Loading…

Limited Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging of the Middle Ear: A Comparison with Multislice Helical Computed Tomography

Purpose: To determine the applicability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in otological imaging, and to compare its accuracy with the routinely used multislice helical CT (MSCT) for imaging of the middle- and inner-ear areas. Material and Methods: Thirteen unoperated human cadaver temporal bon...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta radiologica (1987) 2007-03, Vol.48 (2), p.207-212
Main Authors: Peltonen, L. I., Aarnisalo, A. A., Kortesniemi, M. K., Suomalainen, A., Jero, J., Robinson, S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-624f6736643b4ba666b8dffdf467c1e5d50bb9b645b0b7c9879c2d9ad41c78923
cites
container_end_page 212
container_issue 2
container_start_page 207
container_title Acta radiologica (1987)
container_volume 48
creator Peltonen, L. I.
Aarnisalo, A. A.
Kortesniemi, M. K.
Suomalainen, A.
Jero, J.
Robinson, S.
description Purpose: To determine the applicability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in otological imaging, and to compare its accuracy with the routinely used multislice helical CT (MSCT) for imaging of the middle- and inner-ear areas. Material and Methods: Thirteen unoperated human cadaver temporal bones were imaged with CBCT and MSCT. Sixteen landmarks of the middle and adjacent inner ear were evaluated and compared for their conspicuity according to a modified Likert scale. Total scores and scores for subgroups including landmarks of specific clinical interest were also compared. Results: No significant differences were found between the imaging techniques or subgroups when scores of individual structures were compared. While the middle ear itself was visible in all cases with CBCT, parts of the inner ear were "cut off" in four cases due to the limited field of view. For the same reason, the evaluation of the whole mastoid was not possible with CBCT. The cochlear and vestibular aqueducts were not visualized in either CT techniques. The contrast-to-noise ratio was more than 50% lower in CBCT than in MSCT, but still adequate for diagnostic task. Conclusion: CBCT proved to be at least as accurate as routinely used MSCT in revealing the clinically and surgically important middle-ear structures. The results show that high-quality imaging of the middle ear is possible with the current CBCT device.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02841850601080465
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70257628</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_02841850601080465</sage_id><sourcerecordid>70257628</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-624f6736643b4ba666b8dffdf467c1e5d50bb9b645b0b7c9879c2d9ad41c78923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtv1DAURi0EotPCD2CDvIFdip34kcCqjFpaaSo2ZR1dvyau4niwE1Xz7_EwI3UBQqyuH-d8V_oQekfJJSUt-UTqltGWE0EOVyb4C7SigpCKMM5fotXhvyoAPUPnOT8SQmvJ6Wt0RmXDGWXNCu03PvjZGryOk62-WgjlFHbL4ekhhrhNsBv2-C7A1k9bHB2eB4vvvTGjxdeQPuOr3wIkn-OEn_w84PtlnH0evbb41pYB498y36BXDsZs357mBfpxc_2wvq0237_dra82lWY1mStRMydkIwRrFFMghFCtcc44JqSmlhtOlOqUYFwRJXXXyk7XpgPDqJZtVzcX6OMxd5fiz8XmuQ8-azuOMNm45F6SmktRtwWkR1CnmHOyrt8lHyDte0r6Q8H9H30X5_0pfFHBmmfjVHABPpwAyKUIl2DSPj9zLe86KlnhLo9chq3tH-OSplLKPzd_OQp-cjEFGCyM86Ah_Zf9C6OCp3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70257628</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Limited Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging of the Middle Ear: A Comparison with Multislice Helical Computed Tomography</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Peltonen, L. I. ; Aarnisalo, A. A. ; Kortesniemi, M. K. ; Suomalainen, A. ; Jero, J. ; Robinson, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Peltonen, L. I. ; Aarnisalo, A. A. ; Kortesniemi, M. K. ; Suomalainen, A. ; Jero, J. ; Robinson, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To determine the applicability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in otological imaging, and to compare its accuracy with the routinely used multislice helical CT (MSCT) for imaging of the middle- and inner-ear areas. Material and Methods: Thirteen unoperated human cadaver temporal bones were imaged with CBCT and MSCT. Sixteen landmarks of the middle and adjacent inner ear were evaluated and compared for their conspicuity according to a modified Likert scale. Total scores and scores for subgroups including landmarks of specific clinical interest were also compared. Results: No significant differences were found between the imaging techniques or subgroups when scores of individual structures were compared. While the middle ear itself was visible in all cases with CBCT, parts of the inner ear were "cut off" in four cases due to the limited field of view. For the same reason, the evaluation of the whole mastoid was not possible with CBCT. The cochlear and vestibular aqueducts were not visualized in either CT techniques. The contrast-to-noise ratio was more than 50% lower in CBCT than in MSCT, but still adequate for diagnostic task. Conclusion: CBCT proved to be at least as accurate as routinely used MSCT in revealing the clinically and surgically important middle-ear structures. The results show that high-quality imaging of the middle ear is possible with the current CBCT device.