Loading…
Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies
We consider Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies where the association between a binary exposure, binary response, measured confounders and a single binary unmeasured confounder can be formulated using logistic regression models. A model for unmeasured co...
Saved in:
Published in: | Statistics in medicine 2007-05, Vol.26 (11), p.2331-2347 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3841-7d7abc5b01ab064e0abb6a057354cd4ad9b54714e2c55cdd0e7b7bd8213cdafb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3841-7d7abc5b01ab064e0abb6a057354cd4ad9b54714e2c55cdd0e7b7bd8213cdafb3 |
container_end_page | 2347 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2331 |
container_title | Statistics in medicine |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | McCandless, Lawrence C. Gustafson, Paul Levy, Adrian |
description | We consider Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies where the association between a binary exposure, binary response, measured confounders and a single binary unmeasured confounder can be formulated using logistic regression models. A model for unmeasured confounding is presented along with a family of prior distributions that model beliefs about a possible unknown unmeasured confounder. Simulation from the posterior distribution is accomplished using Markov chain Monte Carlo. Because the model for unmeasured confounding is not identifiable, standard large‐sample theory for Bayesian analysis is not applicable. Consequently, the impact of different choices of prior distributions on the coverage probability of credible intervals is unknown. Using simulations, we investigate the coverage probability when averaged with respect to various distributions over the parameter space. The results indicate that credible intervals will have approximately nominal coverage probability, on average, when the prior distribution used for sensitivity analysis approximates the sampling distribution of model parameters in a hypothetical sequence of observational studies. We motivate the method in a study of the effectiveness of beta blocker therapy for treatment of heart failure. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/sim.2711 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70378277</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1254194331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3841-7d7abc5b01ab064e0abb6a057354cd4ad9b54714e2c55cdd0e7b7bd8213cdafb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1r1UAUxvFBLPbaCn4CCS7ETeq8ZDK5S63aVmtFruJymJcTmZrM1DlJNd_eKTcoCK7O5sfD4U_IY0ZPGKX8BYbxhCvG7pENo1tVUy67-2RDuVJ1q5g8JA8RryllTHL1gByydrvtOs425NMrswAGEyuEiGEKt2FaKhPNsGDAqk-5muMIBucMvnIp9mmOPsRvVYhVsgj51kwhFV_hNPsAeEwOejMgPFrvEfny9s3n0_P68uPZxenLy9qJrmG18spYJy1lxtK2AWqsbQ2VSsjG-cb4rZWNYg1wJ6XznoKyyvrytHDe9FYckWf73ZucfsyAkx4DOhgGEyHNqBUVqisBCnz6D7xOcy4fo-ZcMNEyKgp6vkcuJ8QMvb7JYTR50Yzqu8a6NNZ3jQt9su7NdgT_F65RC6j34GcYYPnvkN5dfFgHVx9wgl9_vMnfdauEkvrr1Zlm4vXu3e79TnfiN6snlkM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223136103</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>McCandless, Lawrence C. ; Gustafson, Paul ; Levy, Adrian</creator><creatorcontrib>McCandless, Lawrence C. ; Gustafson, Paul ; Levy, Adrian</creatorcontrib><description>We consider Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies where the association between a binary exposure, binary response, measured confounders and a single binary unmeasured confounder can be formulated using logistic regression models. A model for unmeasured confounding is presented along with a family of prior distributions that model beliefs about a possible unknown unmeasured confounder. Simulation from the posterior distribution is accomplished using Markov chain Monte Carlo. Because the model for unmeasured confounding is not identifiable, standard large‐sample theory for Bayesian analysis is not applicable. Consequently, the impact of different choices of prior distributions on the coverage probability of credible intervals is unknown. Using simulations, we investigate the coverage probability when averaged with respect to various distributions over the parameter space. The results indicate that credible intervals will have approximately nominal coverage probability, on average, when the prior distribution used for sensitivity analysis approximates the sampling distribution of model parameters in a hypothetical sequence of observational studies. We motivate the method in a study of the effectiveness of beta blocker therapy for treatment of heart failure. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-6715</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0258</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sim.2711</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16998821</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SMEDDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bayes Theorem ; Bayesian analysis ; Bias ; British Columbia ; Cardiac Output, Low - drug therapy ; Confounding Factors (Epidemiology) ; coverage probability ; Drug therapy ; Female ; Humans ; identifiability ; Male ; Medical statistics ; observational studies ; Probability ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; unmeasured confounding</subject><ispartof>Statistics in medicine, 2007-05, Vol.26 (11), p.2331-2347</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright John Wiley and Sons, Limited May 20, 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3841-7d7abc5b01ab064e0abb6a057354cd4ad9b54714e2c55cdd0e7b7bd8213cdafb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3841-7d7abc5b01ab064e0abb6a057354cd4ad9b54714e2c55cdd0e7b7bd8213cdafb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16998821$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCandless, Lawrence C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gustafson, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Adrian</creatorcontrib><title>Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies</title><title>Statistics in medicine</title><addtitle>Statist. Med</addtitle><description>We consider Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies where the association between a binary exposure, binary response, measured confounders and a single binary unmeasured confounder can be formulated using logistic regression models. A model for unmeasured confounding is presented along with a family of prior distributions that model beliefs about a possible unknown unmeasured confounder. Simulation from the posterior distribution is accomplished using Markov chain Monte Carlo. Because the model for unmeasured confounding is not identifiable, standard large‐sample theory for Bayesian analysis is not applicable. Consequently, the impact of different choices of prior distributions on the coverage probability of credible intervals is unknown. Using simulations, we investigate the coverage probability when averaged with respect to various distributions over the parameter space. The results indicate that credible intervals will have approximately nominal coverage probability, on average, when the prior distribution used for sensitivity analysis approximates the sampling distribution of model parameters in a hypothetical sequence of observational studies. We motivate the method in a study of the effectiveness of beta blocker therapy for treatment of heart failure. