Loading…

Comparison of lysogeny (prophage induction) in heterotrophic bacterial and Synechococcus populations in the Gulf of Mexico and Mississippi river plume

Lysogeny has been documented as a fundamental process occurring in natural marine communities of heterotrophic and autotrophic bacteria. Prophage induction has been observed to be prevalent during conditions of low host abundance, but factors controlling the process are poorly understood. A research...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The ISME Journal 2008-02, Vol.2 (2), p.132-144
Main Authors: Long, Amy, McDaniel, Lauren D, Mobberley, Jennifer, Paul, John H
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-8c0093091c8d422a78cbba3f255a7746e4c53697eabebadce1eedbd05ac7915a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-8c0093091c8d422a78cbba3f255a7746e4c53697eabebadce1eedbd05ac7915a3
container_end_page 144
container_issue 2
container_start_page 132
container_title The ISME Journal
container_volume 2
creator Long, Amy
McDaniel, Lauren D
Mobberley, Jennifer
Paul, John H
description Lysogeny has been documented as a fundamental process occurring in natural marine communities of heterotrophic and autotrophic bacteria. Prophage induction has been observed to be prevalent during conditions of low host abundance, but factors controlling the process are poorly understood. A research cruise was undertaken to the Gulf of Mexico during July 2005 to explore environmental factors associated with lysogeny. Ambient physical and microbial parameters were measured and prophage induction experiments were performed in contrasting oligotrophic Gulf and eutrophic Mississippi plume areas. Three of 11 prophage induction experiments in heterotrophic bacteria (27%) demonstrated significant induction in response to Mitomycin C. In contrast, there was significant Synechococcus cyanophage induction in seven of nine experiments (77.8%). A strong negative correlation was observed between lysogeny and log-transformed activity measurements for both heterotrophic and autotrophic populations ( r =−0.876, P =0.002 and r =−0.815, P =0.025, respectively), indicating that bacterioplankton with low host growth favor lysogeny. Multivariate statistical analyses indicated that ambient level of viral abundance and productivity were inversely related to heterotrophic prophage induction and both factors combined were most predictive of lysogeny (ρ=0.899, P =0.001). For Synechococcus , low ambient cyanophage abundance was most predictive of lysogeny (ρ=0.862, P =0.005). Abundance and productivity of heterotrophic bacteria was strongly inversely correlated with salinity, while Synechococcus was not. This indicated that heterotrophic bacterial populations were well adapted to the river plume environments, thus providing a possible explanation for differences in prevalence of lysogeny observed between the two populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/ismej.2007.102
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70277236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19968312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-8c0093091c8d422a78cbba3f255a7746e4c53697eabebadce1eedbd05ac7915a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxUVpadKk1xyDoFDaw270x7bkY1jSbSGhh6ZnI8vjXS22pEhW6X6Rft7I2aUtJVAQaIb5vTcMD6ELSpaUcHll4gi7JSNE5J69QKdUlHQhuCAvf9cVO0FvYtwRUoqqEq_RCZWkqIuKnKJfKzd6FUx0FrseD_voNmD3-IMPzm_VBrCxXdKTcfZjLvEWJghumodG41bp3Bo1YGU7_G1vQW-ddlqniL3zaVCzMM7CaQt4nYZ-3nIHP412T5o7E-P8vDc4mB8QsB_SCOfoVa-GCG-P_xn6_unmfvV5cft1_WV1fbvQBWfTQmpCak5qqmVXMKaE1G2reM_KUglRVFDokle1ANVCqzoNFKBrO1IqLWpaKn6G3h9887kPCeLUjCZqGAZlwaXYCMKEYLz6L0jrupKcsgy--wfcuRRsPqLJAdVSCiZ5ppYHSgcXY4C-8cGMKuwz1MzBNk_BNnOwsy4LLo-2qR2h-4Mfk8zA1QGIeWQ3EP7e-6zlI_DesoU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1029887283</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of lysogeny (prophage induction) in heterotrophic bacterial and Synechococcus populations in the Gulf of Mexico and Mississippi river plume</title><source>Oxford University Press Open Access</source><creator>Long, Amy ; McDaniel, Lauren D ; Mobberley, Jennifer ; Paul, John H</creator><creatorcontrib>Long, Amy ; McDaniel, Lauren D ; Mobberley, Jennifer ; Paul, John H</creatorcontrib><description>Lysogeny has been documented as a fundamental process occurring in natural marine communities of heterotrophic and autotrophic bacteria. Prophage induction has been observed to be prevalent during conditions of low host abundance, but factors controlling the process are poorly understood. A research cruise was undertaken to the Gulf of Mexico during July 2005 to explore environmental factors associated with lysogeny. Ambient physical and microbial parameters were measured and prophage induction experiments were performed in contrasting oligotrophic Gulf and eutrophic Mississippi plume areas. Three of 11 prophage induction experiments in heterotrophic bacteria (27%) demonstrated significant induction in response to Mitomycin C. In contrast, there was significant Synechococcus cyanophage induction in seven of nine experiments (77.8%). A strong negative correlation was observed between lysogeny and log-transformed activity measurements for both heterotrophic and autotrophic populations ( r =−0.876, P =0.002 and r =−0.815, P =0.025, respectively), indicating that bacterioplankton with low host growth favor lysogeny. Multivariate statistical analyses indicated that ambient level of viral abundance and productivity were inversely related to heterotrophic prophage induction and both factors combined were most predictive of lysogeny (ρ=0.899, P =0.001). For Synechococcus , low ambient cyanophage abundance was most predictive of lysogeny (ρ=0.862, P =0.005). Abundance and productivity of heterotrophic bacteria was