Loading…

Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies

We consider Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies where the association between a binary exposure, binary response, measured confounders and a single binary unmeasured confounder can be formulated using logistic regression models. A model for unmeasured co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Statistics in medicine 2007-05, Vol.26 (11), p.2331-2347
Main Authors: McCandless, Lawrence C., Gustafson, Paul, Levy, Adrian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3841-7d7abc5b01ab064e0abb6a057354cd4ad9b54714e2c55cdd0e7b7bd8213cdafb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3841-7d7abc5b01ab064e0abb6a057354cd4ad9b54714e2c55cdd0e7b7bd8213cdafb3
container_end_page 2347
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2331
container_title Statistics in medicine
container_volume 26
creator McCandless, Lawrence C.
Gustafson, Paul
Levy, Adrian
description We consider Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies where the association between a binary exposure, binary response, measured confounders and a single binary unmeasured confounder can be formulated using logistic regression models. A model for unmeasured confounding is presented along with a family of prior distributions that model beliefs about a possible unknown unmeasured confounder. Simulation from the posterior distribution is accomplished using Markov chain Monte Carlo. Because the model for unmeasured confounding is not identifiable, standard large‐sample theory for Bayesian analysis is not applicable. Consequently, the impact of different choices of prior distributions on the coverage probability of credible intervals is unknown. Using simulations, we investigate the coverage probability when averaged with respect to various distributions over the parameter space. The results indicate that credible intervals will have approximately nominal coverage probability, on average, when the prior distribution used for sensitivity analysis approximates the sampling distribution of model parameters in a hypothetical sequence of observational studies. We motivate the method in a study of the effectiveness of beta blocker therapy for treatment of heart failure. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/sim.2711
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70378277</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1254194331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3841-7d7abc5b01ab064e0abb6a057354cd4ad9b54714e2c55cdd0e7b7bd8213cdafb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1r1UAUxvFBLPbaCn4CCS7ETeq8ZDK5S63aVmtFruJymJcTmZrM1DlJNd_eKTcoCK7O5sfD4U_IY0ZPGKX8BYbxhCvG7pENo1tVUy67-2RDuVJ1q5g8JA8RryllTHL1gByydrvtOs425NMrswAGEyuEiGEKt2FaKhPNsGDAqk-5muMIBucMvnIp9mmOPsRvVYhVsgj51kwhFV_hNPsAeEwOejMgPFrvEfny9s3n0_P68uPZxenLy9qJrmG18spYJy1lxtK2AWqsbQ2VSsjG-cb4rZWNYg1wJ6XznoKyyvrytHDe9FYckWf73ZucfsyAkx4DOhgGEyHNqBUVqisBCnz6D7xOcy4fo-ZcMNEyKgp6vkcuJ8QMvb7JYTR50Yzqu8a6NNZ3jQt9su7NdgT_F65RC6j34GcYYPnvkN5dfFgHVx9wgl9_vMnfdauEkvrr1Zlm4vXu3e79TnfiN6snlkM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223136103</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>McCandless, Lawrence C. ; Gustafson, Paul ; Levy, Adrian</creator><creatorcontrib>McCandless, Lawrence C. ; Gustafson, Paul ; Levy, Adrian</creatorcontrib><description>We consider Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies where the association between a binary exposure, binary response, measured confounders and a single binary unmeasured confounder can be formulated using logistic regression models. A model for unmeasured confounding is presented along with a family of prior distributions that model beliefs about a possible unknown unmeasured confounder. Simulation from the posterior distribution is accomplished using Markov chain Monte Carlo. Because the model for unmeasured confounding is not identifiable, standard large‐sample theory for Bayesian analysis is not applicable. Consequently, the impact of different choices of prior distributions on the coverage probability of credible intervals is unknown. Using simulations, we investigate the coverage probability when averaged with respect to various distributions over the parameter space. The results indicate that credible intervals will have approximately nominal coverage probability, on average, when the prior distribution used for sensitivity analysis approximates the sampling distribution of model parameters in a hypothetical sequence of observational studies. We motivate the method in a study of the effectiveness of beta blocker therapy for treatment of heart failure. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-6715</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0258</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sim.2711</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16998821</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SMEDDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bayes Theorem ; Bayesian analysis ; Bias ; British Columbia ; Cardiac Output, Low - drug therapy ; Confounding Factors (Epidemiology) ; coverage probability ; Drug therapy ; Female ; Humans ; identifiability ; Male ; Medical statistics ; observational studies ; Probability ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; unmeasured confounding</subject><ispartof>Statistics in medicine, 2007-05, Vol.26 (11), p.2331-2347</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2006 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright 2006 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright John Wiley and Sons, Limited May 20, 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3841-7d7abc5b01ab064e0abb6a057354cd4ad9b54714e2c55cdd0e7b7bd8213cdafb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3841-7d7abc5b01ab064e0abb6a057354cd4ad9b54714e2c55cdd0e7b7bd8213cdafb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16998821$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCandless, Lawrence C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gustafson, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Adrian</creatorcontrib><title>Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies</title><title>Statistics in medicine</title><addtitle>Statist. Med</addtitle><description>We consider Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies where the association between a binary exposure, binary response, measured confounders and a single binary unmeasured confounder can be formulated using logistic regression models. A model for unmeasured