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0284-1851</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02841850601080465</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17354143</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACRAE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cadaver ; Ear, Middle - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Medical sciences ; Temporal Bone - diagnostic imaging ; Tomography, Spiral Computed ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Acta radiologica (1987), 2007-03, Vol.48 (2), p.207-212</ispartof><rights>2007 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2007</rights><rights>2007 Taylor &amp; Francis</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-624f6736643b4ba666b8dffdf467c1e5d50bb9b645b0b7c9879c2d9ad41c78923</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18599174$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17354143$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peltonen, L. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aarnisalo, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kortesniemi, M. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suomalainen, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jero, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Limited Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging of the Middle Ear: A Comparison with Multislice Helical Computed Tomography</title><title>Acta radiologica (1987)</title><addtitle>Acta Radiol</addtitle><description>Purpose: To determine the applicability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in otological imaging, and to compare its accuracy with the routinely used multislice helical CT (MSCT) for imaging of the middle- and inner-ear areas. Material and Methods: Thirteen unoperated human cadaver temporal bones were imaged with CBCT and MSCT. Sixteen landmarks of the middle and adjacent inner ear were evaluated and compared for their conspicuity according to a modified Likert scale. Total scores and scores for subgroups including landmarks of specific clinical interest were also compared. Results: No significant differences were found between the imaging techniques or subgroups when scores of individual structures were compared. While the middle ear itself was visible in all cases with CBCT, parts of the inner ear were "cut off" in four cases due to the limited field of view. For the same reason, the evaluation of the whole mastoid was not possible with CBCT. The cochlear and vestibular aqueducts were not visualized in either CT techniques. The contrast-to-noise ratio was more than 50% lower in CBCT than in MSCT, but still adequate for diagnostic task. Conclusion: CBCT proved to be at least as accurate as routinely used MSCT in revealing the clinically and surgically important middle-ear structures. The results show that high-quality imaging of the middle ear is possible with the current CBCT device.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Ear, Middle - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Temporal Bone - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tomography, Spiral Computed</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0284-1851</issn><issn>1600-0455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEtv1DAURi0EotPCD2CDvIFdip34kcCqjFpaaSo2ZR1dvyau4niwE1Xz7_EwI3UBQqyuH-d8V_oQekfJJSUt-UTqltGWE0EOVyb4C7SigpCKMM5fotXhvyoAPUPnOT8SQmvJ6Wt0RmXDGWXNCu03PvjZGryOk62-WgjlFHbL4ekhhrhNsBv2-C7A1k9bHB2eB4vvvTGjxdeQPuOr3wIkn-OEn_w84PtlnH0evbb41pYB498y36BXDsZs357mBfpxc_2wvq0237_dra82lWY1mStRMydkIwRrFFMghFCtcc44JqSmlhtOlOqUYFwRJXXXyk7XpgPDqJZtVzcX6OMxd5fiz8XmuQ8-azuOMNm45F6SmktRtwWkR1CnmHOyrt8lHyDte0r6Q8H9H30X5_0pfFHBmmfjVHABPpwAyKUIl2DSPj9zLe86KlnhLo9chq3tH-OSplLKPzd_OQp-cjEFGCyM86Ah_Zf9C6OCp3Q</recordid><startdate>20070301</startdate><enddate>20070301</enddate><creator>Peltonen, L. I.</creator><creator>Aarnisalo, A. A.</creator><creator>Kortesniemi, M. K.</creator><creator>Suomalainen, A.</creator><creator>Jero, J.</creator><creator>Robinson, S.