Loading…

Challenges faced by general practitioners and allied mental health services in providing mental health services in rural Queensland

Objective:  To examine the views of rural practitioners concerning issues and challenges in mental health service delivery and possible solutions. Design:  A qualitative study using individual semi‐structured interviews. Setting:  Eight general practices from eight rural Queensland towns, three rura...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Australian journal of rural health 2007-04, Vol.15 (2), p.126-130
Main Authors: Bambling, Matthew, Kavanagh, David, Lewis, Gisela, King, Robert, King, David, Sturk, Heidi, Turpin, Merrill, Gallois, Cindy, Bartlett, Helen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4606-4b1195f91d70b8510426823c94f79d184689a699c2cc5ceaf14c288c910b2d53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4606-4b1195f91d70b8510426823c94f79d184689a699c2cc5ceaf14c288c910b2d53
container_end_page 130
container_issue 2
container_start_page 126
container_title The Australian journal of rural health
container_volume 15
creator Bambling, Matthew
Kavanagh, David
Lewis, Gisela
King, Robert
King, David
Sturk, Heidi
Turpin, Merrill
Gallois, Cindy
Bartlett, Helen
description Objective:  To examine the views of rural practitioners concerning issues and challenges in mental health service delivery and possible solutions. Design:  A qualitative study using individual semi‐structured interviews. Setting:  Eight general practices from eight rural Queensland towns, three rural mental health services and two non‐government organisations, with interviews being conducted before recent changes in government‐subsidised access to allied health practitioners. Participants:  A sample of 37 GPs, 19 Queensland Health mental health staff and 18 participants from community organisations. Main outcome measures:  Analysis of qualitative themes from questions about the key mental health issues facing the town, how they might be addressed and what challenges would be faced in addressing them. Results:  There was substantial consensus that there are significant problems with inter‐service communication and liaison, and that improved collaboration and shared care will form a critical part of any effective solution. Differences between groups reflected differing organisational contexts and priorities, and limitations to the understanding each had of the challenges that other groups were facing. Conclusions:  Improvements to mental health staffing and to access to allied health might increase the ability of GPs to meet the needs of less complex patients, but specific strategies to promote better integrated services are required to address the needs of rural and regional patients with complex mental health problems. The current study provides a baseline against which effects of recent initiatives to improve mental health care can be assessed.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2007.00866.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70398762</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57079987</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4606-4b1195f91d70b8510426823c94f79d184689a699c2cc5ceaf14c288c910b2d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS1UREvhK6CcuCWMHcd_pF6qVSmgCihaqUfLcSa73mazrZ0su2e-OA67KjfKXGas-b3nkR4hGYWCpvqwKijnkNNK8YIByAJACVHsXpCzp8VJmqFUecUUOyWvY1wBgAbKX5FTKjmnirEz8mu2tF2H_QJj1lqHTVbvswX2GGyXPQTrBj_4TXrGzPZNllifmDX2Q9ov0XbDMosYtt4lA98nyWbrG98v_sGEcTK_HRH72CXXN-Rla7uIb4_9nMw_Xs1nn_Kbb9efZ5c3ueMCRM5rSnXVatpIqFVFgTOhWOk0b6VuqOJCaSu0dsy5yqFtKXdMKacp1KypynPy_mCbbnwcMQ5m7aPDLp2AmzEaCaVWUrBnwUqC1AlNoDqALmxiDNiah-DXNuwNBTMFZVZmysNMeZgpKPMnKLNL0nfHP8Z6jc1f4TGZBFwcgJ--w_1_G5vLLz_SkOT5Qe7jgLsnuQ33RshSVubu67X5Pr-jt7ScG13-BlRCseY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57079987</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Challenges faced by general practitioners and allied mental health services in providing mental health services in rural Queensland</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Bambling, Matthew ; Kavanagh, David ; Lewis, Gisela ; King, Robert ; King, David ; Sturk, Heidi ; Turpin, Merrill ; Gallois, Cindy ; Bartlett, Helen</creator><creatorcontrib>Bambling, Matthew ; Kavanagh, David ; Lewis, Gisela ; King, Robert ; King, David ; Sturk, Heidi ; Turpin, Merrill ; Gallois, Cindy ; Bartlett, Helen</creatorcontrib><description>Objective:  To examine the views of rural practitioners concerning issues and challenges in mental health service delivery and possible solutions. Design:  A qualitative study using individual semi‐structured interviews. Setting:  Eight general practices from eight rural Queensland towns, three rural mental health services and two non‐government organisations, with interviews being conducted before recent changes in government‐subsidised access to allied health practitioners. Participants:  A sample of 37 GPs, 19 Queensland Health mental health staff and 18 participants from community organisations. Main outcome measures:  Analysis of qualitative themes from questions about the key mental health issues facing the town, how they might be addressed and what challenges would be faced in addressing them. Results:  There was substantial consensus that there are significant problems with inter‐service communication and liaison, and that improved collaboration and shared care will form a critical part of any effective solution. Differences between groups reflected differing organisational contexts and priorities, and limitations to the understanding each had of the challenges that other groups were facing. Conclusions:  Improvements to mental health staffing and to access to allied health might increase the ability of GPs to meet the needs of less complex patients, but specific strategies to promote better integrated services are required to address the needs of rural and regional patients with complex mental health problems. The current study provides a baseline against which effects of recent initiatives to improve mental health care can be assessed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1038-5282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2007.00866.