Loading…

Integrating conflict analysis and consensus reaching in a decision support system for water resource management

The importance of shared decision processes in water management derives from the awareness of the inadequacy of traditional—i.e. engineering—approaches in dealing with complex and ill-structured problems. It is becoming increasingly obvious that traditional problem solving and decision support techn...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of environmental management 2007-07, Vol.84 (2), p.213-228
Main Authors: Giordano, R., Passarella, G., Uricchio, V.F., Vurro, M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-d0562788530249c8e521a0f414c47290a45296e6a4301c9ef482023f45f78ec23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-d0562788530249c8e521a0f414c47290a45296e6a4301c9ef482023f45f78ec23
container_end_page 228
container_issue 2
container_start_page 213
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 84
creator Giordano, R.
Passarella, G.
Uricchio, V.F.
Vurro, M.
description The importance of shared decision processes in water management derives from the awareness of the inadequacy of traditional—i.e. engineering—approaches in dealing with complex and ill-structured problems. It is becoming increasingly obvious that traditional problem solving and decision support techniques, based on optimisation and factual knowledge, have to be combined with stakeholder based policy design and implementation. The aim of our research is the definition of an integrated decision support system for consensus achievement (IDSS-C) able to support a participative decision-making process in all its phases: problem definition and structuring, identification of the possible alternatives, formulation of participants’ judgments, and consensus achievement. Furthermore, the IDSS-C aims at structuring, i.e. systematising the knowledge which has emerged during the participative process in order to make it comprehensible for the decision-makers and functional for the decision process. Problem structuring methods (PSM) and multi-group evaluation methods (MEM) have been integrated in the IDSS-C. PSM are used to support the stakeholders in providing their perspective of the problem and to elicit their interests and preferences, while MEM are used to define not only the degree of consensus for each alternative, highlighting those where the agreement is high, but also the consensus label for each alternative and the behaviour of individuals during the participative decision-making. The IDSS-C is applied experimentally to a decision process regarding the use of treated wastewater for agricultural irrigation in the Apulia Region (southern Italy).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.05.006
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70410819</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479706001393</els_id><sourcerecordid>1260656341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-d0562788530249c8e521a0f414c47290a45296e6a4301c9ef482023f45f78ec23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c-L1TAQB_Aiivt29U9Qi7DeWidJk6anRRZ_LCx40D2HmE6fKW3yTNKV99-b8goLXt5pQvhMmMy3KN4QqAkQ8XGsR3SPs3Y1BRA18DqXZ8WOQMcrKRg8L3bAgFRN27UXxWWMIwAwStqXxQURknVCwK7wdy7hPuhk3b403g2TNanUTk_HaGM-9OttRBeXWAbU5vcKrSt12aOx0XpXxuVw8CGV8RgTzuXgQ_lXJwzZR78Eg2UeU-9xRpdeFS8GPUV8vdWr4uHL55-336r771_vbj_dV4aDSFUPXNBWSs6ANp2RyCnRMDSkMU1LO9ANp51AoZv8RdPh0EgKlA0NH1qJhrKr4sPp3UPwfxaMSc02Gpwm7dAvUbXQEJCkOwtZXpPkHTsLSV5ol4fN8P1_cMxbyBtdDRdEAvCM-AmZ4GMMOKhDsLMOR0VArQGrUW0BqzVgBVzlkvvebo8vv2bsn7q2RDO43oCORk9D0C7H9OSkhJZwmd27kxu0V3ofsnn4QYEwgLaVwNYRb04Cc06PFoOKxqIz2NuAJqne2zPD_gMvbs8z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195618005</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrating conflict analysis and consensus reaching in a decision support system for water resource management</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Giordano, R. ; Passarella, G. ; Uricchio, V.F. ; Vurro, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Giordano, R. ; Passarella, G. ; Uricchio, V.F. ; Vurro, M.</creatorcontrib><description>The importance of shared decision processes in water management derives from the awareness of the inadequacy of traditional—i.e. engineering—approaches in dealing with complex and ill-structured problems. It is becoming increasingly obvious that traditional problem solving and decision support techniques, based on optimisation and factual knowledge, have to be combined with stakeholder based policy design and implementation. The aim of our research is the definition of an integrated decision support system for consensus achievement (IDSS-C) able to support a participative decision-making process in all its phases: problem definition and structuring, identification of the possible alternatives, formulation of participants’ judgments, and consensus achievement. Furthermore, the IDSS-C aims at structuring, i.e. systematising the knowledge which has emerged during the participative process in order to make it comprehensible for the decision-makers and functional for the decision process. Problem structuring methods (PSM) and multi-group evaluation methods (MEM) have been integrated in the IDSS-C. PSM are used to support the stakeholders in providing their perspective of the problem and to elicit their interests and preferences, while MEM are used to define not only the degree of consensus for each alternative, highlighting those where the agreement is high, but also the consensus label for each alternative and the behaviour of individuals during the participative decision-making. The IDSS-C is applied experimentally to a decision process regarding the use of treated wastewater for agricultural irrigation in the Apulia Region (southern Italy).