Loading…
Integrating conflict analysis and consensus reaching in a decision support system for water resource management
The importance of shared decision processes in water management derives from the awareness of the inadequacy of traditional—i.e. engineering—approaches in dealing with complex and ill-structured problems. It is becoming increasingly obvious that traditional problem solving and decision support techn...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of environmental management 2007-07, Vol.84 (2), p.213-228 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-d0562788530249c8e521a0f414c47290a45296e6a4301c9ef482023f45f78ec23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-d0562788530249c8e521a0f414c47290a45296e6a4301c9ef482023f45f78ec23 |
container_end_page | 228 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 213 |
container_title | Journal of environmental management |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Giordano, R. Passarella, G. Uricchio, V.F. Vurro, M. |
description | The importance of shared decision processes in water management derives from the awareness of the inadequacy of traditional—i.e. engineering—approaches in dealing with complex and ill-structured problems. It is becoming increasingly obvious that traditional problem solving and decision support techniques, based on optimisation and factual knowledge, have to be combined with stakeholder based policy design and implementation. The aim of our research is the definition of an integrated decision support system for consensus achievement (IDSS-C) able to support a participative decision-making process in all its phases: problem definition and structuring, identification of the possible alternatives, formulation of participants’ judgments, and consensus achievement. Furthermore, the IDSS-C aims at structuring, i.e. systematising the knowledge which has emerged during the participative process in order to make it comprehensible for the decision-makers and functional for the decision process. Problem structuring methods (PSM) and multi-group evaluation methods (MEM) have been integrated in the IDSS-C. PSM are used to support the stakeholders in providing their perspective of the problem and to elicit their interests and preferences, while MEM are used to define not only the degree of consensus for each alternative, highlighting those where the agreement is high, but also the consensus label for each alternative and the behaviour of individuals during the participative decision-making. The IDSS-C is applied experimentally to a decision process regarding the use of treated wastewater for agricultural irrigation in the Apulia Region (southern Italy). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.05.006 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70410819</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479706001393</els_id><sourcerecordid>1260656341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-d0562788530249c8e521a0f414c47290a45296e6a4301c9ef482023f45f78ec23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c-L1TAQB_Aiivt29U9Qi7DeWidJk6anRRZ_LCx40D2HmE6fKW3yTNKV99-b8goLXt5pQvhMmMy3KN4QqAkQ8XGsR3SPs3Y1BRA18DqXZ8WOQMcrKRg8L3bAgFRN27UXxWWMIwAwStqXxQURknVCwK7wdy7hPuhk3b403g2TNanUTk_HaGM-9OttRBeXWAbU5vcKrSt12aOx0XpXxuVw8CGV8RgTzuXgQ_lXJwzZR78Eg2UeU-9xRpdeFS8GPUV8vdWr4uHL55-336r771_vbj_dV4aDSFUPXNBWSs6ANp2RyCnRMDSkMU1LO9ANp51AoZv8RdPh0EgKlA0NH1qJhrKr4sPp3UPwfxaMSc02Gpwm7dAvUbXQEJCkOwtZXpPkHTsLSV5ol4fN8P1_cMxbyBtdDRdEAvCM-AmZ4GMMOKhDsLMOR0VArQGrUW0BqzVgBVzlkvvebo8vv2bsn7q2RDO43oCORk9D0C7H9OSkhJZwmd27kxu0V3ofsnn4QYEwgLaVwNYRb04Cc06PFoOKxqIz2NuAJqne2zPD_gMvbs8z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195618005</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrating conflict analysis and consensus reaching in a decision support system for water resource management</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Giordano, R. ; Passarella, G. ; Uricchio, V.F. ; Vurro, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Giordano, R. ; Passarella, G. ; Uricchio, V.F. ; Vurro, M.</creatorcontrib><description>The importance of shared decision processes in water management derives from the awareness of the inadequacy of traditional—i.e. engineering—approaches in dealing with complex and ill-structured problems. It is becoming increasingly obvious that traditional problem solving and decision support techniques, based on optimisation and factual knowledge, have to be combined with stakeholder based policy design and implementation. The aim of our research is the definition of an integrated decision support system for consensus achievement (IDSS-C) able to support a participative decision-making process in all its phases: problem definition and structuring, identification of the possible alternatives, formulation of participants’ judgments, and consensus achievement. Furthermore, the IDSS-C aims at structuring, i.e. systematising the knowledge which has emerged during the participative process in order to make it comprehensible for the decision-makers and functional for the decision process. Problem structuring methods (PSM) and multi-group evaluation methods (MEM) have been integrated in the IDSS-C. PSM are used to support the stakeholders in providing their perspective of the problem and to elicit their interests and preferences, while MEM are used to define not only the degree of consensus for each alternative, highlighting those where the agreement is high, but also the consensus label for each alternative and the behaviour of individuals during the participative decision-making. The IDSS-C is applied experimentally to a decision process regarding the use of treated wastewater for agricultural irrigation in the Apulia Region (southern Italy).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.05.