Loading…
Development and quality of porcine embryos in different culture system and embryo-producing methods
In this study, the developmental ability and cellular composition of porcine IVF, parthenote and somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) embryos were evaluated following different in vitro culture systems. Group 1, embryos were cultured in NCSU-23 with 5.55 mM D-glucose (NCSU+) until day 6 on 20% O2 or...
Saved in:
Published in: | Zygote (Cambridge) 2007-02, Vol.15 (1), p.1-8 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-39cbaec08319440f6f7488c043a41b8f18551580598951b56c9ac269ebaf8dd53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-39cbaec08319440f6f7488c043a41b8f18551580598951b56c9ac269ebaf8dd53 |
container_end_page | 8 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Zygote (Cambridge) |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Ock, S-A. Lee, S-L. Kim, J-G. Kumar, B-M. Balasubramanian, S. Choe, S-Y. Rho, G-J. |
description | In this study, the developmental ability and cellular composition of porcine IVF, parthenote and somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) embryos were evaluated following different in vitro culture systems. Group 1, embryos were cultured in NCSU-23 with 5.55 mM D-glucose (NCSU+) until day 6 on 20% O2 or 5% O2 (Group 2). Group 3, embryos were cultured in D-glucose-free NCSU-23 (NCSU−) with 0.17 mM Na pyruvate/2.73 mM Na lactate for 58 h and subsequently cultured in NCSU+ until day 6 (NCSU −/+) on 20% O2 or 5% O2 (Group 4). IVF blastocysts did not differ significantly with O2 concentrations, but differed significantly with major energy source (glucose and pyruvate/lactate). In Group 3 and 4 IVF blastocysts, the total cell number and apoptosis rates were not significantly different with different O2 concentrations. Blastocyst rate, total cell number and apoptosis rate in Groups 3 and 4 parthenote embryos also were not significantly different. Parthenote and SCNT, under the same culture treatment, exhibited significant differences in blastocyst and apoptosis rates (47.5 ± 16.1 vs. 24.0 ± 4.0 and 4.9 ± 9.0 vs. 22.8 ± 23.3). Apoptosis-generating rate increased in the order parthenote, IVF and then SCNT. In conclusion, in vitro development of porcine embryos was not affected by O2 concentrations but was affected by major energy source. Even so, the concentration of each major energy source and the timing of its inclusion in culture could accomplish relatively high embryonic development, the apoptosis rate stressed that more work still needs to be done in developing a better defined culture system that could support SCNT embryos equivalent to in vivo preimplantation porcine embryos. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0967199406003911 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70324849</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0967199406003911</cupid><sourcerecordid>70324849</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-39cbaec08319440f6f7488c043a41b8f18551580598951b56c9ac269ebaf8dd53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c2KFDEUBeAgitOOPoAbCS7cld50_pcy6ozQIKKuQyp1M9ZYVelJqsR-e1N2o6KIqyzud8JNDiGPGTxnwPSLD2CVZtYKUADcMnaHbJhQtjGaw12yWcfNOj8jD0q5AQCtrbhPzpiuWgrYkPAKv-KQ9iNOM_VTR28XP_TzgaZI9ymHfkKKY5sPqdB-ol0fI-bVhmWYl4y0HMqM44_o0TX7nLqlBq_piPPn1JWH5F70Q8FHp_OcfHrz-uPFVbN7d_n24uWuCRLk3HAbWo8BDGdWCIgqamFMAMG9YK2JzEjJpAFpjZWslSpYH7bKYuuj6TrJz8mz4711g9sFy-zGvgQcBj9hWorTwLfCCPtfyOxKGa_w6R_wJi15qo-oRnHBrRIVsSMKOZWSMbp97kefD46BW3tyf_VUM09OFy_tiN2vxKmYCpoj6Ov3fvs59_mLU5pr6dTle6d2W8PklXKmen5awtcW-u4af1v1n2t8B94oq3U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196343964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and quality of porcine embryos in different culture system and embryo-producing methods</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><creator>Ock, S-A. ; Lee, S-L. ; Kim, J-G. ; Kumar, B-M. ; Balasubramanian, S. ; Choe, S-Y. ; Rho, G-J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ock, S-A. ; Lee, S-L. ; Kim, J-G. ; Kumar, B-M. ; Balasubramanian, S. ; Choe, S-Y. ; Rho, G-J.</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, the developmental ability and cellular composition of porcine IVF, parthenote and somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) embryos were evaluated following different in vitro culture systems. Group 1, embryos were cultured in NCSU-23 with 5.55 mM D-glucose (NCSU+) until day 6 on 20% O2 or 5% O2 (Group 2). Group 3, embryos were cultured in D-glucose-free NCSU-23 (NCSU−) with 0.17 mM Na pyruvate/2.73 mM Na lactate for 58 h and subsequently cultured in NCSU+ until day 6 (NCSU −/+) on 20% O2 or 5% O2 (Group 4). IVF blastocysts did not differ significantly with O2 concentrations, but differed significantly with major energy source (glucose and pyruvate/lactate). In Group 3 and 4 IVF blastocysts, the total cell number and apoptosis rates were not significantly different with different O2 concentrations. Blastocyst rate, total cell number and apoptosis rate in Groups 3 and 4 parthenote embryos also were not significantly different. Parthenote and SCNT, under the same culture treatment, exhibited significant differences in blastocyst and apoptosis rates (47.5 ± 16.1 vs. 24.0 ± 4.0 and 4.9 ± 9.0 vs. 22.8 ± 23.3). Apoptosis-generating rate increased in the order parthenote, IVF and then SCNT. In conclusion, in vitro development of porcine embryos was not affected by O2 concentrations but was affected by major energy source. Even so, the concentration of each major energy source and the timing of its inclusion in culture could accomplish relatively high embryonic development, the apoptosis rate stressed that more work still needs to be done in developing a better defined culture system that could support SCNT embryos equivalent to in vivo preimplantation porcine embryos.