Loading…

Rural Interhospital Transfer of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization : The Stat Heart Program

In Europe, interhospital transfer of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from non-PCI-capable (STEMI-referral) to PCI-capable (STEMI-accepting) facilities has been shown to be a superior reperfusion strategy compared with on-site f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2008-03, Vol.117 (9), p.1145-1152
Main Authors: AGUIRRE, Frank V, VARGHESE, Joji J, KELLEY, Michael P, LAM, Wilfred, LUCORE, Charles L, GILL, John B, PAGE, Lisa, TURNER, Leah, DAVIS, Conrad, MIKELL, Frank L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-e42e57b3380e50dbc3f7804ce443764ceafe2c1063fafacdb907d4e0b9111cf83
container_end_page 1152
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1145
container_title Circulation (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 117
creator AGUIRRE, Frank V
VARGHESE, Joji J
KELLEY, Michael P
LAM, Wilfred
LUCORE, Charles L
GILL, John B
PAGE, Lisa
TURNER, Leah
DAVIS, Conrad
MIKELL, Frank L
description In Europe, interhospital transfer of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from non-PCI-capable (STEMI-referral) to PCI-capable (STEMI-accepting) facilities has been shown to be a superior reperfusion strategy compared with on-site fibrinolysis. The feasibility of such programs in the United States remains poorly defined. We describe an observational cohort of 230 consecutive presumed STEMI patients who underwent interhospital transfer between January 2005 and March 2007 among 6 STEMI-referral and 2 STEMI-accepting hospitals in rural central Illinois. A standard treatment protocol using rapid interhospital transfer for primary PCI or rescue PCI after full-dose intravenous fibrinolysis (in event of unanticipated transfer delays) was initiated by the STEMI-referral emergency department physician. Three time intervals were evaluated: STEMI-referral care (door 1 to departure), transport time (door 1 departure to STEMI-accepting hospital arrival [door 2]), and STEMI-accepting hospital care (door 2 to balloon). Primary PCI was performed in 165 STEMI-confirmed patients (87.7%), whereas fibrinolysis was required in 16 patients (8.5%), with 56% undergoing rescue PCI. The median door 1-to-departure time was 46 minutes (25th and 75th percentiles, 32 and 62 minutes); approximately two thirds of this delay was attributable to the wait for transport arrival and departure. The transport and door 2-to-balloon times were 29 minutes (25th and 75th percentiles, 25 and 35 minutes) and 35 minutes (25th and 75th percentiles, 32 and 46 minutes), respectively. The door 1-to-balloon time was 117 minutes (25th and 75th percentiles, 98 and 137 minutes), with 12.2% and 58% of patients achieving a time of < or = 90 and < or = 120 minutes, respectively. No adverse clinical events occurred during interhospital transport. In rural US communities, emergency department physician-initiated interhospital transfer of STEMI patients for primary or rescue PCI is feasible and was safely executed with achievement of timely reperfusion when performed within coordinated healthcare networks.
doi_str_mv 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.728519
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70365518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70365518</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-e42e57b3380e50dbc3f7804ce443764ceafe2c1063fafacdb907d4e0b9111cf83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUcFu1DAQtRCILi2_gMyB3rLYcRwn3FZRYVda2tU2PUeOM6ZB2XgZO0jlK_jkus2KitNoxu-98bxHyEfOlpzn_HO12Vd321W9ublerVdLztRSpYXk5Suy4DLNkkyK8jVZMMbKRIk0PSPvvP8Z21wo-Zac8SLNCy75gvzdT6gHuhkD4L3zxz7ErkY9egtInaW3dXI1wG8dejfS7w_OaOz6Z4bVaJ6nu_gIY_DUOqQ7QDMFPYKbPK0culHjA91HBW-mQWP_Z5b6Qut7oLdBB7oGjYHu0P1Afbggb6wePLw_1XNy9_WqrtbJ9ubbplptEyMEDwlkKUjVClEwkKxrjbCqYJmBLBMqj1VbSA2PB1tttenakqkuA9aWnHNjC3FOLmfdI7pfE_jQHHpvYBjmrzeKiVxK_gQsZ6BB5z2CbY7YH-JRDWfNUxzN_3HEsWrmOCL3w2nJ1B6ge2Ge_I-ATydAtEcPNhpvev8PlzKelyovxSNmX5hd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70365518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rural Interhospital Transfer of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization : The Stat Heart Program</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>AGUIRRE, Frank V ; VARGHESE, Joji J ; KELLEY, Michael P ; LAM, Wilfred ; LUCORE, Charles L ; GILL, John B ; PAGE, Lisa ; TURNER, Leah ; DAVIS, Conrad ; MIKELL, Frank L</creator><creatorcontrib>AGUIRRE, Frank V ; VARGHESE, Joji J ; KELLEY, Michael P ; LAM, Wilfred ; LUCORE, Charles L ; GILL, John B ; PAGE, Lisa ; TURNER, Leah ; DAVIS, Conrad ; MIKELL, Frank L ; Stat Heart Investigators</creatorcontrib><description>In Europe, interhospital transfer