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>British Columbia</subject><subject>Cardiac Output, Low - drug therapy</subject><subject>Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)</subject><subject>coverage probability</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>identifiability</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical statistics</subject><subject>observational studies</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>unmeasured confounding</subject><issn>0277-6715</issn><issn>1097-0258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E1r1UAUxvFBLPbaCn4CCS7ETeq8ZDK5S63aVmtFruJymJcTmZrM1DlJNd_eKTcoCK7O5sfD4U_IY0ZPGKX8BYbxhCvG7pENo1tVUy67-2RDuVJ1q5g8JA8RryllTHL1gByydrvtOs425NMrswAGEyuEiGEKt2FaKhPNsGDAqk-5muMIBucMvnIp9mmOPsRvVYhVsgj51kwhFV_hNPsAeEwOejMgPFrvEfny9s3n0_P68uPZxenLy9qJrmG18spYJy1lxtK2AWqsbQ2VSsjG-cb4rZWNYg1wJ6XznoKyyvrytHDe9FYckWf73ZucfsyAkx4DOhgGEyHNqBUVqisBCnz6D7xOcy4fo-ZcMNEyKgp6vkcuJ8QMvb7JYTR50Yzqu8a6NNZ3jQt9su7NdgT_F65RC6j34GcYYPnvkN5dfFgHVx9wgl9_vMnfdauEkvrr1Zlm4vXu3e79TnfiN6snlkM</recordid><startdate>20070520</startdate><enddate>20070520</enddate><creator>McCandless, Lawrence C.</creator><creator>Gustafson, Paul</creator><creator>Levy, Adrian</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070520</creationdate><title>Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies</title><author>McCandless, Lawrence C. ; Gustafson, Paul ; Levy, Adrian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3841-7d7abc5b01ab064e0abb6a057354cd4ad9b54714e2c55cdd0e7b7bd8213cdafb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>British Columbia</topic><topic>Cardiac Output, Low - drug therapy</topic><topic>Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)</topic><topic>coverage probability</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>identifiability</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical statistics</topic><topic>observational studies</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>unmeasured confounding</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCandless, Lawrence C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gustafson, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Adrian</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Statistics in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCandless, Lawrence C.</au><au>Gustafson, Paul</au><au>Levy, Adrian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies</atitle><jtitle>Statistics in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Statist. Med</addtitle><date>2007-05-20</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2331</spage><epage>2347</epage><pages>2331-2347</pages><issn>0277-6715</issn><eissn>1097-0258</eissn><coden>SMEDDA</coden><abstract>We consider Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies where the association between a binary exposure, binary response, measured confounders and a single binary unmeasured confounder can be formulated using logistic regression models. A model for unmeasured confounding is presented along with a family of prior distributions that model beliefs about a possible unknown unmeasured confounder. Simulation from the posterior distribution is accomplished using Markov chain Monte Carlo. Because the model for unmeasured confounding is not identifiable, standard large‐sample theory for Bayesian analysis is not applicable. Consequently, the impact of different choices of prior distributions on the coverage probability of credible intervals is unknown. Using simulations, we investigate the coverage probability when averaged with respect to various distributions over the parameter space. The results indicate that credible intervals will have approximately nominal coverage probability, on average, when the prior distribution used for sensitivity analysis approximates the sampling distribution of model parameters in a hypothetical sequence of observational studies. We motivate the method in a study of the effectiveness of beta blocker therapy for treatment of heart failure. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>16998821</pmid><doi>10.1002/sim.2711</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-6715 |
ispartof | Statistics in medicine, 2007-05, Vol.26 (11), p.2331-2347 |
issn | 0277-6715 1097-0258 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70378277 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use Aged Aged, 80 and over Bayes Theorem Bayesian analysis Bias British Columbia Cardiac Output, Low - drug therapy Confounding Factors (Epidemiology) coverage probability Drug therapy Female Humans identifiability Male Medical statistics observational studies Probability Sensitivity and Specificity Studies Treatment Outcome unmeasured confounding |
title | Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T10%3A15%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bayesian%20sensitivity%20analysis%20for%20unmeasured%20confounding%20in%20observational%20studies&rft.jtitle=Statistics%20in%20medicine&rft.au=McCandless,%20Lawrence%20C.&rft.date=2007-05-20&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2331&rft.epage=2347&rft.pages=2331-2347&rft.issn=0277-6715&rft.eissn=1097-0258&rft.coden=SMEDDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sim.2711&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1254194331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3841-7d7abc5b01ab064e0abb6a057354cd4ad9b54714e2c55cdd0e7b7bd8213cdafb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223136103&rft_id=info:pmid/16998821&rfr_iscdi=true |