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.05.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16839660</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVMAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agriculture - methods ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; case studies ; Community Participation ; Conflict ; Conflict analysis ; conflict management ; Conflict of Interest ; consensus reaching ; Consensus support system ; consensus support systems ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Decision making ; Decision support systems ; Decision Support Techniques ; Environmental engineering ; Environmental management ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Humans ; Irrigation ; Italy ; optimization ; Participatory water management ; problem solving ; Resource management ; stakeholders ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; wastewater irrigation ; water management ; Water Movements ; water policy ; Water resources ; Water Supply ; Water treatment</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2007-07, Vol.84 (2), p.213-228</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Ltd. Jul 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-d0562788530249c8e521a0f414c47290a45296e6a4301c9ef482023f45f78ec23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-d0562788530249c8e521a0f414c47290a45296e6a4301c9ef482023f45f78ec23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18807158$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16839660$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giordano, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passarella, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uricchio, V.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vurro, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Integrating conflict analysis and consensus reaching in a decision support system for water resource management</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>The importance of shared decision processes in water management derives from the awareness of the inadequacy of traditional—i.e. engineering—approaches in dealing with complex and ill-structured problems. It is becoming increasingly obvious that traditional problem solving and decision support techniques, based on optimisation and factual knowledge, have to be combined with stakeholder based policy design and implementation. The aim of our research is the definition of an integrated decision support system for consensus achievement (IDSS-C) able to support a participative decision-making process in all its phases: problem definition and structuring, identification of the possible alternatives, formulation of participants’ judgments, and consensus achievement. Furthermore, the IDSS-C aims at structuring, i.e. systematising the knowledge which has emerged during the participative process in order to make it comprehensible for the decision-makers and functional for the decision process. Problem structuring methods (PSM) and multi-group evaluation methods (MEM) have been integrated in the IDSS-C. PSM are used to support the stakeholders in providing their perspective of the problem and to elicit their interests and preferences, while MEM are used to define not only the degree of consensus for each alternative, highlighting those where the agreement is high, but also the consensus label for each alternative and the behaviour of individuals during the participative decision-making. The IDSS-C is applied experimentally to a decision process regarding the use of treated wastewater for agricultural irrigation in the Apulia Region (southern Italy).</description><subject>Agriculture - methods</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>case studies</subject><subject>Community Participation</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Conflict analysis</subject><subject>conflict management</subject><subject>Conflict of Interest</subject><subject>consensus reaching</subject><subject>Consensus support system</subject><subject>consensus support systems</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision support systems</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Environmental engineering</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>optimization</subject><subject>Participatory water management</subject><subject>problem solving</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>stakeholders</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>wastewater irrigation</subject><subject>water management</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><subject>water policy</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water Supply</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c-L1TAQB_Aiivt29U9Qi7DeWidJk6anRRZ_LCx40D2HmE6fKW3yTNKV99-b8goLXt5pQvhMmMy3KN4QqAkQ8XGsR3SPs3Y1BRA18DqXZ8WOQMcrKRg8L3bAgFRN27UXxWWMIwAwStqXxQURknVCwK7wdy7hPuhk3b403g2TNanUTk_HaGM-9OttRBeXWAbU5vcKrSt12aOx0XpXxuVw8CGV8RgTzuXgQ_lXJwzZR78Eg2UeU-9xRpdeFS8GPUV8vdWr4uHL55-336r771_vbj_dV4aDSFUPXNBWSs6ANp2RyCnRMDSkMU1LO9ANp51AoZv8RdPh0EgKlA0NH1qJhrKr4sPp3UPwfxaMSc02Gpwm7dAvUbXQEJCkOwtZXpPkHTsLSV5ol4fN8P1_cMxbyBtdDRdEAvCM-AmZ4GMMOKhDsLMOR0VArQGrUW0BqzVgBVzlkvvebo8vv2bsn7q2RDO43oCORk9D0C7H9OSkhJZwmd27kxu0V3ofsnn4QYEwgLaVwNYRb04Cc06PFoOKxqIz2NuAJqne2zPD_gMvbs8z</recordid><startdate>20070701</startdate><enddate>20070701</enddate><creator>Giordano, R.</creator><creator>Passarella, G.</creator><creator>Uricchio, V.F.