of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from non-PCI-capable (STEMI-referral) to PCI-capable (STEMI-accepting) facilities has been shown to be a superior reperfusion strategy compared with on-site fibrinolysis. The feasibility of such programs in the United States remains poorly defined. We describe an observational cohort of 230 consecutive presumed STEMI patients who underwent interhospital transfer between January 2005 and March 2007 among 6 STEMI-referral and 2 STEMI-accepting hospitals in rural central Illinois. A standard treatment protocol using rapid interhospital transfer for primary PCI or rescue PCI after full-dose intravenous fibrinolysis (in event of unanticipated transfer delays) was initiated by the STEMI-referral emergency department physician. Three time intervals were evaluated: STEMI-referral care (door 1 to departure), transport time (door 1 departure to STEMI-accepting hospital arrival [door 2]), and STEMI-accepting hospital care (door 2 to balloon). Primary PCI was performed in 165 STEMI-confirmed patients (87.7%), whereas fibrinolysis was required in 16 patients (8.5%), with 56% undergoing rescue PCI. The median door 1-to-departure time was 46 minutes (25th and 75th percentiles, 32 and 62 minutes); approximately two thirds of this delay was attributable to the wait for transport arrival and departure. The transport and door 2-to-balloon times were 29 minutes (25th and 75th percentiles, 25 and 35 minutes) and 35 minutes (25th and 75th percentiles, 32 and 46 minutes), respectively. The door 1-to-balloon time was 117 minutes (25th and 75th percentiles, 98 and 137 minutes), with 12.2% and 58% of patients achieving a time of &lt; or = 90 and &lt; or = 120 minutes, respectively. No adverse clinical events occurred during interhospital transport. In rural US communities, emergency department physician-initiated interhospital transfer of STEMI patients for primary or rescue PCI is feasible and was safely executed with achievement of timely reperfusion when performed within coordinated healthcare networks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-7322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.728519</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18268151</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CIRCAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood and lymphatic vessels ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Catheter Ablation - methods ; Catheter Ablation - trends ; Coronary heart disease ; Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous ; Female ; Heart ; Hospitals, Rural - trends ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Infarction - diagnosis ; Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology ; Myocardial Infarction - therapy ; Patient Transfer - methods ; Patient Transfer - trends ; Stroke Volume ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 2008-03, Vol.117 (9), p.1145-1152</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-e42e57b3380e50dbc3f7804ce443764ceafe2c1063fafacdb907d4e0b9111cf83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20169769$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18268151$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>AGUIRRE, Frank V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VARGHESE, Joji J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KELLEY, Michael P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAM, Wilfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LUCORE, Charles L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GILL, John B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAGE, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TURNER, Leah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVIS, Conrad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIKELL, Frank L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stat Heart Investigators</creatorcontrib><title>Rural Interhospital Transfer of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization : The Stat Heart Program</title><title>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><description>In Europe, interhospital transfer of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from non-PCI-capable (STEMI-referral) to PCI-capable (STEMI-accepting) facilities has been shown to be a superior reperfusion strategy compared with on-site fibrinolysis. The feasibility of such programs in the United States remains poorly defined. We describe an observational cohort of 230 consecutive presumed STEMI patients who underwent interhospital transfer between January 2005 and March 2007 among 6 STEMI-referral and 2 STEMI-accepting hospitals in rural central Illinois. A standard treatment protocol using rapid interhospital transfer for primary PCI or rescue PCI after full-dose intravenous