIFdip34kcCqjFpaaSo2ZR1dvyau4niwE1Xz7_EwI3UBQqyuH-d8V_oQekfJJSUt-UTqltGWE0EOVyb4C7SigpCKMM5fotXhvyoAPUPnOT8SQmvJ6Wt0RmXDGWXNCu03PvjZGryOk62-WgjlFHbL4ekhhrhNsBv2-C7A1k9bHB2eB4vvvTGjxdeQPuOr3wIkn-OEn_w84PtlnH0evbb41pYB498y36BXDsZs357mBfpxc_2wvq0237_dra82lWY1mStRMydkIwRrFFMghFCtcc44JqSmlhtOlOqUYFwRJXXXyk7XpgPDqJZtVzcX6OMxd5fiz8XmuQ8-azuOMNm45F6SmktRtwWkR1CnmHOyrt8lHyDte0r6Q8H9H30X5_0pfFHBmmfjVHABPpwAyKUIl2DSPj9zLe86KlnhLo9chq3tH-OSplLKPzd_OQp-cjEFGCyM86Ah_Zf9C6OCp3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70257628</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Limited Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging of the Middle Ear: A Comparison with Multislice Helical Computed Tomography</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Peltonen, L. I. ; Aarnisalo, A. A. ; Kortesniemi, M. K. ; Suomalainen, A. ; Jero, J. ; Robinson, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Peltonen, L. I. ; Aarnisalo, A. A. ; Kortesniemi, M. K. ; Suomalainen, A. ; Jero, J. ; Robinson, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To determine the applicability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in otological imaging, and to compare its accuracy with the routinely used multislice helical CT (MSCT) for imaging of the middle- and inner-ear areas.
Material and Methods: Thirteen unoperated human cadaver temporal bones were imaged with CBCT and MSCT. Sixteen landmarks of the middle and adjacent inner ear were evaluated and compared for their conspicuity according to a modified Likert scale. Total scores and scores for subgroups including landmarks of specific clinical interest were also compared.
Results: No significant differences were found between the imaging techniques or subgroups when scores of individual structures were compared. While the middle ear itself was visible in all cases with CBCT, parts of the inner ear were "cut off" in four cases due to the limited field of view. For the same reason, the evaluation of the whole mastoid was not possible with CBCT. The cochlear and vestibular aqueducts were not visualized in either CT techniques. The contrast-to-noise ratio was more than 50% lower in CBCT than in MSCT, but still adequate for diagnostic task.
Conclusion: CBCT proved to be at least as accurate as routinely used MSCT in revealing the clinically and surgically important middle-ear structures. The results show that high-quality imaging of the middle ear is possible with the current CBCT device.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0284-1851</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02841850601080465</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17354143</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACRAE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cadaver ; Ear, Middle - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Medical sciences ; Temporal Bone - diagnostic imaging ; Tomography, Spiral Computed ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Acta radiologica (1987), 2007-03, Vol.48 (2), p.207-212</ispartof><rights>2007 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2007</rights><rights>2007 Taylor & Francis</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-624f6736643b4ba666b8dffdf467c1e5d50bb9b645b0b7c9879c2d9ad41c78923</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18599174$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17354143$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peltonen, L. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aarnisalo, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kortesniemi, M. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suomalainen, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jero, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Limited Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging of the Middle Ear: A Comparison with Multislice Helical Computed Tomography</title><title>Acta radiologica (1987)</title><addtitle>Acta Radiol</addtitle><description>Purpose: To determine the applicability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in otological imaging, and to compare its accuracy with the routinely used multislice helical CT (MSCT) for imaging of the middle- and inner-ear areas.
Material and Methods: Thirteen unoperated human cadaver temporal bones were imaged with CBCT and MSCT. Sixteen landmarks of the middle and adjacent inner ear were evaluated and compared for their conspicuity according to a modified Likert scale. Total scores and scores for subgroups including landmarks of specific clinical interest were also compared.
Results: No significant differences were found between the imaging techniques or subgroups when scores of individual structures were compared. While the middle ear itself was visible in all cases with CBCT, parts of the inner ear were "cut off" in four cases due to the limited field of view. For the same reason, the evaluation of the whole mastoid was not possible with CBCT. The cochlear and vestibular aqueducts were not visualized in either CT techniques. The contrast-to-noise ratio was more than 50% lower in CBCT than in MSCT, but still adequate for diagnostic task.