confounding is presented along with a family of prior distributions that model beliefs about a possible unknown unmeasured confounder. Simulation from the posterior distribution is accomplished using Markov chain Monte Carlo. Because the model for unmeasured confounding is not identifiable, standard large‐sample theory for Bayesian analysis is not applicable. Consequently, the impact of different choices of prior distributions on the coverage probability of credible intervals is unknown. Using simulations, we investigate the coverage probability when averaged with respect to various distributions over the parameter space. The results indicate that credible intervals will have approximately nominal coverage probability, on average, when the prior distribution used for sensitivity analysis approximates the sampling distribution of model parameters in a hypothetical sequence of observational studies. We motivate the method in a study of the effectiveness of beta blocker therapy for treatment of heart failure. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>British Columbia</subject><subject>Cardiac Output, Low - drug therapy</subject><subject>Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)</subject><subject>coverage probability</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>identifiability</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical statistics</subject><subject>observational studies</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>unmeasured confounding</subject><issn>0277-6715</issn><issn>1097-0258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E1r1UAUxvFBLPbaCn4CCS7ETeq8ZDK5S63aVmtFruJymJcTmZrM1DlJNd_eKTcoCK7O5sfD4U_IY0ZPGKX8BYbxhCvG7pENo1tVUy67-2RDuVJ1q5g8JA8RryllTHL1gByydrvtOs425NMrswAGEyuEiGEKt2FaKhPNsGDAqk-5muMIBucMvnIp9mmOPsRvVYhVsgj51kwhFV_hNPsAeEwOejMgPFrvEfny9s3n0_P68uPZxenLy9qJrmG18spYJy1lxtK2AWqsbQ2VSsjG-cb4rZWNYg1wJ6XznoKyyvrytHDe9FYckWf73ZucfsyAkx4DOhgGEyHNqBUVqisBCnz6D7xOcy4fo-ZcMNEyKgp6vkcuJ8QMvb7JYTR50Yzqu8a6NNZ3jQt9su7NdgT_F65RC6j34GcYYPnvkN5dfFgHVx9wgl9_vMnfdauEkvrr1Zlm4vXu3e79TnfiN6snlkM</recordid><startdate>20070520</startdate><enddate>20070520</enddate><creator>McCandless, Lawrence C.</creator><creator>Gustafson, Paul</creator><creator>Levy, Adrian</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070520</creationdate><title>Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies</title><author>McCandless, Lawrence C. ; Gustafson, Paul ; Levy, Adrian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3841-7d7abc5b01ab064e0abb6a057354cd4ad9b54714e2c55cdd0e7b7bd8213cdafb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>British Columbia</topic><topic>Cardiac Output, Low - drug therapy</topic><topic>Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)</topic><topic>coverage probability</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>identifiability</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical statistics</topic><topic>observational studies</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>unmeasured confounding</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCandless, Lawrence C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gustafson, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Adrian</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Statistics in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCandless, Lawrence C.</au><au>Gustafson, Paul</au><au>Levy, Adrian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies</atitle><jtitle>Statistics in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Statist. Med</addtitle><date>2007-05-20</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2331</spage><epage>2347</epage><pages>2331-2347</pages><issn>0277-6715</issn><eissn>1097-0258</eissn><coden>SMEDDA</coden><abstract>We consider Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies where the association between a binary exposure, binary response, measured confounders and a single binary unmeasured confounder can be formulated using logistic regression models. A model for unmeasured confounding is presented along with a family of prior distributions that model beliefs about a possible unknown unmeasured confounder. Simulation from the posterior distribution is accomplished using Markov chain Monte Carlo. Because the model for unmeasured confounding is not identifiable, standard large‐sample theory for Bayesian analysis is not applicable. Consequently, the impact of different choices of prior distributions on the coverage probability of credible intervals is unknown. Using simulations, we investigate the coverage probability when averaged with respect to various distributions over the parameter space. The results indicate that credible intervals will have approximately nominal coverage probability, on average, when the prior distribution used for sensitivity analysis approximates the sampling distribution of model parameters in a hypothetical sequence of observational studies. We motivate the method in a study of the effectiveness of beta blocker therapy for treatment of heart failure. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>16998821</pmid><doi>10.1002/sim.2711</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-6715
ispartof Statistics in medicine, 2007-05, Vol.26 (11), p.2331-2347
issn 0277-6715
1097-0258
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70378277
source Wiley
subjects Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bayes Theorem
Bayesian analysis
Bias
British Columbia
Cardiac Output, Low - drug therapy
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
coverage probability
Drug therapy
Female
Humans
identifiability
Male
Medical statistics
observational studies
Probability
Sensitivity and Specificity
Studies
Treatment Outcome
unmeasured confounding
title Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T10%3A15%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bayesian%20sensitivity%20analysis%20for%20unmeasured%20confounding%20in%20observational%20studies&rft.jtitle=Statistics%20in%20medicine&rft.au=McCandless,%20Lawrence%20C.&rft.date=2007-05-20&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2331&rft.epage=2347&rft.pages=2331-2347&rft.issn=0277-6715&rft.eissn=1097-0258&rft.coden=SMEDDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sim.2711&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1254194331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3841-7d7abc5b01ab064e0abb6a057354cd4ad9b54714e2c55cdd0e7b7bd8213cdafb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223136103&rft_id=info:pmid/16998821&rfr_iscdi=true