</creator><creator>Vurro, M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Academic Press Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070701</creationdate><title>Integrating conflict analysis and consensus reaching in a decision support system for water resource management</title><author>Giordano, R. ; Passarella, G. ; Uricchio, V.F. ; Vurro, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-d0562788530249c8e521a0f414c47290a45296e6a4301c9ef482023f45f78ec23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Agriculture - methods</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>case studies</topic><topic>Community Participation</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Conflict analysis</topic><topic>conflict management</topic><topic>Conflict of Interest</topic><topic>consensus reaching</topic><topic>Consensus support system</topic><topic>consensus support systems</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision support systems</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Environmental engineering</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>optimization</topic><topic>Participatory water management</topic><topic>problem solving</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>stakeholders</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>wastewater irrigation</topic><topic>water management</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><topic>water policy</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water Supply</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giordano, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passarella, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uricchio, V.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vurro, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giordano, R.</au><au>Passarella, G.</au><au>Uricchio, V.F.</au><au>Vurro, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrating conflict analysis and consensus reaching in a decision support system for water resource management</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2007-07-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>213</spage><epage>228</epage><pages>213-228</pages><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><coden>JEVMAW</coden><abstract>The importance of shared decision processes in water management derives from the awareness of the inadequacy of traditional—i.e. engineering—approaches in dealing with complex and ill-structured problems. It is becoming increasingly obvious that traditional problem solving and decision support techniques, based on optimisation and factual knowledge, have to be combined with stakeholder based policy design and implementation. The aim of our research is the definition of an integrated decision support system for consensus achievement (IDSS-C) able to support a participative decision-making process in all its phases: problem definition and structuring, identification of the possible alternatives, formulation of participants’ judgments, and consensus achievement. Furthermore, the IDSS-C aims at structuring, i.e. systematising the knowledge which has emerged during the participative process in order to make it comprehensible for the decision-makers and functional for the decision process. Problem structuring methods (PSM) and multi-group evaluation methods (MEM) have been integrated in the IDSS-C. PSM are used to support the stakeholders in providing their perspective of the problem and to elicit their interests and preferences, while MEM are used to define not only the degree of consensus for each alternative, highlighting those where the agreement is high, but also the consensus label for each alternative and the behaviour of individuals during the participative decision-making. The IDSS-C is applied experimentally to a decision process regarding the use of treated wastewater for agricultural irrigation in the Apulia Region (southern Italy).</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16839660</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.05.006</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2007-07, Vol.84 (2), p.213-228
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70410819
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Agriculture - methods
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
case studies
Community Participation
Conflict
Conflict analysis
conflict management
Conflict of Interest
consensus reaching
Consensus support system
consensus support systems
Conservation of Natural Resources
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Decision making
Decision support systems
Decision Support Techniques
Environmental engineering
Environmental management
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Humans
Irrigation
Italy
optimization
Participatory water management
problem solving
Resource management
stakeholders
Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods
wastewater irrigation
water management
Water Movements
water policy
Water resources
Water Supply
Water treatment
title Integrating conflict analysis and consensus reaching in a decision support system for water resource management
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A45%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrating%20conflict%20analysis%20and%20consensus%20reaching%20in%20a%20decision%20support%20system%20for%20water%20resource%20management&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Giordano,%20R.&rft.date=2007-07-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=213&rft.epage=228&rft.pages=213-228&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft.coden=JEVMAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.05.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1260656341%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-d0562788530249c8e521a0f414c47290a45296e6a4301c9ef482023f45f78ec23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195618005&rft_id=info:pmid/16839660&rfr_iscdi=true