Loading…
Elucidation of spheroid formation with and without the extrusion step
Spheroid formation mechanisms were investigated using extrusion-spheronization (ES) and rotary processing (RP). Using ES (cross-hatch), ES (teardrop), and RP (teardrop), spheroids with similar mass median diameter (MMD) and span were produced using equivalent formulation and spheronization condition...
Saved in:
Published in: | AAPS PharmSciTech 2007-02, Vol.8 (1), p.10-10 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 10 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 10 |
container_title | AAPS PharmSciTech |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Liew, Celine V Chua, Siang Meng Heng, Paul W S |
description | Spheroid formation mechanisms were investigated using extrusion-spheronization (ES) and rotary processing (RP). Using ES (cross-hatch), ES (teardrop), and RP (teardrop), spheroids with similar mass median diameter (MMD) and span were produced using equivalent formulation and spheronization conditions. During spheronization, the teardrop-studded rotating frictional surface, with increased peripheral tip speed and duration, produced spheroids of equivalent MMD and span to those produced by the cross-hatch rotating frictional plate surface. The roundness of these spheroids was also similar. RP required less water to produce spheroids of MMD similar to that of spheroids produced by ES. However, these RP spheroids were less spherical. Image analysis of 625 spheroids per batch indicated that the size distribution of RP spheroids had significantly greater SD, positive skewness, and kurtosis. Morphological examination of time-sampled spheroids produced by ES indicated that spheroid formation occurred predominantly by attrition and layering, while RP spheroids were formed by nucleation, agglomeration, layering, and coalescence. RP produced spheroids with higher crushing strength than that of ES-produced spheroids. The amount of moisture lost during spheronization for spheroids produced by ES had minimal influence on their eventual size. Differences in process and formulation parameters, in addition to size distribution and observed morphological changes, enabled a greater understanding of spheroid formation and methods to optimize spheroid production. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70346011</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70346011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p139t-1c41d0466e5b13ad9014cef169bbeb6397f4924f6dcdc60910ab12ac58795d833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j0tLxDAcxIMg7rr6FSQnb4X8mzRtjrLUByx40XPJk0bapuaB-u197HqaYebHwJyhLTSUVELQeoMuU3ojpKYg6AXaQMtIVwPZor6fivZGZh8WHBxO62hj8Aa7EOdj-uHziOVi_kwoGefRYvuZY0m_dcp2vULnTk7JXp90h17v-5f9Y3V4fnja3x2qFajIFWgGhjDObaOASiMIMG0dcKGUVZyK1jFRM8eNNpoTAUQqqKVuulY0pqN0h26Pu2sM78WmPMw-aTtNcrGhpKEllHEC8APenMCiZmuGNfpZxq_h_zj9Bu81U90</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70346011</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Elucidation of spheroid formation with and without the extrusion step</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Liew, Celine V ; Chua, Siang Meng ; Heng, Paul W S</creator><creatorcontrib>Liew, Celine V ; Chua, Siang Meng ; Heng, Paul W S</creatorcontrib><description>Spheroid formation mechanisms were investigated using extrusion-spheronization (ES) and rotary processing (RP). Using ES (cross-hatch), ES (teardrop), and RP (teardrop), spheroids with similar mass median diameter (MMD) and span were produced using equivalent formulation and spheronization conditions. During spheronization, the teardrop-studded rotating frictional surface, with increased peripheral tip speed and duration, produced spheroids of equivalent MMD and span to those produced by the cross-hatch rotating frictional plate surface. The roundness of these spheroids was also similar. RP required less water to produce spheroids of MMD similar to that of spheroids produced by ES. However, these RP spheroids were less spherical. Image analysis of 625 spheroids per batch indicated that the size distribution of RP spheroids had significantly greater SD, positive skewness, and kurtosis. Morphological examination of time-sampled spheroids produced by ES indicated that spheroid formation occurred predominantly by attrition and layering, while RP spheroids were formed by nucleation, agglomeration, layering, and coalescence. RP produced spheroids with higher crushing strength than that of ES-produced spheroids. The amount of moisture lost during spheronization for spheroids produced by ES had minimal influence on their eventual size. Differences in process and formulation parameters, in addition to size distribution and observed morphological changes, enabled a greater understanding of spheroid formation and methods to optimize spheroid production.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1530-9932</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17408210</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Absorption ; Cellulose - chemistry ; Diffusion ; Drug Compounding - methods ; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical ; Excipients - chemistry ; Hardness ; Materials Testing ; Microspheres ; Powders ; Technology, Pharmaceutical - methods ; Water - chemistry</subject><ispartof>AAPS PharmSciTech, 2007-02, Vol.8 (1), p.10-10</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17408210$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liew, Celine V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chua, Siang Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heng, Paul W S</creatorcontrib><title>Elucidation of spheroid formation with and without the extrusion step</title><title>AAPS PharmSciTech</title><addtitle>AAPS PharmSciTech</addtitle><description>Spheroid formation mechanisms were investigated using extrusion-spheronization (ES) and rotary processing (RP). Using ES (cross-hatch), ES (teardrop), and RP (teardrop), spheroids with similar mass median diameter (MMD) and span were produced using equivalent formulation and spheronization conditions. During spheronization, the teardrop-studded rotating frictional surface, with increased peripheral tip speed and duration, produced spheroids of equivalent MMD and span to those produced by the cross-hatch rotating frictional plate surface. The roundness of these spheroids was also similar. RP required less water to produce spheroids of MMD similar to that of spheroids produced by ES. However, these RP spheroids were less spherical. Image analysis of 625 spheroids per batch indicated that the size distribution of RP spheroids had significantly greater SD, positive skewness, and kurtosis. Morphological examination of time-sampled spheroids produced by ES indicated that spheroid formation occurred predominantly by attrition and layering, while RP spheroids were formed by nucleation, agglomeration, layering, and coalescence. RP produced spheroids with higher crushing strength than that of ES-produced spheroids. The amount of moisture lost during spheronization for spheroids produced by ES had minimal influence on their eventual size. Differences in process and formulation parameters, in addition to size distribution and observed morphological changes, enabled a greater understanding of spheroid formation and methods to optimize spheroid production.