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0967-1994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8730</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0967199406003911</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17391540</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Apoptosis ; Blastocyst - cytology ; Cell Count ; Culture Media ; Development ; Embryo culture system ; Embryo Culture Techniques - methods ; Embryo Culture Techniques - veterinary ; Embryonic Development ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro ; Gas atmosphere ; Glucose ; Nuclear Transfer Techniques ; Oxygen ; Parthenogenesis ; Porcine ; Pregnancy ; Sus scrofa - embryology</subject><ispartof>Zygote (Cambridge), 2007-02, Vol.15 (1), p.1-8</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-39cbaec08319440f6f7488c043a41b8f18551580598951b56c9ac269ebaf8dd53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-39cbaec08319440f6f7488c043a41b8f18551580598951b56c9ac269ebaf8dd53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0967199406003911/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,72960</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17391540$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ock, S-A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, S-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, J-G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, B-M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balasubramanian, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choe, S-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rho, G-J.</creatorcontrib><title>Development and quality of porcine embryos in different culture system and embryo-producing methods</title><title>Zygote (Cambridge)</title><addtitle>Zygote</addtitle><description>In this study, the developmental ability and cellular composition of porcine IVF, parthenote and somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) embryos were evaluated following different in vitro culture systems. Group 1, embryos were cultured in NCSU-23 with 5.55 mM D-glucose (NCSU+) until day 6 on 20% O2 or 5% O2 (Group 2). Group 3, embryos were cultured in D-glucose-free NCSU-23 (NCSU−) with 0.17 mM Na pyruvate/2.73 mM Na lactate for 58 h and subsequently cultured in NCSU+ until day 6 (NCSU −/+) on 20% O2 or 5% O2 (Group 4). IVF blastocysts did not differ significantly with O2 concentrations, but differed significantly with major energy source (glucose and pyruvate/lactate). In Group 3 and 4 IVF blastocysts, the total cell number and apoptosis rates were not significantly different with different O2 concentrations. Blastocyst rate, total cell number and apoptosis rate in Groups 3 and 4 parthenote embryos also were not significantly different. Parthenote and SCNT, under the same culture treatment, exhibited significant differences in blastocyst and apoptosis rates (47.5 ± 16.1 vs. 24.0 ± 4.0 and 4.9 ± 9.0 vs. 22.8 ± 23.3). Apoptosis-generating rate increased in the order parthenote, IVF and then SCNT. In conclusion, in vitro development of porcine embryos was not affected by O2 concentrations but was affected by major energy source. Even so, the concentration of each major energy source and the timing of its inclusion in culture could accomplish relatively high embryonic development, the apoptosis rate stressed that more work still needs to be done in developing a better defined culture system that could support SCNT embryos equivalent to in vivo preimplantation porcine embryos.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Apoptosis</subject><subject>Blastocyst - cytology</subject><subject>Cell Count</subject><subject>Culture Media</subject><subject>Development</subject><subject>Embryo culture system</subject><subject>Embryo Culture Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Embryo Culture Techniques - veterinary</subject><subject>Embryonic Development</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro</subject><subject>Gas atmosphere</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Nuclear Transfer Techniques</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Parthenogenesis</subject><subject>Porcine</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Sus scrofa - embryology</subject><issn>0967-1994</issn><issn>1469-8730</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0c2KFDEUBeAgitOOPoAbCS7cld50_pcy6ozQIKKuQyp1M9ZYVelJqsR-e1N2o6KIqyzud8JNDiGPGTxnwPSLD2CVZtYKUADcMnaHbJhQtjGaw12yWcfNOj8jD0q5AQCtrbhPzpiuWgrYkPAKv-KQ9iNOM_VTR28XP_TzgaZI9ymHfkKKY5sPqdB-ol0fI-bVhmWYl4y0HMqM44_o0TX7nLqlBq_piPPn1JWH5F70Q8FHp_OcfHrz-uPFVbN7d_n24uWuCRLk3HAbWo8BDGdWCIgqamFMAMG9YK2JzEjJpAFpjZWslSpYH7bKYuuj6TrJz8mz4711g9sFy-zGvgQcBj9hWorTwLfCCPtfyOxKGa_w6R_wJi15qo-oRnHBrRIVsSMKOZWSMbp97kefD46BW3tyf_VUM09OFy_tiN2vxKmYCpoj6Ov3fvs59_mLU5pr6dTle6d2W8PklXKmen5awtcW-u4af1v1n2t8B94oq3U</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Ock, S-A.</creator><creator>Lee, S-L.</creator><creator>Kim, J-G.</creator><creator>Kumar, B-M.</creator><creator>Balasubramanian, S.</creator><creator>Choe, S-Y.</creator><creator>Rho, G-J.