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070301</creationdate><title>Limited Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging of the Middle Ear: A Comparison with Multislice Helical Computed Tomography</title><author>Peltonen, L. I. ; Aarnisalo, A. A. ; Kortesniemi, M. K. ; Suomalainen, A. ; Jero, J. ; Robinson, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-624f6736643b4ba666b8dffdf467c1e5d50bb9b645b0b7c9879c2d9ad41c78923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Ear, Middle - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Temporal Bone - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tomography, Spiral Computed</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peltonen, L. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aarnisalo, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kortesniemi, M. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suomalainen, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jero, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta radiologica (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peltonen, L. I.</au><au>Aarnisalo, A. A.</au><au>Kortesniemi, M. K.</au><au>Suomalainen, A.</au><au>Jero, J.</au><au>Robinson, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Limited Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging of the Middle Ear: A Comparison with Multislice Helical Computed Tomography</atitle><jtitle>Acta radiologica (1987)</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Radiol</addtitle><date>2007-03-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>207-212</pages><issn>0284-1851</issn><eissn>1600-0455</eissn><coden>ACRAE3</coden><abstract>Purpose: To determine the applicability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in otological imaging, and to compare its accuracy with the routinely used multislice helical CT (MSCT) for imaging of the middle- and inner-ear areas. Material and Methods: Thirteen unoperated human cadaver temporal bones were imaged with CBCT and MSCT. Sixteen landmarks of the middle and adjacent inner ear were evaluated and compared for their conspicuity according to a modified Likert scale. Total scores and scores for subgroups including landmarks of specific clinical interest were also compared. Results: No significant differences were found between the imaging techniques or subgroups when scores of individual structures were compared. While the middle ear itself was visible in all cases with CBCT, parts of the inner ear were "cut off" in four cases due to the limited field of view. For the same reason, the evaluation of the whole mastoid was not possible with CBCT. The cochlear and vestibular aqueducts were not visualized in either CT techniques. The contrast-to-noise ratio was more than 50% lower in CBCT than in MSCT, but still adequate for diagnostic task. Conclusion: CBCT proved to be at least as accurate as routinely used MSCT in revealing the clinically and surgically important middle-ear structures. The results show that high-quality imaging of the middle ear is possible with the current CBCT device.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>17354143</pmid><doi>10.1080/02841850601080465</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0284-1851
ispartof Acta radiologica (1987), 2007-03, Vol.48 (2), p.207-212
issn 0284-1851
1600-0455
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70257628
source Sage Journals Online
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Cadaver
Ear, Middle - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Medical sciences
Temporal Bone - diagnostic imaging
Tomography, Spiral Computed
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
title Limited Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging of the Middle Ear: A Comparison with Multislice Helical Computed Tomography
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T11%3A41%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Limited%20Cone-Beam%20Computed%20Tomography%20Imaging%20of%20the%20Middle%20Ear:%20A%20Comparison%20with%20Multislice%20Helical%20Computed%20Tomography&rft.jtitle=Acta%20radiologica%20(1987)&rft.au=Peltonen,%20L.%20I.&rft.date=2007-03-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=207-212&rft.issn=0284-1851&rft.eissn=1600-0455&rft.coden=ACRAE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02841850601080465&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70257628%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-624f6736643b4ba666b8dffdf467c1e5d50bb9b645b0b7c9879c2d9ad41c78923%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70257628&rft_id=info:pmid/17354143&rft_sage_id=10.1080_02841850601080465&rfr_iscdi=true