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16839660</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVMAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agriculture - methods ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; case studies ; Community Participation ; Conflict ; Conflict analysis ; conflict management ; Conflict of Interest ; consensus reaching ; Consensus support system ; consensus support systems ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Decision making ; Decision support systems ; Decision Support Techniques ; Environmental engineering ; Environmental management ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Humans ; Irrigation ; Italy ; optimization ; Participatory water management ; problem solving ; Resource management ; stakeholders ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; wastewater irrigation ; water management ; Water Movements ; water policy ; Water resources ; Water Supply ; Water treatment</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2007-07, Vol.84 (2), p.213-228</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Ltd. Jul 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-d0562788530249c8e521a0f414c47290a45296e6a4301c9ef482023f45f78ec23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-d0562788530249c8e521a0f414c47290a45296e6a4301c9ef482023f45f78ec23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18807158$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16839660$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giordano, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passarella, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uricchio, V.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vurro, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Integrating conflict analysis and consensus reaching in a decision support system for water resource management</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>The importance of shared decision processes in water management derives from the awareness of the inadequacy of traditional—i.e. engineering—approaches in dealing with complex and ill-structured problems. It is becoming increasingly obvious that traditional problem solving and decision support techniques, based on optimisation and factual knowledge, have to be combined with stakeholder based policy design and implementation. The aim of our research is the definition of an integrated decision support system for consensus achievement (IDSS-C) able to support a participative decision-making process in all its phases: problem definition and structuring, identification of the possible alternatives, formulation of participants’ judgments, and consensus achievement. Furthermore, the IDSS-C aims at structuring, i.e. systematising the knowledge which has emerged during the participative process in order to make it comprehensible for the decision-makers and functional for the decision process. Problem structuring methods (PSM) and multi-group evaluation methods (MEM) have been integrated in the IDSS-C. PSM are used to support the stakeholders in providing their perspective of the problem and to elicit their interests and preferences, while MEM are used to define not only the degree of consensus for each alternative, highlighting those where the agreement is high, but also the consensus label for each alternative and the behaviour of individuals during the participative decision-making. The IDSS-C is applied experimentally to a decision process regarding the use of treated wastewater for agricultural irrigation in the Apulia Region (southern Italy).</description><subject>Agriculture - methods</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>case studies</subject><subject>Community Participation</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Conflict analysis</subject><subject>conflict management</subject><subject>Conflict of Interest</subject><subject>consensus reaching</subject><subject>Consensus support system</subject><subject>consensus support systems</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision support systems</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Environmental engineering</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>optimization</subject><subject>Participatory water management</subject><subject>problem solving</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>stakeholders</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>wastewater irrigation</subject><subject>water management</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><subject>water policy</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water Supply</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c-L1TAQB_Aiivt29U9Qi7DeWidJk6anRRZ_LCx40D2HmE6fKW3yTNKV99-b8goLXt5pQvhMmMy3KN4QqAkQ8XGsR3SPs3Y1BRA18DqXZ8WOQMcrKRg8L3bAgFRN27UXxWWMIwAwStqXxQURknVCwK7wdy7hPuhk3b403g2TNanUTk_HaGM-9OttRBeXWAbU5vcKrSt12aOx0XpXxuVw8CGV8RgTzuXgQ_lXJwzZR78Eg2UeU-9xRpdeFS8GPUV8vdWr4uHL55-336r771_vbj_dV4aDSFUPXNBWSs6ANp2RyCnRMDSkMU1LO9ANp51AoZv8RdPh0EgKlA0NH1qJhrKr4sPp3UPwfxaMSc02Gpwm7dAvUbXQEJCkOwtZXpPkHTsLSV5ol4fN8P1_cMxbyBtdDRdEAvCM-AmZ4GMMOKhDsLMOR0VArQGrUW0BqzVgBVzlkvvebo8vv2bsn7q2RDO43oCORk9D0C7H9OSkhJZwmd27kxu0V3ofsnn4QYEwgLaVwNYRb04Cc06PFoOKxqIz2NuAJqne2zPD_gMvbs8z</recordid><startdate>20070701</startdate><enddate>20070701</enddate><creator>Giordano, R.</creator><creator>Passarella, G.</creator><creator>Uricchio, V.F.