</description><subject>Absorption</subject><subject>Cellulose - chemistry</subject><subject>Diffusion</subject><subject>Drug Compounding - methods</subject><subject>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical</subject><subject>Excipients - chemistry</subject><subject>Hardness</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Microspheres</subject><subject>Powders</subject><subject>Technology, Pharmaceutical - methods</subject><subject>Water - chemistry</subject><issn>1530-9932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1j0tLxDAcxIMg7rr6FSQnb4X8mzRtjrLUByx40XPJk0bapuaB-u197HqaYebHwJyhLTSUVELQeoMuU3ojpKYg6AXaQMtIVwPZor6fivZGZh8WHBxO62hj8Aa7EOdj-uHziOVi_kwoGefRYvuZY0m_dcp2vULnTk7JXp90h17v-5f9Y3V4fnja3x2qFajIFWgGhjDObaOASiMIMG0dcKGUVZyK1jFRM8eNNpoTAUQqqKVuulY0pqN0h26Pu2sM78WmPMw-aTtNcrGhpKEllHEC8APenMCiZmuGNfpZxq_h_zj9Bu81U90</recordid><startdate>20070209</startdate><enddate>20070209</enddate><creator>Liew, Celine V</creator><creator>Chua, Siang Meng</creator><creator>Heng, Paul W S</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070209</creationdate><title>Elucidation of spheroid formation with and without the extrusion step</title><author>Liew, Celine V ; Chua, Siang Meng ; Heng, Paul W S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p139t-1c41d0466e5b13ad9014cef169bbeb6397f4924f6dcdc60910ab12ac58795d833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Absorption</topic><topic>Cellulose - chemistry</topic><topic>Diffusion</topic><topic>Drug Compounding - methods</topic><topic>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical</topic><topic>Excipients - chemistry</topic><topic>Hardness</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Microspheres</topic><topic>Powders</topic><topic>Technology, Pharmaceutical - methods</topic><topic>Water - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liew, Celine V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chua, Siang Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heng, Paul W S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>AAPS PharmSciTech</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liew, Celine V</au><au>Chua, Siang Meng</au><au>Heng, Paul W S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Elucidation of spheroid formation with and without the extrusion step</atitle><jtitle>AAPS PharmSciTech</jtitle><addtitle>AAPS PharmSciTech</addtitle><date>2007-02-09</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>10</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>10-10</pages><eissn>1530-9932</eissn><abstract>Spheroid formation mechanisms were investigated using extrusion-spheronization (ES) and rotary processing (RP). Using ES (cross-hatch), ES (teardrop), and RP (teardrop), spheroids with similar mass median diameter (MMD) and span were produced using equivalent formulation and spheronization conditions. During spheronization, the teardrop-studded rotating frictional surface, with increased peripheral tip speed and duration, produced spheroids of equivalent MMD and span to those produced by the cross-hatch rotating frictional plate surface. The roundness of these spheroids was also similar. RP required less water to produce spheroids of MMD similar to that of spheroids produced by ES. However, these RP spheroids were less spherical. Image analysis of 625 spheroids per batch indicated that the size distribution of RP spheroids had significantly greater SD, positive skewness, and kurtosis. Morphological examination of time-sampled spheroids produced by ES indicated that spheroid formation occurred predominantly by attrition and layering, while RP spheroids were formed by nucleation, agglomeration, layering, and coalescence. RP produced spheroids with higher crushing strength than that of ES-produced spheroids. The amount of moisture lost during spheronization for spheroids produced by ES had minimal influence on their eventual size. Differences in process and formulation parameters, in addition to size distribution and observed morphological changes, enabled a greater understanding of spheroid formation and methods to optimize spheroid production.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>17408210</pmid><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1530-9932 |
ispartof | AAPS PharmSciTech, 2007-02, Vol.8 (1), p.10-10 |
issn | 1530-9932 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70346011 |
source | Springer Nature; PubMed Central |
subjects | Absorption Cellulose - chemistry Diffusion Drug Compounding - methods Drug Evaluation, Preclinical Excipients - chemistry Hardness Materials Testing Microspheres Powders Technology, Pharmaceutical - methods Water - chemistry |
title | Elucidation of spheroid formation with and without the extrusion step |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A08%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Elucidation%20of%20spheroid%20formation%20with%20and%20without%20the%20extrusion%20step&rft.jtitle=AAPS%20PharmSciTech&rft.au=Liew,%20Celine%20V&rft.date=2007-02-09&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=10&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=10-10&rft.eissn=1530-9932&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70346011%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p139t-1c41d0466e5b13ad9014cef169bbeb6397f4924f6dcdc60910ab12ac58795d833%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70346011&rft_id=info:pmid/17408210&rfr_iscdi=true |