Conclusion: CBCT proved to be at least as accurate as routinely used MSCT in revealing the clinically and surgically important middle-ear structures. The results show that high-quality imaging of the middle ear is possible with the current CBCT device.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Ear, Middle - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Temporal Bone - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tomography, Spiral Computed</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0284-1851</issn><issn>1600-0455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEtv1DAURi0EotPCD2CDvIFdip34kcCqjFpaaSo2ZR1dvyau4niwE1Xz7_EwI3UBQqyuH-d8V_oQekfJJSUt-UTqltGWE0EOVyb4C7SigpCKMM5fotXhvyoAPUPnOT8SQmvJ6Wt0RmXDGWXNCu03PvjZGryOk62-WgjlFHbL4ekhhrhNsBv2-C7A1k9bHB2eB4vvvTGjxdeQPuOr3wIkn-OEn_w84PtlnH0evbb41pYB498y36BXDsZs357mBfpxc_2wvq0237_dra82lWY1mStRMydkIwRrFFMghFCtcc44JqSmlhtOlOqUYFwRJXXXyk7XpgPDqJZtVzcX6OMxd5fiz8XmuQ8-azuOMNm45F6SmktRtwWkR1CnmHOyrt8lHyDte0r6Q8H9H30X5_0pfFHBmmfjVHABPpwAyKUIl2DSPj9zLe86KlnhLo9chq3tH-OSplLKPzd_OQp-cjEFGCyM86Ah_Zf9C6OCp3Q</recordid><startdate>20070301</startdate><enddate>20070301</enddate><creator>Peltonen, L. I.</creator><creator>Aarnisalo, A. A.</creator><creator>Kortesniemi, M. K.</creator><creator>Suomalainen, A.</creator><creator>Jero, J.</creator><creator>Robinson, S.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070301</creationdate><title>Limited Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging of the Middle Ear: A Comparison with Multislice Helical Computed Tomography</title><author>Peltonen, L. I. ; Aarnisalo, A. A. ; Kortesniemi, M. K. ; Suomalainen, A. ; Jero, J. ; Robinson, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-624f6736643b4ba666b8dffdf467c1e5d50bb9b645b0b7c9879c2d9ad41c78923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Ear, Middle - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Temporal Bone - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tomography, Spiral Computed</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peltonen, L. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aarnisalo, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kortesniemi, M. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suomalainen, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jero, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta radiologica (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peltonen, L. I.</au><au>Aarnisalo, A. A.</au><au>Kortesniemi, M. K.</au><au>Suomalainen, A.</au><au>Jero, J.</au><au>Robinson, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Limited Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging of the Middle Ear: A Comparison with Multislice Helical Computed Tomography</atitle><jtitle>Acta radiologica (1987)</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Radiol</addtitle><date>2007-03-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>207-212</pages><issn>0284-1851</issn><eissn>1600-0455</eissn><coden>ACRAE3</coden><abstract>Purpose: To determine the applicability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in otological imaging, and to compare its accuracy with the routinely used multislice helical CT (MSCT) for imaging of the middle- and inner-ear areas.
Material and Methods: Thirteen unoperated human cadaver temporal bones were imaged with CBCT and MSCT. Sixteen landmarks of the middle and adjacent inner ear were evaluated and compared for their conspicuity according to a modified Likert scale. Total scores and scores for subgroups including landmarks of specific clinical interest were also compared.
Results: No significant differences were found between the imaging techniques or subgroups when scores of individual structures were compared. While the middle ear itself was visible in all cases with CBCT, parts of the inner ear were "cut off" in four cases due to the limited field of view. For the same reason, the evaluation of the whole mastoid was not possible with CBCT. The cochlear and vestibular aqueducts were not visualized in either CT techniques. The contrast-to-noise ratio was more than 50% lower in CBCT than in MSCT, but still adequate for diagnostic task.
Conclusion: CBCT proved to be at least as accurate as routinely used MSCT in revealing the clinically and surgically important middle-ear structures. The results show that high-quality imaging of the middle ear is possible with the current CBCT device.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>17354143</pmid><doi>10.1080/02841850601080465</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0284-1851 |
ispartof | Acta radiologica (1987), 2007-03, Vol.48 (2), p.207-212 |
issn | 0284-1851 1600-0455 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70257628 |
source | Sage Journals Online |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Cadaver Ear, Middle - diagnostic imaging Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Medical sciences Temporal Bone - diagnostic imaging Tomography, Spiral Computed Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
title | Limited Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging of the Middle Ear: A Comparison with Multislice Helical Computed Tomography |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T11%3A41%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Limited%20Cone-Beam%20Computed%20Tomography%20Imaging%20of%20the%20Middle%20Ear:%20A%20Comparison%20with%20Multislice%20Helical%20Computed%20Tomography&rft.jtitle=Acta%20radiologica%20(1987)&rft.au=Peltonen,%20L.%20I.&rft.date=2007-03-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=207-212&rft.issn=0284-1851&rft.eissn=1600-0455&rft.coden=ACRAE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02841850601080465&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70257628%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-624f6736643b4ba666b8dffdf467c1e5d50bb9b645b0b7c9879c2d9ad41c78923%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70257628&rft_id=info:pmid/17354143&rft_sage_id=10.1080_02841850601080465&rfr_iscdi=true |