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17441822</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJRHF6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Allied health professionals ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Case Management - organization & administration ; Communication ; Community Mental Health Services - organization & administration ; continuity of patient care ; Continuity of Patient Care - organization & administration ; Cooperative Behavior ; depression ; General practitioners ; Health Priorities ; Health Services Accessibility - organization & administration ; Health Services Research ; Humans ; Interinstitutional Relations ; mental health ; mental health service ; Mental health services ; Needs Assessment - organization & administration ; Nursing ; Organizations - organization & administration ; Physicians, Family - organization & administration ; Physicians, Family - psychology ; primary health care ; Psychiatry - organization & administration ; Qualitative Research ; Queensland ; Referral and Consultation - organization & administration ; Rural communities ; Rural Health Services - organization & administration ; Service delivery ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Total Quality Management - organization & administration]]></subject><ispartof>The Australian journal of rural health, 2007-04, Vol.15 (2), p.126-130</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4606-4b1195f91d70b8510426823c94f79d184689a699c2cc5ceaf14c288c910b2d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4606-4b1195f91d70b8510426823c94f79d184689a699c2cc5ceaf14c288c910b2d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17441822$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bambling, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavanagh, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Gisela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturk, Heidi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turpin, Merrill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallois, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, Helen</creatorcontrib><title>Challenges faced by general practitioners and allied mental health services in providing mental health services in rural Queensland</title><title>The Australian journal of rural health</title><addtitle>Aust J Rural Health</addtitle><description>Objective:  To examine the views of rural practitioners concerning issues and challenges in mental health service delivery and possible solutions. Design:  A qualitative study using individual semi‐structured interviews. Setting:  Eight general practices from eight rural Queensland towns, three rural mental health services and two non‐government organisations, with interviews being conducted before recent changes in government‐subsidised access to allied health practitioners. Participants:  A sample of 37 GPs, 19 Queensland Health mental health staff and 18 participants from community organisations. Main outcome measures:  Analysis of qualitative themes from questions about the key mental health issues facing the town, how they might be addressed and what challenges would be faced in addressing them. Results:  There was substantial consensus that there are significant problems with inter‐service communication and liaison, and that improved collaboration and shared care will form a critical part of any effective solution. Differences between groups reflected differing organisational contexts and priorities, and limitations to the understanding each had of the challenges that other groups were facing. Conclusions:  Improvements to mental health staffing and to access to allied health might increase the ability of GPs to meet the needs of less complex patients, but specific strategies to promote better integrated services are required to address the needs of rural and regional patients with complex mental health problems. The current study provides a baseline against which effects of recent initiatives to improve mental health care can be assessed.</description><subject>Allied health professionals</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Case Management - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Community Mental Health Services - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>continuity of patient care</subject><subject>Continuity of Patient Care - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>depression</subject><subject>General practitioners</subject><subject>Health Priorities</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interinstitutional Relations</subject><subject>mental health</subject><subject>mental health service</subject><subject>Mental health services</subject><subject>Needs Assessment - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Organizations - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Physicians, Family - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Physicians, Family - psychology</subject><subject>primary health care</subject><subject>Psychiatry - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Queensland</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Rural Health Services - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Service delivery</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Total Quality Management - organization &amp; administration</subject><issn>1038-5282</issn><issn>1440-1584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS1UREvhK6CcuCWMHcd_pF6qVSmgCihaqUfLcSa73mazrZ0su2e-OA67KjfKXGas-b3nkR4hGYWCpvqwKijnkNNK8YIByAJACVHsXpCzp8VJmqFUecUUOyWvY1wBgAbKX5FTKjmnirEz8mu2tF2H_QJj1lqHTVbvswX2GGyXPQTrBj_4TXrGzPZNllifmDX2Q9ov0XbDMosYtt4lA98nyWbrG98v_sGEcTK_HRH72CXXN-Rla7uIb4_9nMw_Xs1nn_Kbb9efZ5c3ueMCRM5rSnXVatpIqFVFgTOhWOk0b6VuqOJCaSu0dsy5yqFtKXdMKacp1KypynPy_mCbbnwcMQ5m7aPDLp2AmzEaCaVWUrBnwUqC1AlNoDqALmxiDNiah-DXNuwNBTMFZVZmysNMeZgpKPMnKLNL0nfHP8Z6jc1f4TGZBFwcgJ--w_1_G5vLLz_SkOT5Qe7jgLsnuQ33RshSVubu67X5Pr-jt7ScG13-BlRCseY</recordid><startdate>200704</startdate><enddate>200704</enddate><creator>Bambling, Matthew</creator><creator>Kavanagh, David</creator><creator>Lewis, Gisela</creator><creator>King, Robert</creator><creator>King, David</creator><creator>Sturk, Heidi</creator><creator>Turpin, Merrill</creator><creator>Gallois, Cindy</creator><creator>Bartlett, Helen</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200704</creationdate><title>Challenges faced by general practitioners and allied mental health services in providing mental health services in rural Queensland</title><author>Bambling, Matthew ; Kavanagh, David ; Lewis, Gisela ; King, Robert ; King, David ; Sturk, Heidi ; Turpin, Merrill ; Gallois, Cindy ; Bartlett, Helen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4606-4b1195f91d70b8510426823c94f79d184689a699c2cc5ceaf14c288c910b2d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Allied health professionals</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Case Management - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Community Mental Health Services - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>continuity of patient care</topic><topic>Continuity of Patient Care - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>depression</topic><topic>General practitioners</topic><topic>Health Priorities</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interinstitutional Relations</topic><topic>mental health</topic><topic>mental health service</topic><topic>Mental health services</topic><topic>Needs Assessment - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Organizations - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Physicians, Family - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Physicians, Family - psychology</topic><topic>primary health care</topic><topic>Psychiatry - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Queensland</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Rural Health Services - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Service delivery</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Total Quality Management - organization &amp; administration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bambling, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavanagh, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Gisela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturk, Heidi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turpin, Merrill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallois, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, Helen</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Australian journal of rural health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bambling, Matthew</au><au>Kavanagh, David</au><au>Lewis, Gisela</au><au>King, Robert</au><au>King, David</au><au>Sturk, Heidi</au><au>Turpin, Merrill</au><au>Gallois, Cindy</au><au>Bartlett, Helen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Challenges faced by general practitioners and allied mental health services in providing mental health services in rural Queensland</atitle><jtitle>The Australian journal of rural health</jtitle><addtitle>Aust J Rural Health</addtitle><date>2007-04</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>126</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>126-130</pages><issn>1038-5282</issn><eissn>1440-1584</eissn><coden>AJRHF6</coden><abstract>Objective:  To examine the views of rural practitioners concerning issues and challenges in mental health service delivery and possible solutions. Design:  A qualitative study using individual semi‐structured interviews. Setting:  Eight general practices from eight rural Queensland towns, three rural mental health services and two non‐government organisations, with interviews being conducted before recent changes in government‐subsidised access to allied health practitioners. Participants:  A sample of 37 GPs, 19 Queensland Health mental health staff and 18 participants from community organisations. Main outcome measures:  Analysis of qualitative themes from questions about the key mental health issues facing the town, how they might be addressed and what challenges would be faced in addressing them. Results:  There was substantial consensus that there are significant problems with inter‐service communication and liaison, and that improved collaboration and shared care will form a critical part of any effective solution. Differences between groups reflected differing organisational contexts and priorities, and limitations to the understanding each had of the challenges that other groups were facing. Conclusions:  Improvements to mental health staffing and to access to allied health might increase the ability of GPs to meet the needs of less complex patients, but specific strategies to promote better integrated services are required to address the needs of rural and regional patients with complex mental health problems. The current study provides a baseline against which effects of recent initiatives to improve mental health care can be assessed.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><pmid>17441822</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1440-1584.2007.00866.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1038-5282
ispartof The Australian journal of rural health, 2007-04, Vol.15 (2), p.126-130
issn 1038-5282
1440-1584
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70398762
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Allied health professionals
Attitude of Health Personnel
Case Management - organization & administration
Communication
Community Mental Health Services - organization & administration
continuity of patient care
Continuity of Patient Care - organization & administration
Cooperative Behavior
depression
General practitioners
Health Priorities
Health Services Accessibility - organization & administration
Health Services Research
Humans
Interinstitutional Relations
mental health
mental health service
Mental health services
Needs Assessment - organization & administration
Nursing
Organizations - organization & administration
Physicians, Family - organization & administration
Physicians, Family - psychology
primary health care
Psychiatry - organization & administration
Qualitative Research
Queensland
Referral and Consultation - organization & administration
Rural communities
Rural Health Services - organization & administration
Service delivery
Surveys and Questionnaires
Total Quality Management - organization & administration
title Challenges faced by general practitioners and allied mental health services in providing mental health services in rural Queensland
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T09%3A15%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Challenges%20faced%20by%20general%20practitioners%20and%20allied%20mental%20health%20services%20in%20providing%20mental%20health%20services%20in%20rural%20Queensland&rft.jtitle=The%20Australian%20journal%20of%20rural%20health&rft.au=Bambling,%20Matthew&rft.date=2007-04&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=126&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=126-130&rft.issn=1038-5282&rft.eissn=1440-1584&rft.coden=AJRHF6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1440-1584.2007.00866.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57079987%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4606-4b1195f91d70b8510426823c94f79d184689a699c2cc5ceaf14c288c910b2d53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57079987&rft_id=info:pmid/17441822&rfr_iscdi=true