Holo-analysis of the efficacy of Bio-Mos® in broiler nutrition

• Published in: British poultry science 2007-02, Vol.48 (1), p.21-26
• Main Author: Rosen, G.D.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal Feed; Animals; Body Weight; Chickens - metabolism; Chickens - physiology; Dietary Supplements; Eating - drug effects; Eating - physiology; Mannans - administration & dosage; Models, Biological; Oligosaccharides - administration & dosage; Regression Analysis
• ISSN: 0007-1668; 1466-1799
• DOI: 10.1080/00071660601050755

1. This first holo-analysis of the efficacy in broiler nutrition of the saccharide product, Bio-Mos® (BM), is part of a comprehensive empirical modelling research programme quantifying and comparing the efficacies and future research needs of the diverse candidates offered as replacements for antibiotics. 2. The data used are from 32 publications with broiler performance data from a world-wide literature collection of 124 (1997-2003) on the use of BM as a broiler feed additive. It contains the results of 82 negatively controlled feeding tests from 21 countries using a total of 85 142 broilers, averaging 401 per treatment. 3. The 82 feed intake, liveweight gain, feed conversion ratio and 44 mortality responses to BM average −12·2 g, 27·6 g, −0·0391 and 0·0311%, respectively, with coefficients of variation of 828, 227, 192 and 8392%. Respective beneficial response frequencies for gain, conversion and mortality are 65, 70 (52% jointly) and 52%. 4. Holo-analytical multiple regression models were elaborated for the effects of BM on feed intake, liveweight gain, feed conversion ratio and mortality, using conventional P ≤ 0·05 in/P ≥ 0·10 out and less stringent P ≤ 0·25 in/P ≥ 0·34 out partial regression coefficient standards, with and without ≥3 × root mean square error outliers, in order to quantify the influences of negative control performance, test duration, BM dosage, cage housing, processed feed, antibiotic feed, year of test and USA test. To date they account for only 5−36% of response variations, due primarily to 52 of the 82 tests having no reported feed formulations. 5. These exploratory models confirm beneficial responses to BM for current broiler performance levels. They also indicate a need to clarify BM dose-response relationships in order to maximise efficient use in praxis and to facilitate cogent comparisons with other pronutrients, including other saccharide products.