strongly inversely correlated with salinity, while Synechococcus was not. This indicated that heterotrophic bacterial populations were well adapted to the river plume environments, thus providing a possible explanation for differences in prevalence of lysogeny observed between the two populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-7362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-7370</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2007.102</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18049460</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Bacteria - virology ; Bacteriolysis ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Brackish ; Ecology ; Environmental factors ; Eutrophication ; Evolutionary Biology ; Heterotrophic Processes ; Life Sciences ; Lysogeny ; Marine ; Microbial Ecology ; Microbial Genetics and Genomics ; Microbiology ; original-article ; Productivity ; Prophages - physiology ; River plumes ; Rivers ; Rivers - microbiology ; Rivers - virology ; Salinity ; Seawater - microbiology ; Seawater - virology ; Statistical analysis ; Synechococcus ; Synechococcus - virology ; Virus Activation</subject><ispartof>The ISME Journal, 2008-02, Vol.2 (2), p.132-144</ispartof><rights>International Society for Microbial Ecology 2008</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Feb 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-8c0093091c8d422a78cbba3f255a7746e4c53697eabebadce1eedbd05ac7915a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-8c0093091c8d422a78cbba3f255a7746e4c53697eabebadce1eedbd05ac7915a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18049460$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Long, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDaniel, Lauren D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mobberley, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, John H</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of lysogeny (prophage induction) in heterotrophic bacterial and Synechococcus populations in the Gulf of Mexico and Mississippi river plume</title><title>The ISME Journal</title><addtitle>ISME J</addtitle><addtitle>ISME J</addtitle><description>Lysogeny has been documented as a fundamental process occurring in natural marine communities of heterotrophic and autotrophic bacteria. Prophage induction has been observed to be prevalent during conditions of low host abundance, but factors controlling the process are poorly understood. A research cruise was undertaken to the Gulf of Mexico during July 2005 to explore environmental factors associated with lysogeny. Ambient physical and microbial parameters were measured and prophage induction experiments were performed in contrasting oligotrophic Gulf and eutrophic Mississippi plume areas. Three of 11 prophage induction experiments in heterotrophic bacteria (27%) demonstrated significant induction in response to Mitomycin C. In contrast, there was significant Synechococcus cyanophage induction in seven of nine experiments (77.8%). A strong negative correlation was observed between lysogeny and log-transformed activity measurements for both heterotrophic and autotrophic populations ( r =−0.876, P =0.002 and r =−0.815, P =0.025, respectively), indicating that bacterioplankton with low host growth favor lysogeny. Multivariate statistical analyses indicated that ambient level of viral abundance and productivity were inversely related to heterotrophic prophage induction and both factors combined were most predictive of lysogeny (ρ=0.899, P =0.001). For Synechococcus , low ambient cyanophage abundance was most predictive of lysogeny (ρ=0.862, P =0.005). Abundance and productivity of heterotrophic bacteria was strongly inversely correlated with salinity, while Synechococcus was not. This indicated that heterotrophic bacterial populations were well adapted to the river plume environments, thus providing a possible explanation for differences in prevalence of lysogeny observed between the two populations.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteria - virology</subject><subject>Bacteriolysis</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Heterotrophic Processes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lysogeny</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Microbial Ecology</subject><subject>Microbial Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>original-article</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Prophages - physiology</subject><subject>River plumes</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Rivers - microbiology</subject><subject>Rivers - virology</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Seawater - microbiology</subject><subject>Seawater - virology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Synechococcus</subject><subject>Synechococcus - virology</subject><subject>Virus Activation</subject><issn>1751-7362</issn><issn>1751-7370</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxUVpadKk1xyDoFDaw270x7bkY1jSbSGhh6ZnI8vjXS22pEhW6X6Rft7I2aUtJVAQaIb5vTcMD6ELSpaUcHll4gi7JSNE5J69QKdUlHQhuCAvf9cVO0FvYtwRUoqqEq_RCZWkqIuKnKJfKzd6FUx0FrseD_voNmD3-IMPzm_VBrCxXdKTcfZjLvEWJghumodG41bp3Bo1YGU7_G1vQW-ddlqniL3zaVCzMM7CaQt4nYZ-3nIHP412T5o7E-P8vDc4mB8QsB_SCOfoVa-GCG-P_xn6_unmfvV5cft1_WV1fbvQBWfTQmpCak5qqmVXMKaE1G2reM_KUglRVFDokle1ANVCqzoNFKBrO1IqLWpaKn6G3h9887kPCeLUjCZqGAZlwaXYCMKEYLz6L0jrupKcsgy--wfcuRRsPqLJAdVSCiZ5ppYHSgcXY4C-8cGMKuwz1MzBNk_BNnOwsy4LLo-2qR2h-4Mfk8zA1QGIeWQ3EP7e-6zlI_DesoU</recordid><startdate>20080201</startdate><enddate>20080201</enddate><creator>Long, Amy</creator><creator>McDaniel, Lauren D</creator><creator>Mobberley, Jennifer</creator><creator>Paul, John H</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080201</creationdate><title>Comparison of