fibrinolysis (in event of unanticipated transfer delays) was initiated by the STEMI-referral emergency department physician. Three time intervals were evaluated: STEMI-referral care (door 1 to departure), transport time (door 1 departure to STEMI-accepting hospital arrival [door 2]), and STEMI-accepting hospital care (door 2 to balloon). Primary PCI was performed in 165 STEMI-confirmed patients (87.7%), whereas fibrinolysis was required in 16 patients (8.5%), with 56% undergoing rescue PCI. The median door 1-to-departure time was 46 minutes (25th and 75th percentiles, 32 and 62 minutes); approximately two thirds of this delay was attributable to the wait for transport arrival and departure. The transport and door 2-to-balloon times were 29 minutes (25th and 75th percentiles, 25 and 35 minutes) and 35 minutes (25th and 75th percentiles, 32 and 46 minutes), respectively. The door 1-to-balloon time was 117 minutes (25th and 75th percentiles, 98 and 137 minutes), with 12.2% and 58% of patients achieving a time of &lt; or = 90 and &lt; or = 120 minutes, respectively. No adverse clinical events occurred during interhospital transport. In rural US communities, emergency department physician-initiated interhospital transfer of STEMI patients for primary or rescue PCI is feasible and was safely executed with achievement of timely reperfusion when performed within coordinated healthcare networks.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood and lymphatic vessels</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation - methods</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation - trends</subject><subject>Coronary heart disease</subject><subject>Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Hospitals, Rural - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - diagnosis</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - therapy</subject><subject>Patient Transfer - methods</subject><subject>Patient Transfer - trends</subject><subject>Stroke Volume</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0009-7322</issn><issn>1524-4539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUcFu1DAQtRCILi2_gMyB3rLYcRwn3FZRYVda2tU2PUeOM6ZB2XgZO0jlK_jkus2KitNoxu-98bxHyEfOlpzn_HO12Vd321W9ublerVdLztRSpYXk5Suy4DLNkkyK8jVZMMbKRIk0PSPvvP8Z21wo-Zac8SLNCy75gvzdT6gHuhkD4L3zxz7ErkY9egtInaW3dXI1wG8dejfS7w_OaOz6Z4bVaJ6nu_gIY_DUOqQ7QDMFPYKbPK0culHjA91HBW-mQWP_Z5b6Qut7oLdBB7oGjYHu0P1Afbggb6wePLw_1XNy9_WqrtbJ9ubbplptEyMEDwlkKUjVClEwkKxrjbCqYJmBLBMqj1VbSA2PB1tttenakqkuA9aWnHNjC3FOLmfdI7pfE_jQHHpvYBjmrzeKiVxK_gQsZ6BB5z2CbY7YH-JRDWfNUxzN_3HEsWrmOCL3w2nJ1B6ge2Ge_I-ATydAtEcPNhpvev8PlzKelyovxSNmX5hd</recordid><startdate>20080304</startdate><enddate>20080304</enddate><creator>AGUIRRE, Frank V</creator><creator>VARGHESE, Joji J</creator><creator>KELLEY, Michael P</creator><creator>LAM, Wilfred</creator><creator>LUCORE, Charles L</creator><creator>GILL, John B</creator><creator>PAGE, Lisa</creator><creator>TURNER, Leah</creator><creator>DAVIS, Conrad</creator><creator>MIKELL, Frank L</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080304</creationdate><title>Rural Interhospital Transfer of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization : The Stat Heart Program</title><author>AGUIRRE, Frank V ; VARGHESE, Joji J ; KELLEY, Michael P ; LAM, Wilfred ; LUCORE, Charles L ; GILL, John B ; PAGE, Lisa ; TURNER, Leah ; DAVIS, Conrad ; MIKELL, Frank L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-e42e57b3380e50dbc3f7804ce443764ceafe2c1063fafacdb907d4e0b9111cf83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood and lymphatic vessels</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation - methods</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation - trends</topic><topic>Coronary heart disease</topic><topic>Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Hospitals, Rural - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - diagnosis</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - therapy</topic><topic>Patient Transfer - methods</topic><topic>Patient Transfer - trends</topic><topic>Stroke Volume</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>AGUIRRE, Frank V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VARGHESE, Joji J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KELLEY, Michael P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAM, Wilfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LUCORE, Charles L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GILL, John B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAGE, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TURNER, Leah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVIS, Conrad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIKELL, Frank L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stat