</creator><creator>Vurro, M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Academic Press Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070701</creationdate><title>Integrating conflict analysis and consensus reaching in a decision support system for water resource management</title><author>Giordano, R. ; Passarella, G. ; Uricchio, V.F. ; Vurro, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-d0562788530249c8e521a0f414c47290a45296e6a4301c9ef482023f45f78ec23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Agriculture - methods</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>case studies</topic><topic>Community Participation</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Conflict analysis</topic><topic>conflict management</topic><topic>Conflict of Interest</topic><topic>consensus reaching</topic><topic>Consensus support system</topic><topic>consensus support systems</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision support systems</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Environmental engineering</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>optimization</topic><topic>Participatory water management</topic><topic>problem solving</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>stakeholders</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>wastewater irrigation</topic><topic>water management</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><topic>water policy</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water Supply</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giordano, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passarella, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uricchio, V.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vurro, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giordano, R.</au><au>Passarella, G.</au><au>Uricchio, V.F.</au><au>Vurro, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrating conflict analysis and consensus reaching in a decision support system for water resource management</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2007-07-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>213</spage><epage>228</epage><pages>213-228</pages><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><coden>JEVMAW</coden><abstract>The importance of shared decision processes in water management derives from the awareness of the inadequacy of traditional—i.e. engineering—approaches in dealing with complex and ill-structured problems. It is becoming increasingly obvious that traditional problem solving and decision support techniques, based on optimisation and factual knowledge, have to be combined with stakeholder based policy design and implementation. The aim of our research is the definition of an integrated decision support system for consensus achievement (IDSS-C) able to support a participative decision-making process in all its phases: problem definition and structuring, identification of the possible alternatives, formulation of participants’ judgments, and consensus achievement. Furthermore, the IDSS-C aims at structuring, i.e. systematising the knowledge which has emerged during the participative process in order to make it comprehensible for the decision-makers and functional for the decision process. Problem structuring methods (PSM) and multi-group evaluation methods (MEM) have been integrated in the IDSS-C. PSM are used to support the stakeholders in providing their perspective of the problem and to elicit their interests and preferences, while MEM are used to define not only the degree of consensus for each alternative, highlighting those where the agreement is high, but also the consensus label for each alternative and the behaviour of individuals during the participative decision-making. The IDSS-C is applied experimentally to a decision process regarding the use of treated wastewater for agricultural irrigation in the Apulia Region (southern Italy).</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16839660</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.05.006</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4797 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental management, 2007-07, Vol.84 (2), p.213-228 |
issn | 0301-4797 1095-8630 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70410819 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Agriculture - methods Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences case studies Community Participation Conflict Conflict analysis conflict management Conflict of Interest consensus reaching Consensus support system consensus support systems Conservation of Natural Resources Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Decision making Decision support systems Decision Support Techniques Environmental engineering Environmental management Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Humans Irrigation Italy optimization Participatory water management problem solving Resource management stakeholders Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods wastewater irrigation water management Water Movements water policy Water resources Water Supply Water treatment |
title | Integrating conflict analysis and consensus reaching in a decision support system for water resource management |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A45%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrating%20conflict%20analysis%20and%20consensus%20reaching%20in%20a%20decision%20support%20system%20for%20water%20resource%20management&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Giordano,%20R.&rft.date=2007-07-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=213&rft.epage=228&rft.pages=213-228&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft.coden=JEVMAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.05.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1260656341%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-d0562788530249c8e521a0f414c47290a45296e6a4301c9ef482023f45f78ec23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195618005&rft_id=info:pmid/16839660&rfr_iscdi=true |