Solid phase microextraction-comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry for the analysis of honey volatiles

• Published in: Journal of separation science 2007-03, Vol.30 (4), p.534-546
• Main Authors: Čajka, Tomáš, Hajšlová, Jana, Cochran, Jack, Holadová, Kateřina, Klimánková, Eva
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC); Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods; Honey; Honey - analysis; Solid Phase Microextraction - methods; Solid phase microextration (SPME); Temperature; Time Factors; Time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TOFMS); Volatiles; Volatilization
• ISSN: 1615-9306; 1615-9314
• DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200600413

Head‐space solid phase microextration (SPME), followed by comprehensive two‐dimensional gas chromatography–time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry (GC×GC–TOFMS), has been implemented for the analysis of honey volatiles, with emphasis on the optimal selection of SPME fibre and the first‐ and second‐dimension GC capillaries. From seven SPME fibres investigated, a divinylbenzene/Carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (DVB/CAR/PDMS) 50/30 μm fibre provided the best sorption capacity and the broadest range of volatiles extracted from the headspace of a mixed honey sample. A combination of DB‐5ms×SUPELCOWAX 10 columns enabled the best resolution of sample components compared to the other two tested column configurations. Employing this powerful analytical strategy led to the identification of 164 volatile compounds present in a honey mixture during a 19‐min GC run. Combination of this simple and inexpensive SPME‐based sampling/concentration technique with the advanced separation/identification approach represented by GC×GC–TOFMS allows a rapid and comprehensive examination of the honey volatiles profile. In this way, the laboratory sample throughput can be increased significantly and, at the same time, the risk of erroneous identification, which cannot be avoided in one‐dimensional GC separation, is minimised.