Genetic evaluation of retail product percentage in Simmental cattle

• Published in: Journal of animal breeding and genetics (1986) 2008-02, Vol.125 (1), p.13-19
• Main Authors: Crews, D.H. Jr, Enns, R.M, Rumph, J.M, Pollak, E.J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology; Animals; Beef cattle; Body fat; Body Weight - genetics; Breeding of animals; carcass; Cattle; Cattle - anatomy & histology; Cattle - genetics; Correlation analysis; Databases, Factual; Female; Genetic engineering; genetic regression; Heredity; Hybridization, Genetic; Male; Meat; Models, Genetic; Muscle, Skeletal - anatomy & histology; Phenotype; retail product; Selective breeding; Simmental; Species Specificity
• ISSN: 0931-2668; 1439-0388
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00695.x

The objective of this study was to estimate genetic parameters required for genetic evaluation of retail product percentage (RPP) in Simmental cattle. Carcass weight (HCW), subcutaneous fat thickness (FAT), longissimus muscle area (REA) and kidney, pelvic, and heart fat (KPH) records were available to compute RPP on steers (n = 5171) and heifers (n = 1400) from the American Simmental Association database; animals were sired by 561 Simmental bulls and out of 5886 crossbred dams. Genetic parameters were estimated using residual maximal likelihood and a four trait animal model for the components of RPP including fixed harvest contemporary group effects, random animal genetic effects, and a linear covariate for age at harvest. Heritability estimates were 0.51 ± 0.05, 0.36 ± 0.05, 0.46 ± 0.05, and 0.18 ± 0.05 for HCW, FAT, REA and KPH respectively. Non-zero genetic correlations were estimated between HCW and REA (rg = 0.51 ± 0.06) and between REA and FAT (rg = -0.43 ± 0.08), but other genetic correlation estimates among the component traits were low. As a linear function of its components, heritability and genetic correlations involving RPP were estimated using index methods. The heritability estimate for RPP was 0.41, and genetic correlations were -0.17, -0.83, 0.67, and 0.01 with HCW, FAT, REA and KPH respectively. Therefore, RPP was strongly associated with muscle and fat deposition, but essentially independent of carcass weight and internal body cavity fat. Genetic evaluation of RPP would be straightforward using multiple trait index methods and genetic regression, although the inclusion of KPH would be of marginal value.