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>Development and quality of porcine embryos in different culture system and embryo-producing methods</title><author>Ock, S-A. ; Lee, S-L. ; Kim, J-G. ; Kumar, B-M. ; Balasubramanian, S. ; Choe, S-Y. ; Rho, G-J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-39cbaec08319440f6f7488c043a41b8f18551580598951b56c9ac269ebaf8dd53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Apoptosis</topic><topic>Blastocyst - cytology</topic><topic>Cell Count</topic><topic>Culture Media</topic><topic>Development</topic><topic>Embryo culture system</topic><topic>Embryo Culture Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Embryo Culture Techniques - veterinary</topic><topic>Embryonic Development</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro</topic><topic>Gas atmosphere</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Nuclear Transfer Techniques</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Parthenogenesis</topic><topic>Porcine</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Sus scrofa - embryology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ock, S-A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, S-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, J-G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, B-M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balasubramanian, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choe, S-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rho, G-J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Proquest Health and Medical Complete</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Zygote (Cambridge)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ock, S-A.</au><au>Lee, S-L.</au><au>Kim, J-G.</au><au>Kumar, B-M.</au><au>Balasubramanian, S.</au><au>Choe, S-Y.</au><au>Rho, G-J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and quality of porcine embryos in different culture system and embryo-producing methods</atitle><jtitle>Zygote (Cambridge)</jtitle><addtitle>Zygote</addtitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>1-8</pages><issn>0967-1994</issn><eissn>1469-8730</eissn><abstract>In this study, the developmental ability and cellular composition of porcine IVF, parthenote and somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) embryos were evaluated following different in vitro culture systems. Group 1, embryos were cultured in NCSU-23 with 5.55 mM D-glucose (NCSU+) until day 6 on 20% O2 or 5% O2 (Group 2). Group 3, embryos were cultured in D-glucose-free NCSU-23 (NCSU−) with 0.17 mM Na pyruvate/2.73 mM Na lactate for 58 h and subsequently cultured in NCSU+ until day 6 (NCSU −/+) on 20% O2 or 5% O2 (Group 4). IVF blastocysts did not differ significantly with O2 concentrations, but differed significantly with major energy source (glucose and pyruvate/lactate). In Group 3 and 4 IVF blastocysts, the total cell number and apoptosis rates were not significantly different with different O2 concentrations. Blastocyst rate, total cell number and apoptosis rate in Groups 3 and 4 parthenote embryos also were not significantly different. Parthenote and SCNT, under the same culture treatment, exhibited significant differences in blastocyst and apoptosis rates (47.5 ± 16.1 vs. 24.0 ± 4.0 and 4.9 ± 9.0 vs. 22.8 ± 23.3). Apoptosis-generating rate increased in the order parthenote, IVF and then SCNT. In conclusion, in vitro development of porcine embryos was not affected by O2 concentrations but was affected by major energy source. Even so, the concentration of each major energy source and the timing of its inclusion in culture could accomplish relatively high embryonic development, the apoptosis rate stressed that more work still needs to be done in developing a better defined culture system that could support SCNT embryos equivalent to in vivo preimplantation porcine embryos.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>17391540</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0967199406003911</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0967-1994 |
ispartof | Zygote (Cambridge), 2007-02, Vol.15 (1), p.1-8 |
issn | 0967-1994 1469-8730 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70324849 |
source | Cambridge Journals Online |
subjects | Animals Apoptosis Blastocyst - cytology Cell Count Culture Media Development Embryo culture system Embryo Culture Techniques - methods Embryo Culture Techniques - veterinary Embryonic Development Female Fertilization in Vitro Gas atmosphere Glucose Nuclear Transfer Techniques Oxygen Parthenogenesis Porcine Pregnancy Sus scrofa - embryology |
title | Development and quality of porcine embryos in different culture system and embryo-producing methods |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T20%3A26%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20quality%20of%20porcine%20embryos%20in%20different%20culture%20system%20and%20embryo-producing%20methods&rft.jtitle=Zygote%20(Cambridge)&rft.au=Ock,%20S-A.&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=1-8&rft.issn=0967-1994&rft.eissn=1469-8730&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0967199406003911&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70324849%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-39cbaec08319440f6f7488c043a41b8f18551580598951b56c9ac269ebaf8dd53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196343964&rft_id=info:pmid/17391540&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0967199406003911&rfr_iscdi=true |