lysogeny (prophage induction) in heterotrophic bacterial and Synechococcus populations in the Gulf of Mexico and Mississippi river plume</title><author>Long, Amy ; McDaniel, Lauren D ; Mobberley, Jennifer ; Paul, John H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-8c0093091c8d422a78cbba3f255a7746e4c53697eabebadce1eedbd05ac7915a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteria - virology</topic><topic>Bacteriolysis</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Heterotrophic Processes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lysogeny</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Microbial Ecology</topic><topic>Microbial Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>original-article</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Prophages - physiology</topic><topic>River plumes</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Rivers - microbiology</topic><topic>Rivers - virology</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Seawater - microbiology</topic><topic>Seawater - virology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Synechococcus</topic><topic>Synechococcus - virology</topic><topic>Virus Activation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Long, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDaniel, Lauren D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mobberley, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, John H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The ISME Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Long, Amy</au><au>McDaniel, Lauren D</au><au>Mobberley, Jennifer</au><au>Paul, John H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of lysogeny (prophage induction) in heterotrophic bacterial and Synechococcus populations in the Gulf of Mexico and Mississippi river plume</atitle><jtitle>The ISME Journal</jtitle><stitle>ISME J</stitle><addtitle>ISME J</addtitle><date>2008-02-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>132</spage><epage>144</epage><pages>132-144</pages><issn>1751-7362</issn><eissn>1751-7370</eissn><abstract>Lysogeny has been documented as a fundamental process occurring in natural marine communities of heterotrophic and autotrophic bacteria. Prophage induction has been observed to be prevalent during conditions of low host abundance, but factors controlling the process are poorly understood. A research cruise was undertaken to the Gulf of Mexico during July 2005 to explore environmental factors associated with lysogeny. Ambient physical and microbial parameters were measured and prophage induction experiments were performed in contrasting oligotrophic Gulf and eutrophic Mississippi plume areas. Three of 11 prophage induction experiments in heterotrophic bacteria (27%) demonstrated significant induction in response to Mitomycin C. In contrast, there was significant Synechococcus cyanophage induction in seven of nine experiments (77.8%). A strong negative correlation was observed between lysogeny and log-transformed activity measurements for both heterotrophic and autotrophic populations ( r =−0.876, P =0.002 and r =−0.815, P =0.025, respectively), indicating that bacterioplankton with low host growth favor lysogeny. Multivariate statistical analyses indicated that ambient level of viral abundance and productivity were inversely related to heterotrophic prophage induction and both factors combined were most predictive of lysogeny (ρ=0.899, P =0.001). For Synechococcus , low ambient cyanophage abundance was most predictive of lysogeny (ρ=0.862, P =0.005). Abundance and productivity of heterotrophic bacteria was strongly inversely correlated with salinity, while Synechococcus was not. This indicated that heterotrophic bacterial populations were well adapted to the river plume environments, thus providing a possible explanation for differences in prevalence of lysogeny observed between the two populations.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>18049460</pmid><doi>10.1038/ismej.2007.102</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1751-7362
ispartof The ISME Journal, 2008-02, Vol.2 (2), p.132-144
issn 1751-7362
1751-7370
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70277236
source Oxford University Press Open Access
subjects Bacteria
Bacteria - virology
Bacteriolysis
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Brackish
Ecology
Environmental factors
Eutrophication
Evolutionary Biology
Heterotrophic Processes
Life Sciences
Lysogeny
Marine
Microbial Ecology
Microbial Genetics and Genomics
Microbiology
original-article
Productivity
Prophages - physiology
River plumes
Rivers
Rivers - microbiology
Rivers - virology
Salinity
Seawater - microbiology
Seawater - virology
Statistical analysis
Synechococcus
Synechococcus - virology
Virus Activation
title Comparison of lysogeny (prophage induction) in heterotrophic bacterial and Synechococcus populations in the Gulf of Mexico and Mississippi river plume
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A14%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20lysogeny%20(prophage%20induction)%20in%20heterotrophic%20bacterial%20and%20Synechococcus%20populations%20in%20the%20Gulf%20of%20Mexico%20and%20Mississippi%20river%20plume&rft.jtitle=The%20ISME%20Journal&rft.au=Long,%20Amy&rft.date=2008-02-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=132&rft.epage=144&rft.pages=132-144&rft.issn=1751-7362&rft.eissn=1751-7370&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/ismej.2007.102&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19968312%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-8c0093091c8d422a78cbba3f255a7746e4c53697eabebadce1eedbd05ac7915a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1029887283&rft_id=info:pmid/18049460&rfr_iscdi=true