Heart Investigators</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>AGUIRRE, Frank V</au><au>VARGHESE, Joji J</au><au>KELLEY, Michael P</au><au>LAM, Wilfred</au><au>LUCORE, Charles L</au><au>GILL, John B</au><au>PAGE, Lisa</au><au>TURNER, Leah</au><au>DAVIS, Conrad</au><au>MIKELL, Frank L</au><aucorp>Stat Heart Investigators</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rural Interhospital Transfer of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization : The Stat Heart Program</atitle><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><date>2008-03-04</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1145</spage><epage>1152</epage><pages>1145-1152</pages><issn>0009-7322</issn><eissn>1524-4539</eissn><coden>CIRCAZ</coden><abstract>In Europe, interhospital transfer of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from non-PCI-capable (STEMI-referral) to PCI-capable (STEMI-accepting) facilities has been shown to be a superior reperfusion strategy compared with on-site fibrinolysis. The feasibility of such programs in the United States remains poorly defined. We describe an observational cohort of 230 consecutive presumed STEMI patients who underwent interhospital transfer between January 2005 and March 2007 among 6 STEMI-referral and 2 STEMI-accepting hospitals in rural central Illinois. A standard treatment protocol using rapid interhospital transfer for primary PCI or rescue PCI after full-dose intravenous fibrinolysis (in event of unanticipated transfer delays) was initiated by the STEMI-referral emergency department physician. Three time intervals were evaluated: STEMI-referral care (door 1 to departure), transport time (door 1 departure to STEMI-accepting hospital arrival [door 2]), and STEMI-accepting hospital care (door 2 to balloon). Primary PCI was performed in 165 STEMI-confirmed patients (87.7%), whereas fibrinolysis was required in 16 patients (8.5%), with 56% undergoing rescue PCI. The median door 1-to-departure time was 46 minutes (25th and 75th percentiles, 32 and 62 minutes); approximately two thirds of this delay was attributable to the wait for transport arrival and departure. The transport and door 2-to-balloon times were 29 minutes (25th and 75th percentiles, 25 and 35 minutes) and 35 minutes (25th and 75th percentiles, 32 and 46 minutes), respectively. The door 1-to-balloon time was 117 minutes (25th and 75th percentiles, 98 and 137 minutes), with 12.2% and 58% of patients achieving a time of &lt; or = 90 and &lt; or = 120 minutes, respectively. No adverse clinical events occurred during interhospital transport. In rural US communities, emergency department physician-initiated interhospital transfer of STEMI patients for primary or rescue PCI is feasible and was safely executed with achievement of timely reperfusion when performed within coordinated healthcare networks.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>18268151</pmid><doi>10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.728519</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-7322
ispartof Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 2008-03, Vol.117 (9), p.1145-1152
issn 0009-7322
1524-4539
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70365518
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Blood and lymphatic vessels
Cardiology. Vascular system
Catheter Ablation - methods
Catheter Ablation - trends
Coronary heart disease
Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous
Female
Heart
Hospitals, Rural - trends
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction - diagnosis
Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology
Myocardial Infarction - therapy
Patient Transfer - methods
Patient Transfer - trends
Stroke Volume
Time Factors
title Rural Interhospital Transfer of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization : The Stat Heart Program
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A37%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rural%20Interhospital%20Transfer%20of%20ST-Elevation%20Myocardial%20Infarction%20Patients%20for%20Percutaneous%20Coronary%20Revascularization%20:%20The%20Stat%20Heart%20Program&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=AGUIRRE,%20Frank%20V&rft.aucorp=Stat%20Heart%20Investigators&rft.date=2008-03-04&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1145&rft.epage=1152&rft.pages=1145-1152&rft.issn=0009-7322&rft.eissn=1524-4539&rft.coden=CIRCAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.728519&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70365518%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-e42e57b3380e50dbc3f7804ce443764ceafe2c1063fafacdb907d4e0b9111cf83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70365518&rft_id=info:pmid/18268151&rfr_iscdi=true